Talk:Q36392
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Gonnym35 in topic Описывается в источниках. «Документ эпохи»
Autodescription — Moldovan (Q36392)
description: name for the Romanian language in Moldova
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Moldovan” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
Moldovan⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Substitution of the Moldovan language by the Romanian language
editThere is no need to project the current situation onto the historical past. Wikipedia also has a separate article Moldovan language. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 14:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Edits must respect Wikidata:Verifiability, based on Help:Sources. Please, read Wikidata:What Wikidata is not. (Rgvis (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC))
- I also advise again Лобачев Владимир to stop using edit summaries referring to an unexisting consensus. Consensus is not anything that has lasted for a certain time. Consensus, according to the Oxford Dictionary of the English language, is "general agreement about some issue within a group or in public opinion" [1]. No such a thing had been done nor here, nor in many other places where this user has used such a policy as a justification for reverting. The same happens with using "WP:WAR". Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. But in Wikipedia it is accepted that if your editing is rejected, then it is THIS EDITING that is not consensus. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- And if the status quo is disputed without there having been a discussion to reaffirm it before, that editing is not consensus as well. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 12:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Term "status quo" is not neutral. Which "status"? E.g. Ethnologue had the code "mo" some time, was it "status quo"? --Infovarius (talk) 12:55, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. But in Wikipedia it is accepted that if your editing is rejected, then it is THIS EDITING that is not consensus. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- I also advise again Лобачев Владимир to stop using edit summaries referring to an unexisting consensus. Consensus is not anything that has lasted for a certain time. Consensus, according to the Oxford Dictionary of the English language, is "general agreement about some issue within a group or in public opinion" [1]. No such a thing had been done nor here, nor in many other places where this user has used such a policy as a justification for reverting. The same happens with using "WP:WAR". Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism
editЛобачев Владимир, please stop your aggressive edit-warring. Stop wasting everyone's time. We can take it to the admin noticeboard again so you fail in proving your POV again. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Лобачев Владимир, courtesy ping, I reported you: [2]. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Описывается в источниках. «Документ эпохи»
editПожалуйста, добавьте P1343 (описывается в источниках): источник Q20078554, тема утверждения Q43400632. Заранее спасибо, Gonnym35 (talk) 10:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)