Wikidata:Property proposal/PIM auth id

Description	ID for an authority record (mostly persons) in the PIM (Petőfi Literary Museum, Hungary)
Represents	PIM identifier (Q29043331)
Data type	External identifier
Template parameter	`\|PIM=`
Domain	human (Q5)
Allowed values	PIM\d+
Example	Sándor Petőfi (Q81219) → PIM67655
Planned use	huwp, already used the old format in infoboxes, we migrate to the new URI schema + wikidata
Formatter URL	http://resolver.pim.hu/auth/$1
Robot and gadget jobs	Bots will sync data in multiple phases with existing [and possibly to be created] WP entries

The Petőfi Literary Museum (Q1234343) database contains data approximately 380 000 persons in Hungarian literature. The PIM plans to offer this data for inclusion, with crosslinking between PIM and WD. --grin ✎ 13:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After a discussion regarding the question of @Pigsonthewing: we agreed with the PIM that the id should be PIM+numbers; I have updated the proposal. --grin ✎ 12:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@grin: Which template does the "|id=" relate to, please? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: Just question. I have updated it, and the template would be Sablon:Személy_infobox and its descendants; most probably also all its international translations. --grin ✎ 00:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Máté (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. But should the ID in thee example be "PIM67655"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment All the PIM authority id-s start with "PIM", so I would say not. It could be relevant if you look it up in anindependent lookup system, though. Are the WD entities referred by their number or with the Q as well? For me both are okay, but if there was already a reasoning about this in the past I welcome the input. --grin ✎ 00:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- This has been updated, thanks for the good question! --grin ✎ 12:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mikey641 (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does the "auth" stand for author or for something else? If it stands for author, can we change the name to "PIM author ID"? ChristianKl (talk) 21:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- "auth" stands for "authority", as far as I know. --grin ✎ 12:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should domain "human" removed since it may contain non humans occasionally? --grin ✎ 12:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have examples of nonhuman values and find a proper domain? ChristianKl (talk) 11:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was informed that there should be no other than Q5 in there. --grin ✎ 16:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]