Wikidata

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator

< Wikidata:Requests for permissions
(Redirected from Wikidata:RFP/A)
Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator
To request adminship for yourself or another user, please input the relevant name into the box below. If there has been a past request, successful or unsuccessful, please follow add a number − "Example 2" for a second request, "Example 3" for a third, and so on. Be sure to transclude the request on this page.


Old requests go to the archive. If you want to request administrator help, please post at Administrators' noticeboard.
Requirements for adminship

To be promoted, the following requirements must be met:

  • Nominations remain open for at least a full week.
  • To pass, the user needs:
    • at least 8 support votes
    • at least 75% of support or higher in pro/con voting
  • Only registered users with minimum 100 local non-automated edits can vote. The edits must be acquired before the voting started. Unregistered users can leave comments in the comments section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as unsuccessful--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WT20 2 edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 22 February 2024 17:46 (UTC)

Hi.This is my 2nd apply I'm active on Wikidata.I am applying for sysop permission on Wikidata. I want to do more to help fight vandalism on Wikidata. I request to delete, protect and block by myself admin rights that I identify and need in my daily work here. I already did requests at WD:RFD and WD:AN and I know the policies of this tools.Thank you.WT20 (talk) 17:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Votes edit

  1.  Support Probably still a bit early, but I do not have real concerns --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Neutral I think I will have to second the cheerful echidna here, probably a little early still. I think I would give a supporting vote once I feel you're a tad more familiar with how things work on Wikidata. I hear doing patrolling is the fastest way to become an admin, but other experience is certainly relevant. E.g. if you help out creating properties I would vote in favor. Infrastruktur (talk) 16:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @InfrastrukturMy patrol 705, Also I have good experience with mediawiki because I am a freelancer mediawiki developer, also I am aware of all wikidata rules. WT20 (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose His level of false positive in WD:RfD is too high. I'm actually skeptic this is user make the difference between a new user and a spammer. I like just warn him 5 days ago for this behaviour after he submited 13 taxons in RFD. (User talk:WT20#Taxons). Also his request in Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vcldead two weeks ago create a whole mess as he block a study whole group. Far too early. --Fralambert (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The taxons were all empty with no data so I requested to delete them.After that as well I said on his talk page then there was a resolution through a discussion.And to the second check user I request that since their behavior and contribution was the same, it is a misunderstanding caused by the check user.Also, those users do not mention their competition in Wikidata.Although it was a check user opinion I can't say anything about it.All in all I have contributed here based on the situation.Thank you. WT20 (talk) 15:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose this user is probably of goodwill but he confuses quality and quantity (which leads to errors as Fralambert clearly demonstrated above). My advise would be to  Wait, slow down a bit and make better edits before reapplying again (the last request for adminship was less than 2 months ago, not much has change since and rather on the bad side :/). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Why not? To be better at wikidata. keep up the spirit to contribute constructively. Thank you for helping us. Murbaut (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose per canvassing. Personal communication on Telegram, not asked for a vote, but the nomination page was sent without introducing oneself. Doǵu (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Doǵu what? I'm not WT20 (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Happened on the unofficial Wikipedia Discord server in the Wikidata channel as well. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Oppose per VIGNERON (only). Mahir256 (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose --WikiBayer (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Neutral For now, per my comment below. I haven't really seen the context behind the "canvassing", I'm usually not really a fan of that, but, it's not the biggest reason for my vote. Now, if this does not succeed I have nothing against granting rollback. EPIC (talk) 09:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Neutral --Rzuwig► 12:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Oppose too many concerns per above, and the canvassing is the nail in the coffin. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Neutral, I'm not sure about this one. There are concerns, but I believe this editor is trying to behave in good faith. I think WT20 should  Wait, demonstrate improved conduct, and then re-file. —Tomodachi94 (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Neutral – I believe that WT20 wants to contribute to the project in good faith, and am not too concerned about the lack of crosswiki activity that EPIC mentions. I feel, though, that they should slow down a bit and focus on quality rather than quantity. I picked a RFD archive at random and landed on February 12; in addition to the taxons mentioned by Fralambert, there were two other items (I Am Morbid (Q124423652) and Bernard Binetruy (Q124423505)) tagged as lacking notability that were kept as notable. I think they should focus in obtaining other rights, such as rollback, first. –FlyingAce✈hello 22:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Oppose per VIGNERON --Emu (talk) 08:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Oppose Multichill (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Oppose Has been flooding WD:RfD. Some of the requests are false positives, and some are made very soon after the item's creation. I would not trust this user with the power to delete items.--DrGavinR (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • I won't vote just yet, because I don't know what to vote, but I will list some good/less good stuff.
 Plus for being active, frequent reports on RfD (it gives me more work to do, so I'm thankful for that) and overall good work.
 Minus for sometimes a bit too quick on RfD or sometimes reporting too many items at once. It clogs up our backlog, which is already really large (we have went from 40 to 150+ reports in just a month). Therefore, sometimes consider making bulk deletion requests. And, like last time, it would be good to see some activity outside of Wikidata. That in itself is of course by itself not a reason to oppose, but considering that Wikidata is a database for all of Wikimedia wikis, a little more than one SUL edit outside of Wikidata would be good.
I don't know how to weigh in on this though and will wait a bit. EPIC (talk) 17:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two days done.I have made admin request but no one is giving any feedback my question is is no one aware

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/WT20 2 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/WT20_2 WT20 (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're trying to say which is concerning because your user page says you are fluent in english. BrokenSegue (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BrokenSegue: WT20 is quoting what was written in the Discord channel. - Premeditated (talk) 14:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful. --Lymantria (talk) 08:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madamebiblio edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 3 March 2024 04:25 (UTC)

Hola comunidad, I am Madamebiblio, I have been a Wikimedian since 2017: an active Wikinomo, rollbacker and patroller on Wikipedia in Spanish. Later, I enlarged my contributions to other projects and now Wikidata became my home project. In addition, an engaged member of Wikimedia Argentina, Wikimedia Spain and some WM user groups. Professionally, I come from a GLAM environment: I am an academic-researcher librarian, with wide experience on information resources, authority control and structured data.

In the last time here I was very much involved in anti-vandalism and anti-spam work. I am fighting cross-wiki vandalism, LTA, spam, etc., and frequently reporting on RfD and AN. I contribute along with other maintenance tasks by referencing, merging, adding persistent IDs, and translating templates.

As you know the massive quantity of vandalism from LAC countries and Spain is so impressive. I would like to effectively continue fighting against vandalism in Spanish and give assistance to the Spanish-speaking community to optimize editions on the project.

Already I have rollback permission locally and I have carefully read the Wikidata Administrators policy. Because of that, I would like to offer my help as an administrator. I will focus mostly on counter-vandalism work and maintenance for blocking vandals, protecting items, and deleting nonsense items, in order to act as the project needs.

I am an enthusiastic person with a genuine desire to make positive contributions to this community. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards. Madamebiblio (talk) 04:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support solid candidate with experience in countervandalism --Nastoshka (talk) 10:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Being involved in counter-vandalism work is a bit of an understatement. She has a five-figure number of undos and restores on Wikidata alone. Infrastruktur (talk) 10:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 10:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support — Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 13:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --Gymnicus (talk) 15:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Estopedist1 (talk) 15:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support very diligent work on RfD and vandalism, probably also in other fields --Emu (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Bksm (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --LuchoCR (talk) 17:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support A perfect administrator, very diligent. --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 22:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Saroj (talk) 04:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support. --Wolverène (talk) 04:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Ruy (talk) 05:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Surely, seen very good work from this user, and they could surely make a benefit with the admin tools. EPIC (talk) 06:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support por supuesto! –FlyingAce✈hello 01:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support ¡Necesaria!--Florenciac (talk) 07:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support --Epìdosis 08:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support ¡Una editora muy comprometida con el proyecto! --RitaStardust (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support Viene haciendo un excelente trabajo! Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support. —Hasley + 15:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Todo mi apoyo. Gran editora comprometida con los proyectos y atenta a los detalles. Gran valor para la comunidad tenerla de administradora. --Sangianense (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Gran compromiso con el proyecto :) --Esteban16 (talk) 04:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support MiguelAlanCS (talk) 18:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Looks good to me. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 05:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support Zapipedia (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support Calei (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Peel 2 edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 9 March 2024 13:08 (UTC)

I am re-applying for the admin tools since I was de-admined on 1 March for inactivity. I mostly use the tools to check deleted contributions, as I operate User:Pi bot, which in particular now creates new items here for new Wikipedia articles (after searching for any potential existing items and putting them into a Wikidata Game for human review), and I regularly check cases where the items have been deleted/nominated for deletion to make sure the bot is working OK (often deleting them myself where appropriate, but others have got there first recently!). I do similar work while maintaining the Wikidata Infobox on Commons. Accessing deleted items is not a logged admin action. I also run User:Pi admin bot, which maintains the list of properties for deletion that you see on your watchlist (the template this uses is admin-protected).

I was previously supported 40:0 in 2020. I've been a Wikimedian since 2005, and I've been editing here since 2016. I have over 200k edits here, and over 480k globally. In addition, Pi bot has made over 12 million edits (9m on Wikidata). I currently have admin access on both enwp and Commons. I'm also very involved in Wikimedia governance. Thanks. --Mike Peel (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 13:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support I was awaiting this. Just try to make sure we don't have to remove your tools again :) EPIC (talk) 13:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Trustworthy and experienced editor. Keep going, Mike! --Joalpe (talk) 14:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support - Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 14:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Epìdosis 15:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support If you need quick loggable admin actions, there are lots of deletion lists to choose from. Mahir256 (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mahir256: Thanks for the links. I know it's easy to find such lists, and if I'd have had any notice prior to being de-admin'd I'd have quickly done the 2 logged actions I was short of for the minimum activity requirements, but there was no warning this time. I also want to be more active in these areas (as I have been in the past), but have had to be more active in other areas of Wikimedia of late. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support to hit 8 BrokenSegue (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support.-- Hakan·IST 17:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Infrastruktur (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support We need to treat good-faith contributors better than this (and not waste everyone else's time by requiring redundant RfAs). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Oppose tendency towards what I think is poor judgement on RfD and COI as Commons admin --Emu (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Emu: can you elaborate, please? Using Wikidata on Commons and admin'ing Wikidata shouldn't be in conflict... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    While I can't speak for Emu, I think (a feeling, though not unjustifiable) you have been considerably more inclusionist than other admins to the point that you effectively warp or outright discard any parts of the notability criteria that would even hint at excluding a particular item. My links to the maintenance lists in my vote are more exhortative and insistent, rather than merely suggestive, to make the deletions presented in those lists. Mahir256 (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm, I don't think I go that far, although I do tend to think that an item shouldn't be deleted if it's in use, e.g., on Commons. One of the reasons I backed away from RfD somewhat, since a wider discussion needs to happen there sometime. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mahir256 I couldn’t have described my issues with this style of admin actions in a more circumspect way. It’s not that I don’t value Mike’s contributions to Wikidata or indeed the Wikimedia communities at large, I just think that admins should be more careful not to let their individual preferences influence their admin actions. --Emu (talk) 11:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support But please try to be active with some logged actions like deletions --DannyS712 (talk) 21:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Weak support - very likely his free time is scattered toward different Wikiprojects (esp. because admin in Commons), but there is lack of admins in Wikidata, so even little help by super-Wikipedians is really appreciated in Wikidata--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Ruy (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support but please increase your activity --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Nastoshka (talk) 16:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support --Frettie (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support PKM (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support. -- Donald Trung/徵國單  (討論 🀄) (方孔錢 💴) 20:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support. Gamaliel (talk) 20:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support -- Ajraddatz (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support Lotje (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Obvious support. We need to improve the inactivity policy to prevent this happening with active editors — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support --Hoo man (talk) 17:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support -KonstantinaG07 (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support –FlyingAce✈hello 19:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support --Bksm (talk) 20:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support --Rzuwig► 19:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful and promoted. --Lymantria (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zafer edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 12 March 2024 20:03 (UTC)

Dear Wikidata community, I'd like to nominate User:Zafer, former Turkish Wikipedia administrator and an active contributor to Wikidata, has a demonstrated experience in combatting vandalism and deletion processes. In light of the growing needs of admin action on the project they will undoubtedly contribute to the managing the workload. -- Hakan·IST 20:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support as nominator. -- Hakan·IST 20:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Weak support on the one hand I don't see much counter-vandalism work or participation in deletion requests in wikidata. On the other hand, they are a very experienced editor here, they have counter-vandalism and admin experience in other projects and I trust HakanIST judgement, so if they want to give a hand, why not to give them a chance. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support --Rzuwig► 19:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support No concerns --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support With your activity on turkish Wikipedia taken into consideration. Infrastruktur (talk) 16:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support LGTM. –FlyingAce✈hello 19:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Never seen them before, but looks good to me. We need more admins. EPIC (talk) 20:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Weak support per KonstantinaG07. Mahir256 (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support per EPIC --Emu (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support no concerns. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 05:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support per EPIC--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support--WikiBayer (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Fralambert (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Alaa :)..! 13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • Thank you for your trust, User:HakanIST. I am accepting this nomination. I would be happy to assist with administrative operations at Wikidata, which I have enjoyed contributing to for a long time. I had previously resigned at my own request from Turkish Wiki. The reason for this was that I wanted to change duties with new users instead of being a servant for years. I hope I will be useful to this project with the actions I will take. Regards, Zafer (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Zafer: Thanks for your willingness to help the project! In which admin areas do you think you mainly want to contribute and in what ways? --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello @KonstantinaG07:, I plan to start working on WD:RFD backlog, and in general help prevent vandalism by blocking vandals and protecting items with this issue. Zafer (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough, thanks for the response. KonstantinaG07 (talk) 20:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have a lot of experience here and more admins who speak non-English languages would be nice, but I notice that you have not spent a lot of time on non-main namespaces (e.g. zero edits to properties). Are you confident you know/understand our policies regarding deletion/blocking/protection? BrokenSegue (talk) 00:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello @BrokenSegue:, I have proposed creation couple properties and I participate in discussions time to time. For deletions/protections/blocking, I've experiences as a former Turkish Wikipedia administrator, I also have read the policies here, including WD:DELETE WD:BLOCK WD:PPP WD:N and previous RfCs, I think I can help myself with the relevant applications. Zafer (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The applicant has a short block on turkish wikipedia for sockpuppeting. I realize you were proposed by someone else but not divulging something like this up-front does not inspire confidence. I don't necessarily think sockpuppeting is unforgiveable in itself, but keeping quiet about it is concerning. Some explanations might be in order. Infrastruktur (talk) 19:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello @Infrastruktur:, thanks for this question, but it has funny story, @Uncitoyen: apply to wrong block, rollback in a same second as you can see on block history. And Uncitoyen message here on my message archive. Message translation writing is Hello Sakhalinio (my former username), you were blocked by me by mistake and the relevant action was immediately reverted. That's why I wanted to apologize to you and give you some information. I hope everything is clear. Regards, Zafer (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • My apologies, I closed this request one day early. Zafer will have to wait for one day. --Lymantria (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KonstantinaG07 3 edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 20 March 2024 17:37 (UTC)

Hello! I am KonstantinaG07 - I am a former Wikidata admin and oversighter (I have been globally renamed). I was removed due to lengthy inactivity due to personal reasons.

I have now returned and plan to stay, and after also asking a couple of other editors' thoughts I would like to apply to get the sysop access again. My aim is to help with the sysop backlogs that seem to be growing - (instead of contributing in growing them).

Like in the past my main areas of focus would be counter-vandalism/spam, assisting in WD:RfD and protection requests / user reports at WD:AN. I am willing to handle WD:REVDEL requests as well since I had such an experience before, plus I intend to be involved in some non-complicated edit filter improvements (after testing in testwikidata)

As a disclaimer, I have briefly edited as Konstantina07 before returning, which is also declared in my userpage. The reason for it was some concerns I had re global rename involving some IRL info - I can elaborate privately if needed.

For transparency, my previous RfPs before the rename can be found here:

Please feel free to ask me any questions, and thanks for the consideration --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support - looks good and I think lapsed admins should be granted back their status with a really low bar. BrokenSegue (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Hoo man (talk) 18:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support I had wondered where you went; glad to see you are back (and hopefully living a better, freer life)! Mahir256 (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support trusted user.-- Hakan·IST 19:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 19:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support trusted --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 20:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Epìdosis 20:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 21:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 00:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support, welcome back to the corps. :) --Wolverène (talk) 05:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Normally I would have wanted to see more sustained activity (you came back just nine days ago after two and a half years of no edits, and your last 50 edits before that went back to May 2020). On the other hand, you have previously been an admin and have been active in the last few days, and like I said on Zafer's RfA, we need more admins and any help is good help. So, a support with a hope of sustained activity in the future. EPIC (talk) 10:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Ayane (talk) 11:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Welcome back. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Infrastruktur (talk) 23:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Fralambert (talk) 02:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Welcome back! –FlyingAce✈hello 02:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support -- speedy support, former admin--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support welcome back! -- Ajraddatz (talk) 14:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Ruy (talk) 03:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Welcome back --DannyS712 (talk) 03:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support Rzuwig► 17:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support --Emu (talk) 23:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Zafer (talk) 10:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support --Saroj (talk) 06:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The Squirrel Conspiracy edit

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 9 June 2024 06:47 (UTC)

I was one of the original Wikidata admins under the username Sven Manguard, but my adminship lapsed in 2015 from inactivity. I'm now primarily active on Commons, but occasionally the work I do there creates the need for uncontroversial deletions here. For example, the CfDs at the bottom of Commons:Commons:Village_pump#Category:Steamboat_Willie are leading to a huge number of items like Q125913491 - items created solely for a Commons category that no longer exists - and it would just be easier for everyone if I cleaned those up myself. As such, I'm throwing my hat in the ring for adminship here again. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.   Support - welcome back! This is a bit of a random and out-of-nowhere comment, but I actually really regret opposing your RfOS a decade ago. I felt like that kind of pushed you away from the project, though maybe that wasn't directly connected. So, happy to support now, hopefully you're doing well, and apologies for my past vote. As for current reasons to support: previous experience, use for the tools, general competence. Not the most active presently, but I don't see any harm in giving them the access. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support - Agree with the above, usage of the tools will benefit both Wikidata and Commons. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support – more helping hands are always welcome – even better if they are already experienced! –FlyingAce✈hello 19:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support - Rtnf (talk) 06:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support looks good to me.-- Hakan·IST 06:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator&oldid=2170670799"