Wikidata:Requests for comment/User Tm's vandalism

An editor has requested the community to provide input on "User Tm's vandalism" via the Requests for comment (RFC) process. This is the discussion page regarding the issue.

If you have an opinion regarding this issue, feel free to comment below. Thank you!

The user @Tm: insists on carrying out disruptive, arrogant and obsessive behaviour. He insists on deleting a comment made by me on his talk page asking him for the reason why he has introduced TWELVE Portuguese names in article Q3375706 when they are just FOUR repeated. He insists on using a different name in Portuguese for the article Q427907 instead of the one agreed by users in the Portuguese Wikipedia. Can someone just put the agreed name?

I was told by other user: "I assure you, it is not something personal against you. User TM has a... particular vision of Wikipedia, which he seeks to maintain at all costs, and unfortunately his behavior has been disrespectful of the wishes and collaborations of others. He considers large portions of Commons and some Wikipedia articles as his personal property, and only some users with a higher rank (administrators, supervisors and bureaucrats) or a similar volume of contributions can stand up to him". I don't think this is aceptable.

--Lojwe (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment@Lojwe: As i said about my reverts on my talkpage, insulting me by saying that i have OCD gives me every right to ignore you in mine talkpage.

You are the one that, after what already has been said in Wikidata:Project_chat#Tm that continues with the same behaviour, now with the addiction of made up policies (that you admited do not exist in mine talkpage) and insults directed to me. After you tried to modify a portuguese description added\edited by me (a portuguese and portuguese native speaker, when you are a native spanish speaker, not a portuguese one as seen on the portuguese Wikipedia where you write portuguese with a lot of errors (perfectly understandable to a non-native speaker), and when i told you that said description is perfectly correct and yet you continued to try to modify, albeit i linked to portuguese newspapers that made similar constructions of phrases, you were not happy as , after calling me obsessive, in the very next phrase said that i should read about obsessive-compulsive disorder. Given the out of context remark and as you said that, after calling me obssesive, you were clearly saying that i have said disorder. But this escalation is nothing new as he trying to delete sourced names in an item, for several weeks, not once, not twice, even deleting the source of the name, but several times or even today (albeit he seemed to have stoped this behaviour.

Some of his editions are difficult to understand as, for example one day he is [removing labels like "Linha Internacional de Barca d'Alva-La Fregeneda a La Fuente de San Esteban" that is the name of the article in the portuguese wikipedia, but four days later he changes the main label to the exact same name he was trying previously to delete. A similar behaviour was when he added the correct french labels "Ligne Barca d'Alva-Salamanque" and "Ligne Porto-Salamanque" on March 22, but after he tried to removed them on May 9 and May 11. Tm (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also strange is the fact that, by his own words, a non-native portuguese speaker insists in saying, to a native portuguese speaker, how his own language is written. Tm (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name Linha Internacional de Barca d'Alva-La Fregeneda a La Fuente de San Esteban was agreed as main name in the Portuguese Wikipedia. Just leave like that, please. Don't try to get here what you didn't get in the Portuguese Wikipedia. --Lojwe (talk) 11:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strange fact that now you want it to be the main label and yet 5 days ago you were trying to delete it for the third time, after the second attempt on March 21 a and the first deletion attempt on July 4 2020. Call it consistency.

Portuguese Wikipedia is its own project, as is Wikimedia Commons or Wikidata, complementary but separate projects. But if you speak about that discussion, why not link to it as per proper use and make a resume like refering that it was me that opened that discussion. Yes, me, the obsessive and arrogant, can open discussions and call other users.

I would like, as Lojwe spoke about that discussion, to comment on facts like when you insisted that a company with solely portuguese capitals was not only portuguese but also spanish just because it received a subsidie from the spanish state that i disproved with several contemporary and modern spanish and portuguese sources (list of partners\shareholders and share of capitals, oficial portuguese and spanish documents of the creation of this company, etc).

Refering another one of your insults, when you said that i have an obsessive e arrogant behaviour or that i´am ridiculous, insult that was removed as it was an "serious insult, in disregard of the rules of conduct". You threw this insult after i said, as another of several examples of your sloppy handling of sources, that you added an newspaper source for an event ocurred on July 25 1887, via a blog, claiming it to be the article «La Línea de ferro-carril de S.F.P en su sección del Duero y estaciones de Boadilla, Fuente de San Esteban à Lumbrales»" in the newspaper El Progreso. 1887" however as i pointed out just before your insults, [http://bogajo-en-salamanca.blogspot.com/2016/11/bogajo-en-los-papeles-1886-el-tren.html the only number of this newspaper on the blog was from September 19 1886 and that i added the correct newspaper, with the correct article and date.

So i pointed out a mistake of yours, corrected it and i was "rewarded" with an insult. But the again the sloppy manipulation of sources is nothing new like changing events and dates that has sourced in a book, to other events and dates, without changing the source or, in this case, the page of the book where it was reffered. Tm (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, just someone put "Linha Internacional de Barca d'Alva-La Fregeneda a La Fuente de San Esteban" as the main name of the article Q427907, as agreed in the Portuguese Wikipedia, and it's finished. I'm not commenting on all the madness this user promotes. He also insists on repeating Portuguese names (even more) in the English section of the article Q3375706 It's madness! --Lojwe (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Despite of what you tried to claim, the labels are fine per Wikidata:Project_chat#Tm and still you havent commented your 180 turn from wanting to delete this label just 5 days ago the third time, after the second attempt on March 21 and the first deletion attempt on July 4 2020 to now insisting in making this the main label, on a different project. Tm (talk) 15:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And continuing to insult me by saying, after saying that i have OCD, that "You are not in your right mind. You should be banned from this project", will not give more reason, but less so. Tm (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]