Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Hahc21
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Done. --MF-W 20:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hahc21 edit
Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 5 April 2013 20:29 (UTC)
- Hahc21 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hey, this guy knows what he's doing. We should make him a sysop. Any objections? — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 20:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I also think that we should, as he has a lot of experience crosswiki, a good amount here, and is enthusiastic about Wikimedia projects. --Rschen7754 20:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hahc21 is a really nice and experienced contributor. He should definitely be an admin. Please vote for him. Vogone talk 20:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I accept this nomination. Thanks! — ΛΧΣ21 20:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Votes edit
- Support as nom. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 20:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Iste (D) 20:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as co-nom. --Rschen7754 20:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Trusted user --Ricordisamoa 20:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as co-co-nom. --Vogone talk 20:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Rzuwig► 21:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Absolutely!--Bill william compton (talk) 21:21, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Not sure why we need three nominators, but whatever. No concerns with how he'll use the bit. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Because we couldn't find a fourth? — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 03:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Fairly active in this project. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support IW (wikidata addict) 16:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Mark91it's my world 17:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Trusted user. Early lack of deletion on other communities were poor but much better with Wikidata, I see no main reason to oppose. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, good Job. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Why not?--DangSunM (talk) 02:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, do not expect any problems.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - No reason to oppose. Ljubinka (discussion) 17:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Consistently shows good knowledge of the way that Wikidata works. I think that giving them administrator tools will be a benefit to the Wikidata community. Del♉sion23 (talk) 22:07, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I seem to remember pushing the candidate in this direction myself. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. LlamaAl (talk) 22:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. FrigidNinja 01:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support sure Javad|Talk (16 Farvardin 1392) 18:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments edit
- ...