Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/PintochBot 4
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Approved--Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PintochBot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Pintoch (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s: migrate references using imported from Wikimedia project (P143) to stated in (P248) when the value is not a Wikimedia project
Function details: This only migrates references if the existing value will not violate the value-type constraint (Q21510865) on stated in (P248), so this should not generate any new constraint violation.
See related discussion at:
See sample edits at Special:Contributions/PintochBot.
Pinging some editors involved: @MisterSynergy, Tacsipacsi, Multichill, Nikki: do you support this? − Pintoch (talk) 14:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems a good plan to pick up this clean up again. Maybe the only tweak is to not move sources that are actually derived from Wikipedia like DBpedia (Q465) and Wiki Loves Monuments monuments database (Q28563569). That also requires a bit of constraint tweaking. Multichill (talk) 14:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Multichill: why not. In that case, can you create an item "database derived from Wikimedia projects" or something along these lines, add it to the imported from Wikimedia project (P143) constraint and the items you want to keep with imported from Wikimedia project (P143)? Thanks. − Pintoch (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Created database derived from Wikimedia projects (Q63144794) and added it to the two items.
- @MisterSynergy: see ^ Wiki Loves Monuments monuments database (Q28563569) shouldn't be changed. That data is all imported from Wikipedia and should get real references. Multichill (talk) 17:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. Mix'n'match (Q28054658) with ~27000 references is another database which likely needs special consideration. See also the query I added further below in this edit. —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Multichill: why not. In that case, can you create an item "database derived from Wikimedia projects" or something along these lines, add it to the imported from Wikimedia project (P143) constraint and the items you want to keep with imported from Wikimedia project (P143)? Thanks. − Pintoch (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support of course. I started a similar task last year with my bot, but I don't have enough time to finish it. There are still ~5.1 million references to fix.
Unfortunately, I don't manage to provide a single query which lists a statistical overview of values to fix. Have a look at this query to see which values to expect as values in P143 reference qualifiers, and this one where the result of the first query needs to be hardcoded as input for the actual number of references for each value.A statistical overview of values which (potentially) need to be moved can be found with this query. There are some rather often used values such as Wiki Loves Monuments monuments database (Q28563569) with ~470.000 references where I am not sure whether they should be moved to stated in (P248). —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply] - @Multichill: @MisterSynergy: anything preventing us from approving this bot?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't think so. I'll just add a green Support for you to make it easier ;-) Multichill (talk) 21:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]