Wikidata talk:Requests for permissions/Bot/RobotMichiel1972 2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

 Bot unblocked per clear consensus. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 19:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

---

Since my bot was stopped in the middle of the process of adding streets, I like to see the community opinion of this task. Please vote below. (There was an additional question of maintainability, which is very limited because of the static information of postal codes; only when municipalities merge P131 must be copied to P276 and a new P131 should be added. This can be done automated. Michiel1972 (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

There is also the question of maintainability re how to avoid spam and vandalism on these articles. I.e. will we have people watching them, will we have regular reports on the changes that happened to them that can be reviewed, etc.? Although these questions are unanswered, and it would be good to find answers, I still vote to finish this particular job. --Denny (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, go ahead

1. I don't see any problems. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
   • That's because this poll doesn't mention the discussion already taking place at Wikidata:Project chat#An item for every street?. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
     • Sjoerd has already been participating in that discussion three days before he wrote this. Dinsdagskind (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
2. Me neither. Dinsdagskind (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
3.  Support. Please don't leave it unfinished. --- Jura 11:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
4. As Jura. --Succu (talk) 11:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
5. --GZWDer (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
6. — Ayack (talk) 08:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
7. As Jura. Conny (talk) 08:59, 16 March 2015 (UTC).
8. Finish this particular job now. As a community we should ensure that future bot runs are better vetted before started. I am aware of the discussion on the project chat, and it would be great to resolve that discussion, but I would prefer not to have this job linger so close to finished. --Denny (talk) 15:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
9. This job is already over 75% of it's workload, the items are properly populated with properties, and was started (long ago) following the correct procedures. As no one even mentioned deleting all these items, we better let it finish, instead of having only half of the job done. And actually I'm waiting for it to finish, I want to use some of those items on other items. Edoderoo (talk) 20:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
10. I don't see a problem with continuing. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 21:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

No, no further streets

1. Pending community discussion. --Ricordisamoa 12:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
2. Pending community discussion which has already been started at Wikidata:Project chat#An item for every street?. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

No, no further streets and delete the 230.000 already added.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.