(Q21092701)

English

The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations

scientific article

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

0 references

title

The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations (English)

0 references

0 references

0 references

0 references

0 references

0 references

0 references

1

Adam Eyre-Walker

Adam

Eyre-Walker

1 reference

15 August 2022

Nina Stoletzki

2

Nina

Stoletzki

1 reference

15 August 2022

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

October 2013

0 references

published in

PLOS Biology

0 references

volume

11

0 references

issue

10

0 references

page(s)

e1001675

0 references

copyright license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

start time

8 October 2013

1 reference

stated in

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

0 references

cites work

A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3792863

retrieved

19 March 2017

The Impact Factor Game

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3792863

retrieved

19 March 2017

Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3792863

retrieved

19 March 2017

Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3792863

retrieved

12 September 2017

Sense and nonsense about the impact factor

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3792863

retrieved

12 September 2017

Region-based citation bias in science.

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3792863

retrieved

30 May 2018

What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PBIO.1001675

retrieved

21 January 2018

WHO CITES WOMEN? WHOM DO WOMEN CITE?: AN EXPLORATION OF GENDER AND SCHOLARLY CITATION IN SOCIOLOGY

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PBIO.1001675

retrieved

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1001675

1 reference

stated in

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1506364

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1506364

1 reference

stated in

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1506364

ResearchGate publication ID

257649801

0 references

(Q21092701)

The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)