User:Swpb/bmp-msg

Incorrect use of {{subst:#if:|[[Property:P{{{1}}}|P{{{1}}} (PP{{{1}}})]]|instance of (P31) or subclass of (P279)}}

Hello –

[{{{url}}} This statement ] was incorrect. Errors with basic membership properties create false inferences{{subst:#if:|, such as {{subst:#invoke:String|match|s={{{url}}}|Q%d+}}|}}. Before using [[Property:P{{{1}}}|P{{{1}}} (PP{{{1}}})]], check the item descriptions, and make sure your statement {{subst:#switch:|P31=makes sense|P279=is true in all cases}}. {{subst:#if:|(In this case, {{subst:lcfirst:}}.)|Note that {{subst:#ifeq:|P31|all instances of a class must be of the same type|"A" is only a subclass of "B" if all instances of "A" are also instances of "B"}}.}} Often, another {{subst:#switch:{{subst:#invoke:String|sub|{{{3}}}|j=1}}|P=property can accurately express the relationship you had in mind; in this case, [[Property:P{{{3}}}|P{{{3}}} (P{{{3}}})]] works better. You can search through available properties here.|Q=item can accurately complete the statement you had in mind; in this case, [[d:Special:EntityPage/{{{3}}}|{{{3}}}]] allows for the accurate statement {{subst:#invoke:String|match|s={{{url}}}|Q%d+}}{{{1}}}[[d:Special:EntityPage/{{{3}}}|{{{3}}}]].|property is suited to expressing the relationship you had in mind; you can search for one here.}} Thanks!