Property talk:P1001
Documentation
the item (institution, law, public office, public register...) or statement belongs to or has power over or applies to the value (a territorial jurisdiction: a country, state, municipality, ...)
| Description | the item (an institution, law, court, election, public office, ...) belongs to or applies to the value (a jurisdiction/area: a country, state, municipality, ...) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Represents | jurisdiction (Q5982983), jurisdiction (Q471855) | ||||||||||||
| Data type | Item | ||||||||||||
| Template parameter | e.g. "jurisdiction" in en:Template:Infobox government agency; "legaljuris" in en:Template:Infobox law enforcement agency | ||||||||||||
| Domain | According to this template:
institution, law...
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementsrule (Q1151067), governing body (Q895526), symbol (Q80071), organization (Q43229), title (Q216353), position (Q4164871), Wikidata property (Q18616576), national identification number (Q1140371), administrative territorial entity type (Q15617994), heritage register (Q15097084), heritage designation (Q30634609), supreme audit institution (Q43306178), embassy (Q3917681), consulate general (Q372690), diplomatic mission (Q213283), consulate (Q7843791), police (Q35535), tax (Q8161), law (Q7748), motto (Q42470), educational institution (Q2385804), legal concept (Q2135465), protected area (Q473972), prison (Q40357), inquiry (Q21004260), legal act (Q1864008), coat of arms (Q14659), bill (Q686822), cadastre (Q191072), legislative term (Q15238777), religious organization (Q1530022), award (Q618779), fictional legislation (Q65554936), holiday (Q1445650), judiciary (Q105985), currency (Q8142), police district (Q4992061), military unit (Q176799), criminal charge (Q329525), telephone number (Q214995), parish church (Q317557), Catholic parish church (Q55876909), Catholic parish (Q17143723), personal parish (Q12798556), territorial parish (Q12804010), parish (Q102496), voucher (Q689044), administrative territorial entity (Q56061), software (Q7397), political position (Q20045456), proclamation (Q1572600), order (Q567696), imperial decree (Q905765), white paper (Q223729), agreement (Q321839), Wikimedia list article (Q13406463), fictional office, position, or title (Q21451536), social class (Q187588), violation of law (Q1456832), classification (Q13582682), registration authority (Q166140), fictional organization (Q14623646), socken (Q1523821), written question (Q99045339), interpellation (Q1505023), legal form (Q10541491), service (Q7406919), national minority (Q769696), legal instrument (Q3150005), court (Q41487), grouping of jurisdictions around copyright legislation (Q63705939), division (Q334453), organizational subdivision (Q9261468), official act (Q481182), lottery (Q189409), sports competition (Q13406554), area of law in a place (Q119974171), electoral result (Q19571328), economic activity (Q8187769), convention (Q367293), government program (Q22222786), copyright law (Q67011165), register (Q19386377), recurring event (Q15275719), death index (Q104587594) or copyright determination method (Q61005213) | ||||||||||||
| Allowed values | political/administrative divisions, including sovereign states and supranational entities (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | ||||||||||||
| Example | European Central Bank (Q8901) → Eurozone (Q8268) President of the United States (Q11696) → United States of America (Q30) member of the State Senate of Oregon (Q19689183) → Oregon (Q824) mayor of Paris (Q12371988) → Paris (Q90) abbot (Q103163) → not applicable Criminal Code of Belarus (Q3917299) → Belarus (Q184) North American Free Trade Agreement (Q181574) → Mexico (Q96) United States of America (Q30) Canada (Q16) Embassy of Japan, Beijing (Q29868931) → Beijing (Q956) Tianjin (Q11736) Shaanxi (Q47974) Shanxi (Q46913) Gansu (Q42392) Henan (Q43684) Hebei (Q21208) Hubei (Q46862) Hunan (Q45761) Qinghai (Q45833) Xinjiang (Q34800) Ningxia (Q57448) Tibet Autonomous Region (Q17269) Inner Mongolia (Q41079) United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Q7889769) → Washington, D.C. (Q61) 2020 Swinomish Indian Tribal Community stay-at-home order (Q88908049) → Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (Q16900986) Roman Catholic Archbishop of Zaragoza (Q48626227) → Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Zaragoza (Q1365554) Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical province of Saragossa (Q6088734) | ||||||||||||
| Tracking: same | no label (Q42533404) | ||||||||||||
| Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P1001 (Q26250009) | ||||||||||||
| See also | operating area (P2541), facet of (P1269), valid in place (P3005) | ||||||||||||
| Lists | |||||||||||||
| Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
| Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
| Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1001#Value type Q56061, Q1048835, Q82794, Q3895768, Q2882257, Q3918, Q7188, Q44782, Q5982983, Q6087062, Q13414953, Q7278, Q57662985, Q31728, Q2221906, Q61005213, Q4358176, Q43229, Q155076, Q8187769, Q192611, SPARQL
if [item A] has this property (applies to jurisdiction (P1001)) linked to [item B],
then [item A] and [item B] have to coincide or coexist at some point of history. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1001#Contemporary, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1001#Conflicts with P8047, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1001#Type Q1151067, Q895526, Q80071, Q43229, Q216353, Q4164871, Q18616576, Q1140371, Q15617994, Q15097084, Q30634609, Q43306178, Q3917681, Q372690, Q213283, Q7843791, Q35535, Q8161, Q7748, Q42470, Q2385804, Q2135465, Q473972, Q40357, Q21004260, Q1864008, Q14659, Q686822, Q191072, Q15238777, Q1530022, Q618779, Q65554936, Q1445650, Q105985, Q8142, Q4992061, Q176799, Q329525, Q214995, Q317557, Q55876909, Q17143723, Q12798556, Q12804010, Q102496, Q689044, Q56061, Q7397, Q20045456, Q1572600, Q567696, Q905765, Q223729, Q321839, Q13406463, Q21451536, Q187588, Q1456832, Q13582682, Q166140, Q14623646, Q1523821, Q99045339, Q1505023, Q10541491, Q7406919, Q769696, Q3150005, Q41487, Q63705939, Q334453, Q9261468, Q481182, Q189409, Q13406554, Q119974171, Q19571328, Q8187769, Q367293, Q22222786, Q67011165, Q19386377, Q15275719, Q104587594, Q61005213, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1001#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1001#Scope, SPARQL
Untitled edit
Related to country (P17) and located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) (those are also used on items that are located in that area), and part of (P361). – The preceding unsigned comment was added by SPQRobin (talk • contribs) at 20:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC).
How to distinguish federal-level powers edit
If I want to specify that something only applies to the federal level of government and not things under the jurisdiction of state/provincial/constituent-country governments, should I link this property to Federal Government of the United States (Q48525) and Government of Canada (Q422404) rather than United States of America (Q30) and Canada (Q16), respectively? --Arctic.gnome (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
RFC edit
This property had an horrifyingly muddled definition from its inception. I have started a RFC in an attempt to clear that up. Wikidata:Requests for comment/Property: belongs to jurisdiction. Circeus (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm. I am only reading about this now? I guess I don't have the talk pages of all properties on my watch list that I may be interested in. I wonder how I am supposed to be able to do that? Jane023 (talk) 11:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Use for public offices edit
There is some discussion about it at Property_talk:P39. I also added samples to the item. --- Jura 09:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Use for non-public offices edit
@Billinghurst, Jura1: I think it's worth re-opening the question of whether this should apply to private organizations. A fair number of people are using this for university boards, religious orders, etc. Would there be any harm in expanding this to include private organizations, or should we make a new property for jurisdiction over organizations? --Arctic.gnome (talk) 15:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- <shrug> I just fill data. jurisdiction (Q5982983) seems to be here by definition and be specific, so you are changing the basis of what envisaged. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:32, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment I have changed the English label name to remove the word "territorial". position held (P39) requires this as a quantifier, and as such the territorial aspect was no longer applicable, so it would seem that this does apply for non-public offices. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have a sample? If an office doesn't have one, it's sufficient to use "no value".
--- Jura 05:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have a sample? If an office doesn't have one, it's sufficient to use "no value".
The description of this implies that this is only used for political jurisdictions. Is it really ok to use it with any kind of organization? Right now it seems to be limited to geographic places/political jurisdictions. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Can't use countries with this property edit
In the examples and in many many statements in WD there are countries added as value for this property. However, that is a constraint violation right now, because state (Q7275) and administrative territorial entity (Q56061) are not linked using P279 (bot are subclasses of political territorial entity (Q1048835)). I think state (Q7275) should be added to value-type constraint (Q21510865). Wostr (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
What shall we use if the something is true world wide? edit
Mona Lisa or Day of the God (Mahana no Atua) (Q3765980) is presumed to be in Public Domain world-wide. What value shall we use with P1001 to express it world (Q16502), Worldwide (Q8036765), something else? --Jarekt (talk) 03:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
This property for protected area (Q473972) edit
This property should also be used for every item connected with NACSIS-CAT author ID (P271) and instance of (P31) to protected area (Q473972). Because protected areas are sometimes manged by the administrative territorial entity (Q56061) connected by located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) but in the most cases it is an higher administrative unit. --GPSLeo (talk) 13:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Use of P1001 for datasets edit
I'm developing an Infobox for datasets (data set (Q1172284) in the French Wikipedia (Q8447) (see w:fr:Modèle:Infobox Jeu de données). I think that it would be really interesting to use applies to jurisdiction (P1001) to describe spatial coverage of a dataset. See for instance SIRENE (Q3509449). What do you think ? Would it be possible to add entity with class data set (Q1172284) in the list of possible entities for applies to jurisdiction (P1001) ? --PAC2 (talk) 21:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add Q78839839 as a possible thing being applied edit
Hello there. General Roman Calendar (Q78839839) (liturgical calendars of the Catholic church) apply to specific jurisdictions, mostly dioceses, but possibly also cities, countries, continents and worldwide. --MF-W 23:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Extend the set of classes for the value-type contraint. edit
Consider adding the following items wd:Q170156 confederation wd:Q1335818 supranational union wd:Q3623811 economic union so that values like European Union can be used for the property without problem. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Graph weaver (talk • contribs) at 15:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC).
Change property to "applies to place"? edit
@SPQRobin, Lavallen, Izno, Filceolaire, Jura1, Macadamia1472: @Arctic.gnome, Jane023, Billinghurst, Wostr, Jarekt, GPSLeo: @PAC2, MF-W, Mahir256, Nikki:
This property has been used a lot for places that are not jurisdictions, and I'd like to rename it to reflect its use as applying to any place, not just jurisdictions. For example, see Euro+Med PlantBase taxon ID (P12380), where it has been used with values Europe (Q46), Mediterranean Basin (Q72499), and Caucasus (Q18869). And item Primate of the Orthodox Church in America (Q113784960), where it was used with value North America (Q49). Are there objections to revising the label and definition so that is clearly useable for any type of place? AdamSeattle (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I would object based on that argument. "applies to place" is already an alias of valid in place (P3005), so it's not clear what the difference between the two properties would be if this one is made more broad. The second example, as far as I can tell, is intended to be the North American diocese mentioned on en:w:List of primates of the Orthodox Church in America which doesn't seem to have an item yet. This property doesn't make sense to me on Euro+Med PlantBase taxon ID (P12380) even if we were to call it "applies to place" (it applies to a taxon, not a place). You're also the only person who has used Mediterranean Basin (Q72499) and Caucasus (Q18869) with this property. - Nikki (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Applies to jurisdiction is an ill-defined property and I would be for deleting it (how does something apply to a place?). valid in place is actually okay since it's only meant to be used as a qualifier and it just indicates a statement is true in that place, not necessarily the entire item. Lectrician1 (talk) 22:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)