Property talk:P111

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Toni 001 in topic One-off constraint?

Documentation

measured physical quantity
value of a physical property expressed as number multiplied by a unit
Descriptionphysical property measured by an unit
Representsphysical quantity (Q107715)
Data typeItem
Domain
According to this template: unit of measurement (Q47574)
According to statements in the property:
unit of measurement (Q47574) or physical constant (Q173227)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values
According to this template: physical quantity (Q107715)
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Exampleminute (Q7727)duration (Q2199864)
kelvin (Q11579)thermodynamic temperature (Q264647)
hertz (Q39369)frequency (Q11652)
henry (Q163354)inductance (Q177897)
candela (Q83216)luminous intensity (Q104831)
mole (Q41509)amount of substance (Q104946)
siemens (Q169893)electrical conductance (Q309017)
lumen (Q484092)luminous flux (Q107780)
steradian (Q177612)solid angle (Q208476)
katal (Q208634)catalytic activity (Q1735592)
gray (Q190095)absorbed dose (Q215313)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P111 (Q26250022)
See alsomeasures (P2575), main subject (P921)
Lists
Proposal discussion[not applicable Proposal discussion]
Current uses
Total3,880
Main statement3,86799.7% of uses
Qualifier130.3% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “unit of measurement (Q47574), physical constant (Q173227): item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “unit of measurement (Q47574), physical constant (Q173227)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P111#Type Q47574, Q173227, SPARQL
Value type “individual quantity (Q71550118): This property should use items as value that contain property “subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value individual quantity (Q71550118) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P111#Value type Q71550118, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P111#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P111#Entity types
Property “ISQ dimension (P4020)” declared by target items of “measured physical quantity (P111): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “ISQ dimension (P4020)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P111#Target required claim P4020, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)


 

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

label edit

Can I change the label to "measured physical quantity" (or just "measures") ? "Physical quantity" sounds rather ambiguous. --Zolo (talk) 08:45, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I changed for de, en and fr. --Zolo (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

domain edit

I've run into this talkpage because find obvious that domain should be different. I see that P111 is redundant for units like kilowatt hour (Q182098) because they already have mention of quantity in instance of (P31) unit of energy (Q2916980). I propose to use current property only for subclasses of unit of measurement (Q47574), for example in unit of energy (Q2916980). --Infovarius (talk) 06:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Infovarius: Not all units have a class of the form "unit of <some physical quantity>". I would argue that those classes could be eliminated (not saying they should), given that their members can be derived (that is, queried) because each unit should have a value for measured physical quantity (P111). Toni 001 (talk) 12:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

"measured physical quantity"? edit

It now says "measured physical quantity". But it can also be a defined quantity. Alas. Actually, a better wording is: "value of a quantity" (that 'value' per SI is defined as: number × unit). All in all, the Wikidata handling of physical quantity and SI definition concepts is substandard. -DePiep (talk) 22:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Measurement devices edit

A measuring instrument (Q2041172) measures a physical quantity (Q107715): For instance, a tide gauge (Q686697) measures height (Q208826) (of the tide). Given that the name of this property is currently "measured physical quantity" I propose to add measuring instrument (Q2041172) to the domain. Toni 001 (talk) 20:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

What about measures (P2575)? --Infovarius (talk) 19:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Infovarius: That's it, thanks. Toni 001 (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

wider scope edit

Some items has explicit relation to physical quantities (like Shore durometery (Q2035690), orders of magnitude (temperature) (Q182460))). I don't see any real obstacle to link them through P111 to quantities (what else? and why to have another property?), so I propose to remove constraint "should be unit". --Infovarius (talk) 03:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

We currently have the following connections:
  1. P111: unit to quantity
  2. P2575: measurement device to quantity
  3. P1880: quantity to scale
The only things that don't fit in nicely at the moment are those "orders of magnitude" items. I'm not convinced that we should sacrifice the well-scopedness of any of those properties to squeeze in those items. Having tight constraints helps a lot with improving and maintaining the quality. Toni 001 (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

One-off constraint? edit

Hello @Jura1. What is the purpose of this edit? Why add a deprecated statement? Best wishes. Toni 001 (talk) 07:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I see, thanks. Toni 001 (talk) 08:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Return to "P111" page.