Property talk:P1424

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lectrician1 in topic Property change proposal

Documentation

topic's main template
the main template relating to a topic
RepresentsWikimedia template (Q11266439)
Data typeItem
ExampleSyngnathiformes (Q650692)Template:Taxonomy/Syngnathiformes (Q14464882)
human (Q5)Template:Infobox person (Q6249834)
Basshunter (Q383541)Template:Basshunter (Q8090653)
Robot and gadget jobsDeltaBot does the following jobs:
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P1424 (Q61035447)
See alsocorresponding template (P2667), topic's main category (P910), template or module that populates category (P4329)
Lists
  • Items with the most statements of this property
  • Count of items by number of statements (chart)
  • Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart)
  • Items with the most identifier properties
  • By value of property
  • Items with no other statements
  • Most recently created items
  • Items with novalue claims
  • Items with unknown value claims
  • Usage history (total)
  • Chart by item creation date
  • Database reports/Constraint violations/P1424
  • Map
  • Random list
  • Proposal discussionProposal discussion
    Current uses
    Total40,813
    Main statement40,800>99.9% of uses
    Qualifier11<0.1% of uses
    Reference2<0.1% of uses
    Search for values
    [create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
    Inverse property of “template has topic (P1423):
    if [item A] has this property (topic's main template (P1424)) linked to [item B],
    then [item B] should also have property “template has topic (P1423)” linked to [item A]. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1424#inverse, SPARQL
    Value type “Wikimedia template (Q11266439), Wikimedia module (Q15184295): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value Wikimedia template (Q11266439), Wikimedia module (Q15184295) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1424#Value type Q11266439, Q15184295, SPARQL
    Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1424#Scope, SPARQL
    Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1424#Entity types
    Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1424#Single value, SPARQL
     

    Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

    Single-value? edit

    Micru, hello! Why is it single-value? For example, in Q178048#P1424 it is reasonable to add both infobox and navbox. Wikisaurus (talk) 11:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Then we should perhaps have two specialised properties: "Topic's main infobox" and "Topic's main navbox", and we then should gradually move values to these appropriate specialised properties. --UV (talk) 12:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
    @Wikisaurus: single value make sense, in you example you simply should add a qualifier, I did it as an example. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Adding date as separator edit

    Hi,

    Is there any objections to add point in time (P585) as a separator (P4155) for single-value constraint (Q19474404)? See Q66363643#P1424 for an example where I added applies to part (P518) as a separator (to solve the current constraint) but it's strange and redundant with point in time (P585).

    Pinging top-6 user of this property: @Ary29, Kooma, Mr. Ibrahem, Putnik, Florentyna, Wikisaurus:

    Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

    @VIGNERON: Hi,
      Weak support (more like a   Comment) Even if these concepts overlap a lot, there is a still small difference: we usually refer more to an edition of an event, therefore numbered according to the year rather than directly to the date of the event. For example, the 2020 Summer Olympics (Q181278) or UEFA Euro 2020 (Q373501), initially scheduled for 2020, are postponed to 2021 due to the Covid-19 pandemic, but from what I see, "2020" as a number has been kept. It seems a bit wonky but maybe we should add point in time (P585) and put both each time. — Baidax 💬 13:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
    No support from my side. From the experiences from the past, a couple of bots right after such changes modifying the pages a second time, getting the pages out of the former reach (scheme). Additionally, maintenance is from my side much more difficult with sub-properties then with direct properties. --Florentyna (talk) 20:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Property change proposal edit

    I suggested as part of the Wikidata:Property_proposal/Change_template-topic_property_names_and_scopes that we should rename this property to topic has template.

    Many topics cover a number of templates, as mentioned in the proposal and the section of above.

    Inversely, a template can have many topics.

    That is why I think the current proposal should include renaming this property and renaming the inverse property template has topic (P1423) to template has topic.

    This establishes a system comparable to that of part of (P361)/has part(s) (P527).

    Please see the proposal and discuss this change on the Proposal.

    --Lectrician1 (talk) 20:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Done. Property scope expanded and property constraints updated. --Lectrician1 (talk) 14:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Return to "P1424" page.