Property talk:P1464

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Ivan A. Krestinin in topic Strange bug in Constraint

Documentation

category for people born here
category item that groups people born in this place
Representsplace of birth (Q1322263)
Data typeItem
Template parameterbirth place (various templates in various projects)
Domaingeographical feature (Q618123) or geographic region (Q82794)
ExampleSaxony (Q1202)Category:Births in Saxony (Q8070983)
Moscow (Q649)Category:Births in Moscow (Q16363460)
Sourcewikipedia categorization (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896))
Robot and gadget jobsDeltaBot does the following jobs:
<complementary property>category for people who died here (P1465)
See alsoplace of birth (P19), category of associated people (P1792), category for honorary citizens of entity (P10280)
Lists
  • Items with the most statements of this property
  • Count of items by number of statements (chart)
  • Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart)
  • Items with the most identifier properties
  • By value of property
  • Items with no other statements
  • Most recently created items
  • Items with novalue claims
  • Items with unknown value claims
  • Usage history (total)
  • Chart by item creation date
  • Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464
  • Map
  • Random list
  • Proposal discussionProposal discussion
    Current uses
    Total41,582
    Main statement41,579>99.9% of uses
    Qualifier2<0.1% of uses
    Reference1<0.1% of uses
    Search for values
    [create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
    Conflicts with “instance of (P31): Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410), human (Q5): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Conflicts with P31, hourly updated report, SPARQL
    Value type “Wikimedia category (Q4167836): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value Wikimedia category (Q4167836) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Value type Q4167836, hourly updated report, SPARQL
    Property “category combines topics (P971): place of birth (Q1322263)” declared by target items of “category for people born here (P1464): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “category combines topics (P971): place of birth (Q1322263)”. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Target required claim P971, SPARQL
    Inverse property of “category combines topics (P971):
    if [item A] has this property (category for people born here (P1464)) linked to [item B],
    then [item B] should also have property “category combines topics (P971)” linked to [item A]. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#inverse, SPARQL
    Item “country (P17): Items with this property should also have “country (P17)”. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Item P17, search, SPARQL
    Type “geographical feature (Q618123), geographic region (Q82794): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “geographical feature (Q618123), geographic region (Q82794)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Type Q618123, Q82794, SPARQL
    Item “coordinate location (P625): Items with this property should also have “coordinate location (P625)”. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Item P625, SPARQL
    Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
    Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Entity types

    Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

    Discussion edit

    Make sense edit

    Why don't we have simply a have a class "people born in whatever" which would have a definition like "people with a <born in: Whatever> statement and a "people born in whatever" <category : Category:People born in whatever> ? I think these kind of properties are useless. author  TomT0m / talk page 14:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

    What's different from last time you asked the question? --- Jura 14:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
    Remind me, what was the answer? author  TomT0m / talk page 14:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

    Strange bug in Constraint edit

    Hi,

    There is a {{Constraint:Type|classes=Q7703766, Q7275|relation=instance}} but apparently something is wrong (though this syntax is give as an example on Template:Constraint:Type) as a lot of territory (Q7703766) are listed as violation on Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464. Right now, there is 16254 violations on 16762 uses, near 97%...

    Could someone see what is wrong and why ? Poke Ivan A. Krestinin

    Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

    Return to "P1464" page.