Property talk:P1843

Active discussions

Documentation

taxon common name
common or vernacular name of a biological taxon
Explanations [Edit]

Guidelines by languageEdit

FrenchEdit

The first word of compound names and the following words are uppercaseed only if they are proper names or species names, but not the adjectives.

Correct examples: "Grand Boucage", "Cyclamen à fleur immaculée", "Cyclamen à feuille de Lierre" and "Cyclamen de Perse", etc.
  Type “taxon (Q16521), polyphyletic common name (Q55983715): element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “taxon (Q16521), polyphyletic common name (Q55983715)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1843#type Q16521, Q55983715, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
  Item “taxon name (P225): Items with this property should also have “taxon name (P225)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1843#Item P225, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
  Format “[^\/]*: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1843#Format, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
  Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1843#scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)

Strange propertyEdit

Many times it simply repeats label and aliases. --Infovarius (talk) 17:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

And this is strange? Why, Infovarius? --Succu (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Because it is duplication. --Infovarius (talk) 18:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
If taxon name (P225) repeats labels and/or aliases because taxon common name (P1843) is present this is not strange, Infovarius? --Succu (talk) 18:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
taxon name (P225) has mostly single (or a few) values, it's standardized. This property can have hundreds/thousands of values, several per each language. Which are already at labels/aliases. --Infovarius (talk) 19:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
So what? Having a source for labels/aliases (some of them are abstruse) is inconvenient? --Succu (talk) 19:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
I do not appreciate and understand the "so what". It is duplication. The notion of sources of labels has been shot down in the past so this is that same discussion through the back-door. There is no point to them so imho this property is superfluous. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 12:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Return to "P1843" page.