Property talk:P2061

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Macondo in topic Problem with values

Documentation

aspect ratio (W:H)
image width to height ratio of films, photographs, and other images
Representsaspect ratio (Q1441762)
Data typeItem
Domain
According to this template: various, including cameras
According to statements in the property:
image (Q478798), audiovisual work (Q2431196), image sensor (Q209121) or photographic film (Q6293)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesitems for specific ratios (3:2, etc.) (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleNikon D800 (Q1992016)3:2 (Q20970431)
5:4 (Q20970435)
Open Air Interior (Q11683444)3:4 (Q57975150)
Portrait of Santiago Rusiñol on a light (Q24049239)1:2 (Q98946935)
Commons example
Sourcehttps://www.freebase.com/digicams/digital_camera/image_ratio
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total38,036
Main statement37,37798.3% of uses
Qualifier6581.7% of uses
Reference1<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase MediaInfo (Q59712033): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2061#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2061#Scope, SPARQL
Value type “aspect ratio (Q1441762), width to height aspect ratio (Q20970434): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value aspect ratio (Q1441762), width to height aspect ratio (Q20970434) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2061#Value type Q1441762, Q20970434, SPARQL
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2061#Conflicts with P31, SPARQL
Property “numeric value (P1181)” declared by target items of “aspect ratio (W:H) (P2061): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “numeric value (P1181)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2061#Target required claim P1181, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)
 
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Problem with values edit

It seems that some values are incorrectly defined, see 2:3 (Q98929171) that used the definition of 3:2 (Q20970431). Some cleanup is needed. @Macondo: --- Jura 12:39, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Should we create a second set of values? Currently most (if not all) are defined as width to height aspect ratio (Q20970434) in their labels, e.g. Q20970431 with "3:2", with "3:2 (W:H)" as alias.
Depending on the field (or the language?), people are expecting (or using them as) height to width aspect ratio (Q21075810).
We could add "2:3" and "2:3 (H:W)" as aliases to Q20970431 , but this is likely to make it even more confusing.
The second set of values would look like Q109448502.
Maybe the labels (at least in English) should be "2:3 (H:W)" and "3:2 (W:H)". I updated that for the samples.
Numeric values for both could be provided (samples also at Q20970431 and Q109448502 with criterion used (P1013)). --- Jura 09:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
ok, it is already corrected. Macondo (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

OTH the property description does call for width to height value. Maybe the property label should include "(W:H)". --- Jura 12:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P2061" page.