Property talk:P2660
Latest comment: 1 year ago by LlywelynII in topic Parent peak
Documentation
topographic prominence
height of a mountain or hill relative to the lowest contour line encircling it (on Earth, maximum 8,848 m)
height of a mountain or hill relative to the lowest contour line encircling it (on Earth, maximum 8,848 m)
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “mountain (Q8502), summit (Q207326), hill (Q54050), ridge (Q740445)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “mountain (Q8502), summit (Q207326), hill (Q54050), ridge (Q740445)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#Type Q8502, Q207326, Q54050, Q740445, SPARQL
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#Units
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#Units
Range from “0” to “30000”: values should be in the range from “0” to “30000”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#Range
Item “coordinate location (P625)”: Items with this property should also have “coordinate location (P625)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#Item P625, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#Scope, SPARQL
Qualifiers “reason for deprecated rank (P2241), reason for preferred rank (P7452)”: this property should be used only with the listed qualifiers. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2660#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
value should be lower or equal to elevation
TODO: correct value or elevation, adjust ranks, define exceptions (Help)
Violations query:
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P2660#value should be lower or equal to elevation
TODO: correct value or elevation, adjust ranks, define exceptions (Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel ?item_elevation ?value { ?item p:P7479 / psn:P7479 / wikibase:quantityAmount ?value . ?item p:P2044 / psn:P2044 / wikibase:quantityAmount ?item_elevation . FILTER( ?item_elevation >= ?value ) FILTER( ?item not in ( wd:Q15397819 , wd:Q4115189 ) ) SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" } } LIMIT 100
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P2660#value should be lower or equal to elevation
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Statistics edit
Discussion edit
Parent peak edit
Which qualifier could be used to indicate the parent peak? criterion used (P1013) ? relative to (P2210)?
--- Jura 11:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is now a property for this. --- Jura 09:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Similarly, the template is whining at me for using "relative to" when OF COURSE prominence should explain what it's being measured against if it's anything more important than "that puddle over there".—LlywelynII (talk) 00:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Why is this limited to metres? edit
Is there a reason why the units are restricted to metres? Danrok (talk) 01:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- I would imagine the reason is to allow for comparison with all features around the world as most of the world uses the metric system while relatively few use feet for measurement. That being said, why not put both? Measurements in feet are allowed so just add that measurement in with the metric. Epolk (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)