Property talk:P2698
Documentation
identifier for a person in the CricketArchive.com database
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2698#Item P106, search
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2698#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2698#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2698#Item P641, search, SPARQL
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
ID format edit
@Stigmj: I hope you agree, that Freebase, Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes (and many others) are at least little bit different properties. IDs there are constructed from multiple "distinct" parts, here we're playing aroundusing one numerical value (41464). And again - the ID will be clickable here (OK, I'm only sure for 99.9%), you can use local URLs at templates, modules, gadgets etc. And I would like to note, that property isn't set in stone. We can always add formatter URL, if website would provide such and/or formatter URL (P1630) allows complex URLs. Don't get me wrong, I'm also not very, very happen with this solution, but that doesn't mean we can't store IDs themself here. --Edgars2007 (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Umpires shouldn't trigger the constraint edit
Hi there, I noticed in the constraint violations that Billy Doctrove was listed. He is a well known cricket umpire, who didn't actually play at a notable level and does have a CricketArchive page & ID. Can the constraint be modified to be must be occupation = Q12299841 (cricketer) or Q2143894 (cricket umpire)? The-Pope (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Paywall edit
This is now behind a paywall. Avilena (talk) 15:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)