Property talk:P3680

Active discussions


statement supported by
entity that supports a given statement
Descriptionentity that supports a given statement
Data typeItem
  1. Choekyi Gyaltsen, 10th Panchen Lama (Q83312) followed by (P156) Gyaincain Norbu (Q724350), <statement supported by> People's Republic of China (Q148); Choekyi Gyaltsen, 10th Panchen Lama (Q83312) followed by (P156) Gedhun Choekyi Nyima (Q372526), <statement supported by> Central Tibetan Administration (Q326343)
  2. Use of designated as terrorist by (P3461) can be replaced with instance of (P31) terrorist organization (Q17127659) with this qualifier
(note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property Wikidata property example (P1855), Wikidata property example for properties (P2271), Wikidata property example for lexemes (P5192), Wikidata property example for forms (P5193) or Wikidata property example for senses (P5977))
See alsocriterion used (P1013), statement disputed by (P1310), nature of statement (P5102)
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Main statement443.1% of uses
Qualifier1,22186.6% of uses
Reference14510.3% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Scope is as qualifiers (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3680#scope, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)



I think we forgot about approved by (P790). d1g (talk) 05:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@D1gggg: Looks like it. I think maybe we should get rid of the qualifier use of P790 rather than delete this, though. (Not certain.) Still, we definitely shouldn't have a duplicate. --Yair rand (talk) 22:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Use in references ?Edit

I used this property in a reference snak to source a religion claim : . It’s a constraint violation but I don’t really think it should be. We have stuff to say that something is stated in a news article, « stated in », but not really « by whom », here it’s the case of a person that proclaims something in an event, that thing is reported in a newspaper article. statement supported by (P3680) seems perfect to say the « who » said. author  TomT0m / talk page 08:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Return to "P3680" page.