Property talk:P393

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vicarage in topic Edition of an event

Documentation

edition number
number of an edition (first, second, ... as 1, 2, ...) or event
Representsversion number (Q114469879)
Data typeString
Domainversion, edition or translation (Q3331189), recurrent event edition (Q27968055), tennis tournament (Q13219666), sports competition (Q13406554), event (Q1656682), publication (Q732577), software version (Q20826013), music award (Q1364556), license (Q79719), season (Q10688145), reference work (Q13136) or roadside station in Japan (Q1187691)
Example10th edition of Systema Naturae (Q4547210) → 10
2006 Winter Olympics (Q9672) → 20
German Communists (Q18328145) → 2
Tracking: sameno label (Q42533417)
Tracking: differencesno label (Q55283171)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P393 (Q23909022)
Tracking: local yes, WD nono label (Q55283173)
See alsoseries ordinal (P1545), has edition or translation (P747), catalog code (P528), inventory number (P217), software version identifier (P348), version type (P548), edition/version (P9767), total produced (P1092)
Lists
Proposal discussion[not applicable Proposal discussion]
Current uses
Total252,903
Main statement232,72892% of uses
Qualifier7,5013% of uses
Reference12,6745% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P393#Single value, SPARQL
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P393#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P393#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P393#Scope, SPARQL
Pattern ^\?$ will be automatically replaced to somevalue.
Testing: TODO list
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Discussion edit

Proposal: Remove numeric string constraint. edit

As already agreed upon in other discussion on this page this property should be usable for software. There are also cases where editions of documents or written works use non numeric versioning:

at the time of writing this property has the following constraint/properties which prohibits the above use cases:

I propose that we remove these constraints and have none as it is not clear that there are reasonable constraints that would cover all cases. As a compromise if this is a serious problem we could just limit the constraints to cover all known cases of legitimate uses. Iwan.Aucamp (talk) 11:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  WikiProject Informatics has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.   WikiProject Books has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.

@Malore, Jsamwrites, OdileB: @Amadalvarez:

Discussion edit

  •   Comment I'm in favour of this but not voting as this is my proposal, I would personally count all support for the proposal to use this for software version numbering as support for this but I would prefer to make support explicit for the removal of specific constraints as otherwise it is too open to interpretation. Iwan.Aucamp (talk) 11:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Property use edit

This property is mainly used for the next cases:

  • edition of a book
  • edition of an event

Edition / Auflage / Édition edit

What´s the difference between Number of Edition and Edition number mentioned above?--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 12:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
I think the difference is that this is actual number of the edition of the single book (as an item). EG: second edition of The trial. Number of edition is the toatl number of these editions (eg. 35). I don't think that "Number of edition" is useful, because it is likely to change over the time (editions just increase).
  Support --Aubrey (talk) 09:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Datatype edit

Use string datatype because we don't need numeric one: no uncertainty, no unit, no conversion. String can do the work with a very simple property. Snipre (talk) 01:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edition of an event edit

Can this property be used in the context of events as well? Like in en:2008 Wimbledon Championships => "122" or en:17th Congress of the All-Union Communist Party => "17"?--Kompakt (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes why not. Snipre (talk) 17:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Very good, thanks. I thought this was a property solely for publications as its German description suggests this. It's also listed under "literature" on the Wikidata:List_of_properties.--Kompakt (talk) 18:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
That was the initial idea but we can modify the scope of one property. Please just modify the description in the languages you know. Snipre (talk) 18:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
No why yes. In Russian this notions have no word in common. Don't be english-oriented. Infovarius (talk) 21:18, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Seconded. I'm having trouble translating this into Estonian. There's no label that would make sense for both of these distinct uses. I suggest returing to original scope and introducing a separate property for other uses. 90.191.81.65 15:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
series ordinal (P1545) seems to fit better, at least in English events are part of a series, while an edition of a document or software can be a tree expressed as a non-ordinal, eg patch 2.3.4 released after major release 3. Events have a much simpler progression. An edition of the Olympics sounds wrong. I note that 2012 Summer Olympics (Q8577) has a warning because the sequence number is a qualifier to an instance, that only allows series ordinal. Putting the sequence number, follows, followed etc as top-level items to avoid the warnings seems to weaken the concept of an item in a tight sequence. Vicarage (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Name change request edit

This property refers to "edition number", and it should be named as such. Once renamed, it will be necessary to create a new property with datatype item which will be used to link item-works with items representing translations or editions.--Micru (talk) 04:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

No, we have stated in (P248) for link between items. This property is used to define the edition number in the item. Snipre (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
If, as you say, this property is used to define the edition number in the item, then it should be called "edition number", otherwise it is confusing.--Micru (talk) 12:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
It is an English problem: in French and in German there is no possible confusion about the definition of the property. Snipre (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Changed.--Micru (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Restored DE. --Succu (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Guidelines for References calls for proposed properties 'edition' and 'edition of' to be used to link between the WD pages for books and for editions of that book. stated in (P248) is used to link source statements to books or editions.
This 'edition number' property with data type string, can be used to link to editions which don't have their own WD page. Filceolaire (talk) 20:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Qualifier edit

I suggest that this property could also be used as a qulifier in items about literary works, perhaps together with a qualifier language of work or name (P407). In some wikis, there is a tradition to show ISBN (OCLC, or whatsoever) of the first edition in infoboxes, or simply one of editions in a given language. It was imported to Wikidata as simply "ISBN", and because of that we had an English ISBN in infobox here, which was quite silly. Danneks (talk) 09:05, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I see, it has already been discussed :) Danneks (talk) 07:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Having property prompted? edit

What is the means to have this property prompted when adding version, edition or translation (Q3331189). I get other property options presented that are quite unlikely and would appreciate this one being presented as it is one that I overlook. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 20:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Then you should add it more, it's based on usage. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 07:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deprecate in favour of series ordinal (P1545) and (book editon) and other properties edit

"Edition of the book" usually means that the same book was updated and corrected with better variant.

Rarely it is opposite: earlier edition is better.

Edition of the book is semantically closer to software version identifier (P348) in Wikidata property related to software (Q21126229) than to series ordinal (P1545) (or ordinal number (Q191780)).

  • versions, editions, ... multiple versions/editions are possible
  • simple/single ordinal number in collection (series ordinal (P1545))

d1g (talk) 21:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Comment Personally, I noticed its use on events the other day and found it convenient. Contrary to P1545, it can be added directly on items for specific editions of events (e.g. 50th Venice Film Festival). There isn't much of any ambiguity of what it refers to.
I don't have much of view on its used on books/editions. The structure for these probably needs some work anyways. Maybe this property could be limited to events.
--- Jura 22:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
> Contrary to P1545 ...
I would drop Constraint:Qualifier for series ordinal (P1545)} so we can use it with items. But I'm not sure if it is a good move. d1g (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Use for software? edit

  Notified participants of WikiProject Informatics/Software

What about using it to indicate the software version number of the item? It would be different from "software version" because the latter is used to list all the versions of a software, while this property would be used directly on the item about a particular software version. Something like this: Firefox 3.6 (Q2615631)edition number (P393)3.6 --Malore (talk) 03:42, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Roman numerals edit

This property should accept Roman numerals (Q38918). May, someone, change the constraint to avoid the errors ?. Thanks, Amadalvarez (talk) 09:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Non-numeric edition name? edit

Some books call themselves "Updated Edition" or "New Edition" instead of "2nd Edition". If I let "Updated" be this property's value, it will be a constraint error. Should I ignore the error or is there a separate property for these cases? 朝彦/Asahiko (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Could you give an example? ISBN? OCLC number? In my country there is also edition number somewhere, if the edition is marked as updated or modified, so maybe in this case there is edition number somewhere or at least in other databases there is a clue how to describe this situation. With 'new edition', are we sure it's still edition of the same book, not a new book that should not be described as an edition? Wostr (talk) 15:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Include Book Series as valid entities for this property edit

Some book series are re-published as new editions in their entirety (for instance the European Garden Flora was re-published in a new format for all 5 volumes simultaneously in 2011). Semudobia (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P393" page.