Property talk:P4777

Latest comment: 6 years ago by ChristianKl in topic Limited to 2D?

Documentation

has boundary
element that's on the two dimensional border that surrounds the subject; the limit of an entity
Descriptionthe element that's on the two dimensional border that surrounds the subject; the limit of an entity
Data typeItem
Domaingeographic location (Q2221906) (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleOld City of Jerusalem (Q213274)Walls of Jerusalem (Q2918723)
Carança valley (Q28380499)Pic de la Fossa del Gegant (Q3382408)
Arizona (Q816)Arizona–New Mexico border (Q3088721)
peritoneal cavity (Q1030169)peritoneum (Q9629)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P4777 (Q118210312)
See alsoshares border with (P47), contains (P4330)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total1,326
Main statement1,31298.9% of uses
Qualifier141.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase lexeme (Q51885771): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4777#Entity types
Qualifiers “”: this property should be used only with the listed qualifiers. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4777#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL

Limited to 2D? edit

At the moment, I think we don't have to make this poperty limited to the 2D boundary line. Exactly speaking, walls are not 2D, but 3D. And it is very useful if it can also be used to link to 3D boundary surface. For example, many anatomical entities have 3D boundary surface. If necessary in the future, we can create subproperties or use qualifiers to distinguish 2D bounary lines and 3D boundary surfaces. --Okkn (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

dimensionalty is tricky. [digs out Euclid] The boundary of a 2-D surface is a line; a line has length without breadth, i.e. a 1 dimensioned thing in 2-D space. Likewise the boundary of a 3-D space is a 2-D surface. Physical boundary markers in the real world, like the walls of Jerusalem, are 3-D. There's no need for this to be a problem if the definition is "the border that surrounds the subject; the limit of an entity". --Philbarker (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Okkn: A wall around a city doesn't surround most of the 3D surface of the city. It only surrounds a 2D boundary line. Airplanes can fly over the wall of Jerusalem and you can dig tunnels under it. Mixing both things that actually surround all the 3D surface and things that surround an object only in two dimensions in the same property is going to lead to misinterpretation about what's claimed.
That said, things that do surround an object in three dimensions also surround it in two. ChristianKl21:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Return to "P4777" page.