Property talk:P5782

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Luca.favorido in topic Other MiBACT Identifiers, specific identifier

Documentation

DBUnico MIBACT ID
database identifier from the Italian Ministry MIBACT (DBUnico 2.0)
Associated itemMinistry of Culture (Q1347047)
Applicable "stated in" valueDBUnico MiBACT database (Q52896862)
Data typeExternal identifier
Allowed values^[1-9]\d{4,5}$
ExampleVilletta Di Negro (Q4012942)107176 (RDF)
Doge's Palace, Genoa (Q2047566)107205 (RDF)
Ospedale del Ceppo (Q1115846)103212 (RDF)
Formatter URLhttp://dati.beniculturali.it/mibact/luoghi/resource/CulturalInstituteOrSite/$1
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P5782 (Q56479546)
Related to country  Italy (Q38) (See 396 others)
See alsoICCD ID - S form (P6286), ICCD ID - CF form (P6287), ICCD ID - CG form (P6288), beniculturali.it place ID (P11601), Catalogo Nazionale Dati ID (P12171)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total6,686
Main statement6,67999.9% of uses
Qualifier3<0.1% of uses
Reference4<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5782#Single value, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5782#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Format “^[1-9]\d{4,5}$: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5782#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Item “heritage designation (P1435): Items with this property should also have “heritage designation (P1435)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5782#Item P1435, search, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5782#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5782#Scope, SPARQL
Label required in languages: it: Entities using this property should have labels in one of the following languages: it (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5782#Label in 'it' language, search, SPARQL

Other MiBACT Identifiers, specific identifier edit

Hello,

This property is really important in order to link together Wikidata and MiBACT data clouds.

What I would like to discuss is that in my opinion we should change the different labels and descriptions of this property in order to point out that it is a property related to MiBACT Id for Cultural Institute or Site, not to all the MiBACT database. In the italian description is already specified (luoghi=locations).

As an example, we couldn't link the item Primavera (Q549847) using DBUnico MIBACT ID (P5782) with the following page: Id 0900158550 of the Historic or Artistic Property catalogue.

I wanted to start a discussion instead of changing labels and description of this property.

I could also help by creating the property proposal for the other MiBACT IDs. Here I list a couple of examples:

What do you think? Thank you,

--Luca.favorido (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Luca.favorido: Hi! I thank you for the proposal, personally I greatly support the need of having one or more properties covering all the parts of the website dati.beniculturali.it. Exactly some days ago Wikidata:Property proposal/dati.beniculturali.it ID has been proposed and I hope that, probably with some adjustments, this new proposed property can cover most or all of the parts of the website. Anyway, I think that the correct way of acting is creating one or more new properties, instead of changing this property (in general, changing existing properties is a discouraged practice). I would suggest to continue the reflection in the property proposal. Looking forward to hear your opinion there, --Epìdosis 18:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Epìdosis: Hello Epìdosis, first of all thanks for your response! That makes sense, changing a property would have effects on all the elements linked to that property. I've read the property proposal by Chiaraven, I will comment directly on that property. I've also subscribed to the WikiProject Italy, I will read the pages of the project and then in the future I could give my help. ;-) --Luca.favorido (talk) 19:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Return to "P5782" page.