Property talk:P5826

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• List of values
• List of qualifiers
• Count

majority opinion by
judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the members of a court

Represents	majority opinion (Q6738447)
Data type	Item
Domain	court decision (Q327000) or legal case (Q2334719)
Example	Roe v. Wade (Q300950) → Harry Blackmun (Q1323255) Obergefell v. Hodges (Q19866992) → Anthony Kennedy (Q11171)
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties By value of property Most statements Fewest statements Most sitelinks Most linked wikis Total of sitelinks on items Most identifiers Fewest identifiers Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Database reports/Constraint violations/P5826 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 4,875 Main statement 4,873 >99.9% of uses Qualifier 2 <0.1% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Type “court decision (Q327000), legal case (Q2334719)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “court decision (Q327000), legal case (Q2334719)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5826#Type Q327000, Q2334719, SPARQL

This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Concurring opinion by / dissenting opinion by / plurality opinion by

Hi. I came across this property, and was wondering if it would also make sense to create companion properties for dissents, concurrences, and plurality opinions? Currently, they are modeled with has part(s) (P527) dissenting opinion (Q1092720)/concurring opinion (Q1087840)/plurality opinion (Q7205548) author (P50), but if this property exists so should they. However, I'm not sure if it would be better to keep having this and add those, or delete this - to me it seems unneeded. Before I do one or the other, I wanted to get the thoughts of the people who discussed the creation of this property. Thoughts? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Pings: @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Esbranson, ArthurPSmith, NMaia, Pintoch, Jura1: --DannyS712 (talk) 03:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)