|Type “court decision (Q327000)”: element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “court decision (Q327000)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)|
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5826#type Q327000, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Concurring opinion by / dissenting opinion by / plurality opinion byEdit
Hi. I came across this property, and was wondering if it would also make sense to create companion properties for dissents, concurrences, and plurality opinions? Currently, they are modeled with has part (P527) dissenting opinion (Q1092720)/concurring opinion (Q1087840)/plurality opinion (Q7205548) author (P50), but if this property exists so should they. However, I'm not sure if it would be better to keep having this and add those, or delete this - to me it seems unneeded. Before I do one or the other, I wanted to get the thoughts of the people who discussed the creation of this property. Thoughts? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)