Open main menu

Property talk:P598

Active discussions

This property is being considered for deletion. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this property's entry on the Properties for deletion page.


Documentation

commander of
for persons who are notable as commanding officers, the units they commanded
  Type “person (Q215627), fictional character (Q95074): element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “person (Q215627), fictional character (Q95074)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P598#type Q215627, Q95074, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
  Item “sex or gender (P21): Items with this property should also have “sex or gender (P21)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P598#Item P21, search, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
  Item “occupation (P106): Items with this property should also have “occupation (P106)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P598#Item P106, search, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)


Reverse meaning for the propertyEdit

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2:: If you want to use the property for both directions (unit → leader as well as the original leader → unit), you need to change the whole property definition, not just the description. Currently, the property requires the item where it is used to be a person (also, it requires the item defines the sex/gender and date and place of birth of the person), and the value of the property to be a military unit or a vehicle (erm). It simply does not allow the property to be used in the opposite direction. Also, the original request stated the meaning of the property quite clearly. I don’t think it is a good idea to combine two meanings in a single property and a new inverse property should be created instead; but in either way, as I said, it is not just a matter of changing the property description (or title). --Mormegil (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Note the reverse property already exists: commanded by (P4791) -- Mormegil (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Return to "P598" page.