Property talk:P689
Documentation
type of organism which a condition or disease afflicts (for an organ affected by a condition, use P927)
Description | a type of organism which a condition or disease afflicts. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data type | Item | |||||||||
Domain | According to this template:
physiological condition (Q7189713) : any disease or medical condition
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementsphysiological condition (Q7189713), taxon (Q16521) or pathogen (Q170065) | |||||||||
Allowed values | taxon (Q16521) (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | |||||||||
Example | infectious coryza (Q5788570) → Galliformes (Q21659) gout (Q133087) → human (Q5) | |||||||||
Source | External reference, Wikipedia list article (either infobox or source) (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896)) | |||||||||
Lists |
| |||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | |||||||||
Current uses |
| |||||||||
Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P689#Type Q7189713, Q16521, Q170065, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P689#Value type Q16521, SPARQL
(Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?itemDescription ?value { ?item wdt:P689 ?value. FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item p:P31 [] } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item p:P279 [] } }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P689#Without P31 and P279 :/
Type edit
The constraint I've added is not exact - as some parasites can also afflict other organisms. What we can do to refine this constraint? Infovarius (talk) 06:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- I think it would make sense to have and independet property for the organism that is affected. I already proposed that, but at that time there was no support. Maybe we have to wait until more data is available and we can see how to further structure it. A similar situation with enough data is at cause of death Property talk:P509. --Tobias1984 (talk) 06:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
I think it would be useful to have some constraints on what the value for this property can be. To this effect I added some broad constraints (which was reverted because someone claimed it is vandalism). I think some good constraints for values of this property would be subset of these:
- biological structure (Q55568967)
- biological system (Q30336093)
- taxon (Q16521)
- group of living things (Q16334298)
- biological component (Q28845870)
- species (Q7432)
- organism (Q7239)
Any input would be appreciated - I really would like to have some constraints as it seems leaving this completely open ended is not ideal and constraints will also help guide people to using it properly. I think rather broad constraints which may be wrong is better than no constraints which is definitely wrong.
Clarification regarding purpose edit
The description is currently "type of organism which a condition or disease afflicts" but there is also an example where the value of this property is an organ (i.e. liver cirrhosis (Q147778) afflicts (P689) liver (Q9368)) - can we change the description to include "part of organism" (e.g. "type of or part of organism which a condition or disease afflicts")? I tried to do this but it was reverted as someone saw it as vandalism.
More examples where afflicts is not an organism but a part of an organism:
Expand object type constraint beyond physical entities edit
Would it be appopriate to expand the scope of objects for this property to include systems or capabilities? eg.:
Range of the property edit
Hi. In the property examples, I removed the one about liver cirrhosis (Q147778). When looking at this element, the property used to indicate the organ affected is anatomical location (P927). I suggest that the above proposition by @Daask is also handle by anatomical location (P927), this way, afflicts (P689)’s range can be restricted to affected species. Lepticed7 (talk) 18:37, 8 March 2024 (UTC)