Property talk:P790
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Malore in topic Inconsistency between documentation description and constraint
Documentation
approved by
item is approved by other item(s) [qualifier: statement is approved by other item(s)]
item is approved by other item(s) [qualifier: statement is approved by other item(s)]
Description | items that are approved by other item(s), or, if used as a qualifier, statement approved by other item(s) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Represents | guideline (Q1630279) | ||||||||||||
Data type | Item | ||||||||||||
Domain | Any item or statement type (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | ||||||||||||
Allowed values | person or organisation (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | ||||||||||||
Example | GNU General Public License (Q7603) → Open Source Initiative (Q845918) Boost Software License (Q2353141) → Free Software Foundation (Q48413) | ||||||||||||
Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P790 (Q117011753) | ||||||||||||
See also | statement disputed by (P1310), standards body (P1462), authority (P797), author (P50), publisher (P123) | ||||||||||||
Lists | |||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
Search for values |
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Value type “group of humans (Q16334295), human (Q5), position (Q4164871), referendum (Q43109), administrative territorial entity (Q56061), meeting (Q2761147), international environmental agreement (Q1646218), legal act (Q740464), government agency (Q327333), approval process (Q108899558)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value group of humans (Q16334295), human (Q5), position (Q4164871), referendum (Q43109), administrative territorial entity (Q56061), meeting (Q2761147), international environmental agreement (Q1646218), legal act (Q740464), government agency (Q327333), approval process (Q108899558) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P790#Value type Q16334295, Q5, Q4164871, Q43109, Q56061, Q2761147, Q1646218, Q740464, Q327333, Q108899558, SPARQL
Scope is as qualifier (Q54828449), as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P790#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P790#Entity types
Approved as what? edit
How about:
Because Free Software Foundation uses Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives (Q6999319) for many of its articles, so it does approve that license, too? --AVRS (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- Also, for editors' clarity about the meaning, could it be said that the statement is "approved by" (agreed with by)? --AVRS (talk) 10:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Inconsistency between documentation description and constraint edit
The description says that it can be used as qualifier, the constraint says that it must be used as qualifier. Who is right?--Malore (talk) 21:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)