Property talk:P892

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Iwan.Aucamp in topic Can we rename "RfC ID" to "IETF RFC ID"

Documentation

RfC ID
identifier for an item in Request for Comments, a publication of IETF and the Internet Society (without "RFC" prefix)
DescriptionA w:Request for Comments (RFC) is a publication of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and the Internet Society, the principal technical development and standards-setting bodies for the Internet.
RepresentsRequest for Comments (Q212971)
Associated itemRFC Editor (Q2124152)
Data typeExternal identifier
DomainRequest for Comments (Q212971)
Allowed values[1-9]\d*
ExampleRFC 825: Request for comments on Requests For Comments (Q47164254)825
RFC 768: User Datagram Protocol (Q3415160)768
Formatter URLhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc$1
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc$1/doc.json
Formatter URNurn:ietf:rfc:$1List of Uniform Resource Names (URN)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total9,602
Main statement9,36597.5% of uses
Qualifier2<0.1% of uses
Reference2352.4% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P892#Single value, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P892#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Format “[1-9]\d*a?: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P892#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Type “Request for Comments (Q212971): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “Request for Comments (Q212971)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P892#Type Q212971, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P892#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P892#Scope, SPARQL

constraint “range constraint (Q21510860)” declaration error: “required qualifier “minimum date (property constraint) (P2310)” is missing”.

 

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Little copyedit edit

I edited this to match better with Request for Comments (Q212971). --Rezonansowy (talk) 14:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


Can we rename "RfC ID" to "IETF RFC ID" edit

RFC is somewhat ambiguous, IETF RFC is what this specifically covers. Iwan.Aucamp (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P892" page.