Wikidata

(Q28207563)

English

A critique of claims from Reynolds, Nicolson & Hambly (2003) that DDAT is an effective treatment for children with reading difficulties--'lies, damned lies and (inappropriate) statistics'?

scientific article (publication date: May 2003)

In more languages

Statements

title
A critique of claims from Reynolds, Nicolson & Hambly (2003) that DDAT is an effective treatment for children with reading difficulties--'lies, damned lies and (inappropriate) statistics'? (English)
0 references
main subject
statistics
0 references
author
Charles Hulme
series ordinal
2
object named as
Charles Hulme
0 references
Margaret J. Snowling
series ordinal
1
object named as
Margaret J Snowling
0 references
publication date
May 2003
0 references
published in
Dyslexia
0 references
volume
9
0 references
page(s)
127-33; discussion 134-5
0 references
issue
2
0 references

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/DYS.245
0 references
PubMed ID
12775086
0 references
 
edit
    edit
      edit
        edit
          edit
            edit
              edit
                edit
                  edit
                    Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q28207563&oldid=1446801882"