(Q41657824)

6 October 2017

title

How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems (English)

1 reference

6 October 2017

1 reference

Hodgson C

1

1 reference

6 October 2017

publication date

1 November 1997

1 reference

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

6 October 2017

published in

1 reference

6 October 2017

volume

50

1 reference

6 October 2017

issue

11

1 reference

6 October 2017

page(s)

1189-1195

1 reference

Does good peer review assure good epidemiology?

6 October 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900167-4

7 January 2021

Prescriptions for medical research II--Is medical research well served by peer review?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900167-4

7 January 2021

Malice's wonderland: research funding and peer review

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900167-4

7 January 2021

Chance and Consensus in Peer Review

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900167-4

7 January 2021

The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900167-4

7 January 2021

Chance, concurrence, and clustering. Analysis of reviewers' recommendations on 1,000 submissions to the Journal of Clinical Investigation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900167-4

7 January 2021

Agreement among reviewers of review articles

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900167-4

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00167-4

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

6 October 2017

1 reference