(Q51474602)

5 April 2018

title

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results. (English)

1 reference

5 April 2018

author name string

J W Leighton

series ordinal

1

1 reference

5 April 2018

K Valverde

series ordinal

2

1 reference

5 April 2018

B A Bernhardt

series ordinal

3

1 reference

5 April 2018

publication date

30 June 2011

1 reference

5 April 2018

published in

Public Health Genomics

1 reference

5 April 2018

volume

15

1 reference

5 April 2018

issue

1

1 reference

5 April 2018

page(s)

11-21

1 reference

5 April 2018

The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues

cites work

1 reference

An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons

21 January 2018

1 reference

Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests

21 January 2018

1 reference

Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease

21 January 2018

1 reference

Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci

21 January 2018

1 reference

A comprehensive review of genetic association studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market

21 January 2018

1 reference

Association between a literature-based genetic risk score and cardiovascular events in women

21 January 2018

1 reference

Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice

21 January 2018

1 reference

Assessing perceptions of cancer risk: does mode of assessment or numeracy matter?

21 January 2018

1 reference

General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples

21 January 2018

1 reference

Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers

21 January 2018

1 reference

Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations

21 January 2018

1 reference

Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions

21 January 2018

1 reference

Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study

21 January 2018

1 reference

Evaluating online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests: informed choices or buyers beware?

21 January 2018

1 reference

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1159/000327159

1 reference

5 April 2018

1 reference

5 April 2018