Talk:Q11056689

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Popolon

Autodescription — Kongpo Gyamda (Q11056689)

description: no description
Useful links:
Generic queries for administrative territorial entities

This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.

🌎 Geography 🌎

👥 People 👥

🎭 Arts and fictions 🎭


See also


See Talk:Q844514. zh:工布江达镇, corresponding to the town of Kongpo, is different from en:Kongpo, referring to a region. The recent changes by Popolon should be reversed. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

工布江达镇 is a kind of region in chinese (and more generally asian subdivisions yes, but when I look at french/english/chinese version, everything match, where do you think there is a difference ?Popolon (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
A city is not a region. zh:工布江达镇 refer to a city, with a precise coordinate location, whereas a region has no such precise location. In addition, en:Kongpo refer to an ancient region, which is part of today Gongbo'gyamda County. In conclusion, we have 2 different items. (I have created fr:Kongpo Gyamda that cooresponds to zh:工布江达镇, but differs from fr:Kongpo)--Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 10:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
You are totally wrong, a city in most east-Asian countries (Siberian Russia areas, Mongolia, China, Japan, Korea...) are a region that go far away from the main urban area of the region, in most case you have sub-cities, sub-districts, etc... you can look at every cities of this countries and their map on en:OpenStreetMap if you need to learn how is East-Asian geography administration. The fact that this was didn't started yesterday does not mean that this is not the same. The fact is that the name didn't change and nor the location. Both your "different" cities/region are in the same district?. Please don't try to disorganize Wikipedia one more time.Popolon (talk) 10:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Q11056689" page.