Talk:Q18580661
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Succu
Autodescription — Aderusincertae (Q18580661)
description: error, deriving from the database kept by Hallan (a pencilled-in entry)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Aderusincertae” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
(copied from Wikidata:Requests for deletions)
Aderusincertae (Q18580661): error, deriving from the database kept by Hallan (a pencilled-in entry): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)
This genus doesn't exist. All the species under this name are wrong. It is Aderus incertae, which means that taxonomists doubt to include them in that genus. Solution is to erase the incertae part of all the names. We are working to fix this in es:. Erfil (talk) 13:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Isn't this item still in use? -- BeneBot* (talk) 14:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- This object is empty. No articles existence. --Fiver, der Hellseher (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hellseher, see the third link in the line under the section header of this request: This item is linked to from many items, but maybe only articles in es-wikipedia and bot-created articles in other languages are linked to from that items. Maybe Erfil will do it the right way. Maybe @Succu: will say anything to this? --Diwas (talk) 23:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Erfil is right. Thats not a generic name. But we have to fix this issue at wikidata as well. --09:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- What should be done with the dozens of items using this one: Special:WhatLinksHere/Q18580661? - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 10:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- I found the source of these errors (search for "Aderusincertae"). So I think we can handle it. --Succu (talk) 11:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Erfil, Lymantria: Simply moving Aderusincertae xxx to Aderus xxx can create non existing names (eg. Aderus tetrastictus). There are around 20 cases left. --Succu (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Is there a better alternative than simply letting them be Aderus xxx for the time being, as there original genus was synonymized with Aderus? Aderusincertae was nonsense. I found one ambiguity: Aderus spinipes Pic, 1916 and Aderus spinipes Lea, 1916. Lymantria (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- My idea was to use the original combination. But unfortunately Hylophilus Berthold, 1827 and Xylophilus Curtis, 1830 are not available (later homonyms). --Succu (talk) 18:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- So we'll have to wait until someone writes a review of thit genus / these genera. Meanwhile?? Lymantria (talk) 09:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete them on nlwiki and eswiki. And of course viwiki (@Cheers!:) --Succu (talk) 10:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- That seems the only reasonable way indeed. Vi-wiki entries may be deleted as well... Lymantria (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- If it is wrong, please delete all, also in vi.wiki--Cheers! (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Cheers!, you or another admin at viwiki has to do this. --Succu (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- If it is wrong, please delete all, also in vi.wiki--Cheers! (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- So we'll have to wait until someone writes a review of thit genus / these genera. Meanwhile?? Lymantria (talk) 09:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- My idea was to use the original combination. But unfortunately Hylophilus Berthold, 1827 and Xylophilus Curtis, 1830 are not available (later homonyms). --Succu (talk) 18:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Is there a better alternative than simply letting them be Aderus xxx for the time being, as there original genus was synonymized with Aderus? Aderusincertae was nonsense. I found one ambiguity: Aderus spinipes Pic, 1916 and Aderus spinipes Lea, 1916. Lymantria (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- What should be done with the dozens of items using this one: Special:WhatLinksHere/Q18580661? - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 10:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Erfil is right. Thats not a generic name. But we have to fix this issue at wikidata as well. --09:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hellseher, see the third link in the line under the section header of this request: This item is linked to from many items, but maybe only articles in es-wikipedia and bot-created articles in other languages are linked to from that items. Maybe Erfil will do it the right way. Maybe @Succu: will say anything to this? --Diwas (talk) 23:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
(end of copy)