Talk:Q53869507
Latest comment: 1 year ago by BlaueBlüte in topic Proposal to change English label to stress ‘usage’
Autodescription — property scope constraint (Q53869507)
description: constraint to define the scope of the property (as main property, as qualifier, as reference, or combination). Qualify with "property scope" (P5314)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “property scope constraint” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
property scope constraint
⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
Scope as in what? edit
What does this item do with constraints? Where is it documented? — regards, Revi 12:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- I had no time to create full documentation. It is positive replacement for used as reference constraint (Q21528959), used as qualifier constraint (Q21510863), used for values only constraint (Q21528958). — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Documentation is created. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 21:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- For the record: Help:Property constraints portal/Scope. — regards, Revi 11:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Proposal to change English label to stress ‘usage’ edit
I always stumble over the term ‘scope’ here. To me that sounds like it’s about the domain, i.e., what items are allowed as subjects in statements with this property. Both the French and the German label refer more clearly to ‘usage’ (
application
and
Anwendung
, respectively). Can we change the English label to something like “property usage”? That would also sound less clunky when taken together with the allowed values, ex.: “property usage as qualifier” instead of “property scope as qualifier”. ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 06:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- See parallel proposal to relabel property scope (P5314). ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 06:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)