Just curious: what Twitter feature do you use to ascertain this, i.e. where is it stated at Twitter?
Topic on User talk:Hjfocs
Can you stop the bot until this is clarified?
As it seems to keep running unattended, I asked for a block at Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Please_block_Soweego_bot
The bot account is now blocked; once the bot operator Hjfocs addresses the concerns raised in this topic, it can be unblocked again.
Hi @Jura1, @MisterSynergy. I just came back from vacation, sorry for the delay!
@Jura1: we are not using a specific Twitter feature. It's rather the SocialLink system that generates the links between Wikidata and Twitter. Do you think it would be better to replace Twitter with SocialLink in the reference node?
Just let me know. Cheers!
Not sure what exactly "SocialLink" is, and how it generates the links. "stated in: Twitter" is not appropriate in this case, and I ask you to update the references you have created to something suitable. If you can describe a little more in detail how this "SocialLink" thing works, I would try to make a suggestion how the reference could look like.
In a nutshell, SocialLink is a machine-learning system that aligns a given knowledge base to Twitter. It's the system itself to state that a given Wikidata item has a given Twitter identifier. Posting here a couple of references, FYI:
- see section 4.4.4 of http://remper.ru/thesis/v1.4/All.pdf;
- code at https://github.com/Remper/sociallink/tree/devel.
The bot account is now unblocked. I do not see an issue with editing outside of the approved tasks, thus you need to fix the reference nodes only; start with updating existing references, please, before you import further data. As indicated in the previous comment, I am open to give advice here in this topic.
I suppose we could live without them having a reference .. I'd rather not see an inaccurate one though.
@MisterSynergy, Jura1: before updating existing references, I'd like to confirm whether I should remove the stated in (P248) node, or I should replace Twitter (Q918) with SocialLink. Personally, I would go for the latter solution, which would entail the creation of an item for SocialLink. What do you think?
Well, stated-in does not really fit either, and the reference shouldn't be just an advertisement for that software. I have to think about alternatives for AI-inferred data... Sounds like a topic for the Project chat somehow for more input.
Sounds good, I'll post in the project chat. I'm not meaning to advertise anything, just want to focus on finding the most eloquent (read best) reference.
I don't know the details for your reference, but based on heuristic (P887) might have been made for that.
BTW, we also thought that it would be optimal to add the confidence score output by the AI somehow. See https://github.com/Wikidata/soweego/issues/220
I thought of P887 as well, but somehow it seems tempting for me to consider a completely new format on Help:Sources for AI inferred data; maybe with new reference properties as well. That would need project wide discussion.
P887 with whatever process is used seems the simplest solution.
In any case, "stated in" Twitter should be removed.