68.100.160.250

Religion items

Hi. I saw that you tried to clean up some things in the wide field of religion, where some items really seemed to mix up some things. It's great that you want to help, but it looks like some of your edits created some additional mess. I totally understand that, as re-ordering sitelinks often causes a rat-tail of other necessary fixes to follow. However, before you start moving sitelinks around in a heavy manner, please consider to discuss the issue first at Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts. Because if you're wrong with your assumptions, cleaning up after your cleanup might be an even bigger task than your cleanup itself was. See Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#vandalism? for this special case (don't be frightened by the title, though). Thanks for your work anyway. --YMS (talk) 09:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

I have to second this. Thanks for willing to help, but labels and aliases are not meant to serve as explanations, like you just did. If you want to explain why some links belong to different items, you can use the item's talk page to write down such information. Labels and descriptions are meant to be written on a dictionary fashion. Cheers. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 05:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey. I have seen that you (again) modified the labels of the items I fixed yesterday. Labels and descriptions must follow a dictionary-like formula. The description works as a disambiguator, not the label. So, please stop changing the labels, since there is no need to overdisambiguate these items. Consider this a warning. And, as a side not, it would be good if you, at last, discuss or answer our comments at your talk page (or mine whatsoever). — ΛΧΣ²¹ 02:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

In case you are not aware, there is a thread about you at the Administrators' noticeboard. Please refrain from making further edits and discuss your changes there. Otherwise, if you keep editing without discussing, I will be forced to block you from editing until we solve this. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 02:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for answering. I am not completely sure that your changes are correct (take a look at the thread above, and by the way the trwiki article "Simena" is not related to Kaleköy, but to a remant close to it) but I think you must first discuss given that your actions have alarmed some editors. I understand that you want to make labels as clear as possible, but labels and descriptions must follow the standards of Wikidata. Adding a comprehensive description is enough to solve the issue, I think, and it has worked in the past with a lot of conflictive items. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 04:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Bene*. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. Feel free to use the sandbox for test edits. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Bene* ^t_a^l_k 12:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Last warning

Hi, please do not undo actions that our experienced users have already reverted, but please first read our guidelines and policies. You can find an overview of them at Wikidata:Community portal. If you also make edit wars in future, I will have to block you from editing. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 12:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)