On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2019.

Crime: instance of vs. subclass ofEdit

Why can't it be both? --EthanRobertLee (talk) 01:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Even on Help:Basic membership properties it says that there's nothing that keeps an item from being both an instance of and subclass of. Additionally, why do you believe it's a subclass and not an instance of?

Because the definition of a crime varies from country to country? Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 01:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
An example to illustrate instance/subclass: assassination of John F. Kennedy (Q193484) is an instance of murder (Q132821), so murder must be a subclass of something else. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 01:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
I see where you're coming from, but couldn't assassination of John F. Kennedy (Q193484) be an instance of murder (Q132821), which is an instance of crime (Q83267)? I can understand why your thinking is a useful way to link the data, which is why I didn't delete the existing subclass: crime statements. I think that as someone who's interested in criminology you're looking at it from one angle, which is murder as an act, and I, as a prosecutor, am looking at murder as a statutory law. They're the same thing, which is why they shouldn't probably be broken into two items, but there shouldn't just be one way of looking at this concept. --EthanRobertLee (talk) 02:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

WD:L vis-a-vis AllahEdit

Hey, I saw your revert and checked WD:L. Firstly, it is an informational page and not a policy or guideline so you cannot enforce it at will. Secondly, it discusses the label when it proposes only to capitalize proper nouns not the description but here you are changing the description and uncapitalizing the first letter in description. I think it is preferable to capitalize the first letter of the description. English language rule, the sentence starts with a capital letter and description is a form of a sentence. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant WD:D. Your edits were not according to Wikidata guidelines. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 17:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

User talk:Andreasmperu/2019/2018Edit

Maybe better to use a bot than to move everything. Multichill (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Not very active atm (on my mobile right now), and won’t be for a bit. Why don’t you go ahead and offer such wonderful service to the entire community? Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 02:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Q170217 and Q15863Edit

Hi, You changed the French label for Q170217 and Q15863 arguing that « Lower case according to WD:L », but Tchèques or Slovènes are proper names and the must always be written with a capital. The labels in other languages are for instance Češi / Čechové, Tschechen, Czechs, Česi, Czesi, Česi, Чехи, Tjekker, Ĉeĥoj, Cechi, etc. « tchèque » (čeština, etc.) means czech language Q9056. Alain Schneider (talk) 18:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed reply. I see that you have already fixed my errors. Thank you for that! Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 18:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Commons as category orientatedEdit

Commons is totally category-based. To implement your logic then these are also mistakes??:

--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


Hey! Why did you remove the edit that Eminem is left-handed? In many videos and commercials, Em writes with his left hand. 05:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


Hi. I merge the wp:fr article fr:Roi de Danemark with fr:Monarchie danoise. You can see the discussion on fr:Discussion:Monarchie_danoise. I delete the redirection on wikidata, because it's a part of the merge process, for me. And if wikidata allow the use of redirection, it's not a obligation. I don't think it forbid to suppress redirection after I merge the articles. And for wp:fr, the use of redirection in wikidata, which create interwiki between redirection isn't common. Nouill (talk) 10:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Splitting Wikipedia links between two related Wikidata itemsEdit

Hi Andreasmperu,

I've noticed that you split Wikipedia links between election campaign (Q11642595) and political campaign (Q847301), though they were linked before Wikidata was created.
Same thing on dating (Q654810) and date (Q16302720).

Wikidata is more precise than Wikipedia about subjects, so there will always be more Wikidata items than Wikipedia articles. The initial only purpose of Wikidata was to centralise interlanguage links. Splitting them between related Wikidata articles goes against that purpose. One way to know if Wikipedia articles are related is to check the redirects. For example, en:Election campaign redirects to en:Political campaign. Same thing for fr:Dating and fr:Rendez-vous galant.
Some Wikipedias will sometimes have articles for both subjects, that's not a problem. Just keep the most Wikipedia articles linked together on the broader subject item. The RedBurn (ϕ) 11:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

autonomism (Q127393)Edit

You have reverted my editions regarding autonomism (Q127393). Therefore you should check this:

1. Political movement

a) The item at issue belongs to en:Autonomism. There is stated: "Autonomism, also known as autonomist Marxism or autonomous Marxism, is a set of anti-authoritarian left-wing political and social movements and theories. As a theoretical system, it first emerged in Italy in the 1960s from workerist (operaismo) communism."

b) The Spanish and French labels are "movimiento autónomo" and "mouvement autonome".

c) Therefore it was correct, that I added the statement: instance of (P31) political movement (Q2738074) - and it was as well correct, that I added the German alias "autonome Bewegung".

2. Gran-Enciclopedia-Aragonesa-ID: Autonomismo [aragonés]

a) As already quoted, the object of the item at issue is "Autonomism, also known as autonomist Marxism or autonomous Marxism".

Contrary, Great Aragonese Encyclopedia ID (P1807) 1608 - http://www.enciclopedia-aragonesa.com/voz.asp?voz_id=1608 - deals with aragonese autonomism (i.e.: regionalism):

"El 1.º de Mayo de 1972 aparece el Manifiesto para Aragón del PCE, que viene a captar las reivindicaciones de un naciente autonomismo aragonés que no limita sus objetivos a una autonomía política y a los aspectos tradicionales folclóricos, sino que llega más allá, a una «descentralización económica», a la lucha contra el trasvase, a un mejor reparto de la tierra. Poco a poco se va configurando un autonomismo aragonés de rasgos propios, que vienen a enlazar con las reivindicaciones del Frente Popular en Caspe (1936) y con el Consejo de Aragón de la guerra civil, a la par que con el costismo. [...]"
• Bibliog.:
Cazcarra, Vicente: Aragón: el regionalismo de los comunistas; Guara Editorial, Zaragoza.
Royo Villanova, Carlos: El Regionalismo Aragonés; Guara Editorial.
Sainz de Varanda, Ramón: «Constitución y regiones»; en núm. 128 de Andalán, 26-VIII/2-IX de 1977. Seminario de Estudios Aragoneses: Este problema llamado Aragón; Libros Pórtico, Zaragoza, 1976."

All this has nothing to do with "Autonomism" in the tradition of "operaismo" (Q1109552), rather it is similar to regionalism in other Spanish regions. (And, of course, the Spanish [and as well aragonse] PCE was close to the PCI [and not autonomist Marxism / operaism].)

b) Therefore is was correct, that I deleted the identifier Great Aragonese Encyclopedia ID (P1807) 1608.

3. GND: "autonome Gruppe"

a) As well I deleted the identifier GND ID (P227) 4365111-2 - http://d-nb.info/gnd/4365111-2 -. The "Sachbegriff" (concept) there is: "Autonome Gruppe". It's a simliar object (because there is stated as well: "Oberbegriffe[:] Politische Gruppe[,] Neue Linke[,] Neue soziale Bewegung").

Nevertheless, there is a difference between a certain (specific) "autonome Gruppe" (or several specific "autonome Gruppe[n]") and the entire autonomist movement. The difference between a group and an ideology is even greater.

b) Therefore is was correct, that I


  • created a new item "Autonome Gruppe (Q96146266)", conected the new item with GND ID (P227) 4365111-2

and added the new statements: "movimiento autónomo" and "mouvement autonome"


4. Not all deAutonome are Marxists (maybe even the mayority is not!)

As well it was correct, that I deprecated the statement subclass of (P279) libertarian Marxism (Q3052803) and stated instead subclass of (P279) radical left (Q15141601). As quoted, the identifier Freebase ID (P646) states: "Als Autonome oder autonome Gruppen werden heute Mitglieder bestimmter linksradikaler unorthodox-marxistischer beziehungsweise anarchistischer Bewegungen bezeichnet. Autonome Gruppen sind in Bezugsgruppen organisiert. Untereinander bestehen lose Verbindungen und Netzwerke. Die Autonomen streben danach, auch unabhängig von der bestehenden Gesellschaftsordnung, selbstbestimmte Freiräume zu schaffen. Im Allgemeinen verfolgen sie antiautoritäre, sozialrevolutionäre und dem Anarchismus nahestehende Ideale. Von den Staatsschutz-Behörden Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz wird die autonome Bewegung als linksextrem eingestuft."

5. Theory and movement - to be distinguished?

There is only one point seriously to be discussed: Maybe we (at Wikidata) would have to distinguish between:

  • en-WP: "autonomist Marxism or autonomous Marxism" (= operaism <Q1109552>) (= a Marxist "ideology" or social science theory) on the one hand


  • esmovimiento autónomo, frmouvement autonome and deautonome Bewegung / de:Autonome: "unorthodox-marxistischer beziehungsweise anarchistischer Bewegungen".

Best regards,

--Nstrc (talk) 21:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

User Research - Looking for volunteersEdit

Hello Ansdreasmperu,

For a current research project we are looking for active community members in Wikipedia, Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons who are interested in filling out a survey and participating in an interview. The aim of the research is to identify opportunities for participation and access for new volunteers in the Wikimedia projects. For this purpose we would like to learn from the experiences of the already active community members and find out success factors for participation in the projects. Participation includes filling out a preliminary survey, a self-study and an interview.

If you are interested in participating, simply fill out this survey. The participants in the interviews will be selected on the basis of the answers in order to be able to consider as many different perspectives as possible.

All selected interview partners will receive a book or photo voucher of 25 euros as a thank you.

Feel free to forward this call to other people you think might share interesting experiences about Commons. If you have any questions you can of course contact me or check the project page :) On the Project Page you can also find more information.

Regards --Merle von Wittich (WMDE) (talk) 09:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

aviso sobre un posible caso de autopromocionEdit

hay un usuario bastante molesto que quiere,por narices tener su propia pagina,el lugar de estudios,el dia de nacimiento,el canal de youtube y que no permitira a nadie borrarla, adjunto enlace como prueba felaciente https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q89277289&action=history-- 00:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)


I see that the item of Eren Göksu has been deleted. I have seen no discussion about this deletion request. Have I been pinged somehow? Indeed I have several long watchlists on WMF projects and could have missed any notification. All the same I would like to know when this deletion discussion was opened, by whom and how it developed. Can you indicate me? Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 01:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Sure, all deletion requests are listed on WD:RFD. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 03:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
So you delete items with a cat on Commons upon an anonymous request and not caring to ask a humble contributor who has developed the item. Every passing day my belief in WPs, Commons and now WD is lessening due to these attitudes. --E4024 (talk) 04:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Should I assume that E4024 is your real name then? We are mostly anonymous contributors here, and each contribution is equally taken into account. Maybe you could take the time to ask for advice, instead of blaming other people. The notability policy of Wikidata (WD:N) states that "Category items with a sitelink only to Wikimedia Commons are not permitted, unless either a) there is a corresponding main item which has a sitelink to a Commons gallery or b) the item is used in a Commons-related statement". I have taken the time to answer to you, could I expect you to read the project policies? Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 05:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Reverted edits in Q1439502Edit

Hi, I noticed you reverted my recent edits in Q1439502 and I was wondering, why? I am afraid I am rather new to Wikidata, and I don't see what was wrong with the edits. What I was trying to do was replace the genre 'portrait painting' with the genre 'portrait' considering as the artwork in question is not a painting and that seems to be an integral part of 'portrait painting'. Did I do something wrong? thanks

You were right, so I have changed the statement to portrait sculpture (Q28777669). It's always a good idea to add the reference to the item like I'm doing in this message, and to sign the message at the end. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 18:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Danielsummerstay (talk) 18:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


Hi !

You reverted several of my edits that were there to fix double pages linked in Wikipedia. For instance : w:Minister of Information (France) that is the new page for w:List of Information Ministers of France. Your reverts are problematic because they now point to non-used redirect pages on the english wikipedia. Could we work this out ?

Best regards, CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 21:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)|

Redirects are allowed in Wikidata. Also, Wikidata is not just about enwiki. Please don't mix interwikis that belong to a Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) with normal pages. Just check the statements before changing sitelinks. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 22:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
That still doesn't solve the problem that the pages you reverted point to basically nowhere now. The list and the normal pages are the same, but apparently you don't want to here that. Thanks for the "help" and the "courtesy". I'm out of here. CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Reverted Gregorian Date.Edit

Hello Andreas, why did you revert my edit on a date in year 634 concerning the used calendar model? There was no Gregorian Calendar in year 634 and theses days the Julian Calendar was used. --Looperz (talk) 07:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

And that's why there is a qualifier explaining the issue, which should remain in place. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 15:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

block user TurkmenistanEdit

it does not stop interfering in the article Samuel Doe to your liking, urges to stop your feet-- 15:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


Hi. Could you tell me why did you reverted these two edits of mine: #1 and #2. These weren't vandalisms. The first one eliminated duplicate parameters – didn't you see that? Thats true, I cut off many multi-language entities a few days ago, but I couldn't give them back – why? I don’know why I have no possibility to add label or description for another languages except these of Polish, English and German. Is there a chance to fix it? The second edit above – you see, I don’t have to justify myself. Could you answer me? Best regards. --Pit rock (talk) 15:44, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately, you have created quite a mess in that item. I'm glad that you tried to fix, but it would be better to stop for a second when doing so many edits in one single item. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 15:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Are there any solutions to give me a chance to fix such "mess" on my own in the future? That wasn't another simple edit as you saw? I just merged two items (too fast – that's true), but in all this excitement, I lost track myself. As I remember I couldn't undo my weak changes… Where I should write, to who if I would (I think it won't happen agian) make similar unfortunate edits another time? --Pit rock (talk) 16:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Sure, the easiest fix when it's just to hard to track past edits, it's to go to the history page. Once there, look for the earliest edit you had made. Then, you click on restore the previous edit to that one (in this case it would be this edit by Mkbergman), and everything will be back to the beginning. That "restore button" can really be a life-saver, so hope it helps in the future. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 16:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, true. In that turmoil and chaotic tension by me I couldn't find this passage back ("restore button"). Thank you. Wish you a good health during this dreadful pandemic ;-) --Pit rock (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Deleted itemEdit

Hello, two items link to Q60577599 (they are members of this organization) and there are many news articles on this organization. Please, can you revert the deletion? --Davidpar (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

  Done Please add references to the item or it could get deleted again. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 16:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Deleted itemEdit

Buenos días: No entiendo por que se han borrado los items que yo había dado de alta, cuando eran items reales que aportaban información a wikidata. Al realizar el borrado se empobrece la base de datos. En ningún momento he introducido ningún dato falso o erróneo.--Freycris1969 (talk) 06:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

¿Se ha tomado la molestia de revisar las políticas que señalé en su página de discusión? Parece que no. El desastre que ha hecho al crear infinidad de artículos sin relevancia va a demandar mucho tiempo de otros editores. Estaré observando sus contribuciones, pues su cuenta parece ser de propósito particular: ignorar las políticas de este proyecto, dañándolo en el proceso solo para satisfacer su propia agenda. Si veo que continúa en ese accionar, procederé a un bloqueo indefinido de la cuenta. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 23:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

He revisado las políticas que cortesmente me ha indicado y es ese el motivo por el que no acabo de comprender por qué no son correctas las ediciones que ha procedido a borrar. Mi motivación tan sólo es ampliar el datalle de la información facilitada en wikidata y completar en la medida de mis posibilidades la información que aparece, siempre de manera fiable. Por ejemplo, no comprendo por que puede seguir manteniendo Q60577599 Colegio de veterinarios de Gerona y por contra se han borrado el resto de colegios veterinarios provinciales que había dado de alta. No obstante, descuide, no volveré a hacerlo. Muchas gracias por sus explicaciones.--Freycris1969 (talk) 06:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Revert on itemEdit

Hi, You reverted me here, can you explain what was it for? I was only removing an error giving reference which had been incorrectly added as a journal (was a website with no known credibility) and there were already good database references in the statements so there was no need for that particular website in there anyway. Please look into this and remove that problematic reference from the statements, thanks. Gotitbro (talk) 07:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Balts and the BalticsEdit

Why did you revert my changes to Balts (Q207761), Baltistics (Q463604), Baltics (Q805727), Latvians (Q49540)? As already explained in edit summaries, these were all corrections to obvious errors. See respective articles on Wikipedia: en:Baltic states, en:Balts, en:Baltistics. The Balts (ethnic groups) does not include Estonians, while the Baltics (countries) includes Estonia. Baltistics studies the Balts and Baltic languages, not the Baltics. Also, as explained in edit summary for Q49540, P131 and P17 were mixed up, and description change did not match the content. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:D45E:EB7B:AC1C:6A0A 08:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Coordenadas en subdivisiones administrativasEdit

Hola Andreasmperu, espero que te encuentres bien. Deseo consultarte sobre si los valores de las coordenadas para departamentos/provincias/distritos deberían de tener el centro administrativo (capital) o cualquier valor. Lo pregunto en parte porque me encontré con esta edición, donde un usuario me menciona que no lo vuelva a cambiar (originalmente se encontraba en la capital y el usuario lo cambio a otro lugar), ya que parece estar usándolo en una plantilla de wikipedia en ruso. Saludos --Ovruni (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ovruni: Disculpa que recién pueda contestar. Tu edición es la correcta, así que revisaré todas las ediciones del editor mencionado. Gracias por el aviso, Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 20:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Template:HelloEdit

Hola, Andreasmperu:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductora de español y francés en Wikidata. La página Template:Hello está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

La prioridad de esta página es media.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikidata funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.


Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikidata‎, 19:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Cambio persistenteEdit

hay una especia de BOT el cual insiste en cambiar la fecha de fallecimiento del difunto expresidente liberiano Samuel Doe al 6 de enero de 1986 cuando fue asesinado el 9 de septiembre de 1990-- 21:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

lifting gas (Q1408137)Edit

Most, maybe all, of the other items linked to specialty use of chemicals (Q50413986) do so with instance of (P31) or subclass of (P279). Maybe the simplest answer, to avoid having to change all those statements, is to relabel specialty use of chemicals (Q50413986) to "class of specialty use chemicals", which seems to be how it's actually used, and revise its statements accordingly? Swpb (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not change the sense of an item just to fit in. If you check the identifiers included in that item, you could see that it refers to uses of chemicals (and it's actually a subclass of use (Q1724915)). Therefore, it should be included as a statement of has use (P366). If you find more cases that mistakenly included it together with instance of (P31) or subclass of (P279), you could correct it or ask for a bot task. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 02:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Number of referencesEdit

Hello Andreasmperu. I see that you have reverted the reduction of excessive references here. Did you do it in a hurry, or do you really believe that we should have 12 references for the date of birth of María Casares (Q270834)? --FocalPoint (talk) 07:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not delete valid references. Wikidata does not have a limited space, so we have the opportunity to have as many references as we can. You can always start a discussion on the Project Chat where you'd need to explain your arguments in favour of limiting the amount of references. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 14:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Wikidata:Eighth BirthdayEdit

Hola, Andreasmperu:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductora de español y francés en Wikidata. La página Wikidata:Eighth Birthday está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

La prioridad de esta página es baja.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikidata funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.


Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikidata‎, 10:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Cypriot ministerEdit

Hello. Why Minister of Republic of Cyprus (Q64918889) is not notable? Is similar to Greek minister (Q23636313), Bundesminister (Q248352), minister of Chile (Q3304818), minister of Spain (Q20899145), Minister of Sweden (Q18246031) etc... Data Gamer play 23:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Agree with this request. Support to get Q64918889 recovered. Why a minister of state C(e.g. Cyprus) is not notable while one of state B(e.g. Belgium) is. Especially Wikidata is supposed to be as inclusive as possible. Hundreds of Q-items have no Wikipedia links, you want to remove them all? Kind anti-deletionists regards, Klaas `Z4␟` V:  11:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
@Data Gamer: @KlaasZ4usV: If you check point 1 of WD:N, you'll see that to be notable an item must contain at least one valid sitelink on Wikipedia, which is the case for Greek minister (Q23636313), Bundesminister (Q248352), minister of Chile (Q3304818) and minister of Spain (Q20899145). Minister of Republic of Cyprus (Q64918889) nor Minister of Sweden (Q18246031) include a sitelink. There's no structural need for those items (point 3 of the notability policy), so I will nominate them for deletion. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 16:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

OK. There was already a discussion for deletion. Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/11/27#Q64918889. But we can have another one if you want. Data Gamer play 19:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

User talk:WikiviciaoEdit

Hola, puedes eliminar esto. Es innecesario. Respondeme aquí mismo. Wikiviciao (talk) 15:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

@Wikiviciao:   Done Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 17:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


Dont star Edit warring. --Vlixes (talk) 16:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

@Vlixes: Yo are the one trying to replace the original image with an image that you have created on commons:File:Zornself.jpg. I am only restoring the status quo. If you restore again your edit, you will be blocked form editing Wikidata. So please stop. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 16:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Dont you mind that image have better quality?--Vlixes (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

No you stopEdit

If your father and your brother are Jewish, may you be an Inuit or an Afghani? Is WD policy brutally outweighing any logics? I understand I'm looking here for an empty answer. --Wolverène (talk) 02:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Some properties in Wikidata, such as ethnic group (P172) or sexual orientation (P91), are considered particularly sensitive. For that reason, that type of properties include a constraint: their statements need to have a reference. Those are the rules. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 23:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Callao Region (Q2071352)Edit

Hola Andreasmperu, ¿podrías darle una mirada a Callao Region (Q2071352)? He revertido unas modificaciones que eliminaban varios enlaces a diferentes idiomas, sin embargo parece que el año pasado tambien hubieron algunas modificaciones que cambiaron el elemento que antes era de instancia de región. Saludos --Ovruni (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ovruni: Muchas gracias por el aviso. He separado el enlace de Wikipedia en español en Regional Government of Callao (Q104668030). Por otra parte, existe Callao Region (Q2071352), Callao Constitutional Province (Q2634400) y Q30239036. ¿Crees que podrías completar información en estos elementos para distinguirlos mejor? Saludos y feliz año! Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 00:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


Hola, Andrea. ¿Cómo usas LabelLister? Lo instalé en mi js personal pero no me funciona. Gracias, --Esteban16 (talk) 03:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Esteban16: Hola, Esteban. ¿Has activado el accesorio labelLister? Está en Preferencias→Accesorios→Wikidata-centric. Una vez activado, debería aparecer en la parte superior de cada elemento como un botón "List of headers". Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 03:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Instance of positionEdit

Do you have a specific example of what you are "warning me" about. Your message was spectacularly vague. Lieutcoluseng (talk) 06:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Okay. Got it. Thanks for the clarification. Helps a lot. Doesn't mean that I won't inadvertently do it again, but will try my best not to. Lieutcoluseng (talk) 02:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Doctoral advisor of John CraigEdit


I keep moifying David Gregory Q1174600 because it's listed that he's at the same time the student and advisor of John Craig, since it makes no sense (Craig is actually a student), but it seems either you or a bot keep reverting it back. Is there a reason?

Immune disorder reversionEdit


You have reversed my edit. It is not true that immune disorders are defined as rare. Some of the types of immune disorders certainly are rare. But as a group of disorders are not uncommon, but common (the most common are allergies). This would be like labeling a COVID as deadly. El hecho de que esté referenciado no indica que sea cierto. Guíate por la lógica.

La eliminación de enfermedad rara para la Wikipedia catalana nos es importante ya que utilizamos plantillas multilingües que leen directamente a wikidata y en este caso (ca:Malaltia immunitària) la plantilla muestra en el artículo una información que es falsa (diciendo que es una malaltia minoritària o enfermedad minoritaria). Además un trastorno inmunitario no es una enfermedad sino un agrupador de enfermedades.

--Jordi March (talk) 17:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Please don't delete statements including references (that was the reason why I undid your edit). If you believe that a specific claim is not valid, you could use ranks to show that. These pages could be helpful: Help:Statements and Help:Ranking. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 22:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Veo que no has tenido en cuenta mi escrito, y te has limitado a copiar y pegar una respuesta estándar. Lo reconsideras?. Jordi March (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Please be careful, you have reverted to a wrong dataEdit

You have reverted to a wrong birthdate, please fix your edit, and try to avoid revert when there were more than one field changed. Remove the field you want, not the whole edit. Thank you! --grin 10:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

No, I haven't. You have changed a statement without providing a valid reference. I have added 2 references to support that statement. If you want to add a different date, you should provide references, and mark the statement as disputed. Please do not delete statements which include references. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 17:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Universal Code of Conduct consultationEdit

Hello, I am writing to you to personally invite you to the ongoing consultation about the new Wikimedia movement's Universal Code of Conduct. Your feedback as an admin and experienced user is of great value for us, and we are extremely interested in hearing your say.

You might express your opinion at any given time and in any way you may consider useful (for example, publicly at the consultation page or on my talk page, or privately via email). If you wish or feel more comfortable, we can also set up an online meeting in order to discuss your opinions and ideas.

Please remember that there is no such thing as a “stupid opinion” or “worthless idea”, so be bold and feel free to express yourself. :) Also, if you wish you can help us involving other users you know and that you think might be interested in having their say in this!

Hope to hear from you soon! --Sannita (WMF) (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


Buenas noches, se puede saber ¿porqué has revertido mis últimas contribuciones en los sacramentos? ¿Hice algo mal? Lukecody (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Call for participation in the interview study with Wikidata editorsEdit

Dear Andreasmperu,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized (?) to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me at kholoudsaa@gmail.com or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdmmFHaiB20nK14wrQJgfrA18PtmdagyeRib3xGtvzkdn3Lgw/viewform?usp=sf_link with your choice of the times that work for you.

I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me using the email mentioned above if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.



Taller sobre WikidataEdit

Estimada Andrea, mi nombre es --Aimarabiblio (talk) 20:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC), quisiera contactarme contigo pues estamos organizando un taller básico sobre Wikidata dirigido principalmente a mujeres estudiantes peruanas que se dictaría entre octubre y noviembre. El taller sería dictado entre dos o tres expertos para no recargarlos. Quedo a la espera de tus comentarios! --Aimarabiblio (talk) 20:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Saludos desde PerúEdit

user:Pricipeaero. Grcs. --E4024 (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

user TurkmenistanEdit

This user insists on undoing changes and withdrawing information in the information panel about [[1]], insisting on putting an image to his own liking, he is warned but does not want to give in, or he ends up giving in or he will be blocked indefinitely so that he does not harm wikidata.-- 19:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of childrenEdit

Deletion log 15:50  Andreasmperu talk contribs deleted page Q102234433 ‎(Does not meet the notability policy: content was: "Alicia María Arellano Félix")
Deletion log 15:50  Andreasmperu talk contribs deleted page Q102234454 ‎(Does not meet the notability policy: content was: "Leticia Arellano Félix")
Deletion log 15:50  Andreasmperu talk contribs deleted page Q102234446 ‎(Does not meet the notability policy: content was: "Norma Isabel Arellano Félix")

Why did you delete the family members of Arellano Félix, they certainly fulfill a structural need, and are also linked and portrayed in a Netflix series. Further they can be linked to imdb and fandom. Germartin1 (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

@Germartin1: Please stop creating non-relevant items. Being a child/relative of a criminal is hardly relevant, and that association could be a breach of that person’s privacy. Wikidata even has a specific policy for that, so please take the time to read Wikidata:Living people. Finally, you have created several items without including a single reference (IMDb and fandom pages are not reliable sources). Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 16:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Protection requestEdit

Hello Andreasmperu, sorry to bother you, but I wonder if it is possible for you to have a look at the request placed at AN. Thanks a lot! Stang 04:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Roman Catholic PriestEdit

Buenos días: A mi modo de ver existen diferencias entre el sacerdote católico de rito romano,Roman Catholic Priest (Q1469535) y el sacerdote católico de rito oriental, eastern catholic priest (Q104053959). Ambos son sacerdótes católicos (Q250867) Catholic Priest, pero existen diferencias, entre otras cosas en lo referente al celibato, ya que los católicos orientales, admiten la ordenación de personas casadas, mientras que en los sacerdotes de la iglesia latina, sólo se admite en casos muy excepcionales.--Cruzate1492 (talk) 10:37, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

En ese caso, puede crear 2 elementos nuevos en los que especifique estas diferencias. Por favor, no vuelva a cambiar el sentido de los elementos ya existentes, pues estos remiten a las distintas versiones lingüísticas de Wikipedia que no hacen estas distinciones. Además, cambiar elementos ya existentes tendrá un impacto en cadena, pues los elementos son utilizados como declaraciones (por ejemplo, ocupación: sacerdote católico) en muchísimos elementos. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 15:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


"Sculptress" is an archaic word that hasn't been used in English for 100 years. If you don't believe me:

  • "Some of these are almost entirely obsolete now, such as sculptress, poetess, and aviatrix." - Gender marking in job titles, English Wikipedia
  • "A hundred years ago, a woman aviator was called an “aviatrix” and a woman sculptor was a “sculptress;” those silly terms have pretty much gone away" - Word Nerd: Heroine Overdose
  • "The prominence of feminine endings (-e, -ess) dates back to the 19th century. Lots of words received the feminine ending treatment, but not all of them survived. English words aren’t gendered anymore, so when the dative and genitive cases died out, so did lots of our gender specific words." - From Murderess To Aviatrix: A Dictionary of Gendered Professions

The only -ess labels that are still used in English are actress, waitress, and stewardess, and even those are considered dated by many people. Regardless, sculptress is definitely obsolete and sounds silly to any native English speaker. Nosferattus (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

@Nosferattus: Why are you asssuming I don't know enough English? Also, what is the point of adding links which cannot be considered as reliable references? Anyway, I reverted your edit because it was deleting valid information. Even if information is no longer current, there is no point of deleting it. That's why ranking exists, so a statement can be deprecated, and qualifiers can be added to specify even more, like reason for deprecated rank (P2241). Therefore, please do not delete valid information from Wikidata. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 21:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
I apologize that I implied you didn't know enough English. That was rude of me and I shouldn't make such assumptions. Regarding the links, I didn't intend to use them as references, they were merely for your edification. If you would prefer I use reliable sources to make the argument, here are some better sources:
  • "… words such as ambassadress, ancestress, authoress, poetess, proprietress, and scultpress are no longer used …" – Webster's Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation (2008)
  • "For occupational titles, the use of -ess has been almost completely replaced by recently formed gender-neutral compounds such as flight attendant and letter carrier or by the -er/-or forms." – The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2006)
  • "These days we can all agree to ditch the 'adventuress', 'authoress' … 'poetess', 'sculptress', 'villainess'. But there are others which are not so straightforward." – Grammar for Grown-ups
  • "In 1988, Geoffrey Nunberg polled a panel of 175 established British and American writers, scholars, broadcasters and public figures to investigate their views of acceptable usage in this area (Nunberg 1990). He found that forms with -ess were generally less acceptable with words that denoted occupational roles (e.g., sculptress), than with more general social roles (e.g., hostess). – "Sex-Marking Suffixes in Written New Zealand English". American Speech, 68(4), 357–370.
I'm not sure that using ranking here is good solution. Ranking is typically used in cases where there are multiple claims and the ranking can be used to choose which one to use. In this case, there is only a single claim, so it is likely to get used by scripts or programs that are pulling their data from Wikidata, regardless of the rank, leading to surprising results. I think it would be better to just leave the claim blank for English so that any script will fall back to the default label for English. What do you think? Nosferattus (talk) 00:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Marxism (Q7264)Edit

Hi @Andreasmperu:,

When you revert something and say "this is wrong", could please be more specific ? In the case of Marxism (Q7264) : Marxism (Q7264) is a political ideology (in addition to be an economic theory) which asks for a proletarian dictatorship in order to have a collective appropriation of means of production ("collective appropriation of means of production" = socialism), which, in the end, would lead to a fair redistribution of wealth to each according to their needs ( = communism). I don't know how putting "socialism" and "communism" as parts of "marxism" is so wrong that you need to ask me "please stop". Please explain your thoughts. Angrily reverting contributions of other contributors does not give a good image of wikidata, especially coming from an admin. Wikidata severly lacks of contributors, and having this kind of behavior makes new contributors (like myself) to not stay. More pedagogy and less anger would be extremely beneficial for the community. CaLéValab (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

I noticed that you tend to start long discussions that lead nowhere. We all need to be respectful of other people's time. If one of your edits is contested, you need to provide references to sustain the modification. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 00:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Wow, so on my discussion page you blame me for making edits without first consulting the community (which wasn't even true), and when I start conversations on things I'm not sure about, before doing mass edits, this "is a loss of time". And about "marxism", everyone knowing a little bit about marxism knows what I said on my previous message, and would naturally deduce my contributions. If it needs references like you just said, granted, but in this case just ask for references on my discussion page, do not revert it saying "It is just wrong, please stop". I'm sorry, but it seems you don't have the patience to be an admin. So now please leave me alone, and stop angrily reverting my edits or posting angry message on my discussion page. Thank you. CaLéValab (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
I'm just doing maintenance work on my watchlist. If I find wrong edits, I'll revert them. As simple as that, no feelings involved. And yes, you need to open a wide discussion if you are attempting to do massive changes, like you are doing on genres, specially if several editors have raised issues about such modifications. Please ask for advice on the Project Chat or the respective Wikiproject. If experienced editors are questioning your edits, be prepared to be wrong and learn, or to present reliable references to sustain your position. That's how collaborative projects work. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 00:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Marxism (Q7264) nextEdit

Please read the last paragraph of the reference I added, it does say that marxism as an ideology asks for socialism ("appropriation collective des moyens de production" which is the very definition of socialism) and communism ("la richesse sera redistribuée « à chacun selon ses besoins ». La société sera alors « communiste »"). Maxism as an ideology is then part of the communism and socialism ideologies. If its the "part of" which is a problem, and should be instead "subclass of" or "instance of" or I don't know what other property, please say so. If it's the language of the reference which is a problem, please say so. CaLéValab (talk) 00:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

You are interpretating the reference, which doesn't sustain your personal opinion. Also, I posted this Help:Basic membership properties. The examples on the use of part of (P361) are clear enough: Albert Einstein's brain (Q2464312) part of (P361) Albert Einstein (Q937), not "partial part of", nor "is the base of", nor "has some coincides with". Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 00:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
I repeat myself, but the last paragraph of the reference clearly states that marxism asks for socialism in order to achieve communism. So, fair enough : it does not say marxism is "part of" socialism and communism. But there is no property for "is a sub-ideology of", so another property must be used. So I'll use "subclass of" like it is used in social liberalism (Q201712), green anarchism (Q294864) and many other ideologies. To me "part of" seems more suitable than "subclass of" since ideologies are not classes, but I'll follow the custom on the ideologies ontology. CaLéValab (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

puppet governmentEdit

Definition of puppet government

a government which is endowed with the outward symbols of authority but in which direction and control are exercised by another power [2].

A puppet government is not the same as a puppet state --Ejensyd (talk) 11:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)


Hola, Andreasmperu. Estoy muy en desacuerdo con tus reversiones en Federico García Lorca. Sobre la causa de muerte, es más preciso "fusilamiento" que "herida por arma de fuego". "Fusilamiento" se define en Wikidata como "Método de ejecución por arma de fuego", mientras que tu preferencia (injustificada) es mucho más vaga, agravado porque el apartado de "ejecución extrajudicial" no aparece en la ficha, como puedes comprobar fácilmente [3]. En la misma entrada puedes ver cómo en "sepultura" aparece "valor desconocido". Para que salga eso, como con "cónyuge", yo creo que lo mejor es que no aparezca nada en Wikidata, porque ese es un idioma robótico impropio de una enciclopedia seria, creo yo. Yo no voy a batallar por esto, pero especialmente lo de ocultar su fusilamiento me parece un error y me entristece. Saludos y felices fiestas. Macarrones (talk) 08:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered usersEdit


You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nacimiento Yma SumacEdit

Solo pongo su nacimiento de 13 de setiembre porque ese es el primer y oficial nacimiento de Yma Sumac, 10 de setiembre es posterior y producto de un cambio por lo que no es verídico


Jaws: Robert ChambersEdit

You reverted my removal of cast member Robert Chambers in the movie Jaws, presumably thinking that I committed vandalism. The referenced man died in 1871. He did not participate in that movie. The actor Robert Chambers does not seem to have a Wikidata entry. I don't know how to add comments to changes in Wikidata, otherwise I'd have described my reasons. -- 18:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out my mistake. I've reverted myself. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 14:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)


Hello, I want to talk about the Q1121178 / liste des Compagnons de la Libération. For me spin off this item to Q2990283 / compagnon de la Libération, it's a bad decision. The navigation between the articles on wp:en and the others wikipedia is worst and this spin off is done just because the titles of the articles are differents. Because if you read the wp:de and the wp:fr article, there are also lists. So why the wp:fr and the wp:de article have a different wikidata itam of the wp:en ? And I don't understand : what is the advantage to have the actual structure ? Nouill (talk) 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Unfortunately, lists in Wikipedia need to be instances of Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) here. If you think the articles in wp:de and wp:fr are actually lists, then you need to propose that change in the respective Wikipedia. In my opinion, the only one that looks like a list is the article in German. The French article has only a section dedicated to a list, whereas the Spanish article is definitely not a list. Wikidata structures the existent data, and right now there's a clear difference. Therefore, a merge wouldn't be right. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 14:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Publicación seriadaEdit

Hola Andreasmperu, has revertido una edición mia en publicación en serie donde había cambiado el alias "publicación serial" por "publicación seriada". La Biblioteca Nacional de España describe el ISSN como el número que se aplica a una publicación seriada; te dejo el enlace pertinente para que reconsideres, al menos, añadir esa definición a los alias. Biblioteca Nacional de España: ¿Qué es el ISSN?

Gracias de antemano, --MartinGala (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Los alias en Wikidata son nombres alternativos de los elementos y se pueden incluir tantos como sean necesarios. Si bien en España puede ser común el uso de "publicación seriada", en otros países también se usa el término "publicación serial". Por eso, no se deben borrar, sino más bien ambos términos deben ser incluidos como alias. Saludos, Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 15:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Gracias por añadirlo. --MartinGala (talk) 16:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Undone merge of legislature of a constituent state (Q7603708) into representation of states in a federal system (Q2519113)Edit

Hi - I've undone your merger of legislature of a constituent state (Q7603708) and representation of states in a federal system (Q2519113), as they don't appear to be the same thing. If you look at the German WP article Vertretung der Gliedstaaten attached to Q2519113, it's actually an overview of how constituent states themselves are represented within the federal state they're part of, which is a completely different thing to a state legislature. Theknightwho (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Creación de propiedad Renacyt en WikidataEdit

Hola Andrea, recibe mis saludos cordiales. Estoy interesado en crear una propiedad de corte "Authority control" (ej. VIAF ID) para Renacyt (el Registro Nacional Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica) de Concytec en Perú. De este modo, en los items de lxs investigadorxs de Perú en Wikidata exista el enlace al catálogo público nacional. Por ejemplo, si desde Wikidata hacemos clic en esa propiedad Renacyt con código P0012538 en el item de la investigadora Norma Salinas Revilla, nos vamos a la página de la investigadora en el catálogo. Ahora, estaba revisando y avanzando en la página Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control pero de pronto ya no entendía eso de la documentación. Dada tu experiencia y posición como administradora aquí tal vez sepas quién me puede ayudar con este proceso. Hablo también inglés sin ningún problema. Muchas gracias por la atención, --Cbrescia (talk) 18:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

@Cbrescia: En esta subpágina he completado la plantilla de propuesta de propiedad que es lo más complicado, pero faltaría incluir una motivación (de preferencia en inglés). Una vez esté completa, la presentas en Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control. Saludos, Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 03:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Muchísimas gracias. Yo me encargo ahora del resto, Saludos! Cbrescia (talk) 13:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in the Ratification vote of UCoC Enforcement guidelineEdit

This message has been sent because you are administrator in this project. If you voted, Thank you and please ignore this message 🙂

Hello Andreasmperu,

The Ratification vote of Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelinein currently taking place until March 21. If you didn't vote yet, please take a few minutes to participate the ratification vote! Your voice is important.

Best, —YKo (WMF) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Página eliminada Q107554431Edit

¡Hola Andrea! ¿Cómo estás? Quería consultarte acerca de la eliminación de una de mis páginas: [[4]]. Estuve leyendo detenidamente la justificación de eliminación, pero no encontré la infracción. ¿Serías tan amable de comentarme qué ítems cambiar o modificar para revertir la eliminación de la página? Muchas gracias por adelantado. A disposición, saludos cordiales. --MaryinPink (talk) 18:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Mormon books ("Ether")Edit

Hi Andreas,

I'm not so fond in Mormon doctrine: Is https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q2476514&oldid=1582124979 factually true or false?--Magic Ruickbie (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

sobre Q75984Edit

He notado que revertiste una edición, por favor inicié un debate en dicha página sobre el título que debería tener: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q75984 --Klepisolemure (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


Hola Andrea ¿cómo has estado?

Duda ¿es válido mantener un elemento sin ninguna entrada o, en ese tipo de casos, se solicita el borrado? Saludos BetoCG (talk) 03:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)