Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Beireke1/Structured Discussions Archive 1 on 2018-03-26.



Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Beireke1!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Call for project proposals (software applications based on Wikidata)Edit

Hi Beireke1,

If you guys are planning to create software applications that make use of the performing arts data you have ingested into Wikidata, this call for projects might be of interest to you. If you have any questions, please let me know (beat.estermann(at)bfh.ch).

-- Cheers, Beat Estermann (talk) 08:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Hein PicardEdit

Hein Picard (Q42853895) - no incoming links, just a name, that is pretty general, and a reference that is is mentioned in a location of some archive. To me, this is a useless, full random, created article, that could refer to every Hein Picard on this planet. Why did you create this? Edoderoo (talk) 06:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Edoderoo: It makes perfect sense to have this entry on Wikidata; it should however be expanded by further statements to make it easily distinguishable from other entries (see the related Wikipedia article for further data). Statements about the content of archival collections fall within the scope of the WikiProject Archival Description. They concern the second layer of information described in figure 1 of the following article: "An International Knowledge Base for All Heritage Institutions". Whether the related stub article on Dutch Wikipedia makes sense is subject to discussion on the Dutch Wikipedia. Typically, whenever a heritage institution decides to preserve the archival fonds of a person, the relevancy of the fonds and the person has been assessed and a minimum of information about this person has been collected. If we want to avoid useless notability discussions on Wikipedia, we can just go by the rule that the notability criteria have been fulfilled whenever a heritage institution considers a person relevant enough to preserve their archival fonds. But this is obviously up to every Wikipedia community to decide. --Beat Estermann (talk) 06:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
As an afterthought, after consulting the archive database of Letterenhuis, I wonder whether the "archives at" statement is justified in this case, as there seems to be no archival fonds directly attributed to Hein Picard; he is however mentioned on several database entries. A common policy regarding the usage of "archives at" should be agreed upon in the context of WikiProject Archival Description. --Beat Estermann (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Weadock313 (talk) 01:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 2le2im-bdc (talk) 19:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC) Beat Estermann (talk) 23:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Flor WMCH Gilliane Kern (talk) 05:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 23:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Laureano Macedo (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Daniel Mietchen VIGNERON scottythered Patafisik anarchivist KelliBee123 (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Anne Chardonnens (talk) Yooylee 30 (talk) 23:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC) Mlemusrojas (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC) erussey Kcohenp (talk) 16:28, 03 June 2019 (UTC) Mrtngrsbch Amandine (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2019 (UTC) René La contemporaine (talk) 11:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Sp!ros (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC) Ccooneycuny (talk) 16:49, 19 May 2020 (UTC) Librarian lena (talk) 19:57, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Valeriummaximum (talk) 16:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC) Jneubert (talk) 07:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC) MaryCDominique (talk) 10:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

  Notified participants of WikiProject Archival Description

@Edoderoo: I improved this item (which was obviously not useless, thanks for the creation Beireke1 !), you could (and should) have done the same. « that could refer to every Hein Picard on this planet » apparently, you didn't even read the only reference provided which clearly stated that the archive was created by "Picard Hein (24/10/1925 - 20/11/1988)". Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

You are right, I overlooked the extra information. Maybe I'll check after my holidays if I can pythonically read that website, to auto-improve such items. I get at least once a month a new Dutch lemma that needs/can be attached to an item like this. Edoderoo (talk) 08:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
@Edoderoo: no problem, it happens to everyone (myself first  ). And if you could do the improvement with Python it would be great! Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
@Edoderoo:@VIGNERON:@Beat Estermann: Sorry for my late reaction, but it seems like you three together solved the initial misunderstanding regarding the relevance of the item that I created. In the structured data that are available, there is no distinction between "the one and only archive" from a person and "archival material" from this person being in a collection. That is why I could only group them all under the "archives at" property, which I believe in way certainly makes sense. It would of course be great if the data could be enriched pythonically, as you say, Edoderoo.Beireke1 (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 17:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 19:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

New OpenRefine reconciliation serviceEdit

Hi!

Thank you for wearing the {{User loves OpenRefine}} userbox on your user page!

Because the existing Wikidata reconciliation service has had severe performance issues recently, I have created a new one which should be faster and more robust. You can add it to OpenRefine in the reconciliation dialog with the following URL: https://wikidata.reconci.link/en/api (or by replacing en by any other language code).

If you have any issues with this new service, let me know.

Happy reconciling! − Pintoch (talk)