Open main menu
Hello visitor, I'm very happy to answer questions and inquiries. Please discuss at the place discussion get started.
Wikidata-logo-en.svg

Welcome to Wikidata, Conny!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike, and you can help. Go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familarise yourself with:

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Regards, --Bene* (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Ein herzliches Willkommen bei Wikidata :-) --Bene* (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Dankeschön :) . --Conny (talk) 21:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC).

Contents

AdminEdit

Per your successful RfA I have promoted you to administrator. Congratulations. Best regards. — MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you :) . Conny (talk) 08:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC).

Interwiki conflictsEdit

Hello, Conny. You have new messages at Zolo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Younger/older versionEdit

Hi, there is currently no adopted policy for using lower numbers, and that serves no purpose except being aesthetically pleasing. If you want to undelete, move all of the links over and lose the history associated with the page with more links - go ahead. However, there is no need to according to policy as of yet. See Wikidata talk:Deletion policy for a proposal on it. Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

So then ;) - the history get lost, if you use newer version. First ID ist ID to use for my oppinion. Conny (talk) 14:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC).
Usually, the version with the most links has the history that is usable (though in this case, both only had bot contributions so it doesn't matter). If you feel it is worth doing, then I won't stop you... but I don't see the need myself. Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Q1399895Edit

Hello, could be that you haven't seen my question on page Talk:Q1399895. Could you please reply there, thanks. --Stryn (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Thx, answered there. Conny (talk) 16:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC).

Admin confirmationsEdit

Hello! We are currently in the process of confirming all of the early admins, and you are scheduled to be confirmed between 7 - 11 February 2013. Please create an entry at Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013/4, and see Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013 for more details. Techman224Talk 00:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. I know and did that allready :) . Greetings, Conny (talk) 17:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC).

QuellenEdit

Hi Conny, bei Ben Nevis hast du für die Aussage "Geographisches Objekt" zwei Quellen angegeben:

  1. Verlag: Axel Springer AG
  2. Verlag: Scottish Mountaineering Club

Quellenangaben sind zwar fast immer gut, aber "Axel Springer AG" ist leider zu allgemein. Wo soll ich da nachschlagen? Autor, Buchtitel, Ausgabe, Seitenangabe: alles fehlt. Und der zweite Eintrag ist kein Verlag, sondern ein Club. Außerdem: Die Aussage, dass ein Berg ein "Geographisches Objekt" ist, ist weitgehend unstrittig. Belegt werden sollten weiterführende Angaben wie Höhe, Erstbesteigung etc. Fröhliches Schaffen --Kolja21 (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

PS: Die für Quellenangaben wichtige Eigenschaft (property) "Buchtitel" fehlt leider noch, kommt aber hoffentlich in den nächsten Tagen. --Kolja21 (talk) 18:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Danke für deine Nachfrage. Ich habe erste Versuche unternommen, leider konnte ich die Inhalte, welche ich eintragen wollte nicht eintragen. Mit Buchtitel das ist mir auch aufgefallen :) . Aber Problem ist, nicht jeder Buchtitel einen Wikipediaartikel hat - im Moment scheinen dort nur Items als Quellen angebbar zu sein? Gibt es eine Beschreibungsseite für Sources - ich habe in kurzer Suche nichts gefunden. Grüße, Conny (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC).
Bislang hieß es immer, dass wir Quellen noch nicht verwenden sollen. Ich denke daran hat sich mit dem Update von gestern nichts geändert. Eine Beschreibungsseite gibt es noch nicht. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis. Keine Ahnung wie nicht informierte Benutzer damit umgehen - mangels Diffanzeige fällt dies leider auch nicht offensichtlich auf... Conny (talk) 11:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC).
Die Diffanzeige funktioniert jetzt für die Eigenschaften. Was die Quellen betrifft, habe ich einfach mal die Frage im Forum (Wikidata:Project chat#Sources) gepostet. Grüße --Kolja21 (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Multiple EntriesEdit

Hi! I made double entry for Boldino Fall, this one should be deleted: Q8438000. I apologize, I'm new at this. Cheers, Silbel (talk) 14:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

It's done, thank your for the advice. Conny (talk) 12:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC).

SpezialseiteEdit

Moin, laut WD:N sollen Spezialseiten nicht mit Wikidata-Einträgen beglückt werden. Ich hab den Eintrag zur Beobachtungsliste daher gelöscht. Gruß, IW 17:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. War begeistert, dass es funktioniert hat :) . Grüße, Conny (talk) 17:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC).

Mass deletionsEdit

Hi, next time when you will delete many items within a short time, please enable the flood flag. Thanks. --Stryn (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the tip. Conny (talk) 12:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC).

Re: bottask musicbrainzEdit

Hello, Conny. You have new messages at Ricordisamoa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ricordisamoa 17:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

R stable versionEdit

Hi, Conny

I deleted the "Imported from: English Wikipedia" source because it referred to the 3.0.0 version, not the 3.0.1. What I did was: noticed it needed to be updated; checked latest version at R official site; updated latest stable version at Wikidata; then removed the source.

Was this correct? I've read some of the Wikidata documentation, but not all of it. I may be doing things not in the appropriate way. How should it be done?

Cheers, Moretti (talk) 02:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Ok, now I understand :) . Thank you. In my information there is at this time no way to give a url as source. I have to think about that. Greetings, Conny (talk) 09:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC).

P596 (P596)Edit

The property P596 (P596) that you supported is available now. --Tobias1984 (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the information :) . Greetings, Conny (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC).

Q10861426Edit

Please undelete and restore all links. http://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWagino_20100516&diff=41437516&oldid=41118108. Infovarius (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Explain or undelete please. --Infovarius (talk) 21:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Seems done, greetings, Conny (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC).
What is done? Q3181348 is different rank, they should be separated. Infovarius (talk) 20:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Undeleted now. Contact me if you have queries over it Conny. John F. Lewis (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Kategorie:LeuchtdiodeEdit

Hi Conny, bitte in Q5901963 die Kategorie:Leuchtdiode von de.wp einzufügen, danke.--Wdwd (talk) 20:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Done. Conny (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC).

Talk:Q1754511Edit

Diese Änderungen waren natürlich Unsinn. Sie stammen von Sheynhertz-Unbayg. Am besten zurücksetzen oder die Items, falls möglich, gleich verbessern. Holger1959 (talk) 01:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Danke dir. Conny (talk) 08:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC).

de:Bürstenloser MotorEdit

Hi Conny, hab wieder einen: bitte in Q521013 den de.wp Artikel de:Bürstenloser Motor hinzuzufügen, danke.--Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Erledigt, danke für den Hinweis. Grüße, Conny (talk) 09:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC).

Elo rating (P1087)Edit

Just created Elo rating (P1087). --Tobias1984 (talk) 07:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the tip :) . Greetings, Conny (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC).

Q15851900 und Q3278681Edit

Mahlzeit,

könntest du die beiden bitte zusammenlegen? Ich hab keine Ahnung wie das geht und möchte mich da gerade auch nicht einlesen ;) Grüße--MaxEddi (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Erledigt, danke für den Hinweis. Grüße, Conny (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC).

Projekt OberlausitzEdit

Ich bin grad über die Anfrage zum Projekt Oberlausitz gestolpert. Nun bin ich hier selbst immer noch am Entdecken, aber vielleicht hilft diese Task Force Wikidata:Cultural heritage task force und der User:Multichill weiter. -- Pütz M. (talk) 01:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

DAnke für den Hinweis :) . Conny (talk) 05:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC).

FideIDEdit

Hello, You participiated in the discussion of the property Elo rating (P1087), so you might be interested to know that there now is a proposal for a property of a related topic: FideID. It is discussed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person#FideID. Regards, Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 04:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata:Forum#Einzelnachweise_in_TextformEdit

Hast du dazu eine Antwort? --Kolossos (talk) 22:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Habs mal aus dem Archiv gesucht. Nach meinem Verständnis braucht man entweder einen neuen Wikipedia Artikel, um die Unterscheidung zu machen, oder man fügt als Qualifier eine Zusatzinformation mit dran. Tendiere aber eher zum ersten Punkt. Würde das was bringen? Soll ich mir das mal konkreter anschauen? Grüße, Conny (talk) 12:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC).

Viking funeralsEdit

Please see Talk:Q2662083. --80.71.135.52 10:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

another dupeEdit

Hallo Conny, Q18508484 (mit Link auf commons) ist identisch mit Q5306359 (mit Wp-Links). Geburtsdatum 5. März scheint richtig zu sein. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  Done. Dankende, Conny (talk) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC).

Q2604779Edit

Hallo. Könntest du als Admin der deutschen Version dieses Artikels bitte ein "featured list" spendieren? Danke. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 04:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Dabei frag ich mich, wieso die Möglichkeit gegeben wird, dies als normaler Nutzer selbst zu tun, wenn es dann doch grundsätzlich nicht speicherfähig ist.

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis :) . Informative Liste vergeben. Habe mal getestet - Die Begründung bei dem Versuch als Benutzer zu speichern lautet, dass dies Konsensentscheidungen in den jeweiligen Wikipedien sind und somit nur durch Administratoren gemacht werden sollten :( . Grüße, Conny (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC).
Vielen Dank auch Dir! :) Auf Wikidata (nicht so meine Nische) scheint es wohl, noch Baustellen zu geben. ;) --SamWinchester000 (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Auf jeden Fall. Fühl dich frei mich zu kontaktieren :D . Grüße, Conny (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC).

Talk:Q274758Edit

Kannst Du bitte unter Talk:Q274758 die Situation erklären? --Fomafix (talk) 13:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Item to be deleteEdit

In RFD there are one or more item proposed for the deletion created by you. If you do not agree you can participate in the debate --ValterVB (talk) 21:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Conny (talk) 08:51, 4 March 2017 (UTC).

NoobfrageEdit

Hallo Conny - wie geht das nach dem Beantragen eines neuen Property weiter? - Da steht jetzt oben "ready". Kommt irgendwann jemand vorbei und erstellt das Property oder muss ich dafür noch irgendwas anstellen? (Wikidata lässt mich immer wieder mit einem ratlosen Gesicht zurück....) --Ordercrazy (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Schau ich mir zeitnah an. Danke für Hinweis, Conny (talk) 09:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC).

Special:Diff/588155074Edit

I don't know why? Is there any reason that that can't simply replaced by the new created Quora username (P4411) value? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry Liuxinyu970226, redone it :D . Conny (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC).

stop vandalisingEdit

right now 78.55.25.245 12:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

What edit do you mean? Regards, Conny (talk) 12:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC).

Block of German IP rangeEdit

15:16, 10 May 2018 Mahir256 (talk | contribs) blocked 77.179.0.0/16 (talk) with an expiration time of 3 months (anonymous users only, account creation disabled, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (This IP range has been abused by a vandal for a long time, please log in to edit)

Why that? 77.180.100.59 15:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Please ask user:Mahir256 for details. Regards, Conny (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC).
You've already spoken to MisterSynergy about it. Mahir256 (talk) 05:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Growth team updates #3Edit

Welcome to the third newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

Two Growth team projects to be deployed in next two weeks

We will be deploying the "Understanding first day" and "Personalized first day" projects on Czech and Korean Wikipedias in the coming weeks. See the new project pages below for full details on the projects, and our project updates page for their progress.

  • Understanding first day: learn about the actions new editors take right after creating their accounts. We will be careful with user privacy, and we hope to share initial results in December.
  • Personalized first day: learn about new editors' objectives by adding some optional questions to the new editor’s registration process, and personalizing their onboarding. We hope to share initial results in December.

Third Growth team project begins

  • Focus on help desk: direct newcomers to the local help desks where they can ask questions to help them make their first edits. We hope to have an initial experiment running in December.

Best practices for helping newcomers

We are going to direct newcomers to help desks. But what's the best way to reply to a newcomer there? We have gathered some best practices for successful interactions, based on community experiences and some external documentation. The page has also been reviewed by some experienced community members who suggested some changes. That page is now open for translations. Comments and suggestions are still welcome!

We are still looking for volunteers

Do you want to participate to our experiments? We are looking for new communities to work with us (especially a new mid-size wiki), and people to become ambassadors to help us to communicate with the different communities. Discover how you can involve yourself or your community.

Also, please share this update with your community and interested people!

Learn more about us

You can visit our team page to find out why our team was formed and how we are thinking about new editors, and our project page for detailed updates on the projects we'll work on.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 13:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

Growth team updates #4Edit

Welcome to the fourth newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

We need your feedback!

We have two requests for community members:

  1. Now that data is coming in for the welcome survey, we are planning how to use that data to personalize the newcomer's first day. See our current thoughts here, and join the conversation here.
  2. Try out the help panel's interactive prototype, and read about how we're planning to roll it out, and post any thoughts or reactions here.

Two Growth team projects have been deployed (detailed updates here)

  • Personalized first day (welcome survey) was deployed on November 20 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias.
    • The survey is now being shown to half of new users (A/B test). Responses are being recorded in the database. We'll report on initial results during December.
    • We are planning to test a second version of the survey, called "Variation C", which we think will maximize the number of users who complete the survey and stay on the wiki.
    • The original objective of this project was to give newcomers the materials they need to achieve their goals, and so now we are currently planning how we will use the information collected in the welcome survey to personalize the newcomer's experience. We hope community members will read our current thinking and join the conversation here. Some of the plans we are considering include:
      • Making it easy for newcomers to see editing activity around the topic areas in which they indicated that they're interested.
      • Connecting interested newcomers to experienced editors.
      • Surfacing the help content most relevant to the reason for which the newcomers created their accounts.
  • Understanding first day (EditorJourney) was deployed on November 15 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias. It has been done after a longer security review and final testing than expected. Data is now being recorded for all new users on those wikis, and we've been auditing the data and preparing to make initial reports during December. Stay tuned for the next newsletter!

Help panel is under construction

  • Focus on help desk (help panel) is planned to be deployed during the week of January 7 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias.
  • This interactive prototype is the best way to see the design and wording in the feature.
  • We ran live user tests on the prototype, with results posted here.
  • In addition to giving the ability to ask a question, the help panel will also contain a set of links to existing help content. Our ambassadors on Czech and Korean Wikipedias are determining the right initial set of most helpful links in this task.
  • We encourage community members to try out the prototype and read about the rules for who will get the feature, and add any thoughts to this discussion.

We are still looking for volunteers

Do you want to participate to our experiments? We are looking for new communities to work with us (especially a new mid-size wiki), and people to become ambassadors to help us to communicate with the different communities. Discover how you can involve yourself or your community.

Also, please share this update with your community and interested people!

Learn more about us

You can visit our team page to find out why our team was formed and how we are thinking about new editors, and our project updates page for detailed updates on the projects we work on.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 09:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

Growth team updates #5Edit

Welcome to the fifth newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

New projects for discussionEdit

We began the "Personalized first day" project with the welcome survey so that we could gather information about what newcomers are trying to accomplish. The next step is to use that information to create experiences that help the newcomers accomplish their goal – actually personalizing their first day. We asked for community thoughts in the previous newsletter, and after discussing with community members and amongst our team, we are now planning two projects as next steps: "engagement emails" and "newcomer homepage".

  • Engagement emails: this project was first discussed positively by community members here back in September 2018, and the team how has bandwidth to pursue it. The idea is that newcomers who leave the wiki don't get encouraged to return to the wiki and edit. We can engage them through emails that send them the specific information they need to be successful – such as contact from a mentor, the impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?
  • Newcomer homepage: we developed the idea for this project after analyzing the data from the welcome survey and EditorJourney datasets. We saw that many newcomers seem to be looking for a place to get started – a place that collects their past work, options for future work, and ways to learn more. We can build this place, and it can connect to the engagement emails. The content of both could be guided by what newcomers say they need during their welcome survey, and contain things like contact from a mentor, impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?

Initial reports on newcomer activityEdit

We have published initial reports on each of the team's first two projects. These reports give the basic numbers from each project, and there are many more questions we will continue to answer in future reports. We're excited about these initial findings. They have already helped us define and design parts of our future projects.

  • Welcome survey: the initial report on welcome survey responses is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Most users respond to the survey, giving it high response rates of 67% and 62% in Czech and Korean Wikipedias, respectively.
    • The survey does not cause newcomers to be less likely to edit.
    • The most common reason for creating an account in Korean Wikipedia is to read articles—not for editing—with 29% of Korean users giving that responses.
    • Large numbers of respondents said they are interested in being contacted to get help with editing: 36% in Czech and 53% in Korean.
  • Understanding first day: the initial report on what newcomers do on their first day is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Large numbers of users view help or policy pages on their first day: 42% in Czech and 28% in Korean.
    • Large numbers of users view their own User or User Talk page on their first day: 34% in Czech and 39% in Korean.
    • A majority of new users open an editor on their first day – but about a quarter of them do not go on to save an edit during that time.

Help panel deploymentEdit

The help panel was deployed in Czech and Korean Wikipedias on January 10. Over the past four weeks:

  • About 400 newcomers in each wiki have seen the help panel button.
  • About 20% of them open up the help panel.
  • About 50% of those who open it up click on one of the links.
  • About 5% of Czech users ask questions, and about 1% of Korean users ask questions.

We think that the 20% open rate and 50% click rate are strong numbers, showing that a lot of people are looking for help, and many want to help themselves by looking at help pages. The somewhat lower numbers of asking questions (especially in Korean Wikipedia) has caused us to consider new features to allow people to help themselves. We're going to be adding a search bar to the help panel next, which will allow users to type a search that only looks for pages in the Help and Wikipedia namespaces.

How to create a good feedback page?Edit

What is the way to built a good help page? What blocks you when writing an help page? Your replies will help to create better help contents to newcomers, that would be used on Help panel.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 14:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

DresdenEdit

Hallo Conny, ich hab mich mal etwas genauer mit SPARQL befasst und angefangen ein paar nützliche Abfragen für Dresden zu schreiben. Falls du Ideen hast, lass es mich wissen. -- sk (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Man spitze was du da alles gezaubert hast :) . Danke für Hinweis! Grüße, Conny (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC).

@Stefan Kühn: das finde ich auch stark. Grüße, Conny (talk) 08:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC).

Io panEdit

Hello! Can you block this user? He changes correct links to uncorrect in Ukrainian Wikipedia. Thanks!--DiMon2711 10:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

@Dimon2711: Please talk to the user at first. Regards, Conny (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC).
This is my message to him--DiMon2711 17:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
I also 2 times said it him in Ukrainian Wikipedia, but no reaction. Sorry, my English not very well--DiMon2711 17:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
I also applied to rollbacker rights. Can you give me its? Thanks!--DiMon2711 17:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Find Wikidata:Rollbackers. Conny (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC).
Ah, you found :D . Conny (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC).

Growth team updates #6Edit

18:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Verschwundenes/Vermißte ObjekteEdit

Hallo Conny,
oft stoße ich beim Abarbeiten der Listen von Objekten, bzw. Denkmallisten auf Objekte die abgerissen, zerstört oder verschwunden, also nicht mehr an diesem Ort vorhanden sind. Wie gehen wir auf Wikidata damit um?Lutz (talk) 10:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC).

@Lutzto: Ich handhabe es über die Eigenschaft end time (P582), da man ja beispielsweise auch historische Karten erstellen möchte. Um aktuelle Denkmale zu finden, kann man dann filtern, dass nur Objekte ohne Endzeitpunkt angezeigt werden sollen. Auch die Qualifikatoren dazu sind interessant. Wenn der genaue Endzeitpunkt nicht bekannt ist, kann man bei den kleinen Kästchen neben der Eingabebox für das Datum "Unbekannter Wert" eingeben. Somit ist das Ende definitiv, aber nicht bekannt. Was sagst du dazu? Grüße dir, Conny (talk) 08:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC).
Als Zwischenlösung sicher zu gebrauchen, aber oft weiß man nicht was damit geschehen ist, Beispiel Bernsteinzimmer, oder alte Gemälde die jetzt irgenwo im Keller eines Auftraggebers hängen. Irgendwie fehlt die Aussage ist Verschollen bei Objekten.Lutz (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2019 (UTC).
Es gibt für Personen date of disappearance (P746) - dort habe ich zum Verfahren für Kunstwerke gefragt. Grüße dir, Conny (talk) 10:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC).
Danke, ich kann nur schlechtes Deutsch ;-) Lutz (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC).

Growth team updates #7Edit

16:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania 2019Edit

Welcome to a special newsletter from the Growth team! This special newsletter is not about Wikimedia Foundation Growth team projects. Instead, it is a call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania 2019. We think that many people who receive this newsletter may have something valuable to contribute to this space at Wikimania. We haven't translated the newsletter, because Wikimania's language is English.

Please see below for the message from the organizers of the Community Growth space at Wikimania.

---

Wikimania 2019 is organized into 19 “spaces”, which are all accepting proposals for sessions. This message comes from the team organizing the Community Growth space.

Since you are interested b Growth team projects, and potentially involved in welcoming newcomers initiatives on your wiki, we would like to invite you to submit a proposal to the Community Growth space because of the actions you’ve done around newcomers on wikis. The deadline for submission is June 1. See below for Community Growth submission topics and session formats. Topics and sessions have to be in English.

In the Community Growth space, we will come together for discussions, presentations, and workshops that address these questions:

  • What is and is not working around attracting and retaining newcomers?
  • How should Wikimedia activities evolve to help communities grow and flourish?
  • How should our technology and culture evolve to help new populations to come online, participate and become community members?

Recommended topics: please see this link for the list for the list of recommended topics. If you do not plan to submit a proposal, you can also suggest additional topics here. If your topic does not fit into our space, remember that there are 18 other spaces that could welcome you sharing your knowledge and perspective.

Types of session. We prefer sessions that are participatory, interactive, promote conversations, and give a voice to parts of our movement that are heard less often. Please see this link for the list of recommended session formats.

Poster submissions. Posters are also a good way to introduce a topic, or show some results of an action. Please consider submitting one!

More information about the Community Growth space, topics, and submission formats is available on the proposal page.

Please submit your proposal. The reviews will happen at the beginning of June.

If you have questions about Wikimania in general, please ask them on the Wikimania wiki.

On behalf of the Community Growth leadership team, Trizek (WMF), 11:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #8Edit

09:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Conny".