User talk:Fralambert/Archive 2

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mohammed Sadat (WMDE) in topic Wikidata weekly summary #494

User:Fralambert/Archive

Wikidata weekly summary #480 edit

User:Biba993 edit

Can you please stop this vandal... Merci beaucoup. --E4024 (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Q108104696 edit

Hi, I'm Vaibhav Shukla (MrVaiBH), just getting straight to the point. I have no intention to promote spam on WikiData, I just wanted to enhance my knowledge graph (which was auto-generated by Google algorithm).
Talking about search, please search "MrVaiBH" and you will find me out on top results. That actor "Vaibhav Shukla" you were talking about, I know him, I have even talked with him on IG. To avoid misconception, I can change my name from "Vaibhav Shukla" to "Vaibhav Shukla (MrVaiBH)" - Mr.VaiBH 12:55 PM (GMT)

Posting here was exactly was spamming here. I only gived my argumentation about the notability of this item, nothing more. If you thing that this item was notable, please post at WD:AN instead. --Fralambert (talk) 11:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #477 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #481 edit

se jette dans edit

Bonjour, « se jette dans » est acceptable puisque qu'il inclus affluent qui est une sous-classe de tributaire. J'ai modifié l'article fr:affluent qui portait à confusion et qu'il faudrait renommer fr:tributaire mais comme il y a une redirection, je n'ai pas réussi à le renommer. --Yanik B 15:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Je suis pas sur que tributaire soit le meilleur terme. Comme il y a des cours d'eau qui disparaissent simplement par évaporation comme l'Okavango River (Q188773). Mais en fait j'ai reverté principalement parce que tu n'avais pas mis l'ancien terme dans les alias, donc je le trouvais plus. Fralambert (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Volley edit

Salut. J'espère que tu vas toujours bien. Est-ce que je pourrais avoir Wikidata:Property proposal/Volleybox ID et Wikidata:Property proposal/Jornal do Vôlei ID si tu as le temps ? Je me charge de remplir les propriétés si tu n'en as pas envie. Cela ne te laissera que quelques clics à faire. Thierry Caro (talk) 03:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #482 edit

Affluent vs tributaire edit

Cher Fralambert, si tu lis les définitions spécialisées de affluent et tributaire, tu comprendra que c'est toi qui fait du vandalisme en annulant le changement de nom de l'élément qui par ailleurs est correctement nommé en anglais. L'affluent est une sous-classe de tributaire, ce n'est pas un synonyme. --Yanik B 11:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)?Reply

Mais contrairement à toi j'ai fait cette modification [2] qu'il va être possible de trouver la propriété même avec tributaire. Comme je l'ai dit, c'est de ne pas laissé l'ancien nom en alias qui est du vandalisme, rien d'autre. Tu as renommé mouth of the watercourse (P403), inflows (P200) et tributary (P974) sans laissé leur anciens noms dans la propriété. C'est énervant à la fin. Fralambert (talk) 13:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #483 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #484 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #485 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #486 edit

Mal coloriée edit

Allô,

Sur cette carte Wikidata, une partie de la rivière des Outaouais (à l'ouest de l'île de Montréal, entre Vaudreuil-Dorion et Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue entre autres) est mal coloriée (ça ne paraît pas au zoom par défaut ; zoome quatre fois pour voir le défaut). Sais-tu à qui s'adresser pour que ça soit corrigé ?

Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Prince-bishop of Nysa edit

Why is Ecclesiastical Dukes of Nysa (Q106878163) a hoax? The bishops of Wroclaw did hold Duchy of Nysa (Q570702) and in 1290 they obtained a privilege for princely rights and sovereign rule in the mentioned duchy. The first to use title of prince of Nysa was bishop Henryk z Wierzbna (Q69756). As per Dějiny Slezska v datech by Rudolf Žáček (Q674960). Is Margrave of Moravia (Q48797880) hoax too because Margraviate of Moravia (Q2670751) was ruled by King of Bohemia (Q45341328)? --Silesianus (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #487 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #488 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #489 edit

Q104587349 edit

Why did you delete the data object Category:Exterior of Anfield (stadium) (Q104587349)? How are you doing common cause here with the user Rodhullandemu? I request that you restore the data object until the facts have been clarified. --Gymnicus (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Because the category was empty when I looked. I see that it was filled. I recreated this item. Fralambert (talk) 18:21, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I understood and thank you for recreating! It was just weird because just a minute before you deleted the data object, the user Rodhullandemu made the category to a redirect again, although there was no discussion about it at all. --Gymnicus (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

About User:Printit edit

Hello, I found another account of this user. Maybe User:Printnow is a sock account of this user. See c:Special:Log/Printit and c:Special:Log/Printnow. – Afeef (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

They done nothing here and I don't have adminship on Commons. Maybe you should ask @AmandaNP, they where the one who block tem globally. Or you should go on Meta. Fralambert (talk) 22:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #490 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #491 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #492 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #493 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #494 edit

Return to the user page of "Fralambert/Archive 2".