About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Fuzheado/Archive 1 on 2021-02-02.

Fullyfundedschorlarships (talkcontribs)
Vladimir Alexiev (talkcontribs)

Where do you want to add such links? Wikidata is not an advertisement site and any promotion will be quickly deleted.

Reply to "How to edit external links"
Lymantria (talkcontribs)

Hi Fuzheado, at meta I have requested removal of your sysop rights a minute ago, due to our inactivity policy. Thank you very much for the good work you have done, and perhaps we'll see you back in the future. Kind regards, Lymantria.

Lymantria (talkcontribs)

I see you did several deletions yesterday. Request withdrawn.

Fuzheado (talkcontribs)

Thanks, much appreciated!

Reply to "Sysop rights"
Multichill (talkcontribs)

Hi Andrew, what is the point of adding noise like this? And why are you running a bot under your own account? I think it's better to add object stated in reference as (P5997) in the reference section.

Epìdosis (talkcontribs)
Fuzheado (talkcontribs)

Thanks folks, I agree that the object stated in reference as (P5997) solution is a better one and can adjust to using that. It was created relatively recently (2018) without much fanfare so I missed that discussion. As for the actual reference associated with it, it looks as though reference vocabulary (P5967) is preferred over adding full URL links to object pages. I'll put this all into a bot request for further feedback. - ~~~~

Multichill (talkcontribs)

Any plans for clean up?

Reply to "Bot added noise"
Swpb (talkcontribs)

Incorrect use of subclass of (P279)

Hello –

This edit to "dry stone wall" (Q544504) was in error. The properties instance of (P31) and subclass of (P279) define key ontological relationships. Because subclass of (P279) is transitive, such errors lead to numerous false inferences, such as dry stone wall (Q544504)subclass of (P279)fabrication method (P2079). Before you use these properties, please look at the object item to be sure it's the one you intend. You can also review the usage instructions on these two properties, and Help:Basic membership properties. (In particular, note that "A" is only a subclass of "B" if all instances of "A" are also instances of "B".) There is often another property better suited to expressing the relationship you had in mind; you can search for one here. Thanks! Swpb (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Reply to "Incorrect use of P279"

Hi, interested in a WikiProject Large Language Models?

1
TiagoLubiana (talkcontribs)

Hello, Andrew!

I saw you edited the item about prompt engineering on Wikidata and I am trying to find out the Wikidatians interested in joining a WikiProject Large Language Models,

The idea is to try and group Wikidatians that are interested in tracking/modelling what is happening on the interface of Wikidata and Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT.

I thought maybe you would be interested on joining/contributing!

The idea is open-ended, motivated by finding ways to advance the coverage of Wikidata on the topic, and the discussions of our role in this new ecosystem.

Cheers!

Reply to "Hi, interested in a WikiProject Large Language Models?"

Automated report of empty item: Q116298775

1
Dexbot (talkcontribs)

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner.

Reply to "Automated report of empty item: Q116298775"

Automated report of empty item: Q116234464

1
Dexbot (talkcontribs)

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner.

Reply to "Automated report of empty item: Q116234464"

Brueghel II not Barbiers IV by a few centuries

1
Jane023 (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Brueghel II not Barbiers IV by a few centuries"
Jheald (talkcontribs)

Hi, I noticed this recent edit: diff and a few like it.

Normally subject named as (P1810) would seem to be the qualifier to use for a statement like this, as you are indicating how the source has referred to the subject of the item.

It also looks like it would be worth proposing a property for entries in this database (even if its values would not be linkable).

Fuzheado (talkcontribs)

Hey I think you are right - let me take a look and amend. Thanks for your insights.

Reply to "Met Database edits"

Reminder to participate in the Ratification vote of UCoC Enforcement guideline

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

This message has been sent because you are administrator in this project. If you voted, Thank you and please ignore this message 🙂

Hello Wrs8ivkyda7h61xw,

The Ratification vote of Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelinein currently taking place until March 21. If you didn't vote yet, please take a few minutes to participate the ratification vote! Your voice is important.

Best, —YKo (WMF) via

Reply to "Reminder to participate in the Ratification vote of UCoC Enforcement guideline"