Welcome to Wikidata, Korg!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
- Hello Succu, thank you for the stats, and above all thank you for your work with your bot! Out of curiosity, how did your bot connect the items with their LSIDs, and how did you find all these species that had no match?
- I bet that most of them are probably synonyms, like e.g. Araneus eburnus (Q1842867). What is the recommended action to deal with them? Maybe creating a new item with the current name, but leaving all the sitelinks in the old item?
- On a side note, thanks for this edit, I forgot fossil taxon (Q23038290) existed. I'll correct the other items I created. Korg (talk) 00:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- I grabbed the LSIDs form the website. As a result I had table "scientific name/LSID". Then I was running through the scientific names and found the matching items with the help of a SPARQL query.
- Yes a new item should be created. Essential is to connect the new item with the other one via original combination (P1403) / taxon synonym (P1420) / replaced synonym (for nom. nov.) (P694). There is no fixed rule what to do with the sitelinks. You could leave them at the current item or move them to the new one. In this special case I would leave them at Araneus eburnus (Q1842867) because most sitelinks are using the older name. --Succu (talk) 12:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer! I wasn't quite sure how to deal with synonyms, as I have seen a lot of items about taxa with sitelinks to different names, but it appears that items with the new names simply haven't been created yet, so there's a lot to do...
- And it makes sense to leave the sitelinks in one place, so articles in other wikis may have a chance to be updated. Best regards, Korg (talk) 23:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)