Lexicolover

Duplications

You have created (L11368) which was already created in angrešt (L6391). You can verify before creation if word was already created with tool Ordia https://tools.wmflabs.org/ordia/ KaMan (talk) 08:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Ah, I am sorry. I check words through normal search, at least the common ones as there were not many of them before, and I must have missed this one. I will try to be more rigorous. --Lexicolover (talk) 12:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Lexicolover,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Lexicolover,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Slovesný vid

Nazdar, skvělá práce s provazováním lexémů! Jen do budoucna, pro slovesné vidy existuje speciální Property:P7486, kterou by bylo nejspíše vhodnější používat než Property:P31. Jinak mimochodem, pro vytváření mnohých slovních druhů existuje https://tools.wmflabs.org/lexeme-forms/, který některé vlastnosti vyplní sám (a poskytne krapet úplnější data co se tvarů týče), a chybí-li tam jaká šablona, pomoc s jejich vytvářením jenom uvítáme.--Adrijaned (talk) 18:38, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Také zdravím. Díky za informaci. V době, kdy jsem začínal tu taková vlastnost nebyla a z diskusí vyplývalo, že ani nebyl zájem ji založit. Tak jsem to nesledoval, ale jsem za ni rád, určitě ji začnu používat.

Co se týče nástroje na vyplňování tvarů, o tom samozřejmě vím :-) jen je pro mě mnohdy jednodušší ty tvary generovat v hromadném módu (alespoň u podstatných jmen, u přídavných to ještě nemám úplně vychytané a sloves si nejsem úplně jist, jestli ta šablona je vhodně strukturovaná).--Lexicolover (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Pokud se týče přídavných jmen, pro mne celkem funguje skript na https://wd.adrijaned.eu/generator.html (i když kvalita "po dvou hodinách práce jsem se na vylepšování už vykašlal a JavaScript moc nemusím"), kdyžtak zkuste, byl-li by Vám co k čemu. Jinak slovesa jsou poněkud bolevé a popravdě pozapomenuté téma, jakýkoliv vstup na https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Wikidata_Lexeme_Forms/Czech by byl vítán. --Adrijaned (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Gender of Praděd

Hi,

Is the claim Praděd (L407984) grammatical gender (P5185) masculine animate (Q54020116) really correct? I don't Czech so I'm maybe totally wrong but it seems a bit strange to have an animate feature on a toponym. Could you take a look?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: You are absolutely right, thank you. I somehow used wrong template, it is inanimate for sure. --Lexicolover (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks ! One last question, is it on purpose that it's indicated *both* masculine (Q499327) and masculine inanimate (Q52943434) (the second being a subclass of the first) ? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: I suppose it is not necessary to include both since one is subclass of another, but I really ain't the "tech guy". The reason for this is from when I started editing on Wikidata and there were almost no lexemes I could learn from. There are two approaches to genders in Czech language. The first is to have three genders and animacy as separate feature for masculine and second is to have four genders. Each approach have its advantages and disadvantages. Since I had no idea which would be better for Wikidata I used masculine (Q499327) for those who only need the masculine/feminine/neuter distribution of nouns and masculine inanimate (Q52943434)/masculine animate (Q54020116) for those who need information about animacy as well. Since it is in lexeme forms template this way others started to use it as well and up till now I don't know of any discussion about doing it in another way. --Lexicolover (talk) 14:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I just wanted to be sure that was really on purpose and not a mistake. Here it seems logical, maybe some qualifier or references would even be better (masculine according to this ref and masculine inanimate according to that ref), but it's already ok, thanks for the explanation. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Lexémový workshop

Dobrý den, patříte k nemnoha wikidatistům, kteří občas zakládají české lexémy. Dne 23. ledna pořádám malý virtuální workshop k českým lexémům a hodilo by se mi tam mít kolegy a kolegyně, kteří mají s lexikografickými daty nějaké praktické zkušenosti. Kdybyste měl čas, tak budu moc rád. Link k připojení na akci je zde. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 13:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)