Hello Matěj. Since you are much more experienced than me for abuse filter, could you create a new filter to avoid people add wikisource badges (not proofread (Q20748091), proofread (Q20748092), validated (Q20748093) and problematic (Q20748094)) for all the links that do not point to wikisource? The discussion is here. Thanks in advance.
User talk:Matěj Suchánek
Return to the user page of "Matěj Suchánek".
Reply to "Special:AbuseFilter/125"
Reply to "Coordinate precision"
Reply to "Your modifications"
Abuse filter for Wikisource badges
Created Special:AbuseFilter/127. I don't have much time to keep an eye on it. If somebody did, it would be good.
Thank you very much :)
mmm... just had a try at it... without result - what should it do ? warn the user ? prevent ? tag the edit ?
When a new filter is created, it's preferred to only log its hits for some time.
ok... I'm not really familiar with abuse filters. From the abuse filter page, how do I get the log, please ?
You should see "# hits" with the link even as non-sysop on the page.
oh, yes ! got it ! thanks a lot... 4 more hits in less than 24 hours :(
seems that some users use it as a (random) workaround for a problem when adding a ling User_talk:AlwynapHuw#Badge :/
@Hsarrazin I am not sure you can access the filter pages if you are not sysop.
This filter now tags almost all edits as it includes a link break (\n). Tab (\t) should also be ignored.
See also the abusefilter in zhwiki.
I deleted it.
You also probably need to import zh:Special:滥用过滤器/264 (for replacement character).
I put it to the same filter for now. Thanks for keeping an eye on it.
I could you replace 'melldroader en Italia' by 'melldroader Italia' in MediaWiki:Gadget-autoEdit.js?
Ooups, my bad, I correct my message and put the template on the talk page.
Thanks. Seems I overlooked that request.
A request by a new user
Can you please delete this category? I created it by mistake while I didn’t realise I wasn’t logged on to my account. A duplicate category already exists.-Vaibhavafro (talk) 05:47, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Duplicates can be merged and don't require admin intervention.
You may be interested.
User:Frettie/consistency check add.js
I've just noticed that inverse properties are now automatically added (at least for part of (P361)/has part (P527)). Is it caused by your recent change of User:Frettie/consistency check add.js ? Thanks.
Now they really are added. Previously this feature was broken, possibly by me, too.
Ok, thanks. So it was broken since I installed it then, because I've always add to click on "Consistency" on the left bar and then on the wanted inverse statement to make it work.
edit filter for P856 ?
I wonder if it's worth doing an edit filter for official website (P856).
In general, users should add an end date qualifier and/or the new website with preferred rank instead of updating the existing values.
Limit cases are probably adding (or removing) a trailing "/", switching to https, and adding a language qualifier. These shouldn't be filtered.
Is there a way to skip filtering large items for now?
This is not about items being large but about clutter in the variables. Ideally, you would have there nothing but the old url if and only if it's the only changed thing (sample).
"removed_lines" wouldn't do?
It has the same problem. I'll try to find more test cases and then perhaps craft a now working filter.
Started a catch-all filter to get some test cases.
things that should probably bypass the filter (in addition to above):
- removal or addition of "www." https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126727
- removal of "/index.html" or even "/anything/something/" https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126942 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126666
- addition or removal of "/" after domain name: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8127136 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126607 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126546
- addition of some path or parameter: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8121855
- Even if it can be useful: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8121570
- change to archive: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8121740
- change of domain name: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126943 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126929 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126691 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126678 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8123720 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8122574
- change of tld: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8126982
Thanks. Seems work.
(index\.(html?|php))? could be excluded too: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8150548 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8140313 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/8137153
I added draft message at MediaWiki talk:Abusefilter-warning-120.
Supposedly we would have to do one for statement deletions as well.
I had to deactivate it for a while but it's back now.
I re-checked a couple and didn't find one that shouldn't trigger it.
Hi, I revisited Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2019/07#Editing_and_discussions and did another modification to Template:Edit tools. Please review the changes, especially if the moving of copyright warning was ok. Since the text edit tools is mostly used in chat I assume that it's not often a problem (as it would in Wikipedia itself). My edits didn't change any of the translation items, apart from moving, but it still said I should ask translator for update so consider that done now. Thanks!
PS. I haven't seen this type of talk page before. Are posts auto-signed? ~~~~
Okay, I marked it for translation. It may be better to post such a notice to WD:Translators' noticeboard, in case I'm not available.
This type of talk is called Structured Discussions, formerly Flow and there used to be also LiquidThreads (in case you wanted find more). Neither got enough approval among users although it does have useful features that usual wikitext-based talk pages don't have (and which are likely to be re-invented after the consultation).
Hi Matěj. I noticed you imported several coordinates of Romanian monuments from hu.wp and I was wondering how did you determine the precision of 0.012... (or about 1/77?). As far as I can see, the coordinates in hu.wp were precise up to the second (and probably even more in this case, since they're spot on the monument, so maybe you had another source?
Why did I do that? When editing, line breaks do not always work, so when a title is found with the body of the text, the translation may appear on reading as follows:
== The title == The body of the text...
This is why we must tag each piece of text seperately. Thank you for restoring my change.
Yes, your changes were absolutely right. It seems that now with this wrong markup only the heading is included for translation. Previously, the heading AND the following paragraph would be which I am used to solve by moving the heading to a new T-unit. I also didn't realize that you restored exactly those T-unit markers which were used but then somehow disappear. So thanks for your edits and sorry for the noise. If you want to apply for translation admin, I will gladly support you.