User talk:Multichill/Archives/2015/September

About User:NoclaimsBot at fa.wiki

Hi, thank you for your edits at fa.wiki. to have better results if it is possible please add the below requests to your bot's lists

  • please seprate fa:کاربر:NoclaimsBot/List/0 to subpages with the first word like fa:کاربر:NoclaimsBot/List/آ
  • please seprate the list to two subsections (1- with interwiki 2- without interwiki) because some of these items should be merged.
  • please add wikidata's Q link in front of each link to use them at autolist2 like: # [[foo]] > [[Q1234]]
  • please use # instead of * to know how many case are remained

Thank you for your times Yamaha5 (talk) 14:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Please help us with rerunning your bot and applying above requests. Thanks. Mahdy Saffar (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. please only update the list at fa.wikipedia we added many claims and the list should be update. If it is possible send me the sql I will do it on fa.wiki Yamaha5 (talk) 04:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Europeana ID (and links) on Swedish national museum

Hi,

While working on creators for your imports, I noticed a problem with EUropeana IDs on the Swedish national museum, for exemple on Q18593488.

The Europeana links don't work : the adress has been changed on their side AND the encoding for the ID is wrong, since even after changing the code, the result is 404.

Note that this is the case for References too....

for these items (National Museum of Sweden), the syntax of complete Europeana link is now

http://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/2048005/Athena_Plus_ProvidedCHO_Nationalmuseum__Sweden_26412.html (the number at the end being the same as the objectID on the site of NMS, not the catalog ID).

this is a lot of work to change all links concerned, in P727 (P727) but also in references (4664 items possibly concerned on Autolist (claim[195:842858] and claim[727]). Do you think it could be done by your bot ?

The biggest problem is that, in fact, there is no proper EuropeanaID : for now, they don't have and don't intend to have for a long time. :((--Hsarrazin (talk) 14:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, those links are supposed to be stable links. I'll have a look at it if User:Lokal Profil doesn't beat me to it, he did this upload and knows more about the collection than I do. Multichill (talk) 14:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I was prewarned that this would happen by the museum. The cause is an erroneous mapping of the museum ids whuch in turn generate the Europeana ids.
Due to holidays (in Sweden everyone buggers off for 2 months) I haven't gotten the old id to new id mapping yet but ones I have it (and am myself back from holidays) I'll update all of the affected items (statements and sources).
I'll also get access to the artist/depicted persons dataset later this year and should then be able to fully populate these fields for all of the paintings. /Lokal Profil (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Awesome Lokal Profil. We'll just wait for that. Multichill (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Just talked to the museum and they will provide me with a csv with a mapping of old to new identifiers. I looked into using pywikibot for changing these but while changing the statements seems easy enough changing the references is anything but. Any tips/suggestions are welcome. I've been able to get as far as either removing the old source or adding the new one, but not both. /Lokal Profil (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
@Lokal Profil: Quick reply. Remove the source. Do a forced update ("item.get(force=True)"), add the new source. I think that should work. Multichill (talk) 13:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Still gave me an "APIError: editconflict". I instead ended up doing a much less elegant solution where in addition to the "item.get(force=True)" the claim also gets reaccessed by keeping track of order etc. Guess this is why Claim.changeTarget() is not implemented for Sources/Qualifiers. I'll get started with replacing the bad links later today. /Lokal Profil (talk) 09:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
@Hsarrazin, Multichill: Some 20,000 edits and two patches to pywikibot later all of the links have been replaced. A few of the Europeana id's were removed since not all paintings were included in the new Europeana export. Because nothing says persistent identifier like renaming and deletion ;) /Lokal Profil (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
@Lokal Profil: Thanks a lot.... :) --Hsarrazin (talk) 11:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Frames

Hi Multichill, you created some items for frames of the Minneapolis Institute of Art (Q1700481) like Frame (Q20891731) and Frame (Q20891731) with instance of (P31)painting (Q3305213). I'd be happy if you corrected it. I'm not even sure if it is useful to add some single frames, at least for now. Cheers, --Marsupium (talk) 22:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your involvement in Wiki Loves Open Data

Hi Multichill,

I noticed that you are involved in the Wiki Loves Open Data initiative, specifically regarding the Flemish art collections. Hence, I would like to draw your attention to the StrepHit IEG proposal: one of its goals is to invite Open Data organizations to donate their data through a standard procedure (cf. task T10.4 and this section).

Could you please have a look at the proposal? It would be ideal if you could endorse and/or join it via the blue buttons.

Looking forward to hearing back from you.

Cheers,

--Hjfocs (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Multichill/Archives/2015/September".