Open main menu

User talk:Okkn

Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Okkn!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! --Tobias1984 (talk) 12:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)



Babel lets you view and edit more than one language on Wikidata. Just add e.g. {{#babel:de-N|en-3|es-1|fr-2|nl-3|it-4|da-0}} to your user page. With the same language codes you can add links to your userpage on Wikipedia e.g. ja:User:Okkn. --Tobias1984 (talk) 12:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Tobias. Thank you for informing me. I'll try it. --Okkn (talk) 15:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
I saw that everything worked. Perfect. If you have any questions you can ask here Wikidata:井戸端 --Tobias1984 (talk) 15:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
And if you are interested in Medicine you are more than welcome to join our WikiProject: Wikidata:WikiProject Medicine --Tobias1984 (talk) 15:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Sounds interesting! How can I join the project? --Okkn (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
You just sign your name here: Wikidata:WikiProject_Medicine#Participants. Then you can also add {{ .... |Medicine}} at the end of your Babel box to indicate that you are part of the project. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
I've got it. Thank you very much! --Okkn (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata Graph BuilderEdit

Did you see the Wikidata Graph Builder yet (warning needs a good CPU, might crash browser): ? The ontology shown traverses the subclass of (P279) property down from medication (Q12140). It shows that we do have some problems in certain areas, where we are not specific enough (i.e. linking directly to the drug without any subclasses) or large grouping, which might also need further subdivision. By the way you can do the same in SPARQL by writing ?item wdt:P279* wd:Q12140. The * will traverse subclass of (P279) (367 results) instead of just going to the first level (41 results). --Tobias1984 (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

@Tobias1984: Wow, it's a nice tool and some problems around pharmaceutical drug are visualized... And I didn't know * in SPARQL. Thank you.
Well, I don't really understand the rule for using subclass (and subclass of (P279) property). Should we only use suitable specific subclasses? Superclasses have not to be used with their subclass? For example, linking to both medication (Q12140) and antibiotic (Q12187) is valid or not? --Okkn (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The decision to link is actually more dependent, if there is a source that suggests this link. Multiple p279 statements might seem redundant, but that might change according to how the query is written. I think in general it is a complicated topic and we still have a lot of work to do in Medicine and Pharmacology. --Tobias1984 (talk) 20:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

anatomical branch of (P3261)Edit

Are you planning to add dat for anatomical branch of (P3261)? ChristianKl (talk) 15:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

@ChristianKl: No, not yet. Do you have any idea? --Okkn (talk) 03:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

東雲寺 (名古屋市)Edit

東雲寺 (名古屋市)の編集をしていただき、ありがとうございました。--duck775 (talk) 03:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@Duck775: いえいえ、どういたしまして。Wikidataに日本の項目を増やしていきましょう!わからないことがあればいつでも聞いてください。 --Okkn (talk) 13:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Henri-Frédéric IselinEdit

Bonjour, pouvez-vous supprimer cette image ? Elle n'est pas une image de l'artiste, mais d'un de ses productions, présente au sein de son article. --Lyokoï (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

@Lyokoï: I got it. Because IP address users remove that image, I misunderstood as the acts of vandalism. --Okkn (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Note: this is about Henri-Frédéric Iselin (Q2083652) --Okkn (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, it's because the contributor is learning during an workshop. I'm sorry for this misunderstand. And thank for the link. --Lyokoï (talk) 17:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Dog is not Taxon, but Cat (among others) isEdit

I noticed that cat (Q146) is also instance of common name (Q502895) but is also instance of taxon. is therefore this list also all not considered taxon and need to be corrected? Also the examples Wikidata:SPARQL_query_service/queries/examples#Animals_that_were_executed, Wikidata:SPARQL_query_service/queries/examples#Animals_owned_by_people_holding_any_position do not cover dogs in the query. Thanks! --Sphericon

@Sphericon: You are a man of vision. I think house cat (Q146) should also be fixed. The model case is the relation of human (Q5) and Homo sapiens (Q15978631). Taxon of house cat (Q146) is Felis catus (Q20980826), and that of dog (Q144) is Canis familiaris (Q20717272). It is true that not all taxons have the corresponding items for common name (Q502895), but if common name item exists, common name (Q502895) and taxon (Q16521) should be separated. By the way, examples can be fixed to cover common names (Fixed query for the latter example). --Okkn (talk) 04:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
@Okkn: Thank you! I agree with your example to remove human, I guess in some definitions human is considered an animal. I also saw that many animals use the subclass of (P279) of animal (Q729) is this maybe a viable option additionally to common name (Q502895)? There are also a three animals with both instance of (P31) taxon (Q16521) and subclass of (P279) animal (Q729) as in this list It seems there are many holes in the animal ontology, is there a central discussion dedicated to this?
@Sphericon: You can join Wikidata:WikiProject Taxonomy or disscuss this problem on Wikidata:Project chat. --Okkn (talk) 13:06, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
@Okkn: Thank you, I will have a look! --Sphericon

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!Edit

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | Nederlands | português | русский | +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades... (our gift is better than the one at Commons or Meta)

You have your gun; now here's your badge: {{User admin}}/{{#babel:admin}} and {{Admin topicon}}. Enjoy!

Congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Wikidata. Please take a moment to read the Wikidata:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Wikidata:Project chat, Wikidata:Requests for comment, and Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikidata-admin @ If you need access, you can flag someone down at @ You may find Wikidata:Guide to Adminship to be useful reading. You may also want to consider adding yourself to meta:Template:Wikidata/Ambassadors, and to any similar page on your home wiki if one exists. (Check Wikipedia:Wikidata/Wikidatans (Q14964498).)

Please also add/update the languages you speak to your listing at Wikidata:List of administrators. You may also like to add your username to this list if you would not like that items you delete at RfD get marked as deleted automatically. Again, welcome to the admin corps!

Lymantria (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Backlinked itemsEdit

Hey Okkn, I think you should have a look at this page. When you delete an item, please make sure that it is no longer in use by any other item. If you still think that the item should be deleted (e.g. empty category item), please also remove all other statements that use the deleted item. You can easily find them via Special:WhatLinksHere in the left menu within each item. Good luck! —MisterSynergy (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: Thank you for informing me. I will take care of it. --Okkn (talk) 22:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Edits to "Year"Edit

Your edits to year (Q577) are being discussed at Wikidata: Project chat#Will "applies to part" work well with conversion factors?. Also, I removed one conversion factor because it was too precise to apply to all the kinds of years that the item reasonably applies to. This aspect is discussed further on the item talk page. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I mentioned in Talk:Q577. --Okkn (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Possible WikiProject for year discussionEdit

I have inquired at Wikidata talk:WikiProject Calendar Dates#Expand to cover year items? to see if that project would like to be a more enduring place to discuss and document the year-related discussions currently going on at Wikidata:Project chat. Since you have participated, I wanted to invite you to the discussion. Perhaps we shouldn't advertise the WikiProject in Project chat until a consensus emerges about whether the WikiProject wants to take on years or not. Jc3s5h (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

SuccuBot must be blockedEdit

WD:SOCK clearly and explicitly states that a block placed on his main account applies to all accounts they use, so their bot may not edit. I also strongly dislike that you reverted my action without consulting me.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jasper Deng: Operating the SuccuBot is not "circumventing sanctions or blocks", because the bot had only continued the approved tasks since before you blocked Succu. Do you really think Succu operated his bot account "for an improper purpose"? I believed this is an obvious and uncontroversial case, so I didn't consult you before unblocking it. --Okkn (talk) 05:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
This is the policy the community made. I personally want an exemption for bots in the policy, but the policy makes no such exemption, and we are not at liberty to make one because bot operators are responsible for their bots' edits. If you want to change this, make an RfC. But this is what it is at the time. It is generally frowned upon to revert any admin's actions of any sort except for very obvious mistakes (i.e. things like blocking you by mistake).--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay, if that is the official interpretation of the policy, my action was wrong. --Okkn (talk) 05:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Request for helpEdit

I was referred to you by Mr. @Mahir256:. Can you please add the following to this page in Japanese:

  1. Label: ニセコイ
  2. Description: 河合隼人による映画 (I doubt if this description is correct!)
  3. Aliases: Use the full name as seen in the poster on en wiki.

Harsh Rathod Poke me! 18:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done Thanks! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 19:13, 6 May x2018 (UTC)

@Harshrathod50: Not at all, but what's wrong with you? --Okkn (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

No, nothing, what happened? Harsh Rathod Poke me! 19:20, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Lexeme entity use on Items and Properties phab:T195611Edit

Hi! An abuse filter that I made last night stopped one of your edits to Property:P5186. This is currently in place due to a bug which you can read about @ Adam Shorland (WMDE) (talk) 10:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

@Adam Shorland (WMDE): Thank you for informing me. I had noticed the filter and read the ticket. But isn't it enough to apply this filter only to Items, not to Properties? --Okkn (talk) 10:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
To be honest I am not 100% sure, but to avoid things being broken over the weekend we decided to apply it to both properties and items for now. We will reassess the situation on Monday. If we switch it to just Items I'll go through and undo my undos. Adam Shorland (WMDE) (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Due to a US holiday today (Monday) this will be pushed back to Tuesday. Adam Shorland (WMDE) (talk) 18:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

John LennonEdit

Could you please protect this? - Bossanoven (talk) 06:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Bossanoven: Thank you for reporting the vandalism. I semi-protected John Lennon (Q1203) for three months, but next time please request at Administrators' noticeboard, if there isn't any special reason. Regards, --Okkn (talk) 06:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


I'm surprised by your decision here. When I learnt Japanese, my teacher taught me that the stem for 見る is み! --Deryck Chan (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Deryck Chan: Japanese grammar which native Japanese speakers learn in Japan is sometimes different from the grammar non-native speakers learn. You can see w:ja:上一段活用 and find that 「語幹」 of 「見る」 is put in parentheses. --Okkn (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Actually you're right. When I read w:ja:上一段活用 it came back to me that the prevalent definition of "stem" in Japanese textbooks for 上一 and 下一 is that the last two syllables of the dictionary form both get cut off. Considering み as the stem because it doesn't change with conjugation generally comes from European linguisticians who take a functional definition of "stem". Deryck Chan (talk) 16:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
@Deryck Chan: Definition of "word stem" in the Japanese grammar (studied in school in Japan) may not be linguistic, but it is reasonable to regard the last two syllables of 上一 verbs as their word stem, because some 上一 verbs are derived from w:ja:上二段活用 verbs of Old Japanese language (文語文法). For example, 「落[お]ちる (上一)」 is derived from Old Japanese 「落[お]つ (上二)」, and the word stem of 「落[お]つ」 must be 「落[お]」 (See the table in w:ja:上二段活用). However, if we regard the word stem of 「見る」 as 「み」, the word stem of 「落ちる」 will be 「落ち」. This discordance seems to be strange to native Japanese speakers. --Okkn (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
そですね。そして、文語上一は、「見る」の「語幹」が何ですか。でもありませんか。Deryck Chan (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
@Deryck Chan: 文語文法でも「見る」には語幹がありません。マ行上一段活用の活用語尾は「み-み-みる-みる-みれ-みよ」で、上二段活用の活用語尾は「み-み-む-むる-むれ-みよ」です。上一段活用についても「み」を語幹に入れないことにより、活用パターンに一貫性があり、学習しやすいのだと思います。 --Okkn (talk) 04:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

P1889 and P461Edit

[2] [3]

Do you think the constraint is a bad idea? Swpb (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Swpb: Yes. These properties have already been used many times without that qualifier. --Okkn (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Items about library only in JapaneseEdit


Could you take a look at this item Q11632449. I put a subclass of (P279) a bit more specific but beyond that, I'm not sure what this item is about. Is it similar (sbuclass) or identical (merge) to parliamentary library (Q2052886) ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: It is a common noun for the library of parliament (Q35749). National Diet Library (Q477675) and Library of Congress (Q131454) can be the instance of it. So it may be identical to parliamentary library (Q2052886). --Okkn (talk) 15:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Help us improving the user experience of Lexicographical DataEdit


I’m Jan, doing research on user experience in the Wikidata team. I’m currently discussing with people who are editing Lexemes, in order to understand their needs better, and improve their experience with the interface.

We noticed that you have been actively editing Lexemes recently (thank you for that!) and we would love to have a discussion with you about what you’re doing, how you work, what motivates you to create Lexemes, and how you imagine reusing the data later.

This discussion would take place as an individual interview with one of our designers. Via the communication platform of your choice, you’ll be able to share your screen, show how you’re currently editing the data and chat with us. The discussion would take between 30 and 60 min, we will set up the appointment depending on when you are available. Depending on your preferred language, the discussion can happen in English, German or French.

If you’re interested, feel free to reply to this message or send me an email:

If you don’t want to be contacted by us on this topic anymore, please let me know.

Thanks a lot for your help Jan Dittrich (WMDE) (talk) 11:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


I have a strong feeling that this list of items is using P279 improperly, in part because they show up on Wikidata:List_of_classes_of_administrative_territorial_entities. Should that statement in fact be removed (or moved to a P31 claim)? Mahir256 (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Mahir256: You are right. They should be moved to P31 claims. Could you please replace in that way? --Okkn (talk) 01:59, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Okay, doing this right now. Thank you for letting me know! Mahir256 (talk) 02:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Not at all! Thank you for improving Japan-related items. --Okkn (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Japanese lexemesEdit

Hi, could you look into ? I feel uncomfortable seeing Internet slang as lexical category. KaMan (talk) 16:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@KaMan: Thank you for informing me. Some of them are inappropriate (just disparaging terms), so I have deleted them. --Okkn (talk) 17:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please don't vandalizeEdit

[4] Thank you! 20:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Ernst Johann Alexander Medem (Q16350920) has had a sitelink of w:lv:Aleksandrs fon Mēdems. Is "Ernst Johann Alexander Medem" really a right name? Do you havn any source for that? If so, sorry for reverting the edit. Anyway, please create an account not to be misunderstand as vandals. Best regards, --Okkn (talk) 23:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
You have an account, but you are the vandal! What does it help to create an account? You support the vandalism of Jura1 on Property:P2580. Please stop it. Do you want that Wikidata stores correct informationi? Look all the changes done in the edit that YOU protected [5] are insertion of FALSE information. 15:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
The case of Ernst Johann Alexander Medem (Q16350920) are completely different from your case. I reverted the edit because the label was changed by a new IP user, and the new label was different from the title of sitelink. It is really difficult to distinguish such edits from a real vandals.
When it comes to your case, an edit war was actually happened. That's why I terminate it. I just semi-protected the pages, so every auto-confirmed users can edit those pages. --Okkn (talk) 16:47, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
But you protected a vandalized version, you HELPED a vandal. You say "every auto-confirmed user" - I am not auto-confirmed. It is like saying: Every White-Male can edit, but Black-Woman are out. Even if the Black-Woman gave the correct information, but the White-Male was vandalizing. Look at the content, Jura1 was vandalizing. He removed a lot of content from the talk page. The IPs made dozens of correct edits. You can see in Russian and German and Latvian Wikipedia: IPs made hundreds of correct edits. Jura1 is vandalizing. Look all the edits in the property, he is editing against half a dozen of users and intimidates them, threatening with blocks. And you help Jura1. YOU support a vandal. 19:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Talk pages are not your personal notebook or clipboard. I think Jura's edits are appropriate. If you believe you are right, please ask other (auto-confirmed) users to support you. I haven't prohibited you from doing so. Also, the reason you are not "auto-confirmed" just depends on your own choice; i.e. deciding not to create an account. Be careful at your language. --Okkn (talk) 19:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
You helped and still help a vandal. Editing via IP is allowed, but you disallowed it for some pages. - "I think Jura's edits are appropriate." - see, from the very beginning your intention was to help Jura1. You are co-working with Jura1 in vandalism. Jura1 inserted the nonsense en:label:Aleksandrs fon Mēdems and you support it. Jura1 vandalises BBLD ID - and you support it. 15:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Answered in "You are a liar" section below. --Okkn (talk) 07:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

"Try it!" translation linkEdit

Hi! do you know where the link to translate this term (from Template:SPARQL label)? I need to translate it to Bahasa Indonesia --Pebaryan (talk) 10:37, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

@Pebaryan: You can translate it in Template:Int try it. Thank you for your contribution! --Okkn (talk) 11:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

super! many thanks! --Pebaryan (talk) 13:39, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

The composer of Sikken voldsom trængsel og alarmEdit

We had an editing session with some university students in Aarhus friday. Among the information added or revised was that the composer of that christmas song is Adolf Müller, not as normally stated Emil Horneman (check Danish article). In any case it is not Peter Faber, he wrote the text.Ditlev Petersen (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I see that you have the correct data now. Ditlev Petersen (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
(Q12335279) I'm sorry for upsetting you. I noticed that and undid my edit, just after I mistakenly reverted your edit. --Okkn (talk) 08:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

from User:Okkn/common.js to User:Okkn/jsonLexeme.jsEdit

Hi! I have noticed that you modified and extended functionality from oryginal User:GZWDer/newentity.js. Could you please move your code to separate place outside your common.js so others could include it and benefit from your extensions? From what I understood you have added 'edit' to existing lexemes and I'm very interested in such functionality myself. :) Do I need to modify my Module:Lexeme-pl to be able to edit lexemes? KaMan (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

@KaMan: I have created User:Okkn/jsonLexeme.js (and changed the section title). You will be able to use Module:Lexeme-pl just as it is, but please note that this script will create duplicate claims if the Lexeme had already had the same claims. Regards, --Okkn (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
If you open "Edit Lexeme" dialog on a Lexeme page, the Lexeme ID will be autofilled. --Okkn (talk) 13:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank You, it works great! I have added your script and module to tools list: KaMan (talk) 15:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
I'm glad to hear that. And thank you for adding them to the list! --Okkn (talk) 15:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

You are a liarEdit

"Excessive vandalism"

(cur | prev) 15:35, 11 October 2018‎ Okkn (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (17,595 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Protected "Property talk:P2580": Excessive vandalism ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 15:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 15:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC))))

But you protected the vandalised version! 15:48, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jura1: Any thoughts? --Okkn (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Look what he removed [6] 16:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

As an admin, I must terminate an edit war. Also, Jura1 is a trusted user, and I cannot understand your intention at those pages. Thanks, --Okkn (talk) 16:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Trusted by whom? Look at the edits. He inserts nonsense. His edits have been changed several times by other users. Look at the talk page what he removed. YOU support Jura1 a vandal if you protect the page. He started the edit war. Everything was fine. Look at the changes by jura1 to the property : every single change is wrong. It is "BBLD" not "BBLd" not "BBL digital" - even you as a Japanese can understand that. You are NOT honest if you say you don't understand. It is very easy to understand. See . Jura1 is a vandal. 19:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
I protected the pages not because of the contents of the page, but because of the nonesense edit warring.
Hmm, the property was originally created as "Baltisches Biographisches Lexikon digital ID"(, but "BBLd" and "Baltisches Biographisches Lexikon digital" seems an old name (de:Baltisches Biographisches Lexikon Digital). However, my talk page is not the place to discuss what is the right name for the property. Please open a dicussion in other place. I have no idea about BBLD or BBLd at all. --Okkn (talk) 20:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
YOU protected the page in a vandalised state. Jura1 vandalised hundreds of items, altering labels, removing links, removing other claims e.g. removing instanceOf [7]. You wrote "Excessive vandalism", you didn't write "nonesense edit warring". Look who started the edit warring and content removal on the talk page: Was it Jura1? Why do you help this vandal? 15:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Jura's and my edits on Ernst Johann Alexander Medem (Q16350920) is not vandalism because "Aleksandrs fon Mēdems" is actually the page title of the sitelink (lv:Aleksandrs_fon_Mēdems).
You can make edit requests for the semi-protected pages in Wikidata:Project chat or Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard, if the current contents should be modified. You can also request to unprotect those pages in Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard, if the current protection is inappropriate. --Okkn (talk) 07:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Why do you keep evading your block instead of asking WMF for a deblock? --- Jura 17:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Japanese lexeme in latin alphabetEdit

Hi! Could you please look into 女神/めがみ/megami (L39628) if it is created correctly and support User:Mr. Guye if needed? Thanks in advance. KaMan (talk) 06:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

@KaMan: Thank you for reporting it! I have modified the lexeme. --Okkn (talk) 04:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Tedi AleksandrovaEdit

Hello I see you've taken off my edits because it has no source but to be fair her claimed d.o.b of 11/12/1990 has no source other than her claiming. Everyone in Bulgaria knows she's lying about her age I mean it's obvious she looks a lot older than 28  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) at 14:57, 19 January 2019‎ (UTC).

We cannot allow data which remain no more than speculation. Regards, --Okkn (talk) 11:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello well technically like I said before her being born in 1990 is just a speculation I haven't seen any official documents that prove that's when she's born. Like I'm 23 and I look 15-20 years younger than her.

Is there any source which shows that many people in Bulgaria know she is lying about her age? In that case, we can assign "deprecated rank" to the statement, rather than removing current value. For detail, please see Help:Ranking. --Okkn (talk) 10:01, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Species itemsEdit

Vanessalozano (talk) 09:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Hi Okkn, nice suggestion! instead of country of origin (P495) I can use "indigenous to" (P2341).

  • @Vanessalozano: I'm glad to help! Thank you for your contribution. --Okkn (talk) 13:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Japanese lexemeEdit

Is this invalid ID (L42253) candidate for deletion or it can be fixed? I don't know japanese. KaMan (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

@KaMan: Deleted. It may be a test edit. --Okkn (talk) 13:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Okkn".