Rzuwig

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Rzuwig/Archive 1 on 2015-08-25.

Cześć, są dwa "hasła" opisujące ten sam obiekt: Q640604, Q9159382. Ten drugi moim zdaniem do usunięcia. Pomożesz? ~~~~

Cześć,

Usunąłem zduplikowany element. Pozdrawiam.

Yes, you are. This is the same right.

Not true. I can not edit protected pages (for example: Q7189270). Please return the authorization to me.

@דגש_חזק: According to Special:UserRights/דגש_חזק you are "Implicit member of: Autoconfirmed users", and according to Wikidata:Autoconfirmed users page those are the same rights as what "Confirmed" users get, and that includes editing of semi-protected pages. Do you still have issue editing pages like Q7189270?

Probably my mistake. Sorry..

Cześć, dzięki za edycje w leksemach. Czy nie sądzisz, że dodawanie takich definicji leksemów typu "polskie powiedzenie" mija się z celem, w momencie gdy leksem już jest oznaczony jako powiedzenie a język zdefiniowano jako polski? W dokumentacji leksemów mamy link do tego, jak powinna wyglądać definicja: skos:definition supplies a complete explanation of the intended meaning of a concept. The following example is adapted from [ISO2788]:

ex:documentation skos:definition

   "the process of storing and retrieving information 
   in all fields of knowledge"@en.

Co myślisz? Pozdrawiam serdecznie!

Cześć, dzięki za sugestię. Będę umieszczał bardziej rozbudowane opisy, aby dodane leksemy były bardziej wartościowe :-)

Hi! 👋 I don't think your edits to Neptun (L646348) (and the other planets) are very useful, unfortunately. A gloss is supposed to give a precise meaning (within reason, of course), but these clearly aren't precise. "Neptun" doesn't mean "a planet in our solar system", it means Neptune (Q332). If you go by the glosses in any other language other than English, you would think that Neptun (L646348) and Merkur (L646342) are synonyms, though that's obviously not the case. For glosses in languages other than the subject language, it makes much more sense to just add the translation (like I'd already done with English for that Norwegian Bokmål lexeme), because that gives a pretty precise definition of what it means. I guess my point is, please don't treat glosses like item descriptions, they are two different things, with very different usecases.

I see now you're doing this with colors. Why?

This message has been sent because you are administrator in this project. If you voted, Thank you and please ignore this message 🙂

Hello Wrs8ivkyivkh37xl,

The Ratification vote of Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelinein currently taking place until March 21. If you didn't vote yet, please take a few minutes to participate the ratification vote! Your voice is important.

Best, —YKo (WMF) via

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Please restore the item for Mari Rosendahl Q106113161. There are several authority ids for her, for example

csfd:149704

kinopoisk:6065101

elonet:877891

I created a Wikipedia article about her at https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mari_Rosendahl

I would also like to know your detailed reasoning for the deletion to be able to assist the creator of the item to ensure better that a new item can stay.

One of the sources is currently dysfunctional, that could have been the reason?

Thank you,

Hi,

The item Q106113161 was restored.

It was deleted, because hasn't interwiki links and was requested to delete at Wikidata:Requests for deletions per "not meet the notability policy". Now this item is ok :-)

Regards,

Thank you! We can continue to make it better. Cheers,

Hello! :) Would it be possible for you to help with these?

Property talk:P3141#Rename property

Property_talk:P5576#Rename property

Cześć, czy mógłbyś usunąć? Utworzyłem go minutę później, niż ten Q98628668 ale do tej pory nie widzę referencji ani jednego, ani drugiego w wikipedii dostępnej poprzez blaszanego peceta z Chromem i Windows7. Łączenie (merge) jest zbędne. Dzięki, ~~~~

Cześć, zrobione.

Hej, mógłbyś usunąć moją stronę użytkownika? Ktoś ją stworzył za mnie

Załatwione.

dzięki wielkie :)