About this board

Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Salgo60!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, please ask me on [[User talk:|my talk page]]. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Salgo60/Archive 1 on 2018-05-21.

Clifflandis (talkcontribs)

Hello, I moved the GitHub topic of "athens" from Athens, Georgia, USA (Q203263) to Athens, Greece (Q1524), since that seemed like the best fit. Feel free to undo if I've made a mistake.


Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

Thanks this a new property and its a guessing ;-) see if the people in GITHUB likes this link

I feel it could be used also for us to easier find GITHUB repositories related to WIkidata and properties the future will tell


Magnus in Stockholm, Sweden

Reply to "Moved GitHub topic"

Universal Code of Conduct consultation

Sannita (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Hello, I am writing to you to personally invite you to the ongoing consultation about the new Wikimedia movement's Universal Code of Conduct. Your feedback as an experienced user is of great value for us, and we are extremely interested in hearing your say.

You might express your opinion at any given time and in any way you may consider useful (for example, publicly at the consultation page or on my talk page, or privately via email). If you wish or feel more comfortable, we can also set up an online meeting in order to discuss your opinions and ideas.

Please remember that there is no such thing as a “stupid opinion” or “worthless idea”, so be bold and feel free to express yourself. :) Also, if you wish you can help us involving other users you know and that you think might be interested in having their say in this!

Hope to hear from you soon!

Reply to "Universal Code of Conduct consultation"

Borrow your brain for enWS occupation categories?

Summary by Billinghurst

pointers provided

Billinghurst (talkcontribs)

The Wikisources as they have authors and biographical works have occupations of the people and of the works about the people, let alone works about the occupations irrespective of the people +++.

When set up, the occupational categorisation focused on those of the authors (author: ns) and the naming was kept simple to focus on that relationship. Problem is that we didn't tell the punters so they have been populated with biographies, and later they have been WD-ised so they are now quite dishevelled, and not fit for purpose. Anyway, I am (trying to) sort it out, and what was a simple plan is now needing some input from someone outside with a different (clearer? less polluted?) PoV. Can I borrow your brain somewhere/somehow to discuss and get a perspective that will better align with outside of enWS. This may also be part of a conversation of what is an occupation, versus what is a skill/approach. Thanks if you can, if you think that this may be better with someone else, then please point me in a direction. :-)

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

I am very confused with occupation and I am more a Wikidata person I see two wishes

Billinghurst (talkcontribs)

Thank for the pointers. I grabbed your name at the WikiProject.

GZWDer (talkcontribs)

. Did you really intended to create it as a subproject of Magnus Sälgö project? Or should it be top-level project instead?

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

If you can help me make it as its own.... my skills was not good enough... I just weanted to have it "outside" my todo list

GZWDer (talkcontribs)

What about the Magnus Sälgö project? should it be a subproject of WMSE?

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

If possible not a subproject....

Reply to "Phabricator project "so9q""
JozeSlb (talkcontribs)
Salgo60 (talkcontribs)
JozeSlb (talkcontribs)

Thank you very much!

Reply to "Help"
ChristianKl (talkcontribs)

What is Q104527705 about? Why is there a need for a duplicated item? All I see is a link to a redirect and redirects are not in itself notable.

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

Correct me if you have an idea I will try to explain my thought

I created a Lexeme Lexeme:L349292 = stuss

my thought was that this Lexeme should match the same meaning of the Qnumber even if its nearly the same.... so I created this object ..... and used Property:P5137 = this new object

stuss = Q104527705

stjärt = Q42165

My unskilled feeling is that Q104527705 was used much more in the old days and is more informal....

ChristianKl (talkcontribs)

Items are not about words, they are about concepts. Lexemes can be informal or formal but items about an anatomical entity can't be formal or informal. If the difference between stuss and stjärt is only about formality the lexemes for them should point to the same Wikidata item.

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

Thanks I check in the Swedish Telegram group if the think its the same or not....

Update: we pointed for one sense L349292-S1 on the same item Q42165

L349292-S2 need another item...

Reply to "Stuss"
Maundwiki (talkcontribs)

Shouldn't the uncertainty in the source for birth date and death date show in wikidata? ~~~~

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)
Maundwiki (talkcontribs)

Checked out the video. before, not before, after, not after use latest date (P1326) and earliest date (P1319). But for around (omkring, cirka etc) I tried something but it did not work. We take it at next wikidata meeting

Reply to "Q28343309"

Thanks for pointing out constraints!

KarenJoyce (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Thanks for pointing out constraints!"

P8402 med novalue kvarglömt för 17 kommuner?

Larske (talkcontribs)

Är det någon tanke med att behålla värdet "no value" för egenskapen Open Data portal (P8402) när ett "riktigt värde" läggs in?

Se https://w.wiki/kSr som listar 17 kommuner med både ett "riktigt värde" och "inget värde" på egenskapen.

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

Tackar att du håller koll den tanke jag hade var att hålla koll på att jag letat där.... med nya mönstret /psidata som jag lärde mig i veckan så kan man nog skippa detta .... jag kör listor enl. https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Projekt_svenska_kommuner/PSIdata

B) FYI jag städade just nu upp så vi har alla url:ar som xxxx.se och inte slutar med "/"

C) jag har påpekat för 3 kommuner att dom har Öppen data men inte "/psidata" genom att skicka meddelande på deras Facebook och ofta fixas det med vändande post vilket känns enormt kul och hoppfullt

D) tycker /psidata fungerar enormt bra och när det går så enkelt att få saker ändrade så föreslog jag lite på skämt att vi skall jobba agilt och införa även ett mönster /covid19 se https://forum.jobtechdev.se/t/jobba-agilt-test-case-covid-url-covid19/266 från den världen jag kom som SCRUM master så var det helt självklart att vi i gruppen hade frihet och jobba och att man tror på individen dvs. lite som WIkipedia vi får se om det finns något sätt att föra myndigheterna ditår....

E) jag hart haft lite Linkedin snack med SCB projektledare som skrev på Bybrunnen som du fixa i mallen och han är helt lyrisk.... jag tror SCB kan ha mer statistik som är bra för Wikipedia så vi bör nog ha en dialog med dom

F) gissar att du sett det Jan Ainali dragit igång med Riksdagsdokument och det snygga Daniel gjort med att koppla HD domar i Wikidata till andra Riksdagsdokument.... på denna sida https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Projekt_svenska_kommuner/PSIdata_Myndigheter finns de instruktioner som finns för en myndighet.... om jag fattat rätt så kommer hela tiden regleringsbrev för en myndighet som jag tror mig hittat hos ESV i statsliggaren se https://github.com/salgo60/open-data-examples/blob/master/ESV%20Regleringsbrev.ipynb


Magnus Sälgö


Reply to "P8402 med novalue kvarglömt för 17 kommuner?"
Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talkcontribs)

How do I make those tables that you created at {{Q|Q55262949}}.

This post was hidden by (history)
Reply to "Q55262949"