Open main menu

User talk:Vennor

Wikidata-logo-en.svg

Benvenuto su Wikidata, Viscontino!

Wikidata è la base di conoscenza libera e collaborativa che tu puoi migliorare! Può essere letta e modificata da umani e macchine allo stesso modo, e tu puoi aiutare a farlo. Vai ora alla pagina di un qualsiasi elemento e contribuisci alla crescita sempre continua dell'archivio!

Per favore, dai un'occhiata alle pagine seguenti. Potrebbero dimostrarsi utili se sei nuovo di qui:

  • Come contribuire - Spicciole dritte per contribuire
  • CreaElemento - Crea un nuovo elemento
  • Bar - Discussioni sul progetto
  • Glossario - Terminologia di Wikidata
  • Strumenti - elenco di strumenti (script) per lavorare su Wikidata in modo più confortevole

Se hai domande, non esitare a contattarmi nella mia pagina di discussione. Spero ti troverai subito bene qui e diventerai un ottimo redattore di Wikidata.

Tante buone cose, --Restu20 18:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Contents

Hi!Edit

Hello, Viscontino! I am just letting you know that I have added the autopatroller flag to your account, as you are a trusted user on Wikidata. If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me or leave a message at the Project chat. Thanks, —Theopolisme 19:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Comuni statunitensiEdit

Ciao, siccome è forse la materia della quale mi sono occupato di più su Wikipedia mi permetto di intervenire riguardo al tuo intervento sulla voce Dallas (Dakota del Sud), che è un comune di 120 anime che non ha ancora una voce su it.wiki. Intanto ho modificato la dichiarazione "è un" da "città" a "Comuni degli Stati Uniti d'America" (sì la voce è al plurale... mi sa che su wikidata dobbiamo accettare certe brutture...). Poi volevo dirti che in questi casi sto usando convenzionalmente la descrizione "comune statunitense" in analogia a "comune italiano" ecc... disambiguando quando necessario con lo stato di appartenenza. Dunque io in questo caso propenderei per "comune statunitense del Dakota del Sud". La disquisizione su quando un "semplice" comune possa definirsi città è una vecchia questione aperta in riferimento agli incipit sulle voci di it.wiki sulla quale lì non è stato raggiunto un accordo. Sicuramente non vale la corrispondenza city=città, men che meno nel caso di town ma non voglio dilungarmi (a meno che a te non interessi...). Qui su wikidata si è partiti con descrizioni molto sintetiche mentre ora vedo che c'è una tendenza a renderle un po' più esplicite. Non so cosa sia meglio ma per ora mi accontenterei di dare una certa uniformità. --Ermanon (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Per carità... non interferisci in niente! O meglio, qua tutti interferiamo con tutti ma dobbiamo cercare di farlo nella maniera più coordinata possibile. Su it.wiki c'è un progetto per i comuni statunitensi e delle linee guida, ma qui è tutto un po' più alla buona... però io cerco comunque di mettere un po' d'ordine dove ho un minimo di esperienza. Sulle contee e il minuscolo non ho capito cosa intendevi. --Ermanon (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hai ragione. Io mi stavo occupando delle descrizioni più che delle etichette. Tutte le contee che ho visto hanno il maiuscolo... Ieri ho già segnalato il problema delle etichette con disambiguante tra parentesi... insomma di errori ce ne sono parecchi e su un quantitativo di voci tale che per correggerli dovremo sicuramente usare dei bot ben istruiti. --Ermanon (talk) 17:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Re:ProprietàEdit

Grazie per avermi avvisato, non lo avevo capito leggendo la discussione dal bar!--Appo92 (talk) 17:57, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Mi stavo per mettere a scrivere qui, proseguo?--Appo92 (talk) 18:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: AnnullamentiEdit

Grazie della segnalazione. Pensavo ad una svista. Il problema è che il motore di ricerca quando inserisci nuove proprietà distingue maiuscole da minuscole (spero solo per ora!) e bisogna ricordarsi quale! :P Una domanda: non trovo più il link a tutte le proprietà create! --Paperoastro (talk) 22:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Era quello che mi serviva! :) Grazie! --Paperoastro (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

FirmaEdit

Ciao, sarebbbe utile se nelle preferenze correggessi la tua firma da Utente:Viscontino -> User:Viscontino e Discussioni utente:Viscontino -> User talk:Viscontino, di modo che i link funzionino correttamente quando ti firmi nelle discussioni. Grazie! --Mark91it's my world 11:18, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Traduzione scriptEdit

?!? --Ricordisamoa 20:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Non può che essere stata creata da ScriptTranslator: è quello il sommario ed il testo che usa per creare una pagina di traduzioni; ma dato che wikidata_useful non usa ScriptTranslator (e non mi pare ci sia l'intenzione di usarlo), la pagina è perfettamente inutile, pertanto la cancellerò a breve, se non ci sono obiezioni. --Ricordisamoa 08:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  Done --Ricordisamoa 08:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Please ...Edit

have a look at my discussion page. --Goldzahn (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I have updated wikidata useful.js. If you look into the code, you will see that after discovering the webpage http://coursesweb.net/jquery/jquery-basics I have used lots of jQuery commands. I have tested the new code and I think it should be OK. Would you inform me, if you see something wrong? I think the next improvements will be, to move what is now in the top right corner into a second file and import only the parts the user want to use. In this way, maybe some kind of scripting could be possible. In Wikidata, we have translations of the names of the properties and items. Since you showed me how to use them, maybe it is possible to tell the tool to use those translations. --Goldzahn (talk) 04:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Stemmi comunaliEdit

Ricordati che la maggior parte delle immagini di stemmi comunali su it.wiki non sono libere, e pertanto non dovrebbero essere importate su Commons, né tantomeno impostate come valore su Wikidata... puoi fare una query su Commons per controllare se un'immagine esiste veramente prima di aggiungerla. --Ricordisamoa 18:44, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Mass editsEdit

Could you please stop editing so many items in such a short period of time, because you are spamming RC? And it seems like you are using a script. If you want to edit many items without checking every edit you should create a bot account and request a botflag for it. --Sk!d (talk) 18:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I have approved your bot request. --Sk!d (talk) 09:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Bot flagEdit

Hi, your bot got the botflag but it doesn't use it as far as I see. Could you please modify it so it does not flood recent changes and watchlists any more? -- Bene* talk 09:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Are you sure? I see that Docu is flooding recent changes, not my bot. --Viscontino (talk) 09:34, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
This edit appeared on my watchlist without bot flag. -- Bene* talk 09:36, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Well, it seems that I thought to be using this account (I'll be more careful). But, hey, flooding RC and watchlists is not possible with one single edit... --Viscontino (talk) 09:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Anyhow bots should use botflags if they got it. ;-) -- Bene* talk 09:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
How can I use it (the bot flag) if I want to do an edit like that one? Is it something in the settings? --Viscontino (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Do you use a specific framework? Otherwise append bot=true to the url and the bot flag will be set. -- Bene* talk 09:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

P447 and P446Edit

I apologize. My rationale was this: GameRankings compiles scores only for games, and Metacritic doesn't. Metacritic compiles scores for films, music, games and other types of visual and interactive media. Also, I realized that when using the 'aggregate score' property, I'd have to specify the scorer (GR or MC) and specify the platform, and this was not a good way to write the data. As I said, I apologize because I did not think of it appropriately when I did my proposal. Cheers. — ΛΧΣ21 17:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, I think that this should be fixed. A normal person doesn't know that GameRankings compiles scores only for games and Metacritic compiles scores for other kind of things (they could change at any time, by the way!). And also, in the future we may have to add another 'aggregate score' website property. I think we need only one property: p444 (review score), with p447 'score by' and other qualifiers such as the platform. I think it's the best use of properties and qualifiers. --Viscontino (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Well, I decided to do it mainly because I saw that we have a property for IMDB, and another for Filmaffinity, which are more or less the same in structure as GR and MC. The issue is that review score doesn't work for GameRangkings or Metacritic because those two doens't write reviews, they just compile them, and the review score property is only to be used with the individual publications, and score by to identify those publications. Take a look at 007 Legends to see how I intended to use the properties GR score and MC score :) — ΛΧΣ21 20:34, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation page is not a movieEdit

Hi, what happened in this edit? --Stryn (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

If you are using categories or infoboxes could you pleas add also a source to your bot-added statements so users can see where the bug is coming from and maybe change the category of an article or move the sitelinkt to another item. --Sk!d (talk) 17:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for this segnalation. I'll take a look into my code now. It's a very strange thing... it shouldn't have happened! --Viscontino (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

A new bot listEdit

Hi there! Per a request I have been working on a new informative bot list (that has secretly been hidden under the current list at Wikidata:List_of_bots. I think I am finished and it would be great if every botop (including you) could add your bot to the new list. I have added Addbot already and tried to make the template simple! Goodluck and if you have any problems get in touch on my talk page! ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 20:22, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

double editsEdit

Hey your bot did some double edits which my bot corrected, maybe there are more with other properties then P107 could you pleas check? (e.g. [1], [2]) --Sk!d (talk) 07:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

And my error list of GND values nearly exploded today because of your bot adding P107:Term to many asteroids. There are already marked as Q618123 which is afaik the correct value e.g. GND gives Jupiter the same value. Also you should check if there is already a GND value so that this: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sk!dbot/GND-conflict&diff=30382186&oldid=29920295 does not happen. --Sk!d (talk) 07:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm deeply sorry for this problem caused by my bot. I do a check before adding a claim and it always did it correctly. In fact, in case the claim already exists it skip to the next operation. I hope that this won't happen anymore and I'll be more careful, I promise. --Viscontino (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

geographical feature vs termEdit

Please see Wikidata:List of properties - astronomical objects it is a geographic feature. If possible, I ask you to roll back the bot recent changes like this. --Art-top (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

There is also an example section at the Property see Property_talk:P107#Examples if you are not sure what is the right value you should ask there and add it to the examples. --Sk!d (talk) 17:24, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

re: Elenco elementi da categoria WikipediaEdit

Sto provando a tirarmi dentro quelle del BioBot. Sono più di 200.000 pagine spero me lo faccia fare, in questo momento mi sto tirando dentro le voci. Per quella Olandese sono più di 700.000 la vedo dura. Solo per evitare di fare lavori doppi, a cosa ti servono? --ValterVB (talk) 19:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Ciao, ti segnalo che Wikidata:Bot requests/Italian Wikipedia person data è partita. Potresti voler aggiungere la pagina agli osservati speciali e magari pubblicare gli script che avevi usato a suo tempo, ho visto solo ora che avevi importato delle date di nascita e morte. :) --Nemo 09:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

FontiEdit

Il tuo bot dovrebbe impostare le dovute fonti... --Ricordisamoa 09:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Provvedo quanto prima. Grazie per la segnalazione. --Viscontino (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Opuntia ficus-indicaEdit

This addition is wrong. The correct author citation ist (L.) Mill. --Succu (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, it seems that Linneo is one of the authors. Isn't it right? --Viscontino (talk) 11:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
He ist taxon author of Cactus ficus-indica. --Succu (talk) 12:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Agave - Property:P225Edit

Please check this. --Succu (talk) 09:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I know... but I don't know why this has happened. I hope to solve this problem with future edits. --Viscontino (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
OK I know what's the problem and now I solved it. --Viscontino (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: Aiuto scriptEdit

Hello, Vennor. You have new messages at Ricordisamoa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ricordisamoa 15:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Bot: ultime modificheEdit

Ciao. Le modifiche del tuo bot compaiono nelle ultime modifiche (senza b). Considerando che quell'utenza ha il flag di bot, puoi impostare correttamente il flag quando usi l'API wbsetreference. Grazie :) --β16 - (talk) 18:00, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

I have blocked your bot pending this fix. Please let me know when you have fixed it and I or another admin can unblock. --Rschen7754 18:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

And please be sure of checking edits like this and this. --Ricordisamoa 22:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, fixed flag problem and wrong edits. --Viscontino (talk) 06:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

BotEdit

This edition is wrong. [3] --Kizar (talk) 09:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Why? I see no error. --ViscoBot (talk) 09:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
The bot shouldn't add the "File:" prefix: now it links to File:File:Map of comune of Bressana Bottarone (province of Pavia, region Lombardy, Italy).svg; and be sure of logging in as "Viscontino" before commenting... :-) --Ricordisamoa 11:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
(ho frainteso la frase "Bots do not need to be approved if they are only making edits in the operator/bot's userspace" pensando valesse in senso generico, invece era per quanto riguarda la fase di approvazione). You are right, I stopped the bot and now I'm going to fix the wrong sentences. --Viscontino (talk) 11:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)


Empty "file" propertiesEdit

Hi Viscontino,

At Q18371, "File:" got added in P242 without a file name. Constraint violations/P242 has a series of similar cases. --  Docu  at 13:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

I already reported such edits above. --Ricordisamoa 14:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
All fixed now. --  Docu  at 20:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Bot: Property Property:P225Edit

this edit is wrong. All pages are disambiguation pages, the plant is this item: Q542456. Moreover, if there is already a entry for Property:P225, do not add another one. Either, the interwiki links are wrong or there might be some problems with synonyms. However, if you add additional scientific names, it is no longer clear what the item stands for. FelixReimann (talk) 14:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

For example here. Best solution would be to just add those items to a page for manual checking. Increasing ambiguity bot-based leads only to more manual work. Please try to avoid this.FelixReimann (talk) 14:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Postal codeEdit

I just found on several pages the (incorrect) import of the postal code, eg http://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q641&oldid=36435372. the Italian 'da' xxxx 'a' yyyy should be replaced by a language independent range indication such as xxxx-yyyy. RobotMichiel1972 (talk) 17:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You're right, but since I took the data from infoboxes, it happens that someone added something in a different way than the others, so the best thing is to do a manual edit of such claims... still better than check every single article on Wikipedia. --Viscontino (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Timezone in SwedenEdit

Re: This. Sweden has only one timezone, so I think the need for P421 in every item related to Sweden is low. What we need is instead some kind of relation between these items and Q34. At the moment, I do not know exactly how. --Lavallen (block) 15:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

You're right but even for Italy or other countries there would be the same problem. But it's not possible to solve this using your proposal because many countries have different timezones and it'll difficult to set the correct ones to the right places. And also, some users, like me, don't know that Sweden has only one timezone, so if I want to know that city's timezone I don't have to go to the country's item page. --Viscontino (talk) 08:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
A recursive function in the hierachy of P:P131 until we reach an item with P421 should do the trick. The problem is if Sweden suddenly change timezone. (Remove the DST for example, which I would prefer.) Then we maybe have to identify every item with "wrong" timezone, and I do not know how we should be able to do that. At the moment, I do not know exactly how to use P131 in Swedish provinces. They are outside the administrative hierarchy, so they are tricky in themself. -- Lavallen (block) 09:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
And postal codes always have 5 digits in Sweden. -- Lavallen (block) 13:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
That's because on the italian Wikipedia infobox there was just that partial code. Why did you remove this image by the way? --Viscontino (talk) 13:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
It is related to Karlskrona Municipality and Karlskrona City, not to the urban area of Karlskrona. Urban areas never have a COA. -- Lavallen (block) 14:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Property:P107Edit

Hello Viscontino, your bot added in some cases a second Property:P107 for family names.

  • GND, Type n (names, disambiguation) is correct

GND, Type s (term) is incorrect. Cheers --Kolja21 (talk) 19:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop incorrect edits on page MoscowEdit

Hello! Moscow have never used dialing codes 496 and 498. The only code of Moscow is 495 (before 2000s it was 095) and since 2000s also 499. Codes 496 and 498 are used only in Moscow Oblast (and sometimes 495). --TarzanASG (talk) 02:43, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying, but it's not the job of a bot to correct Wikipedia (imported from: Italian Wikipedia). You have to correct the article it:Mosca: "Prefisso: +7 495, 496, 498, 499". --Kolja21 (talk) 11:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Also, same error on ru.wikipedia. Are you sure that what you're saying is correct TarzanASG? --Viscontino (talk) 12:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I sure. Moscow are currently using only 495 and 499. Also check 496 code on Rostelecom page. Calls between 495 and 496 are non-free inter-city long distance calls. English Wikipedia article is correct: Moscow City has two area codes assigned: 495 and 499. This document about Russia's National Numbering Plan on ITU website can confirm it. And there is some additional information: [4], [5], [6] and [7] (note, 498 code for non-Moscow territory between MKAD and Moscow Forest Park Ring). --TarzanASG (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Duplicate claim being added by ViscoBotEdit

Sometimes (see here for an example on Q1631280 "Portas"), ViscoBot adds a duplicate claim for Property:P242 "locator map image". This is not desirable because 1) only one item gets a source and 2) the item gets added to Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P242. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 06:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

diffEdit

"Emitettente"?!? --Ricordisamoa 17:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Oops, ho proprio "scelto" la parola sbagliata per un errore di battitura (la descrizione l'ho scritta correttamente). --Viscontino (talk) 08:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
È ancora lì! Cosa aspetti a correggerla? ;-) --Ricordisamoa 07:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Fatto! Non avevo più controllato e pensavo ci avessi pensato tu! --Viscontino (talk) 08:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

coolant (P588)Edit

The property coolant (P588) that you supported is now available. --Tobias1984 (talk) 20:18, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

ISTAT ID (P635)Edit

The property ISTAT ID (P635) that you supported is available now. --Tobias1984 (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Nuove proprietà "Emigrato in" e "Emigrato in data"Edit

Buongiorno Viscontino,

A Luglio ho inserito in Property proposal/Person la proposta di due nuove proprietà che dovrebbero chiamarsi "Emigrato in" e "Emigrato in data". Avevo in mente di catalogare su wikidata l'informazione per cui una persona è emigrata dal proprio paese d'origine ed in che data.

Facevo l'esempio: Rudolph Valentino (Q188692) emigrato negli United States of America (Q30) e Rudolph Valentino (Q188692) è emigrato il 23 dicembre 1913.

Ad oggi nessuno si è espresso in modo non favorevole e per questo Ti chiedevo se potevi creare la proprietà. Ovviamente se lo ritieni opportuno e se secondo te è una buona idea.

Ciao e grazie!! LucaBiondi (talk) 22:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

French time zoneEdit

Viscobot has added the relation located in time zone (P421) -> +1 (Q410147) to several hundred French places. However +1 (Q410147) is a disambiguation page, and all the items should actually link to UTC+01:00 (Q6655). Could you please replace the correct item. Thanks. Harryboyles (talk) 23:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm really sorry for the mistake. I replaced them all now. --Viscontino (talk) 10:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

duplicated claimsEdit

your bot should not add duplicated claims. (example 1, example 2) --Akkakk 19:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Just want to say that Sk!dbot removes doubled claims. So you don't have to clean up the double edits. But it would be nice if your bot would check for the claims and maybe only add a source if the claim is already there but the source does not exists or is another source. --Sk!d (talk) 01:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

image (P18)Edit

Hey, you are adding a lot of image statements. But some of the images are only stored locally on the Italian Wikipedia and can't be used by other Wikipedias. So please check before adding an image, if it is stored on commons. Thanks. --Pasleim (talk) 07:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Gini coefficient (P1125)Edit

Just created Gini coefficient (P1125).--Tobias1984 (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Proprietà DBIEdit

Ciao, puoi dare un'occhiata alla richiesta di una proprietà per DBI? --Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 06:57, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

@Federico Leva (BEIC): Ciao, ho creato la proprietà Dizionario biografico degli italiani Identifier (P1986). --Viscontino (talk) 08:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to Wikidata user studyEdit

Dear Viscontino,
I am a researcher of the Web and Internet Science group of the University of Southampton.
Together with a group of other researchers from the same University, we are currently conducting a research aiming to discover how newcomers become full participants into the Wikidata community. We are interested in understanding how the usage of tools, the relationships with the community, and the knowledge and application of policy norms change from users' first approach to Wikidata to their full integration as fully active participants.
This study will take place as an interview, either by videotelephony, e.g. Skype, phone, or e-mail, according to the preference of the interviewees. The time required to answer all the questions will likely be about an hour. Further information can be found on the Research Project Page Becoming Wikidatians: evolution of participation in a collaborative structured knowledge base.
Any data collected will be treated in the strictest confidentiality, no personal information will be processed for the purpose of the research. The study, which has submission number 20117, has received ethical approval following the University of Southampton guidelines.
We aim at gathering about 20 participants, chosen among experienced Wikidata users who authored a large number of contributions.
Should you be interested in taking part or wish to receive further information, you can contact us by writing to the e-mail address ap1a14+wikidata_user_study@ecs.soton.ac.uk.
Thank you very much, your help will be much appreciated!
--Alessandro Piscopo (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

ViscoBotEdit

Your bot has been listed at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Removal/Inactive bot accounts as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure it's proposed to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot should you need it again. Of course, You may request retaining your bot flag here if you need the bot flag. Regards--GZWDer (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Vennor".