Wikidata

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

(Redirected from Wikidata:AN)

Administrators' noticeboard
This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention. IRC channel: #wikidataconnect
Translate this header box!
Start a new discussion
On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2022/05.

Requests for deletions

high

~142 open requests for deletions.

Requests for unblock

low

1 open request for unblock.

User:Pierre MartinsEdit

Hello. On Wikidata:Property proposal/ANR project ID, there was a massive canvassing, with a lot of new editors (even some not registered, details of these users here) voting. I took the decision to strike these votes and to explain the reason on two different places: on the property proposal and on the French project chat where a related discussion was open. Laboratoire LAMOP (talk • contribs • logs) aggressively replied, accusing me of having stopped the discussion, and not assuming my good faith, stating that I showed disdain to their work. I took the time to explain more in details my position. In the mean time, I also took the time to review the property proposal, improve it and support it. A few days later, Pierre Martins (talk • contribs • logs) made another reply, full of sarcasms, passive-aggressive and personal attacks ("cher Envlh", "tout le monde n'est pas forcément dans un logique narcissique de reconnaissance en utilisant son nom et son prénom comme profil", "je considère votre action comme un caprice.", "Tout votre discours n'est qu'un prétexte pour jouir de votre pouvoir de nuisance.", etc.). He also stated that he is the one behind the account Laboratoire LAMOP (talk • contribs • logs) and that he uses several other accounts. To sum up:

I would like the user to be warned and the discussion to go on more constructively and more peacefully, without personal attacks when someone meets contradiction. Cheers, — Envlh (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Since I'm mentionned here on the French project chat, I must say that Laboratoire LAMOP/Pierre Martins reaction is clearly far from ideal. And the second reaction here is even worse. I leave admins decide but at the very least, we should warn him not to react like that and a symbolic short-term could be useful to mark this bad behaviour. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
@Envlh, VIGNERON: je l'ai averti sur sa page utilisateur. Pamputt (talk) 06:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@Pamputt @VIGNERON
j'ai proposé une propriété lié à l'ESR pour à la suite d'une journée d'étude sur WIKIDATA pour prolonger l'intérêt de cette communauté. Cette propriété aurait pu être un exemple idéal. Une demande d'accompagnement dans cette création a été effectué sur le Bistro pour pouvoir bien respecter toutes les étapes. J'en ai parlé sur une mailing liste de l'ESR et plusieurs personnes qui me sont inconnus ont donc notifié leur interêt par leur vote.
Par la suite, Envl a bloqué tous les votes de façon unilatérale et brutale, fait rebasculer le statut de la propriété de Create à Under Discussion. Ma procédure etant transparente, Envl aurait pu interroger sur Bistro sur les raisons de cet afflux dans un dialogue mais il ne l'a pas fait.
J'ai tenté des explications et demandé de retourner à un dialogue serein.
En réponse, Enlv m'a répondu dans ce que je crois être une attaque personnelle en évoquant mes sophismes et mon simili chantage (chose que j'ai évidemment mal pris).
Il me semble qu'à aucun moment ma bonne foi n'a été pris en compte.
Mes messages n'ont pas été approprié mais la méthode choisie par Envl et ses réponses non plus.
Pierre Martins (talk) 08:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@Pierre Martins: je ne doute pas que l'intention de départ soit bonne et la propriété sera sans doute acceptée, mais la méthode elle n'était pas bonne. Notamment en terme de transparence, au moment où j'écris ces mots, n'est pas respectée ; notamment, les comptes Laboratoire LAMOP (talk • contribs • logs) et Pierre Martins (talk • contribs • logs) n'indique toujours pas qu'il s'agit de la même personne comme le demande Wikidata:Alternate accounts. En plus de cela, les votes en masse de nouveaux contributeurs n'est pas une bonne pratique et Envlh (talk • contribs • logs) a totalement eu raison de retirer ces votes invalides, n'importe quel autre utilisateur habitué de Wikidata aurait fait de même. Enfin (et surtout), comme l'indique l'avertissement de Pamputt (talk • contribs • logs), les attaques personnelles - quelle que soit la raison et sur l'ensemble des projets Wikimédia - ne sont pas acceptables et ne sont pas propices au « dialogue serein ». Maintenant, vous pouvez choisir de continuer à être braqué ou bien choisir de respecter les règles et le fonctionnement de Wikipédia, le choix est votre et le cas échéant, ce sera aux administrateurs d'intervenir si besoin. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@Pierre Martins: si mon intervention a permis de faire revenir la discussion a un niveau plus sain, je considère que l'affaire est close. Je viens de créer identifiant de projet ANR(P10781) et vous pouvez donc commencer à l'utiliser  . Pamputt (talk) 06:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Original research, Edit warringEdit

On page Algirdas (Q336754), User:Guccee introduces his own coat of arms, passing it off as official. After the cancellation, he makes again the second and third time. On the Talk:Q336754 page, the main argument is that the image on the seal is automatically a coat of arms. Please pay attention to this page and the user actions. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Our discussion of the historical authenticity of coats of arms is not over yet, which means that you canceling my editions is just as unjustified. Please pay attention to the user who still deletes my edits despite the lack of consensus on this matter. Guccee (talk) 17:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@Guccee: I don’t see any source for your claims. Seals do not necessarily contain coats of arms. Maybe they do in this case, but there needs to be a source. --Emu (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
It is a heraldic sign, so not yet a coat of arms. However, over time, heraldists created coats of arms from seal marks. The Polish historian Sławomir Górski described it more broadly, and another Polish historian - Juliusz Ostrowski - reworked the coats of arms himself in such a way as to fit the times in which he lived. I used this procedure in my case. I decided that the mark on Olgierd's two seals was his "calling card", to which I only added a heraldic shield.

  • First seal of Olgierd

  • Second seal of Olgierd

  • Graphics made by me

    • EXAMPLE:

      • Guccee (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

      @Guccee Let me be frank: You admit that those aren’t CoA in the first place. You admit that you used conjecture to create those images (“I used this procedure in my case”) and you even admit that you added a heraldic shield. I’m not at all saying that you are wrong in believing that the picture you created is the correct CoA (which would be foolish as I have no expertise whatsoever regarding CoA from this specific region in this specific time period and it wouldn’t be my role in this to even weigh in on the merits of the case), but there sure seems to be no proper source saying so, I’m sorry. --Emu (talk) 22:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

      Original research, Edit warring - 2Edit

      Guccee (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

      The user is waging an edit war (1, 2, 3), pushing his fantasy coat of arms into the article Gediminas (Q244852). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

      @Лобачев Владимир Those edits took place before I gave advice to said user on this very page. I see no need to create new topics as this is essentially the same problem, just with a different item. --Emu (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
      OK! --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
      @Emu: Do you intend to undo these edits? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
      @Лобачев Владимир You can go ahead and delete improperly sourced statements. --Emu (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
      @Emu: I deleted (1, 2). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning User:DfsdsEdit

      Dfsds (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism, possibly in conjunction with 158.99.1.19 and 186.139.129.251 (below) bdijkstra (overleg) 12:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Blocked 24 hours and asked question on talk page (just in case this was a misclick or something) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning User:158.99.1.19Edit

      158.99.1.19 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism, possibly in conjunction with Dfsds and 186.139.129.251 (above and below) bdijkstra (overleg) 12:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Blocked one week — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning User:186.139.129.251Edit

      186.139.129.251 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism, possibly in conjunction with Dfsds and 158.99.1.19 (above) bdijkstra (overleg) 12:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Declined. Last edit was a few days ago, and it seems they tried to self-revert — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      VandalismEdit

      Please protect Q12127853: excessive vandalism.--Renvoy (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Protected for 3 months — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Semi-protection for Q9036Edit

      Please semi-protect Nikola Tesla (Q9036) - frequent IP vandalism, popular theme.--Jklamo (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Done by Mahir256 — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Semi-protection for Q112123608Edit

      High traffic item --Trade (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

        Done Semi-protected for a month (because of evidence of IP vandalism, not because of "high traffic"). Bovlb (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning User:2600:1702:10a0:5980:290d:70cb:e71b:aceEdit

      12600:1702:10a0:5980:290d:70cb:e71b:ace (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Posting threats about the perpetrator's (living) parents. --Trade (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      Five minutes of vandalism seven hours ago is too stale, but I did revdel the threat. Bovlb (talk) 23:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

      User Block Request : KateChic Edit

      KateChic (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
      Abusing on my talk page , got triggered because items created by him/her were eliminated for deletion. Also inspect 49.237.12.230 Rockpeterson (talk) 06:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC).

      I have deleted some of the non-notable items and left a warning on their talk page. Will monitor for response and further actions as necessary — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
      Blocked the IP for 3 days — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
      @ Martin: Inspect 223.24.150.166 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log)) , again created the item Q112136909
      which was created by KateChic few hours ago . Possible sock Rockpeterson (talk) 17:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
      Blocked and deleted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

      @MSGJ: Again recreated Q112147966 , third time .This time the IP is Rockpeterson (talk) 08:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
      2405:9800:b840:2670:c110:bd9f:65f7:837c (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log))

      @MSGJ: Today again recreated Q112157828 by ip Rockpeterson (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

      27.55.65.5 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · 27.55.65.5 .html RBLs · 27.55.65.5 proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log))

      Please block 88.27.245.172Edit

      88.27.245.172 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) has been quite today vandalizing a number of items. Was active doing the same thing March 25 & 28 as well as May 5 too.--Hjart (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

      Done. —Hasley+ 13:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
      I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Fralambert (talk) 16:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning User:107.77.207.200Edit

      107.77.207.200 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: edit warring, addition of unnecessary content EthanGaming7640 16:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

      Item protected; user blocked — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
      I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Fralambert (talk) 16:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      User:Palaangelino's undisclosed paid editing activities and PR purposesEdit

      Hi, Palaangelino was banned in trwiki. This user added lots of PR items, all of them needs to be deleted and the user needs to be banned here as he started to be active in enwiki. Regards.--Kadı (talk) 20:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

      [1] Kadı (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning User:Scott cawthon freddy fazbear 7Edit

      Scott cawthon freddy fazbear 7 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam-only account, block evasion. Please also delete the pages created by this user. – LiberatorG (talk) 08:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Has been handled (also globally). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:07, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
      I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Fralambert (talk) 16:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning User:219.110.247.161Edit

      219.110.247.161 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism 春春眠眠 (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Report concerning 118.179.104.46 Edit

      118.179.104.46 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
      Created previously deleted item , also signifies linkage with the sock check here Rockpeterson (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/...Edit

      Hi, they seem to have 20 something items about LTA cases. https://w.wiki/5DKs Are these pages notable? I feel that we should not have these, but I'm maybe wrong. Fralambert (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Semi-protectionEdit

      I want to edit semi protected page(as I want to add link with different wiki). Now I need a permission! please let me to be permitted.--ABDULLAH AL NOMAN (talk) 16:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      @মো. আব্দুল্লাহ আল নোমান: Could you use {{Edit request}} instead? --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
      @Ameisenigel:: but I want to add link also which is not possible through this way.Moreover I am not an autoconfirmed user. Please consider the matter. ABDULLAH AL NOMAN (talk)--02:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

      Semi-protection for Q151972Edit

      Please semi-protect Josephine Baker (Q151972) - frequent IP vandalism, popular theme. --Jklamo (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      @Jklamo Semi protected 1 month. Fralambert (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
      I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Emu (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Semi-protection for Q4119059Edit

      Please semi-protect Youm7 (Q4119059) - frequent spam IP vandalism.--Jklamo (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      semi 3 months --Emu (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
      I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Emu (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      ethangaming7640 constant edit warring + vorsetzer talk protection is required=Edit

      check his history of blatant vandalisms, also killing valuable info, restore to this ver:

      www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Q2534350&diff=1649504346&oldid=1648255754 179.0.225.156 23:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

      Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=1649677241"