Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard
Administrators' noticeboard This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention.
|
 | If you are a user who has a request for removal of non-public personal information, please note that details should not be posted in public. Contact Wikidata oversighters via the on-wiki interface, or email oversight wikidata.org or a local oversighter privately. |
 | If you are requesting the restoration of a deleted item, please be sure to explain how the item meets our notability criteria. If you are claiming that the item "can be described using serious and publicly available references", please list some of those references in your request. |
 |
On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2025/06. |
| Attention administrators: This message is appearing because there are more than 100 open requests at Wikidata:Requests for deletions. Please consider helping with the backlog. |
Requests for deletions high ~196 open requests for deletions. |
46.222.67.92 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: This IP has been adding multiple values without any reference. I have written to this IP about these edits, without receiving a response. Furthermore, their edits have a similar pattern to the edits made over the past few days from the IP 2.138.38.215 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (currently blocked on Wikidata and eswiki). Similarly, edits were previously made in previous days from the IPs 46.6.237.80 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), 2.138.28.129 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (previously blocked on Wikidata with the reason "Disruptive edits. No response"), 2.139.77.85 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), 2.139.77.244 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), and 2.138.44.83 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (previously blocked on Eswiki, the reason being for adding false information). --Ovruni (talk) 10:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I add the 31.221.252.236 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) and 2.154.227.84 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) IPs with similar editions. --Ovruni (talk) 14:33, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- I add the IP 46.222.233.145 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) with a similar pattern of editions. (multiple values of place of birth (P19), place of death (P20), date of birth (P569), date of death (P570) without sources). I have written to these IPs, but I have not received a response from any of them. They simply seem to change IPs to continue the same pattern. --Ovruni (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Add IPs 2.138.52.125 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (currently blocked) and 2.138.35.190 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) with the same pattern of edits and without responding to messages. --Ovruni (talk) 16:57, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- I add IPs 2.138.44.239 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (currently blocked due to block evasion), 31.221.128.173 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), 31.221.227.36 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
Hello Admins,
I’m requesting the undeletion of item Q131387135, which represented Mickey Visit, a well-established Disney theme park news and planning website. This item was deleted in December 2024 for not meeting notability policy, but I would like to present updated evidence that better clearly establishes its notability according to Wikidata guidelines listed in the guide to undeletion.
I have already messaged with the moderator who deleted, Ymblanter, and he directed me here to develop a consensus on the undeletion.
I appreciate all of the hard work that you do so I wanted to give you all of the information for your consideration in one place below. I believe that the links and features by Disney, the City Anaheim, and highly notable industry and general publications listed below demonstrate the notability of Mickey Visit. There are multiple instances of a “useful in-link from another item that has unquestionable notability” that go far beyond incidental mentions.
Evidence of Notability
Anaheim Tourism Bureau Press Announcement
Visit Anaheim, the official tourism authority for the city of Anaheim Q49247 that is home to Disneyland and the management of the Anaheim Convention Center Q4750878 and key partner of the Anaheim Ducks Hockey Team Q192751, called Mickey Visit the “premier Disneyland news and planning publication” and announced a wide-ranging media partnership. This is the official government funded bureau that is closely partnered with Disney saying that Mickey Visit is notable. This is a “useful in-link from another item that has unquestionable notability”. The announcement also includes this about information for Mickey Visit - “Founded in 2011, Mickey Visit reaches millions of Disney enthusiasts each month through its website, newsletter, and social media channels with the latest Disney news and tips. The publication has been cited by top media outlets, including The New York Times, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, ABC, FOX News, the Los Angeles Times, and Orange County Register, as an expert on Disneyland, Disney World, Universal, and cruising.”
https://www.visitanaheim.org/articles/post/visit-anaheim-taps-mickey-visit-to-be-chief-imaginagent-officer-for-imaginagency/
USA Today shares Mickey Visit Crowd Calendar as top resource
Top US media website shares the Mickey Visit crowd calendar resource is one of the top trip planning crowd calendars for visiting Disney. https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/theme-parks/2025/01/09/disney-world-crowd-calendar-cheapest-tickets/77572609007/
Similar feature in Florida Today - https://www.floridatoday.com/story/entertainment/2025/02/06/spring-break-florida-theme-parks-disney-world-universal-legoland-seaworld/78080392007/
Mickey Visit Study on Disney Price Increases Featured by WSJ, Forbes, CNN, CNBC, Fortune, Fox News, LA Times, Skift, Variety, SFGate, and More
Mickey Visit is frequently called upon as a source of original data and insights for reporters covering Disney. Late last year a study was used in over 250 different stories about Disney price increases. As the notability policy for Wikidata states, this goes way beyond just being interviewed for an article. These articles are partially about Mickey Visit as the subject of the pieces. The Skift mention is particuarly notable as it is one of the most notable travel industry publications and it owns industry research.
Here are links to all of these different pieces:
https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/travel/disneyland-ticket-prices-increase-california-ec88084a https://fortune.com/2024/10/09/disneyland-raises-ticket-prices-2024/ https://variety.com/vip/disneyland-price-hikes-2024-1236177454/ https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/09/travel/disneyland-price-increases-finding-savings/index.html https://skift.com/2024/10/10/disneyland-increases-theme-park-ticket-prices/
Disney Experiences Q1431781 Website Featured Mickey Visit
The Disney Parks website featured links to Mickey Visit news coverage in their sidebar before they redesigned their “Disney Parks Blog”. You can see one news item listed on their sidebar as an example in this wayback machine capture. See it listed under “More News” in screenshot below. This fulfills having a “useful in-link from another item that has unquestionable notability”
https://web.archive.org/web/20230702055401/https://disneyparks.disney.go.com/blog/
Travel+Leisure and Over Hundred Other Outlets Featured Mickey Visit Wordle Game
After the success of Wordle, Mickey Visit created a Wordle game clone that was played over 1.5 million times. It was covered broadly. Here’s the Travel+Leisure story on the Mickey Visit game.
Google for Publishers Feature
Google publicly showcases Mickey Visit as a media partner, describing it as a trusted news and planning resource with over 500,000 readers per month and coverage across Disney, Universal, and travel topics:
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ads/publishers/success-stories/mickey-visit/
General News Coverage
Mickey Visit has been featured in many notable news pieces as a Disney news and planning website providing context for the news. See some of the notable features below -
New York Times - https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/30/business/media/disney-shareholders-proxy-battle.html Business Insider - https://www.businessinsider.com/theme-parks-not-accessible-larger-bodies-2023-7 Washington Post - https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/2024/07/20/disneyland-vote-strike-unions-california/ CNBC - https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/02/how-disney-turns-over-its-parks-between-halloween-and-winter-holidays.html ABC - https://abc30.com/disney-parks-world-disneyland-fantasmic/11849276/
Please also note that Mickey Visit is similarly or even more notable than another Disney news website with a WikiData profile here - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q124659871
Conflict of Interest Note
I am affiliated with the subject of this item, but I am committed to a neutral and verifiable entry. I welcome community members to help maintain the item and will refrain from promotional language or unsupported claims.
Proposed Labels and Properties Label: Mickey Visit
Description: Disney theme parks news and planning website Official website (P856): https://www.mickeyvisit.com
Thank you for considering the restoration. I’m happy to provide additional citations if needed and will follow whatever next steps are recommended by the admins.
Best regards,
Mickeyvisit
Mickeyvisit (talk) 18:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Admins,
- Thank you for all you do. I wanted to bump my above request. Would appreciate your perspective on getting this undeleted. Thank you for your time. Mickeyvisit (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- It’s certainly borderline. I would probably narrowly accept notability because of the news coverage, although it certainly is weak. --Emu (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- I would not have issues with any admin overriding my decision and undeleting the item. Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- It’s certainly borderline. I would probably narrowly accept notability because of the news coverage, although it certainly is weak. --Emu (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello dear administrators,
I have marked Alfred North Whitehead as a recommended article on the Danish Wikipedia.
Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to update this on Wikidata myself. I hope one of you might be able to assist me with that :-)
-- Silas Nicolaisen (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Done Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :-)
- -- Silas Nicolaisen (talk) 18:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ymblanter,
- I’m also unable to publish it to the Anne Boleyn article.
- -- Silas Nicolaisen (talk) 19:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- What status does it have? Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- It also has recommended article. Silas Nicolaisen (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done Ymblanter (talk) 21:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Ymblanter,
- I'm back once again because the article history of Russia — or Ruslands historie in Danish — has now been given the "recommended article" badge on the Danish Wikipedia.
- May I ask why I'm unable to change the badge on Wikidata myself? It's a bit frustrating having to reach out here every time I want to update a badge, especially since I'm planning to go through all the nominees.
- Anyway, thank you in advance – and best regards!
- -- Silas Nicolaisen (talk) 23:13, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- You have 38 edits and are 12 edits away from being autoconfirmed. I ghave you the confirmed flag for a year, so that you can now add badges yourself. As soon as you reach 50 edits, you will not need this flag anymore. Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much!
- I didn’t know that, but it makes perfect sense – I’m still quite new to WikiQuote :-)
- Thanks a lot for granting me the flag and for making me aware of it. I really appreciate the guidance!
- -- Silas Nicolaisen (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- You have 38 edits and are 12 edits away from being autoconfirmed. I ghave you the confirmed flag for a year, so that you can now add badges yourself. As soon as you reach 50 edits, you will not need this flag anymore. Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- It also has recommended article. Silas Nicolaisen (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- What status does it have? Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Famous website with less information, vandalism risk Trollface 2006ALT (talk) 00:56, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Item not vandalized. Add references and external identifiers to meet notability criteria. Madamebiblio (talk) 05:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- thanks for response, is my first time doing this, i understand, here the source
- https://www.nintendolife.com/features/back-page-we-fed-the-ace-attorney-scripts-to-a-bot-and-it-wrote-its-own-court-case Trollface 2006ALT (talk) 12:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- Bauschandlomb (talk • contribs • logs)
- 199.229.1.148 (talk • contribs • logs)
User:Bauschandlomb created this entry of an eye drops brand called Blink. I nominated the entry for deletion for notability (the entry was wholly unsourced then and still so as of today) and notified the user of the paid editing policy. Since then, this user has turned to ad hominem attacks under an IP in several instances: Special:Diff/2357200243, Special:Diff/2357202562, Special:Diff/2357203284, and Special:Diff/2357204689. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- No attacks. Just reporting a bully on WikiData. I am not the user BauschLomb. If you go through 'Fancy Refrigerators' history they are clearly being paid by someone to create listings, and reporting other entries for the deletion to maintain the appearance of being an organic, good faith user. The deletion requests by Fancy Refrigerator are often arbitrary and based on their own knowledge, and thoughts about whether people and organizations are noteworthy. I have no stake in the matter but believe this user's account should be suspended. They are using WikiData like the old Digg and attempting to be a gatekeeping power digger for profit. Thank you. 2600:4040:9D86:5800:E06C:A7D8:482C:2384 11:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 06:39, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
User:Bauschandlomb has not responded to the notices I posted on their talk page nor addressed the obvious disruptive edits made logged out. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 06:39, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- I support action in this case since the user's attacks are not acceptable, especially their false claims about "clearly being paid by someone". --Dorades (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Mado76 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: User changed the Persian description of Benjamin Netanyahu (Q43723) to "قصاب غزه و جنایتکار علیه بشریت..." (translation: "Butcher of Gaza and criminal against humanity"), which is a clear case of vandalism and a violation of Wikidata's neutral point of view policy. See revision: diff ―Eliezer1987 (talk) 09:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
86.120.159.0/24 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Returning vandal 2A02:2F08:5D11:600:0:0:0:0/64. Gikü (talk) 21:30, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- blocked by Jasper Deng. But edits are not patrolled, possibly labourous one Estopedist1 (talk) 06:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Eddie Koelpin (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Suspected AI-generated spam ―-wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 00:46, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Dasilvabergin84 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Suspected AI-generated spam ―-wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 00:46, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Brand new accounts responding to an old discussion with promotional and AI-sounding material. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 00:46, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Wd-Ryan: These turn out to be a sockfarm: Category:Wikidata sockpuppets of Admas123. Please report further accounts of this kind to WD:RFCU. All have been blocked and tagged.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:48, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
180.190.143.169 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. LTA Bertrand101, blocked in pagwiki. XReport ―Aqurs1 (talk) 08:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- blocked for three months. Edit are not patrolled Estopedist1 (talk) 06:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Brya (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) Online translation: He defends his version of the taxonomy described on his personal page. It contradicts the data of reputable sources. Please block the participant. VladXe (talk) 08:53, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- @VladXe: It takes at least two to edit war. We will not side with one side or the other on a content dispute usually. Please discuss with them first.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Online translation: The discussion was inconclusive. VladXe (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Other than VladXe states, taxonomy is not involved here. VladXe refuses to acccept the authority of International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision) (and the supporting the Glossary of the LPSN, the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature) on scientific names of Prokaryotes, and refuses to state his reasons why. He does not seen to understand the distinction between scientific names on the one hand, and taxa (groups of organisms) on the other. Discussion is almost non-existent: arguments by VladXe appear to be absent. It seems to be a case of pure denial. - Brya (talk) 02:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Online translation: I will not repeat my arguments (see the discussion), I will only point out that the Brya position is not shared by the existing consensus on the organization of taxon synonymy in Wikidata and common sense. VladXe (talk) 10:19, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- I suggest opening a WD:PC discussion or RfC and for both of you to stop editing the items in question. As long as you do that, no blocks are needed.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Online translation: I explicitly wrote in the discussion that an intermediary is needed. But my knowledge of English does not allow me to find a platform for negotiations, and those participants whom I respect and trust did not respond to the ping. VladXe (talk) 10:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Other than VladXe states, taxonomy is not involved here. VladXe refuses to acccept the authority of International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision) (and the supporting the Glossary of the LPSN, the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature) on scientific names of Prokaryotes, and refuses to state his reasons why. He does not seen to understand the distinction between scientific names on the one hand, and taxa (groups of organisms) on the other. Discussion is almost non-existent: arguments by VladXe appear to be absent. It seems to be a case of pure denial. - Brya (talk) 02:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Online translation: The discussion was inconclusive. VladXe (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Online translation: Repeated request to block Brya, he continues: [1], [2], [3], [4]. He undid the edits caused by the ITIS update without understanding it. --VladXe (talk) 10:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- I should point out that I did not initiate this. I responded to a request on nlwiki where it was pointed out that the pages on a topic, in this case a phylum of prokaryotes, on different Wikipedias were not linked together but by an error on Wikidata were spread over two Wikidata items. Since long this issue has been solved by putting sitelinks to pages on the same taxon in a single Wikidata item. I earlier gave the example Acacia ataxacantha/Senegalia ataxacantha where all the links to the tree species are placed in Acacia ataxacantha (Q4670862): it does not matter that of the twelve Wikipedia's that have a page on this tree species, seven use Acacia ataxacantha, four use Senegalia ataxacantha, and one does not use a scientific name at all. So I made the routine edits, which in this case are easier since placement is not in doubt: there exists only the one scientific name (according to LPSN). When VladXe inexplicably reverted this, I opened a discussion, asking why he does not accept LPSN. But he refuses even to give arguments.
- As to the one ITIS reference I did try and look but it was off-line, so I took no action. - Brya (talk) 04:47, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- @VladXe, @Brya You must both stop edit warring and have a real discussion instead. Bring in others, say at WD:Project chat. Bovlb (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Online translation: If Brya undertakes to keep the above elements in their original state (before he changed them himself) until the final outcome is summed up in the Wikidata talk:WikiProject Taxonomy#The same taxon discussion, then this topic can be closed. VladXe (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
ANANTHULAL N T (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 11:43, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Please inspect Q 16 081 811, as recent accident event item was somehow merged to this very old ID. —Mykhal (talk) 09:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- I tried to revert (original recent event item is Q 134 880 537), but there seem to be some glitches somewhere in history. Author of the weird merge is Quick1984 who is undoing the revert attempt. —Mykhal (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- I believe I've sorted it out. I've merged Golinjevo (Q16081811) with Golinjevo (Q3042800) and Air India Flight 171 (Q134880599) with Air India Flight 171 (Q134880537). CC @RoastPig, @Romano1981. Bovlb (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
My undo (containing my reasons in the summary) has been reverted by the IP. To avoid an edit war with an IP over SEO-Links I'm asking for an Admin to take care of it. -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 16:14, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Protected for six months Estopedist1 (talk) 06:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Madamebiblio (talk) 00:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC) |
Tinymooki (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: When I was patroling, I found that this user created many items that did not comply with the Notability policy. I am currently checking the items one by one, and I will need your help. I originally intended to put it on the chats page but I thought this might need the sysop's attention so I put this report here. :) XReport ―ASid (talk) 10:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- @ASid: did you find any item that should be retained. Or mass-delete? Estopedist1 (talk) 06:25, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, although I haven't finished checking, I haven't found any items that meet the policy. You can check my requests at WD:RFD. Thank you. ASid (talk) 13:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- I can confirm that none of these items meet WD:N#1 and #3, and WD:N#2 is what I am currently checking to confirm. ASid (talk) 14:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- There's no response, but they are continuing to create empty items. It looks like all of their contributions are going to be deleted.
- From the Outreach Dashboard, this user is registered for a number of events, with facilitators including @Shoodho, @Jwale2, @Jael28, @Znyadzi (OFWA). Bovlb (talk) 17:32, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Koza Çadır (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Madeinitalyforme (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- is not spam is information, it is the only Italian marketplace that supports professional Italian artisans with online commerce, managing all digital tasks for them. How can I go about not showing up as spam? Madeinitalyforme (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Item has been deleted. For next time read User:Bovlb/How to create an item on Wikidata so that it won't get deleted and Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion, but note that empty items are seldom useful. Bovlb (talk) 18:18, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Bovlb (talk) 18:18, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
मैने ग्राम प्रतापपुर जलालाबाद कन्नौज के बारे मैं एक लेख लिखा है आपसे अनुरोध हैं कि इसमें एक बैज जोड़ दे VIKRAM47 (talk) 12:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @VIKRAM47 I don’t speak Hindi but could it be that w:hi:प्रतापपुर जलालाबाद is a duplicate of w:hi:परतापपुर गाँव, कन्नौज (कन्नौज)? --Emu (talk) 19:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- yes its the same but its name is different VIKRAM47 (talk) 02:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- @VIKRAM47 If it’s the same, the articles on hi.wp should be merged. --Emu (talk) 06:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- yes its the same but its name is different VIKRAM47 (talk) 02:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Haymillefolium (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) --Printstream (talk) 00:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Printstream: Can you give a reason for reporting this user? --Lymantria (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Adding the nonsense statement perpetrator (P8031)Gaza genocide (Q124086054) to dozens of items. --Printstream (talk) 07:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- could you explain why it is a nonsense ? why did you delete all the occurence, they where all sourced statements Haymillefolium (talk) 10:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- This is nonsense vandalism. The use of perpetrator (P8031) is completely wrong, the statements made here have no ontological validity. It’s clear that you're simply attempting to brand individuals and companies you personally dislike with the immensely serious accusation of involvement in genocide. How could you think that a random parliament member referring to Ursula von der Leyen (Q60772) as Miss Genocide is a valid source proving her involvement in a genocide? In the case of von der Leyen, this would also constitute a criminal offense under several European laws, e.g. German law pursuant to Q2607058. Make yourself familiar with how Wikidata works. --Printstream (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- you deletes "dozens" of my edits and only come back with critics about one of them. So unless you have any serious reasons I will restore my edits following Matěj Suchánek comment about how the property should be used.
- > "In the case of von der Leyen, this would also constitute a criminal offense under several European laws"
- There is various sources that can allow to defend the relationship between Ursula von der Leyen (Q60772) and her role in gaza genocide. I'm not the one saying von der Leyen is a accomplice in gaza genocide, i use external source. I'm just building a database here. If you want me to provide additional source it's not a problem, i will add more references. If you think there is a property that is more adequate let me know. Haymillefolium (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- There are various sources that could be used to support the claim that the Earth is flat. I'm not the one saying the Earth is flat, I use external sources. I'm just building a database here. – The only acceptable source is the ICC, you are completely delusional. Again, make yourself familiar with how Wikidata works. --Printstream (talk) 19:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/gaza-civil-icc-case-ursula-von-der-leyen-genocide-complicity-stakes-raise
- https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20241219-the-eu-continues-to-protect-israel-and-its-genocide-of-the-palestinians/
- https://www.newarab.com/news/irishman-tries-arrest-eus-von-der-leyen-over-gaza-war
- As you can see there is various persons accusing von der Leyen of being an accomplice of gaza genocide. Afaik we don't need in wikidata to use secondary sources : "References can be categorized into primary, secondary, and tertiary references. All categories can be added to Wikidata. A secondary reference being one that analyzes primary references, a compilation of secondary references is a tertiary reference. Encyclopædiæ and library catalogues are generally tertiary references. Wikidata could be seen as a tertiary (or quaternary) reference, but one can't add it to Wikidata itself." https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Sources. The policies from wikipedia doesn't apply to wikidata, which make sense because wikidata is a database, a statement is not an encyclopedic knowledge.
- I will know stop speaking with you because you're insulting me. I'm pretty sure this goes against wikidata moderation policies but it also goes against basic respect. Haymillefolium (talk) 20:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- to be more precise "Wikidata is not a database that stores facts about the world, but a secondary knowledge base that collects and links to references to such knowledge. This means that Wikidata does not state what the population of Germany actually is; it simply provides the information on what the population of Germany is according to a specific source, such as The World Factbook (Q11191)." https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Verifiability. I'm starting restoring my edits now Haymillefolium (talk) 11:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- There are various sources that could be used to support the claim that the Earth is flat. I'm not the one saying the Earth is flat, I use external sources. I'm just building a database here. – The only acceptable source is the ICC, you are completely delusional. Again, make yourself familiar with how Wikidata works. --Printstream (talk) 19:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- perpetrator (P8031) is described "person or organization who carried out this harmful, illegal, or immoral act". Gaza genocide (Q124086054), whether it's real or not, is definitely not a person or an organization. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- ah okey so I should use the perpetrator property in the Gaza genocide (Q124086054) element, like here : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q124005685. Will correct this, sorry for the inconvenience. Haymillefolium (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- This is nonsense vandalism. The use of perpetrator (P8031) is completely wrong, the statements made here have no ontological validity. It’s clear that you're simply attempting to brand individuals and companies you personally dislike with the immensely serious accusation of involvement in genocide. How could you think that a random parliament member referring to Ursula von der Leyen (Q60772) as Miss Genocide is a valid source proving her involvement in a genocide? In the case of von der Leyen, this would also constitute a criminal offense under several European laws, e.g. German law pursuant to Q2607058. Make yourself familiar with how Wikidata works. --Printstream (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- could you explain why it is a nonsense ? why did you delete all the occurence, they where all sourced statements Haymillefolium (talk) 10:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Adding the nonsense statement perpetrator (P8031)Gaza genocide (Q124086054) to dozens of items. --Printstream (talk) 07:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Farehaven (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Bigmiloxdex (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
Art Gravure meilleur ouvrier de France (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
R2 Drive Køreskole i Randers (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Lymantria (talk) 06:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Lymantria (talk) 06:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
Rofiqul Bhaii (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 03:00, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done User is warned. --Lymantria (talk) 06:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Lymantria (talk) 06:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
Please semi-protect Q134563262. Reason: not important XReport --🍃Zulf🍃talk 04:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Rarani: How does 'not important' a valid protection reason? Aqurs1 (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done Deleted by Lymantria --Emu (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Emu (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
180.190.0.0/16 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Ranges used by LTA Bertrand01, not sure would it be too big but so far I don't see anyone else using it. Also look at the stalk toy page. XReport ―Aqurs1 (talk) 04:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done Blocked (anonymous only) for 1 year. Edits are not patrolled. --Lymantria (talk) 06:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Fajar242001 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long-term abuse. LTA Fajar Mardiansyah. XReport ―Černolová (diskuze) 08:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Lymantria (talk) 12:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Lymantria (talk) 12:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
Hi, can an admin please take a look at Q131318799. In short, Salgo60 was recently indeffed on enwikivoyage and they've gone on multiple projects (including this, enwiki, dewiki and dawiki – see w:en:Talk:Stockholm Archipelago Trail#Wikivoyage link removed for the relevant enwiki discussion) removing links to Wikivoyage since. For some reason, they've now tagged the article as "problematic" (Special:Diff/2361172483) and it would be appreciated if an admin or someone more experienced in the project could revert / potentially deal with Salgo60 for importing a vendetta cross-wiki on Wikidata. Thanks, --SHB2000 (talk) 08:37, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- I reverted their last edits and left a message on their user talk. The latter you could and perhaps should have done as well. --Lymantria (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
GrowwMax InfoTech Pvt. Ltd India (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 09:05, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done: Blocked indef.--S8321414 (talk) 09:31, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Lymantria (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
216.119.38.229 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done: Blocked for 1 month.--S8321414 (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Madamebiblio (talk) 00:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC) |
140.213.118.149 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Persistent hoax editing, likely related to User:140.213.118.119, who was blocked 5 days ago. I recommend considering an IP range block. Also, help with mass reverting again would be appreciated. ―Sd5605 (talk) 12:37, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done Blocked the /24 range for 3 months. --Lymantria (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Lymantria (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
Georgia Fencer (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done: Blocked indef.--S8321414 (talk) 13:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Madamebiblio (talk) 00:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC) |
Teamwilliams1 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done by WikiBayer. Madamebiblio (talk) 00:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Madamebiblio (talk) 00:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC) |
147.78.174.14 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
Repeated vandalism RSVartanian (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
I never thought I'd need to do this on Wikidata, but @Infovarius has been reverting my edits at Category:Featured articles (Q4387444) even though I explained to them at their talk page what this was about 3 days ago, here. This is an hrwiki thing that they're no part of, and I simply don't understand the persistence. Can someone please make them stop edit warring. I repeat, this is an internal hrwiki thing, where I serve as sysop. Ponor (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Infovarius Please comply. --Emu (talk) 06:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Eiragorn (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) This user changes the actual Allmovie-IDs into the old ones, e.g. [5] [6]. There was a discussion already on my talk page. Nobody knows how long the old IDs do work, many of them are actual and do work now. This is disruptive editing that has to be stopped. -- Plexci (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- The AllMovie domain name has been sold and the new IDs belong to a totally different database than the legacy ones. The correct way to keep the integrity of our datasets is to implement a new and distinct property for the new IDs as was proposed on the property talk page. Plexci doesn't seem to care and keeps overwriting the legacy IDs (re. his examples: Special:Diff/2284258077 Special:Diff/2246975753) and therefore severs access to the archived reviews, synopsises etc. I have reverted his arbitrary solo action to leave the opportunity for a careful solution. --Eiragorn (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Eiragorn, @Plexci This seems to be a content dispute which generally should be taken to another forum as admins can’t decide content disputes. Has either of you tried to discuss this in an appropriate venue? --Emu (talk) 06:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's a prime example of content drift: The URL/ID now points to an unrelated and totally different database. So in order to keep the integrity of our own datasets intact a new property is needed.
- As has been mentioned I did reach out to Plexci on his talk page before taking action and referred him to a business release of former owner Rovi (1), the website's FAQ from before (2) and after replacing the DB (3) as well as the response of AllMovie's official support team (4). Sadly he ignored all the given sources and tries to brandish my consideration as vandalism now.
- The point of contention are Plexci's updates that overwrite the initial ID. This can only be reasonably resolved as long as the IDs are kept in their original state before the dispute. That's what I reinstated. --Eiragorn (talk) 08:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Eiragorn misrepresents this. One year ago when is was aware of the change of the IDs I pointed this out on the Allmovie talk page (3 June 2024) and was not the only one. But nothing happened and no trace of Eiragorn there. Meanwhile most of the links only lead to the main page of Allmovie. Links that don't work are senseless. Many of the Wikis are using templates to get the data from Wikidata and integrety of a database is the integrity of the available links. Allmovie has enhanced the database and corrected many entries, the database is actual up to now. If you only look at the changes of the last 10 days you can see that the number of links is decreasing. Obviously some users delete not working links completely. Eiragorn just undid my edits, he wasn't looking for any solution anywhere. This is disruptive editing. -- Plexci (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Eiragorn @Plexci Again: This is a content dispute. Admin can’t decide this content dispute. Find some venue (maybe WD:PC) where you can make your respective cases in a succinct manner. If a consensus emerges, admins can intervene. And Plexci, please assume good faith and don’t use language like disruptive editing or worse. --Emu (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Emu: If some user undoes edits of an another user only this is disruptive. The discussion on my side was a month ago. Eiragorn wasn't looking for a solution so far nor hasn't started any discussion elsewhere about his problem. And at this point it is no content dispute any more. -- Plexci (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t know man, seems like a content dispute to me. Hash it out in another venue. It might be easier if you stop calling names. --Emu (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Emu: If some user undoes edits of an another user only this is disruptive. The discussion on my side was a month ago. Eiragorn wasn't looking for a solution so far nor hasn't started any discussion elsewhere about his problem. And at this point it is no content dispute any more. -- Plexci (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Eiragorn @Plexci Again: This is a content dispute. Admin can’t decide this content dispute. Find some venue (maybe WD:PC) where you can make your respective cases in a succinct manner. If a consensus emerges, admins can intervene. And Plexci, please assume good faith and don’t use language like disruptive editing or worse. --Emu (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Eiragorn misrepresents this. One year ago when is was aware of the change of the IDs I pointed this out on the Allmovie talk page (3 June 2024) and was not the only one. But nothing happened and no trace of Eiragorn there. Meanwhile most of the links only lead to the main page of Allmovie. Links that don't work are senseless. Many of the Wikis are using templates to get the data from Wikidata and integrety of a database is the integrity of the available links. Allmovie has enhanced the database and corrected many entries, the database is actual up to now. If you only look at the changes of the last 10 days you can see that the number of links is decreasing. Obviously some users delete not working links completely. Eiragorn just undid my edits, he wasn't looking for any solution anywhere. This is disruptive editing. -- Plexci (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Can somebody help to "clean"/modelate this item? Thanks!!! Madamebiblio (talk) 00:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I have removed all the redundant notable works. They all already had author properties. Removed incorrect usage of described by source to cram it full off references. I have nominated all the barely developed interview items for deletion. Everything else looks reasonable, but I'm certain Dr. Miller will be back soon to continue cramming his entire CV into this item. William Graham (talk) 01:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- A lot of the references are no good. Taking a look at them. William Graham (talk) 01:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
111.88.85.127 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Durhamcitycabs (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Blocked and deleted. —Andreitalk 13:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. —Andreitalk 13:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC) |
New airline phone spam wave is here, see 78.135.252.181 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), 2A02:C7C:187A:7600:98B0:46A5:11DD:6549 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), Aeishmaa11 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)), 2601:640:c080:6c70:55f4:5334:896a:5463 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) etc. Jklamo (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ranges and account blocked. Filter tweaked. Looks like everything is reverted (https://w.wiki/EW77). See also en:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Aeishmaa11. Bovlb (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello again, I would like to kindly request reconsideration or undeletion of the item Q134581221 (Vivid Money), which was previously deleted under the notability policy. While I initially waited for the creation of a corresponding Wikipedia article, it is taking longer than expected.
I understand from the prior discussion that an entity must meet one of the notability criteria outlined at Wikidata:Notability. I would like to demonstrate that Vivid Money clearly satisfies criterion #2:
"It refers to an identifiable entity and is described using serious and publicly available references."
Supporting References
edit- TechCrunch (Global technology publication) “Vivid Money, a financial super app, raises €114M at a $886M valuation to expand in Europe” https://techcrunch.com/2022/02/07/vivid-money-a-financial-super-app-raises-114m-at-an-886m-valuation-to-expand-in-europe/
- Handelsblatt (Germany’s leading financial daily) “Berliner Neobank Vivid übernimmt luxemburgisches Fintech” https://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/banken-versicherungen/finanz-start-ups-berliner-neobank-vivid-uebernimmt-luxemburgisches-fintech/100005394.html
- Tech.eu (European tech industry news site) “SoftBank-backed Vivid Money switches focus from retail to SME banking” https://tech.eu/2025/03/13/softbank-backed-vivid-money-axes-retail-banking-as-standalone-offering-to-focus-on-business-banking/
- Business Insider Germany (Gründerszene) “60 Millionen Euro für N26-Konkurrent Vivid Money” https://www.businessinsider.de/gruenderszene/fintech/60-millionen-euro-fuer-n26-konkurrent-vivid-money/
- Cinco Días (El País) “La fintech Vivid Money lanza una cuenta al 5% para autónomos y empresas” https://cincodias.elpais.com/companias/2024-09-25/la-fintech-vivid-money-lanza-una-cuenta-al-5-para-autonomos-y-empresas.html
These independent and well-established sources provide detailed coverage of Vivid Money’s funding, acquisitions, market activities, and European expansion.
Identifiers
edit- Official website: https://vivid.money
- Crunchbase ID: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/vivid-money
- Twitter/X: https://x.com/vivid_en
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vivid.money.en/
- LEI (Legal Entity Identifier): https://search.gleif.org/#/record/9845006E13OE14D66B97
- LinkedIn company page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/vividmoney/
Vivid Money is a well-documented, independently covered financial technology firm operating across Europe. It satisfies the notability requirement via reliable sources and can be further strengthened with identifiers and structured statements. I kindly request that the item Q134581221 be restored or undeleted to allow further improvements.
Thank you for your time and consideration. 2A02:3100:89E4:600:85DB:59F0:8D0E:8350 16:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)