Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Archive/2013/04

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Kurgan, Cultura de los kurganes, Kurgan hypothesis

Items involved: Q3699342Talk, Q221513Talk, Q5737Talk, Q13379Talk	Status:    resolved
Not really a conflict, just interested in thoughts about the following en:Kurgan interlinks with es:Cultura de los kurganes. Yet these are not exactly the same thing: one is primarily about kurgans as object and the other about the whole culture associated with it. There is also en:Kurgan hypothesis in both languages, but there is a proposal to merge both articles in the es.wiki. What should we do ?--Zolo (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC) User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q5737 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks, there we actually a few things to fix, done now. --Zolo (talk) 14:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Q50637 (art history)

Topic: art history	Items involved: Q50637Talk, Q50641Talk	Status:    resolved
English has two articles: en:History of art, about the evolution of art en:Art history, about the academic discipline Most interwikis currently go to 1, but many of them are actually about 2. There may be tricky cases, for instance es:Historia del arte is about 1., but its first sentence suggests it is about 2.Zolo (talk) 10:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC) This was also discussed at Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2012/12#Art_history_vs_History_of_art -- Make (talk) 17:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC) In portuguese (:pt) the problem is resolved. Q50641 is about history of human creation of works for aesthetic, communicative, or expressive purposes and Q50637 is about the academic study of objects of art in their historical development - Sarilho1 (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC) I've moved both nl: and nds-nl entries, since they are more about the (academic) study than about the historical description of art. Droadnaegel (talk) 22:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC) {{User:Akkakk/iw|Q50637}} Solved now, it seems. Some cases are not very clear, but that seems to be because Wikipedia articles mix the two topics. That should be solved directly in Wikipedias.--Zolo (talk) 10:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2197/Q2186/Q1242632 (Romulus and Remus)

Items involved: Q2197Talk, Q2186Talk, Q1242632Talk	Status:    resolved
Even with Google Translate it's hard to read Armenian, but I'm quite sure hy:Հռոմուլոս is about Romulus only (Q2186), thus not about Romulus and Remus (Q2197). All others seem to be correctly separated to me, though Wikipedias still mix it up in their local interwiki links. --YMS (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC) there is this third item: Q1242632 (remus of course). and the local iw-links realy are mixed up. see User:Akkakk/iw --Akkakk (talk) 00:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Yeah, but I think on Wikidata this is handled correct now. All Remus entries are Remus articles, all Romulus items are Romulus articles, only that one Romulus and Remus article is about Romulus only, as far as I can tell. This one should be moved if I'm right. Merging the items is probably not appropriate, as there it's not really the same subject, see also Wikidata talk:Interwiki conflicts#Sibling conflicts where I was asking about cases like this (this is a rather clear case where there are some overappings - Wikipedias with articles on the sibling duo and individual articles on Romulus and sometimes Remus). I'd say, after checking the hy: article, local interwikis should be removed for these articles, even though we then lose connections between some of the articles (we're back on the generic sibling group problem). --YMS (talk) 10:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC) deleted lots of local iw-links. should be resolved now. --Akkakk (talk) 22:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Q793290/Q9163070/Q7471754

Items involved: Q793290Talk, Q9163070Talk, Q7471754Talk	Status:    resolved
There are two Beregond in the book. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC) Add another item Q9163070 about the Steward of Gondor, Q7471754 is the disambiguation page. tntchn Comment · Contribs 16:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Done. tntchn Comment · Contribs 16:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2017053/Q857837

Items involved: Q2017053Talk, Q857837Talk	Status:    resolved
two disambiguation pages "Okabe", conflict is on japanese wp: ja:岡部 or ja:岡部町? --Akkakk (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2013 (UTC) I merged them in jawiki. --fryed-peach (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3713949 / Q3208932

Items involved: Q3713949Talk, Q3208932Talk	Status:    resolved
same item (same film) Fixed. --Wylve (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Q397911/Q4001046

Items involved: Q397911Talk, Q4001046Talk	Status:    resolved
it:Twilight_Zone and it:Ai_confini_della_realtà are both disambiguation pages for The Twilight Zone. --FelGru (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Items on disambiguation pages usually list only articles that are the same word or set of words. Thus the correct Italian link in Q397911 is it:Twilight_Zone. The other should have its own item. Del♉sion23 (talk) 18:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3501747/Q5908514

Items involved: Q3501747Talk, Q5908514Talk	Status:    resolved
Añú ou paraujano refers to the same Venezuelan language (and people). See the description page of the corresponding ISO 639-3 code pbg : http://www.ethnologue.com/language/pbg. Merge. Bertrand Bellet (talk) 22:17, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Merged. Thanks. Del♉sion23 (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2467894/Q10396669 (Mozilla extension vs add-on)

Items involved: Q2467894Talk, Q7593080Talk, Q10396669Talk	Status:    resolved
same thing  Done. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC) These are not the same thing. Mozilla add-ons include extensions (XPI), themes (background themes and complete XPI themes) and plug-ins (NPAPI). --AVRS (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC) But some of the articles are not only talk about extension but theme? and I think themes are also a kind of extension. tntchn Comment · Contribs 02:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Then those articles may be about add-ons. Themes are distinguished from extensions, even though complete themes are also distributed as XPI files. A list of add-on types, although not including dictionaries, localizations and search tools. See also the site https://addons.mozilla.org/ --AVRS (talk) 10:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Merging items because of a variance in articles won't solve all interwiki conflicts, see for example Wikidata talk:Interwiki conflicts#Sibling_conflicts. Please undelete. --AVRS (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC) (pout) That means we should re-arrange the links. tntchn Comment · Contribs 13:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. --AVRS (talk) 10:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Group 1 Extensions ar:امتداد (موزيلا) fr:Extension (Mozilla) he:הרחבות (מוזילה) it:Estensione Mozilla ja:拡張機能 (Mozilla) ru:Расширение (Mozilla) Group 2 Themes + Extensions ca:Extensió (Mozilla) (?) en:Add-on (Mozilla) es:Extensión (Mozilla) uk:Додаток (Mozilla) I think the article in ca.wiki and in es.wiki are not only talking about extensions but mentioning themes with Google Translate? tntchn Comment · Contribs 11:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Indeed, the article in es.wiki mentions themes (though that might have been a mention of Persona Plus, an extension for creation and use of background themes) and lists plug-ins. I've changed it to be about add-ons generally: w:es:Complemento (Mozilla). The Catalan [ca] article is about extensions, mentioning themes as a separate entity in the context of the creation of a reviewed repository, but says that in English extensions are also called "add-ons". I've removed the mention of "add-ons", it may have been a mistake. [en] and [uk] are certainly about add-ons generally. --AVRS (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC) That is fine. But I'm not sure which group should ca:Extensió be put in. tntchn Comment · Contribs 16:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Q7593080 should be undeleted. There are labels and descriptions, and there are connections with other items. --AVRS (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC) ca can be in Extensions, editing is easy. --AVRS (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC) So what to do next? tntchn Comment · Contribs 02:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Vogone restored the item. Resolved. --AVRS (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Q1321578/Q3093958

Items involved: Q1321578Talk, Q3093958Talk	Status:    resolved
Same item. Hadrianus (talk) 12:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Fixed. --Wylve (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Q9458574, Q1065202, Q1076176

Items involved: Q9458574Talk, Q1065202Talk, Q1076176Talk	Status:    resolved
These three should correspond to en:Wasp, en:Vespula and en:Vespinae respectively, where the former is a common name for a subset of one particular order of insects, and the latter to refer to more taxonomically correct entities, a genus and subfamily respectively. I've started a sort here, but it's quite a bit to sift through and some of the languages I just have no clue about. --Joe Decker (talk) 17:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC) They were a lot, but I think I put every link in its place. --Erfil (talk) 19:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Q5967833 / Q822814

Items involved: Q5967833Talk, Q822814Talk	Status:    resolved
same item (same film : I.N.R.I. (1923)) merged --Akkakk (talk) 01:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Q4663915/Q79216

Items involved: Q4663915Talk, Q79216Talk	Status:    resolved
The 2 elements describe the same abbey (Keur Moussa) in Senegal ; one is linked to franch and german articles, the other to english one. Thanks for merging ! --Laurent Jerry (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2013 (UTC)  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Q606916

Items involved: Q606916Talk	Status:    resolved
seems to be a complete mess. May be someone could help (presumably, to split this item). Thanks in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Should be resolved now. I made a new item for category: Q10604068. --Stryn (talk) 14:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Q736154 vs Q246435 (cop(s))

Items involved: Q736154Talk, Q246435Talk	Status:    resolved
fr:Cops, fr:COP, and en:Cops are all disambiguation pages about "Cop(s)". --πr2 (t • c) 18:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC) solved --Akkakk (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Articles with improper non-free content

Items involved: Q9682933Talk, Q8269086Talk	Status:    resolved
Same item --L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 11:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC) If you are sure that they are the same, please consider merging them on your own. --Michgrig (talk) 21:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)  Done, merged by Littletung, deleted by Riley Huntley. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability

Items involved: Q4616569Talk, Q9136910Talk	Status:    resolved
Same item --L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 11:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)  Done, merged by Littletung, deleted by Riley Huntley. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia files with unknown source

Items involved: Q7677866Talk, Q9522783Talk	Status:    resolved
Same item --L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 11:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)  Done, merged by Littletung, deleted by Riley Huntley. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

Items involved: Q7459838Talk, Q10245124Talk	Status:    resolved
Same item --L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 11:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)  Done, merged by Littletung, deleted by Riley Huntley. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3900224/Q2728258

Items involved: Q3900224Talk, Q2728258Talk	Status:    resolved
Same articles on two different elements I fixed the Italian one, English and Japanese links seem to be different in two items--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3247478/Q4434288

Items involved: Q3247478Talk, Q4434288Talk	Status:    resolved
Q3247478 (en — List of Caucasian Albanian Catholicoi) and Q4434288 (ru — Список католикосов Албанской апостольской церкви) both seem like lists for the same people. --Q Valda (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Indeed, I merged them.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Vic (Q13855) et Vic (homonymie) (Q401177)

Items involved: Q13855Talk, Q401177Talk	Status:    resolved
Sur la WP française, suite aux renommages de Vic (Espagne) en Vic et Vic en Vic (homonymie), les liens interlangues n'ont pas été mis à jour sur les pages (françaises, uniquement ?) des 2 Vic. Les pages Wikidata semblent pourtant correctes. Pourriez-vous voir cela ? --Berdea (talk) 06:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC) If I understand correctly, fr-wiki article had a wrong interwikilinks on left panel, but after I purged the page (some minutes ago), they should be correct now. --Stryn (talk) 08:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC) It seems that it works correctly now. I will remember to purge next time. I suppose you have to purge on Wikidata, but not on Wikipédia ? If yes, how to do it ? --Berdea (talk) 09:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC) No, purging needs to do on Wikipedia article, not on Wikidata. See question #26 here: Help:FAQ. --Stryn (talk) 10:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Q149377 vs. Q2026549

Items involved: Q149377Talk, Q2026549Talk	Status:    resolved
--91.58.101.30 11:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Items merged in Q149377. Andreasmperu (talk) 23:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3306902/Q5883471

Items involved: Q3306902Talk, Q5883471Talk	Status:    resolved
Duplicated article at es.wiki. --Wylve (talk) 00:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC) Redirected the most recent article at es wiki. Deleted Q5883471. Del♉sion23 (talk) 00:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Q1146379/Q5151406

Items involved: Q1146379Talk, Q5151406Talk	Status:    resolved
The interwikilinks should be moved from Blackhead to Comedo, the type Wikipedia:Disambiguation should be removed. Blackhead is merely a redirect now. Moved Comedo to Q1146379. Deleted the now empty Q5151406. Del♉sion23 (talk) 10:18, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Q4982312/Q1708923

Items involved: Q4982312Talk, Q1708923Talk	Status:    resolved
same person --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC) Please read Help:Merge. Thanks. --Izno (talk) 03:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Q364110/Q1763586

Items involved: Q364110Talk, Q1763586Talk	Status:    resolved
The problem comes from the two pages in Italian. Otourly (talk) 09:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC) moved all link in Q1763586 to Q364110 except it link --ValterVB (talk) 12:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3644426/Q911713

Items involved: Q3644426Talk, Q911713Talk	Status:    resolved
Both items refer to the same topic (Briakinumab, an monoclonale antibody). One of these items needs to be removed.SimsKoarl (talk) 10:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC) Items merged.Martin451 (talk) 13:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Q7811645/Q2437890

Items involved: Q7811645Talk, Q2437890Talk	Status:    resolved
Same person. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC) Items merged --Pasleim (talk) 20:41, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Andrade (Pontedeume)/Andrade, Pontedeume

Items involved: Q11117255Talk, Q5675103Talk	Status:    resolved
Done. Though you can perform merges yourself by following the instructions at Help:Merge. Del♉sion23 (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks! --HombreDHojalata (talk) 09:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Q9006466/Q300859

Items involved: Q9006466Talk, Q300859Talk	Status:    resolved
Duplicate item --Sergio Andres Segovia (talk) 13:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC) Marked as resolved Del♉sion23 (talk) 19:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Q942925/Q3991646

Items involved: Q942925Talk, Q3991646Talk	Status:    resolved
Merged Q3991646 in Q942925 and deleted --ValterVB (talk) 20:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Traffic circle vs Roundabout

Items involved: Q1529Talk, Q1525Talk	Status:    resolved
Note, interwiki have us believe that en: traffic-circle = fr: rond-point and en: roundabout = fr: carrefour giratoire. But actually carrefour giratoire matches both traffic circle and roundabout, while rond-point (as defined in the article) is something completely different. In French a Rond-point is a name of a traffic-circle or a roundabout (that's why many people think the two terms are equivalents). Otourly (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC) The usage in English is iffy. The traffic engineers tend to mean roundabout to signify a particular subspecies of circular interchange, while in the US traffic circle coloquially subsumes all types. I believe in Britain roundabout is the comprehensive term but those that don't conform to the engineers' restricted definition have been largely eliminated. Mangoe (talk) 15:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC) We have the same thing in France : « carrefour giratoire » is the technical term, used by enginneers for the 20th century, and « rond-point » is the common term used by people. « rond-point » is older and derived from the ancient meant a circular place in the planning of the classical period. - Bzh-99 (talk) 11:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC) at the moment only tl:Rotonda and zh:环形交叉 are conflicting. both are in Q1529 but link to and are linked from items from Q1525 --Akkakk (talk) 22:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC) I am a zhwiki user. Before 2009, zh:环形交叉 = en:Traffic circle and zh:迴旋處 = en:Roundabout, but in June 2010 zh:迴旋處 was merged into zh:环形交叉. I think zh:环形交叉 should be put in Q1529 because zh:迴旋處 was just a stub article before it had been merged. Most of the contents were translated from en:Traffic circle. tntchn Comment · Contribs 13:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) tl:Rotonda is just like a translation article from enwiki, so I link it to Q1525, and I think it's  Done. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC) I am not sure the French links are really ok. In everyday usage fr:rond-point really means en:traffic circle but fr.wikipedia apparently uses a somewhat different definition. But that seems rather hard to solve, and it is disheartening to see it linger for six months. Son unless there is objection, I am going to mark this one as "in doubt" and archive it. --Zolo (talk) 18:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC) User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q1525 --Akkakk (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Photographic techniques / Category:Photography equipment

Items involved: Q6264323Talk, Q9127969Talk	Status:    resolved
I reached the limit of my language knowledge --Robby (talk) 08:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC) In the meantime I managed to resolve this through the links to commonscat as well as through the historic interwiki links --Robby (talk) 02:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

de:Prostitution in der Antike / en:Prostitution in ancient Greece / en:Prostitution in ancient Rome

Items involved: Q1476406Talk	Status:    resolved
de:Prostitution in der Antike ("prostitution in antiquity") had links to both en:Prostitution in ancient Greece and en:Prostitution in ancient Rome. The bot moved most links to wikidata, but left en:Prostitution in ancient Rome in the dewiki article, which now has confusing interwiki inks. Creted two new items. JAn Dudík (talk) 11:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3125943/Q9285272

Items involved: Q3125943Talk, Q9285272Talk	Status:    resolved
Are these two "Half Moon Cay" the same island? There is also an Island of the same name in Antarctica.Martin451 (talk) 07:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Done.--Joostik (talk) 11:22, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Q1049945/Q7470324

Items involved: Q1049945Talk, Q7470324Talk	Status:    resolved
Mixed up between en:Jacobite rising of 1745 & en:Jacobite risings. I didn't find the item for en:Jacobite rising of 1715. Aurora (talk) 10:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Done. --Joostik (talk) 11:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Q5460115/Q9247710

Items involved: Q5460115Talk, Q9247710Talk	Status:    resolved
It's the same directive (2007/60/EC) Panek (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC) I merged these two and sent a request for deletion. Next time if you are sure that two elements are about the same thing, please consider merging them on your own. --Michgrig (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks. I'm not familiar with Wikidata yet. Panek (talk) 16:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Swiss cheese

Items involved: Q675886Talk, Q285758Talk	Status:    resolved
--Bene* talk 15:42, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Q9689429/Q11711732

Items involved: Q9689429Talk, Q11711732Talk	Status:    resolved
I create Q11711732 thinking that Q9689429 didn't exist. I make a mistake and I don't know how to eliminate Q11711732. --Berdea (talk) 23:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)  Deleted Q11711732. For the future, see Help:Merge: deletion requests can be made here. Regards, Ricordisamoa 00:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Q11721817/Q4487708

Items involved: Q11721817Talk, Q4487708Talk	Status:    resolved
problematic Malay link. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Moved Malay link to Q12270242. Del♉sion23 (talk) 21:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Q152307/Q3095364

Items involved: Q152307Talk, Q3095364Talk	Status:    resolved
Both items describe the same thing and should be merged.--Stanzilla (talk) 10:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)  merged and  Deleted Q3095364. --Ricordisamoa 10:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2619306/Q5994108

Items involved: Q2619306Talk, Q5994108Talk	Status:    resolved
Football player, same person --DamonRN (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Merged and deleted. --ValterVB (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Q6989196/Q158852

Items involved: Q6989196Talk, Q158852Talk	Status:    resolved
About "Conducting": de.wiki and he.wiki have the 2 links, so I can't merge (I don't know the difference). --ValterVB (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC) One is the person, the other is the profession. Compare with "Farmer" (a person who grows food) and "Farming" (the growing of food). Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Q11774373/Q5879648

Items involved: Q11774373Talk, Q5879648Talk	Status:    resolved
Mixed categories for island and programming language I suspect that the pages for each item linked need to be cleaned up, which should prevent this from being mussed in the future. --Izno (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Grundmenge

Items involved: Q597663Talk, Q1550580Talk	Status:    resolved
German "Grundmenge" should be added to Universe (mathematics)  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hangzhou metro

Items involved: Q10252237Talk, Q8505013Talk	Status:    resolved
The two categories describe the same thing (en:Hangzhou Metro) but have different items. They should be merged into one.  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Q4274886/Q11832323

Items involved: Q4274886Talk, Q11832323Talk	Status:    resolved
The page corresponding to the spanish WP La cena de Emaús (La mulata) should not have English interwiki. It should only be on the Spanish page named La mulata. It seems the wikidata is correct but not correctly reflected into interwikis. Vatekor (talk) 11:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC) That is a problem for es.wikipedia, not Wikidata. The English link is there because the [[en:La mulata]] at the bottom of the edit summary is overriding the information from Wikidata. Cheers. Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Q1204808/Q3776278

Items involved: Q1204808Talk, Q3776278Talk	Status:    resolved
The it: in the first page is a redirect to the it: in the second one.  Deleted the second one. Thanks for reporting, Ricordisamoa 13:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3657114/Q5651808

Items involved: Q3657114Talk, Q5651808Talk	Status:    resolved
Both entries refer to the same item. The first one has english (en:Imperial_Bösendorfer_(piano)) and chinese (zh:贝森朵夫290三角钢琴) versions, and the second one has only the spanish (es:290_Imperial) version. They should be merged but I don't know how to do it. I've merged them. You can perform a merge by following the instructions at Help:Merge. Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Q6148090/Q7814106

Items involved: Q6148090Talk, Q7814106Talk	Status:    resolved
es:Tolbaños de Arriba and en:Tolbaños de Arriba are about the same Spanish village. I was unable to link the two articles because each has been assigned its own number. —David Levy 16:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC) I've merged the two items. You can follow the instructions at Help:Merge to find out how to do these. Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2736438/Q3641591

Items involved: Q2736438Talk, Q3641591Talk	Status:    resolved
I've merged the items. You can merge items yourself by following the instructions at Help:Merge. Thanks. Del♉sion23 (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2066069/Q3271275

Items involved: Q2066069Talk, Q3271275Talk	Status:    resolved
I've merged the two items. You can perform merges yourself by following the instructions at Help:Merge. Thanks. Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:44, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Q6813090/Q4664582

Items involved: Q6813090Talk, Q4664582Talk	Status:    resolved
These two items are both about the same Palestinian man. I've merged the two items. You can perform merges yourself by following the instructions at Help:Merge. Thanks. Del♉sion23 (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Vid Vintergatans slut

Items involved: Q12108250Talk, Q3372067Talk	Status:    resolved
In the sv-article (Q3372067) there is a interwikilink to enwp, (Vintergatan#Vintergatans slut) But enwp's Vintergatan (Q3372067) is linking to Vintergatan... --Josve05a (talk) 21:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Q1971543/Q1647331

Items involved: Q1971543Talk, Q1647331Talk	Status:    resolved
Pokémon Raichu. TiboF® 22:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Q12151373/Q12151374

Items involved: Q12151373Talk, Q12151374Talk	Status:    resolved
I created by mistake two pages, can you please unify them?--Paopp (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Hey, I'm afraid Wikidata does not allow for items to be a collection of links to User pages. Thus I have had to delete the items for not passing WD:N criteria 1. Del♉sion23 (talk) 19:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Q8044704/Q11705403

Items involved: Q8044704Talk, Q11705403Talk	Status:    resolved
It is about the same first name (Xiomara). LeRoc (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC) I'm sorry, I'm retracting the request. Q8044704 is about Xiomara as a disambiguation page, Q11705403 is about the first name. Xiomara is also the name of a biological genus, so it makes sense to make a distinction. I'll try to edit the articles accordingly. LeRoc (talk) 21:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3608642/Q2831843

Items involved: Q3608642Talk, Q2831843Talk	Status:    resolved
merged and deleted --ValterVB (talk) 06:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Q6440870/Q6158573

Items involved: Q6440870Talk, Q6158573Talk	Status:    resolved
the same thing. --Gajolen (talk) 09:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Del♉sion23 (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Q441154/Q11084581

Items involved: Q441154Talk, Q11084581Talk	Status:    resolved
It seems to me that these two items should be merged, but I'm afraid I can make a mistake if I try to merge them myself. Py4nf (talk) 12:09, 30 April 2013 (UTC) No problem,  merged and  Deleted :-) --Ricordisamoa 12:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3019636/Q12211119

Items involved: Q3019636Talk, Q12211119Talk	Status:    resolved
Q12211119 & Q3019636 must be the same. --وهراني (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Q4265827/Q5425039

Items involved: Q4265827Talk, Q5425039Talk	Status:    resolved
absolutely the same Denhud (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Del♉sion23 (talk) 21:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Q3920545/Q6356932

Items involved: Q3920545Talk, Q6356932Talk	Status:    resolved
the same. Denhud (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Del♉sion23 (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Tabbed Browsing vs Tab

Items involved: Q849450Talk, Q10590816Talk	Status:    resolved
The first term (tabbed browsing) describes the internet browsing using a Tab. The second one (only Tab, en-wp "Tab (GUI)") describes only the object itself or in general. There are many interwiki conflict with these two items (have a look at the de-wp). I chose the first item (en "Tab (GUI)") for the Tab itself, the second für tabbed browsing. I swaped already the two de-wp links. Thank you for your help. --#Reaper (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Edit: No, I think I did something wrong. I currently don't know for sure, what means what. It seems that in the german wp is something redundant. I've to check this first. My fault. --#Reaper (talk) 13:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC) I've moved the de tabbed browsing to the lonely item, as the majority of the big item covers all types of tabs. DE seems specific to web browsers. --Izno (talk) 04:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Both German articles are not really clarified and jumble those things up, I have to review and edit them. Thank you, --#Reaper (talk) 17:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC) automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q849450,Q10590816 --Akkakk (talk) 18:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Piracy

Items involved: Q45393Talk	Status:    resolved
The interwikis on lt:Piratai (literally means "pirates") are fewer than the interwikis on other wikis. Normally I would just fix it, but lt:Piratavimas (which means "piracy" or the act itself as opposed to pirates) already has these interwikis. Please help!  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by PiRSquared17 (talk • contribs). In all language pirates and piracy is same page, maybe should we merge piratai and piratavimas --Jitrixis (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC) sites in items Q45393, Q201559, Q226581, Q1453836, Q298222 and Q4780717 all only links to themselves, except for ru:Корсары. and there are some other pages (se below, links may be outdated) --Akkakk (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC) User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q45393 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC) I have created Q10729326 for pirates as we may need this for other uses as well, and because it is a bit difficult to add statements to an item that refers both to an activity and to a person. I have moved some, but not all of the relevant articles (many sitelinks, and some languages are a bit obscure) However, that loses some interwiki.Ã potential solution for this sort of case would be a Tempate:RelatedInterwikis that could grab the interwikis from a related item. --Zolo (talk) 14:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Template:Solved --Zolo (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Canteen and cafeteria

Items involved: Q1206714Talk, Q661199Talk, Q30022Talk	Status:    resolved
ru:Столовая is mainly about canteen not room. Where to place en:Cafeteria? Infovarius (talk) 13:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC) ru:Столовая, kk:Асхана, uk:Їдальня should be in one item with en:Cafeteria, fr:Cafétéria (not with en:Dining room), bezik (talk) 19:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC) I see the problem - russian word Столовая has 2 meanings: dining room and restaurant (besides, ru:Ресторан has now different nuance than Restaurant). Now, Dynamik has created ru:Столовая (помещение) which can be safely linked with en:Dining room. Infovarius (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Moved uk:Їдальня from Q661199 to Q8463304 as it is about type of a restaurant/canteen, not a type of a room. Olexa Riznyk (talk) 07:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC) automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q1206714,Q661199,Q30022,Q4236467,Q30022 --Akkakk (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2013 (UTC)  Done, ru:Столовая, kk:Асхана, uk:Їдальня moved to Q8463304, Bezik (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Q65943/Q1497813

Items involved: Q65943Talk, Q1497813Talk	Status:    resolved
The german "Satz" used in a mathematical context refers to the english "Theorem". Its a proven statement from axioms alone. The german "Theorem" is used more liberal (at least according to the german wikipedia) as it is used for certain scientific statements aswell. If the Luxembourgish wikipedia article for [Q1497813]] is rougly the same as the german article (my command of the language is, well, nonexistent) then [Q1497813]] should probably be deleted. I have no idea what to do with the apparent semantic differences between the german and the english "Theorem". As a native speaker of German I wouldn't use "Theorem" when it comes to scientific statements, but it seems that some people do. Should I create a new item for the German "Theorem"?79.226.59.29 00:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC) automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q1497813,Q65943 --Akkakk (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC) Merged by Lymantria. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Q1798094/Q12912887

Items involved: Q1798094Talk, Q12912887Talk	Status:    resolved
de:LHV VT 2E contains four variations of one train. The item links to nl:AKN VT2, but that article contains only one of them, and there are also nl:FKE VT2E and nl:GKB VT 70 that are included in de:LHV VT 2E, too. --93.207.64.62 (de:User:MdE) 16:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Seems already merged with Q12912887?! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Present perfect tense

Items involved: Q11045170Talk, Q1417024Talk	Status:    resolved
despite the names, I suspect that all links in these items are about the same grammatical form, but I am not an experct and most of those languages I do not speak good enough. Note that the Italian article is related (in the body of the article) with many links on Perfect, and some of those may be in fact Present perfect. Thanks in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC) This might be bigger mess than you suspected first. It passato prossima links to en:perfect, also there is it:Present perfect Q1240211. Linnea (talk) 18:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC) In Italian, passato prossimo is for actions related to the present, it more or less clearly emphasizes a result. Passato remoto is tipically for actions not related to the present: e.g. the English "was born" should be translated with passato prossimo when speaking of a living person, otherwise with passato remoto. In Spanish it is quite similar in theory, but there are differences in practice; in Italy most native speakers are not at all reliable on the subject, depending on where they are from. And I would non even dare to try to compare this with what happens in germanic or in slavic languages. --Pegasovagante (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Both merged to present perfect (Q1240211), so there's no longer having problem. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Walnut / nut

Items involved: Q14709Talk, Q11009Talk, Q208021Talk	Status:    resolved
Possibly, the first item needs to be merged in one of the other two. Andreasmperu (talk) 23:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC) automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q14709,Q11009,Q208021 --Akkakk (talk) 00:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC) It seems Q14709 makes a distinction ("nutlet" versus "nut") which isn't made in most languages so difficult or impossible to merge. In many languages "nut" basically means "walnut", so Q11009 / Q208021 seen corect. --Joostik (talk) 08:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC) All interwiki's are correct! Q.Zanden questions? 22:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Q50637/Q50641

Topic: art history	Items involved: Q50637Talk, Q50641Talk	Status:    resolved
English has two articles: en:History of art, about the evolution of art en:Art history, about the academic discipline Most interwikis currently go to 1, but many of them are actually about 2. There may be tricky cases, for instance es:Historia del arte is about 1., but its first sentence suggests it is about 2.Zolo (talk) 10:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC) This was also discussed at Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2012/12#Art_history_vs_History_of_art -- Make (talk) 17:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC) In portuguese (:pt) the problem is resolved. Q50641 is about history of human creation of works for aesthetic, communicative, or expressive purposes and Q50637 is about the academic study of objects of art in their historical development - Sarilho1 (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC) I've moved both nl: and nds-nl entries, since they are more about the (academic) study than about the historical description of art. Droadnaegel (talk) 22:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC) User:Akkakk/iw#Q50637 --Akkakk (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Solved now, it seems. Some cases are not very clear, but that seems to be because Wikipedia articles mix the two topics. That should be solved directly in Wikipedias.--Zolo (talk) 10:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Q22652 / Q22658 / Q22698

Items involved: Q22652Talk, Q22658Talk, Q22698Talk	Status:    resolved
There seems to be partial overlap between the following words, with exact meaning probably varying depending on language and place: "green spaces" Q22652 urban park (Q22746) ja:緑地 en:Village green Additionally, the word "park" itself (Q22698) can have various, very differnt meaning (US National Parks are convervation areas, with minimal human intervention, and sometimes restricted public entry, but urban parks are nearly the opposite: they are generally meant for public enjoyment, with heavy human intervention. So not sure it makes a coherent entry. User:Akkakk/iw#Q22652 --Akkakk (talk) 00:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks, I fixed some problematic sitelinks. I think that is more or less ok now. Though as stated above, words do not have exactly the same meaning in all languages. --Zolo (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

autonomous region (Q782614)/autonomous administrative territorial entity (Q788176)

Items involved: Q782614Talk, Q788176Talk	Status:    resolved
conflict between autonomous region and autonomous administrative division --Del♉sion23 (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Ping French contributors: @LucasD, Elnon: resolved or not? --117.13.95.87 06:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Unfortunately no. Some languages have two articles for the same topis :( ---Medograd (talk) 01:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Note: The later one has merged to autonomous administrative territorial entity (Q788176), and as autonomous region (Q782614)subclass of (P279)autonomous administrative territorial entity (Q788176), there's no problems with both items. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Q1032765/Q2420695

Items involved: Q1032765Talk, Q2420695Talk	Status:    resolved
line 3 of Île-de-France tram is now line 3a and there is also a line 3b (Q3136247) I think we should merge the two items keeping all language articles. line 3 articles will have to be modified. Greenski (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Not possible without merging some language articles. Better keep it this way. --Joostik (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)