Open main menu

Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Unresolved/All

< Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts‎ | Unresolved

Contents

2012Edit

November 2012Edit

probation (Q13961)Edit

Items involved: Q13961Talk, Q4737759Talk, Q5357120Talk, Q3237993Talk, Q13963Talk, Q4204236Talk Status:     partially resolved

germany and us are no longer a problem, but others are--Akkakk (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q13961 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

there are conflict between suspended sentence and probation Q13961 (I can't really understand how the latter can be translated into russian). Also some kind of liberations has some interconnections. Infovarius (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Looking good now. Littledogboy (talk) 19:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Step by step. I think:
  • Q3237993 – is the odd one out in French, the ru and uk don't belong here, fr is simply about the act of leaving a prison, liberation.
  • Q13963 – the odd one out in English, the German page needs a new home.
  • Q13961/Q5357120/Q4737759 – remain problematic...
Littledogboy (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
interwiklinks: Q5357120 in fi, fr, ja, kk, ko, ms versions deleted (now wikidata).
in Q4737759 the German link is missing, but must be somewhere manually connecting to Q13963--Oursana (talk) 20:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
bg,es interwikilink in de Q13963 (to q13961) deleted, there are more--Oursana (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The removed es is incorrectly linked--Oursana (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Q13963 do not fit.

sternum (Q8481)/human sternum (Q8494)Edit

Items involved: Q8481Talk, Q8494Talk Status:     in doubt

sternum and Human sternum are same. Sternum should be used as a general term. Human Sternum for Human bone. Merge them?? --Nizil Shah (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • No, don't merge them. There are two articles in en and pl, one about human sternum and the other about sternum in general.--Snaevar (talk) 01:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
    Most of the articles currently listed under sternum seem to actually be about the Human sternum and thus should be moved under Human sternum, IMO. Kaldari (talk) 22:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
    Thus they should be renamed. You can ask in those articles for renaming. Infovarius (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q8481 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

  Comment. Based on titles, interwikis are correct. Based on content, most articles in the genral sternum article seem to deal only with the human sternum, but as titles may be more stable than content, I think it makes sense to keep things this way. --Zolo (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The pages look all like to handle the human sternum, but the title says it is about the sternum generally. For now, I could only find the polish wp that made a clear difference between the two articles. en.wp has only one article, the other one is a redirect. What to do with the other pages? Q.Zanden questions? 12:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  Comment. Just a fyi, in jawiki article corresponding to sternum has a section for human sternum. --Omotecho (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

barge (Q16518)/hopper barge (Q16523)Edit

Items involved: Q16518Talk, Q16523Talk Status:     in doubt

* Q16518 vs Q16523: see talk:Q16518--Zolo (talk) 10:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Q16158 flat-bottomed boat, regardless of propulsion type
  • Q16523: non-self-propelled flat-bottomed boat

Note that French barge is in 16523 while English barge is in 16158. --Zolo

I relied on images in articles and Google Translate (reading the article, not just the title). However there appears to be problems:

  • most entries refer to ships that "usually" have no engine. As this implies that is sometimes has, I classified them in Q16518. An additional reason for that is that those articles usually have photos of self-propelled barges.
  • definitions may be imprecise, or may vary across languages or countries. For instance:

--Zolo (talk) 10:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Self-propelled barge in Russian is ru:Самоходная баржа, and ru:Пениш stands for self-propelled barges common mostly in Belgium, Netherlands and France, and having specific dimensions corresponding to Freycinet class, which, in turn, correspond to channel and lock dimensions. ru:Баржа and uk:Баржа stand for flat-bottomed cargo ship (small boats are excluded) regardless of propulsion type. In Ukrainian, uk:Самохідна баржа would stand for self-propelled one, and uk:Пеніш would stand for self-propelled Freycinet-class one (both not available yet).

So, possible concepts seem to be:

  • flat-bottomed boat regardless of propulsion type
  • self-propelled flat-bottomed boat
  • self-propelled flat-bottomed boat of Freycinet class
  • non-self-propelled flat-bottomed boat

Olexa Riznyk (talk) 07:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

See User:Akkakk/iw#Q16518

  • I suppose that ru:Баржа, uk:Баржа и en:Barge should be in one item. Infovarius (talk) 14:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Is there somebody who knows a bit more about different types of ships? Q.Zanden questions? 12:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Tibet (Q17252)/Tibet Autonomous Region (Q17269)Edit

Items involved: Q17252Talk, Q17269Talk Status:     not resolved

Tibet vs Tibet Autonomous Region: There is a conflict when import Q17269 interwiki from en.--Stevenliuyi (talk) 18:41, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • The problem is on w:es:Tíbet and w:fi:Tiibet. There is an link to es:Tíbet on cs.wikipedia and there is an link to fi:Tiibet on la.wikipedia.--Snaevar (talk) 01:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
    I put fi:Tiibet in Q17252 Tibet and added fi:Tiibetin autonominen alue, which was in no item, into Q17269 Tibet Autonomous Region, checked to see that the es, cs and la pages were where they were supposed to be, and checked to see that all interwiki links on the en page were in the item (and added the only one that wasn't). So that issue is taken care of. However, looking through the articles listed in each item, there are many articles in Q17252 Tibet that state, roughly, "Tibet is an autonomous region" and try to encompass both the geographical and the political region or are not sure which they should document. Should any "is an autonomous region" article simply be put in the Tibet Autonomous Region item or what should be done? Enoirditalk 11:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q17252 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
For Q17269 (TAR) all interlinks are correct, but I am in doubt about kg.wp and new.wp. @Jfblanc: Could you please look at the kg.wp article and confirm it? @Eukesh, सरोज कुमार ढकाल: Could you please confirm it for the new.wp?
For kg the link is ok, it is about the Autonomous Region. Regards --Jfblanc (talk) 19:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
As I'm controlling the links of Q17252 I come across very much articles that I cannot confirm. Anybody any idea how to quickly solve this problem? Q.Zanden questions? 12:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

December 2012Edit

desk (Q1064858)/secretary desk (Q3666631)/rolltop desk (Q7361371)/writing desk (Q3512772)/fall front desk (Q3477318)/writing table (Q8038544)/slant top desk (Q7538672)/cylinder desk (Q2928341)Edit

Items involved: Q1064858Talk, Q3666631Talk, Q7361371Talk, Q3512772Talk, Q3477318Talk, Q8038544Talk, Q7538672Talk, Q2928341Talk Status:     not resolved

There will be a conflict with Secretary desk and writing desk, as soon they are here. --Peter in s (talk) 03:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I've separated desk (Schreibtisch, Q1064858), secretary desk (Sekretär, Q3666631) and writing desk (Q3512772). Still open: en:Writing table. --Kolja21 (talk) 13:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Fix a few, but still some conflicts. Danrok (talk) 14:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q1064858 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I've added several other items – there are matches to be made against en:List of desk forms and types... Littledogboy (talk) 12:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

2013Edit

January 2013Edit

Tambura/Tanpura...Edit

Items involved: Q3424319Talk, Q1164636Talk, Q1423158Talk, Q7681090Talk, Q4989127Talk, Q4378740Talk Status:     partially resolved

There is an edit war for interwiki on tr:Tambura That's why i am trying to regroup the pages. But i have really problems to separate groups. My bot started on tr:Tambura and lists all pages that a connected to this article and has made a automatic grouping suggestion based on some special algorithm. But i don't have enough knowlage about this topic to verify these groups and decide about the unsorted articles. Could sb. please help? Merlissimo (talk) 15:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q3424319 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Mark as partially resolved as per special:diff/247723714 and special:diff/185783680. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

February 2013Edit

German current national anthem (Q4122341) vs. German historic national anthem (Q44042)Edit

Items involved: Q4122341Talk, Q44042Talk Status:     not resolved

The first Item is the current German national anthem. This is only the 3rd verse of the old/historic national anthem which is the second Item. --Sk!d (talk) 19:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
de:Deutsche Nationalhymne deals with the German anthem(s) in general, not only with the current one. --Kronf (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q4122341 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, the title of this section is not totally accurate. Q...42 is a concrete patriotic song of the 19th century ("Das Lied der Deuteschen", serving since 1922 as the German national anthem), and Q...41 is the German national anthem, a position that has been filled in by different songs. Some language versions have this neat distinction, as German Wikipedia, others take Q...42 (the song) and treat it as if it were the same (e.g., Dutch Wikipedia). By the way, I think that the aliases in the items should be altered. / This problem occurs with several national anthems. In the USA and France, for example, the specific song and the anthem are more or less the same. In Austria, there have been changes, but nonetheless, German Wikipedia has a redirect from "Land der Berge, Land am Strome" to "Österreichische Bundeshymne" [Austrian Federal anthem] (Q126658) (the song is the anthem only since 1947). The German article treats "previous Austrian anthems". Ziko (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Great explanation, why don't you work it into the English and German descriptions of both items? Littledogboy (talk) 15:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I left something on the talk page too. But actually this must be solved in the language version. Ziko (talk) 20:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Q2403634/Q5378501 (gear ratio/mechanical advantage)Edit

Items involved: Q2403634Talk, Q5378501Talk, Q2644088Talk Status:     not resolved

Q5378501 discusses mechanical advantage; Q2403634 discusses gear ratios. The En-wiki interlanguage links are in significant conflict. The ones I haven't been able to resolve are: da:Gearing, de:Übersetzung_(Technik) eo:Transmisia rilatumo, and sv:Kraftöverföring. On some I have a decent guess based on equations, but I'd appreciate if people who speak the relevant languages could look into these. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 10:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Tried to look into this a bit...
  • I put da:Gearing as mechanical advantage. The Danish word gear seems not to mean a gear but a device in English, and I kind of understood the article via Swedish.
  • de:Übersetzung (Technik) seems too general: "In mechanical engineering (I guess), a device that translates the value of a physical quantity into another value of the same quantity with both values remaining in a constructively stable ratio with one another is described as Übersetzung or Transmission." Then again, the article also states that the term is used also for the measure that is the ratio itself, with the symbol i.
  • sv:Kraftöverföring is about transferring force between, for example, a motor and a wheel. I think it's neither of these items.
  • eo:Transmisia rilatumo is about some ratio categorised in hydraulics: "The inverse value of the transfer of movement frequency in a constant state."
I'm tempted to think only the Danish one was about the exact same concept as one of the items. I'm not sure about the German one though, and I didn't quite get the hang of what the Esperanto article was going on about. Enoirditalk 14:44, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q2403634 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Added Q2644088: is about gear train and the english page from gear ratio is a redirect to gear train. Q.Zanden questions? 15:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2013Edit

Q6117552/Q6482368 (Chemical substances category/chemical compounds category)Edit

Items involved: Q6117552Talk, Q6482368Talk Status:     not resolved

Chemical substances category (Q6117552) vs. chemical compounds category (Q6482368). Redaktor says that there's several incorrect links, and at a glance I believe xe's right. If some good multilingual editors could take a look at this, that'd be great. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 23:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q6117552 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Q200297/Q1434958 (thermal power plant/fossil-fuel power station)Edit

Items involved: Q200297Talk, Q1434958Talk Status:     not resolved

ja:火力発電所 should be removed from Q200297 a it is correctly listed under Q1434958. If Q1434958 refers to "fossil-fuel power station" de:Kohlekraftwerk, nl:Kolencentrale, nn:Kolkraftverk, sv:Kolkraftverk and probably other language links as well should be removed from this site, as they treat coal fired power stations only.--ペーター (talk) 10:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I have created a new item called "coal power plant" here for the links that seem to be specific to coal. ja:火力発電 is already present in item Q1434958. Should this be moved to a new item called "thermal power generation"? ja:火力発電所 seems to translate to "thermal power plant" which is what the item at Q200297 currently describes. Delsion23 (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Moved some more (cs, pl) to Q6558431. --Matthiasb (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
The Japanese word 火力発電所 is usually (mis-)translated "thermal power station" by the media. However, the English and German wikipedia articles on thermal power generation include nuclear, solar thermal and geothermal power generation, while the Japanese wikipedia article on 火力発電所 treats fossil fuel power stations only. The word 火力発電所 (as well as the English word "thermal power station") is used by the media in Japan to contrast "fire power stations" (literal translation of 火力発電所) against nuclear power stations. I therefore removed 火力発電所 from Q200297.--ペーター (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q200297 --Akkakk (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Q2626877/Q1367215 (nautical terms)Edit

Items involved: Q2626877Talk, Q1367215Talk Status:     not resolved

There seems to be two problems here:
  1. German wikipedia has split the list into two: de:Liste seemännischer Fachwörter (A bis M), de:Liste seemännischer Fachwörter (N bis Z) and also has the article de:Seemannssprache
  2. French wikipedia has two articles: fr:Lexique de la navigation à voile, fr:Vocabulaire maritime

Maybe some French and German speakers could help sort it out.

  1. The both lists correspond to Q2626877, but are split, as was said, while de:Seemannssprache has nothing to do with both entries above, therefor will create item for that one. (Q7041009)
  2. The first French is a part of the second list, as it contains only terms used when sailing (as in sail boats). I would put the second into Q2626877, the first would stand alone.
  3. I also think that pt:Anexo:Terminologia náutica should be moved into Q2626877.
--Matthiasb (talk) 18:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
I agree with your suggestions. Maybe German wikipedia can be convinced to merge de:Liste seemännischer Fachwörter (A bis M) and de:Liste seemännischer Fachwörter (N bis Z)? It seems to have been split because of the limitations of article size in "the old days" (see de:Diskussion:Liste seemännischer Fachwörter (A bis M)#Zu groß?. I believe this technical problem of slow page loading is less relevant today. --Wikijens (talk) 12:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q2626877 --Akkakk (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Q37137 (Contralto/Alto)Edit

Items involved: Q37137Talk, Q6983813Talk Status:     not resolved

Q37137 refers to Contralto in some languages and to Alto in other languages. en:Alto and fr:Alto (voix) have no Wikidata item. Rsocol (talk) 19:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
By reading Talk:Q37137, I understand that the confusion is caused by de:Alt (Stimmlage), which could mean en:Contralto as well as en:Alto. Maybe we should have three items: the first for en:Alto, fr:Alto (voix), etc; the second for en:Contralto, fr:Contralto, etc; and the third for de::Alt (Stimmlage), hu:Alt and other languages which use the same term for both notions. Rsocol (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
I'll have a go at sorting it out. I think that there should be two items, one for alto and one for contralto. It seems that some languages have an article on the two, and other languages have an article on "alto" which then has a sentance or section on "contralto". I'll mark as resolved if I find no problems. Delsion23 (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
You were right that some of them treat the two almost equally, which made things difficult. Can someone please have a look over items Q37137 (contralto) and Q6983813 (alto) to check to see if this solution is ok. If not, we may need to create a new item for "alto and contralto". Cheers Delsion23 (talk) 11:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q37137 --Akkakk (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Q9186/Q7033959 (Yue Chinese/Cantonese)Edit

Items involved: Q9186Talk, Q7033959Talk Status:     not resolved

It's about "Yue Chinese" and "Cantonese", it's quite same but not same. tntchn Comment · Contribs 17:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
It would be relatively easy to partition according to the article title, but most of them state that the two terms are equivalent... That means we should probably correct them all. --Zolo (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw/include#Q9186 --Akkakk (talk) 00:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Apparently, in es, fr and nl, "Cantonese" means Yue Chinese and "standard Cantonese" means Cantonese. --Zolo (talk) 14:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

lunch/dinner/supperEdit

Items involved: Q657221Talk, Q568285Talk, Q7560587Talk Status:     not resolved

This seems like one of those cultural things. FallingGravity (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
uk vs. ru vs. en are OK in both. Olexa Riznyk (talk) 08:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q568285,Q657221 --Akkakk (talk) 20:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

I have merged in the following: Littledogboy (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2013 (UTC) en:Dinner is about the word itself rather than a specific event.

See above. Infovarius (talk) 13:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Q16021/Q862978/Q6477791/Q725503Edit

Items involved: Q16021Talk, Q862978Talk, Q725503Talk Status:     not resolved

See also Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Archive/2013/03#Q16021/Q3217521. I think the items for the number 10^9, and for the number 10^12 should not be linked to any article which is some kind of disambiguation (disambiguations have the type "disambiguation", while numbers don't). Helder 14:37, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
See also: User talk:Stegop#Bilhão and User talk:Albmont#Re: Bilhão. Helder 22:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q6477791,Q16021,Q862978,Q725503 --Akkakk (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Q48349/Q499146 (Empire/Imperium)Edit

Items involved: Q48349Talk, Q499146Talk Status:     not resolved

Q48349 seems to concern the concept empire in general, while Q499146 concerns "imperium" in a more specific Roman context. I'm not sure in which group la:imperium itself belongs. I'm also not sure about the Slavic languages. Most of them seem to have an -i(j)a ending for general "empire" and a latin -ium ending for the specific Roman. Bosnian bs:Imperija is however connected to the second group, and instead they have bs:Carstvo (as also Serbian Царство etc) in the general Q48349 group. Are these basically synonyms? The apparently cognate Croatian term hr:Carstva is strangely connected to Q1211369 (The empire on which the sun never sets). Hope some speaker of Slavic languages could check if the correct articles are connected. --Wikijens (talk) 09:23, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Needs Arabic contributors to discuss: @MichelBakni, عباد ديرانية:. --117.13.95.87 06:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q50708/Q858520Edit

Items involved: Q50708Talk, Q858520Talk Status:     not resolved

Some of these seem to be about the divisor, some about divisibility while some about divisibility rules. - Matthew Beta (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

There are 3 concepts actually:

  • Divisor
ca:Divisor
da:Divisor
el:Διαιρέτης
en:Divisor
eo:Divizoro
ru:Делитель (→ :ru:Делимость)
uk:Дільник
and so on
  • Divisibility
bs:Djeljivost
cs:Dělitelnost
de:Teilbarkeit
en:Divisibility (→ en:Divisor)
es:Divisibilidad
ru:Делимость
uk:Подільність
and so on
  • Divisibility rule
en:Divisibility rule
ru:Признаки делимости
uk:Ознака подільності чисел
and so on

Also (wider than mathematical):

  • Divisor (disambiguation)
es:Divisor (desambiguación)
ru:Делитель (значения)
maybe more

Olexa Riznyk (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q858520,Q50708 --Akkakk (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Q1424016/Q1054650Edit

Items involved: Q1424016Talk, Q1054650Talk Status:     not resolved

* The Q1424016 (according to English) seems to be the vehicle, but the French link is about the mode of transport.
  • The Q1054650 (according to English) seems to be the mode of transport but it has a few itws
  • Italians terms seems quite similar between the two items... Otourly (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
In it.wiki Q1424016 is a subclass of Q1054650. --ValterVB (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q1424016,Q1054650 --Akkakk (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

person/persona/personalityEdit

Items involved: Q1077857Talk, Q6063277Talk, Q215627Talk Status:     partially resolved

Some interwikis are about the meaning in philosophy (pt) - its a bit confusing the article, others about the meaning in psychology (ca, da, fr and maybe others) and others about persona, a role or character played by an actor (en, es...). There were also some articles pointing to there, instead of pointing to Q215627, when using P107 - Sarilho1 (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q1077857 --Akkakk (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Moved the Portuguese one, linked some disambiguations. Worried about Ukrainian, would some double check uk:Особистість, uk:Індивідуальність and uk:Індивід (людина), please? Littledogboy (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Littledogboy (talk) 13:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Musical collectivesEdit

Items involved: Q215380Talk, Q2088357Talk Status:     not resolved

I can't see the difference but there are 2 (may be more) variants in some languages. Infovarius (talk) 10:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
In Danish (da:) Q25 is about groups of musicians, while Q20 is about groups of any artist (musicians, actors, dancers etc.). Byrial (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q215380,Q2088357 --Akkakk (talk) 22:04, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
I'd suppose that Q25 is about rock and pop-bands, while Q20 is about any musical collectives (like orchestras, choirs...) Infovarius (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Q8189208Edit

Items involved: Q8189208Talk Status:     not resolved

It is good if some else looks at this so find out of this group of articles are about the same subject.
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q8189208 --Akkakk (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Dining locationsEdit

Items involved: Q4236467Talk, Q30022Talk, Q109593Talk Status:     partially resolved

ru:Кофейня nearly the same as ru:Кафе, so as en:Cafe to en:Coffeehouse. There's ca:Cafeteria somehow. Infovarius (talk) 13:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
  • It seems ru:Кофейня does not have equivalences in other wikis. The closest concept in English is Coffeehouse, but it redirects to Cafe in en.wiki now. Cafeteria == ru:Столовая (however, there was in Russian in 1950-1980s "кафетерий", a strange cafeteria without chairs, with high tables, bezik (talk) 19:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
    And there's ru:Кафетерий. I suppose that ru:Кофейня is more associated with coffee than ru:Кафе (which is rather general canteen, at least now), so it's closer to Coffeehouse. Infovarius (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q1206714,Q661199,Q30022,Q4236467,Q30022 --Akkakk (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Vehicles and mode of transportationEdit

Items involved: Q42889Talk, Q334166Talk Status:     not resolved

* Q42889 includes w:en:Vehicle but I suspect that many members are about subgroups of vehicles. The Danish w:da:Køretøj - which another user recently removed - is thus about "landbased vehicles with wheels or belts". w:eo:Vehiklo is not at all about vehicles, but about different uses of the word. no: and se: are also about landbased vehicles, but the may or may not include sleds (I'm not sure) contrary to da:

Byrial (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q42889,Q334166 --Akkakk (talk) 22:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Segregated cycle facilities (Q221722)Edit

Items involved: Q221722Talk Status:     not resolved

Articles in some of languages treat "cycle paths" only, articles on other languages treat all types of segregated cycle facilities (including "cycle lanes" (Q1378400) which is different from "cycle paths"). General item "segregated cycle facilities" should be split from specific items as "cycle paths/bikeways" (some of Q221722 links), "cycle lanes" (Q1378400), "cycle roads" (Q1249483), cycle tracks, cycle shoulders etc. --ŠJů (talk) 21:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
  • The general item extracted and moved to Q11875386 (for some languages). Please check the remained languages.
  • Q11875386 (Segregated cycle facilities) has also a relation to Q5198662 (Cycling infrastructure). --ŠJů (talk) 08:51, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Q8947374/Q4017452/Q59266Edit

Items involved: Q8947374Talk, Q4017452Talk, Q59266Talk Status:     not resolved

Certain conflicts regarding which Wikidata item articles like es:Money in the Bank should belong to. I do not really know the subject matter very well, so I would rather someone else have a look at it. It Is Me Here t / c 00:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I've tried to sort it out but I'm not sure if I've done it correctly. --Michgrig (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q8947374,Q59268,Q59266 --Akkakk (talk) 20:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013Edit

Q1125312 (Microbiological culture)/KultivierungEdit

Items involved: Q1125312Talk, KultivierungTalk Status:     partially resolved

In the German WP there are 2 articles: de:Bakterienkultur is contained in Q1125312 and you can see similarities to en:Microbiological culture. But the article de:Kultivierung is about the same topic, describing more how to get a microbiological culture, it can be compared with es:Cultivo (microbiología), but this Spanish article is part of Q1125312. In nl:Reincultuur (microbiologie) – also part of Q1125312 – the topic is „Reincultuur“ (= „Reinkultur“ in German), which matches a chapter of de:Kultivierung. I don't speak enough French or any of the other languages to compare the content of the articles in Q1125312, but it looks like there is need for more than one Wikidata item. Any other opinions? --A doubt (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Hopefully I have solved the interwiki conflict by creating a new item Q10297148 (bacterial culture) for some of the WP articles. Others stay in Q1125312 (microbiological culture), while some are in item Q357279 (cultivation in a general biological meaning). But I am not familiar with all languages involved, so it would be helpful if other users would check the items. --A doubt (talk) 22:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I've added some extra sitelinks and tried to create a kind of hierarchy using subclass of... but would someone double check Q357279 Q2561978 Q1549003 Q3287622 Q189082 Q1125312 Q537299 Q10297148? Also, isn't explant the same as tissue (Q3287622 × Q2561978)? Also, does not Reikuluur go with axenic into Q537299? Littledogboy (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Q6646418/Q9383928/Q8387023Edit

Items involved: Q6646418Talk, Q9383928Talk, Q8387023Talk Status:     not resolved

Conflict between two categories. Personal life or Domestic life --Delsion23 (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  • There is also Q9985555 which contains a single link in occitan, Categoria:Ustensilha. If you speak this language, please consider moving this to domestic life Q6646418.--Melody Lavender (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Q6701199/Q10514575Edit

Items involved: Q6701199Talk, Q10514575Talk Status:     in doubt

Categories about wars involving the UK and Great Britain respectively. Not sure about the translations of the country name, as sometimes the terms are used to mean the same thing by people unaware that they are different terms. --Delsion23 (talk) 12:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
No solution to this one. Wikipedias that make the categorical distinction are an exception. Most of them seem to have one you could call "Wars of Britain". At least they manage to distinguish England... Littledogboy (talk) 10:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Q6544469/Q6544202Edit

Items involved: Q6544469Talk, Q6544202Talk Status:     partially resolved

Looks like both items are Category:Palms, but there are two different ar-wiki categories, so would be helpful if someone understand Arabian. --Stryn (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, there are no clear difference between Category of Arecaceae by common name (Q6544469) and Category:Arecaceae (Q6544202) in arabic. the first is the common used word and the 2nd is the scientific name. that's what i think. --وهراني (talk) 18:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC) (moved from my talk Littledogboy (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC))

Circle/KreisEdit

Topic: circular figures Items involved: Q238231Talk, Q17278Talk, Q843905Talk Status:     not resolved

Some languages have one word for 2 (first or last). Present order(may be wrong?): plane figure / curve / its length. Also in topology - more general set. Infovarius (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Given that I was adressed in such unkind manner, I will respond here: I have tried to fix the conflicts created by Infovarius (mostly regarding eswiki links) and these were the results: 1, 2 and 3. I haven't marked the issue as resolved because I think it needs to be further reviewed. Andreasmperu (talk) 19:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for unkindness. The reason was that I tried to fix the conflicts, and you have restored the initial wrong links. As I said en:Circumference has no connection to be:Акружнасць. By the way, as a spanish speaker, tell me please what es:Circunferencia mean - length or curve? Infovarius (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q238231,Q17278,Q843905 --Akkakk (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
"Circumferència" (catalan) and "circunferencia" (spanish) mean the curve as their main meaning, as it used to happen in other languages some time ago (e.g. french).--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

I think the questions about the curve and its length are quite set, but I'm concerned with the bounded figure (the surface inside a circle). ro:Disc (formă geometrică) and fr:Disque (géométrie) deal with the planar figure, but they are linked to en:Disk (mathematics) and ca:Disc (topologia) an es:Disco (topología) and other articles which are about the topological concept of disk. I think ro:Disc (formă geometrică) and fr:Disque (géométrie) should be moved to link to ca:Cercle and es:círculo (linking those to en:area of a disk is debatable but I think it's useful, too).--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Furthermore, it:cerchio, ast:círculu and an:cerclo should remain linked to ca:Cercle and es:círculo, instead of other articles more related to topology. As I said, ro:Disc (formă geometrică) and fr:Disque (géométrie) (planar figures) are more related to these than to en:Disk (mathematics) (mostly a topological concept).--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Q517386Edit

Items involved: Q517386Talk Status:     not resolved

Some are about live-action films, some are about fictional (narrative) films. - 146.110.50.34 05:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q517386 --Akkakk (talk) 00:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Q27920Edit

Items involved: Q27920Talk Status:     not resolved

Lolita and Gothic Lolita... tntchn Comment · Contribs 16:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q27920 --Akkakk (talk) 00:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

realismEdit

Items involved: Q10857409Talk, Q735590Talk, Q667661Talk, Q261993Talk Status:     not resolved

Need some help. There is realism in arts, philosophy, painting and maybe some other area --ValterVB (talk) 19:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
  Comment. There are also some articles about a general tendency in the arts (en:Realism (arts), fr:Réalisme) and others about a 19th century movement (it:Realismo (arte), da:Realisme (kunst)
automated analysis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q10857409,Q735590,Q667661,Q261993 --Akkakk (talk) 00:14, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Q782614/Q2533461Edit

Items involved: Q782614Talk, Q2533461Talk Status:     not resolved

conflict between autonomous region and autonomous administrative division --Delsion23 (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Ping French contributors: @LucasD, Elnon: resolved or not? --117.13.95.87 06:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q699405/Q3532563/Q1577547/Q11755880Edit

Items involved: Q699405Talk, Q3532563Talk, Q1577547Talk, Q11755880Talk Status:     not resolved

Subject is dwelling. Danrok (talk) 16:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Merged items 1 and 2 but there are issues with others. --Zolo (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Q6858338/Q6863952Edit

Items involved: Q6858338Talk, Q6863952Talk, Q91520Talk Status:     not resolved

Problem with Poland pages. --ValterVB (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Q637371/Q7330310Edit

Items involved: Q637371Talk, Q7330310Talk Status:     not resolved

the English article covers both poetry and music meanings (part is also covered by en:Upbeat (music)), while a few other wikipedias seem to have split these into two articles (ru:Анакруза (poetry) / ru:Затакт (music) etc.)
Ping cawiki countributors: @Medol, Maria Fullana de València: any ideas? --117.13.95.87 06:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q4113741/Q315/Q34770/Q13057640 Language/langueEdit

Topic: language/langue Items involved: Q4113741Talk, Q315Talk, Q34770Talk, Q13057640 redirects to the latterTalk Status:     in doubt

I don't fill the difference but qualifier "(linguistics)" in both items makes me doubt. Infovarius (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Please explain me which item to use as value for English, Russian, and so on. Infovarius (talk) 19:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Use Q315, of the other I have never heart before. --#Reaper (talk) 19:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Use Q34770. I have moved some sitelinks there.
en:Langue and parole and de:Langue use the French word for individual languages, but in a somewhat different meaning (something like "the set of all linguistic rules internalized by an individual). The French and Spanish articles sort of mix the two concepts -which I think is pretty bad- but are primarily about individual languages. ja seems to be the same as de:langue. bs/cs are disambiguation pages, with words that seem to have the same polysemy as en:Tongue. I do not now about ml.--Zolo (talk) 20:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
So do you think that English is not a language but Einzelsprache? Such a mess, in russian there is one word for all three items... Infovarius (talk) 19:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, in French there are two words: "langage" for the general human faculty and "langue" for individual languages. I think this difference can actually be quite useful for Wikidata, as it will allow to separate statements about language in general from those about why English is considered a language, and London dialect is not. A pity that fr:Langue is so low quality :I...--Zolo (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
The situation has been changed by User:Xapones - now there are four items for languages. Infovarius (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Q34770 links to BNCF 42200 "Lingua parlata". Isn't this spoken language? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 20:28, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Italian is the same as French: linguaggio for human faculty and lingua for specific language. Lingua parlata is spoken language. --SynConlanger (talk) 21:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
And what is it:"parole"? See Q10485156. --Infovarius (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Parole is a concrete utterance as uttered by a speaker. It apparently overlaps with Chomskyan "performance" (Graffi, Giorgio and Sergio Scalise. 2003 Le lingue e il linguaggio. Introduzione alla linguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino. 33. I'm sorry this is in Italian). --SynConlanger (talk) 22:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
To answer your question, I don't know any resource stating "spoken language" nor lingua parlata is parole, so I would say no. --SynConlanger (talk) 22:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

[tl,kbd,be] "Pag-uuring pambiyolohiya" and Q11398 (biological classification) vs Q3516404 (systematics)Edit

Items involved: Q11398Talk, Q3516404Talk Status:     not resolved

kbd:Биологиэ систематикэ and be:Біялагічная сістэматыка are causing conflict when importing interwiki links from tl:Pag-uuring pambiyolohiya (Biological classification).
@Holder, Andi d: ^^ --117.13.95.87 06:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q2249149/Q7889/Q4485157Edit

Items involved: Q2249149Talk, Q7889Talk, Q4485157Talk Status:     not resolved

Electronic game, Video game and PC game. --fryed-peach (talk) 10:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
What do you think needs to be resolved? The English definitions are clear. --Izno (talk) 18:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, English definitions are clear. Japanese links almost exactly follow them. But I can't confirm about other languages. de:Computerspiel corrsponds to Video game, not Electronic game? --fryed-peach (talk) 06:51, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Q6452533/Q189888Edit

Items involved: Q6452533Talk, Q189888Talk Status:     not resolved

In some (roman ?) languages Marionette mean every kind of puppet and not only the wire controlled ones Ske (talk)
It's a bit more complicated: some languages make a difference between half-length (like it:Burattino) and full-length (it:Marionetta and fr:Marionnette), sometimes with a separate article for those with strings (fr:Marionnette à fils). --Joostik (talk) 20:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Q1032765/Q2420695Edit

Items involved: Q1032765Talk, Q2420695Talk Status:     not resolved

line 3 of Île-de-France tram is now line 3a and there is also a line 3b (Q3136247)
I think we should merge the two items keeping all language articles. line 3 articles will have to be modified. Greenski (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Not possible without merging some language articles. Better keep it this way. --Joostik (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Q28989/Q3519259 Graf/CountEdit

Items involved: Q28989Talk, Q3519259Talk Status:     in doubt

These are not disambigs to divide by spelling. For example, ru:Граф usually translated by en:Count (and may be en:Earl), fr:Comte and de:Graf. See wikt:count and wikt:граф. Infovarius (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

This is no interwiki conflict. graf (Q28989) is for the romanistic wording count, count (Q3519259) is the other ethymological equivalent for germanistic/ non romanistic languages. Nothing can be changed here. Does it cause problems to keep it like this?--Oursana (talk) 09:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

The problem is that ru:Граф should be linked to en:Count, fr:Comte and de:Graf. --Infovarius (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

May 2013Edit

Q1368723/Q12646565Edit

Items involved: Q1368723Talk, Q12646565Talk Status:     not resolved

Learning curve(X-Experience, Y-Learning) and Experience curve(X-Cumulative production, Y-Average cost) conflicts. Kwj2772 (talk) 09:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
@RoBri, DerSpezialist: ^^ --117.13.95.87 06:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Arab puzzleEdit

Items involved: Q7023655Talk, Q5838665Talk Status:     partially resolved

We seem to have a serious mix up of the categories about "Arabs" (people), the "Arab world" and the "Arabian Peninsula" in Q7023655 and Q5838665. If someone feels like solving this puzzle.... ;-) Multichill (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC) moved from Project Chat Zolo (talk) 12:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Created new item Q13217422; moved nlwiki links to right places. --117.13.95.87 06:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cities in Colorado / Category:Populated places in ColoradoEdit

Items involved: Q9459329Talk, Q6453456Talk Status:     not resolved

Typical problem between category of cities and category of "Populated places". Lot of categories are mixed. I start to try to resolved. :/ --Nouill (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Denmark/Kingdom of DenmarkEdit

Items involved: Q35Talk, Q756617Talk Status:     not resolved

Some of the articles on Q35, such as en:, are about both the Kingdom and the constituent country of the kingdom which is an EU member, and some, such as da:, are specifically about the constituent country. (The English article, for example, shows two maps in the infobox, one of Denmark in the EU with other parts of the kingdom in gray, and one of the entire kingdom.) Should some of the Q35 articles be moved to Q756617? Or should a new item be created for articles that specifically cover both topics? --Yair rand (talk) 04:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
I think that the pages about both Denmark and the Kingdom of Denmark should be moved to Kingdom of Denmark, because Denmark falls within the Kingdom and not the other way around. I don't prefer to make another item. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
en:Denmark is mostly about Kingdom of Denmark (although for instance some of the data in the infobox is only about Denmark proper). So from a database point of view it would be correct to move the article and other similar articles to Q756617, but it would also be preferable if redirects could be left in Q35 so articles about Denmark in other languages can have language links to these languages. Byrial (talk) 16:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't think that adding a bunch of redirects is the typical way to fix issues like this. I think wikitext redirects in the articles themselves are supposed to be used in this situation. --Yair rand (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Q15315/Q751300/Q207079/Q11681618/Q221378Edit

Items involved: Q15315Talk, Q751300Talk, Q207079Talk, Q11681618Talk, Q221378Talk Status:     partially resolved

Confusion among slate, shale and schist. This is a mess since

"Before the mid 18th century, the terms slate, shale and schist were not sharply differentiated.[2] In the context of underground coal mining, shale was frequently referred to as slate well into the 20th century.[3]"

--Entalpia2 (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Mostly sorted out except Q11681618, which contains two entries which should probably be merged. --Joostik (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Q12981971 (African slave trade)/Q3057915 (Slavery in Africa)/Q12981973 (History of slavery)/Q7584266 (Slave trade)/Q8463 (Slavery)Edit

Items involved: Q12981971Talk, Q3057915Talk, Q12981973Talk, Q7584266Talk, Q8463Talk Status:     partially resolved

Hello, I am rather a beginner with Interwiki conflicts, and I tried to solve conflicts between these items (and other items) myself. Maybe that was not wise. I tried to put articles of different language-versions of Wikipedia into one of these items and then I deleted all existing interwiki-links on all language versions of Wikipedia in the corresponding articles. Today I got six reverts on the English Wikipedia. I want to ask you, what I should consider before removing links. Could you please take a look at this discussion: en:Talk:History_of_slavery#Interwiki_conflict. I am sorry for my mistakes. Thank you! --Alexander.Meier (talk) 19:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Q12981971 merged to Q7584266... --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

BambooEdit

Items involved: Q9159922Talk, Q35922Talk Status:     not resolved

I think there's a mess between taxonomical unit (specifically: tribe) and a common name. fr-articles should be merged may be. Infovarius (talk) 21:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
There are also an enwiki and ukwiki article, which are rather superfluous and can easily be merged. --Joostik (talk) 20:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Q37484/Q1097273Edit

Items involved: Q37484Talk, Q1097273Talk, Q474090Talk Status:     not resolved

Q1097273 was originally about "epos" (containing fi and sv-articles, now both are removed, so original meaning has changed). Now both of those items contains articles about "epos". Especially Q37484 is quite mess now. --Stryn (talk) 08:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Q1097273 should rightly be "Epos", to avoid confusion with Q474090. --Joostik (talk) 08:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

обезьяныEdit

Items involved: Q1367Talk, Q4514984Talk, Q5452918Talk, Q102470Talk Status:     in doubt

I suppose that the word "monkey - animal of the "higher primates" (the simians), but excluding the apes" makes sense only in English. In Russian e.g. обезьяна means monkey+ape+simian. --Infovarius (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
@Cygnis insignis, Antiquary: resolved? --117.13.95.87 06:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
I doubt that, because it can only be assumed that the corresponding term is any language would be vernacular and imprecise, not the accepted classification of simians. As far as I know, the only concordant language system in taxonomic literature is Chinese and would have assumed that Russians would be citing the same nomenclature used by the Euro language wikipedias, rooted in the romantic language structure with stems in numerous other languages. The social construct 'monkey' would have the same latitude as it does in the English language, this term is unrelated to any agreed system of nomenclature. I made changes that accord with sources in English, and most interlanguage accord with that, what is the arrangement of simians at the Russian wiki? Cygnis insignis (talk) 09:51, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Thumb piano/MbiraEdit

Items involved: Q2642697Talk, Q1467960Talk Status:     partially resolved

No clear distinction between generic Thumb piano and Mbira. Perhaps merging would be better, but some languages have two articles.--Joostik (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
English Wikipedia merged both, Spanish Wikipedia one user is requesting to merge es:Mbira and es:Kalimba, so merging both items could be possible in the near future, hence partially resolved. --117.13.95.87 06:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Still need French users @TwoWings, Patachonf: to help. --117.13.95.87 06:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
I don't really know why I'm being pinged, and I don't really get it. As far as French Wikipedia is concerned, Q2642697 is linked to marimbula, a Cuban instrument, and Q1467960 to mbira (or kalimba), an African instrument. So what's the problem ? --TwoWings (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q4851537/Q3055231/Q5971450/Q5461048Edit

Items involved: Q4851537Talk, Q3055231Talk, Q5971450Talk, Q5461048Talk Status:     partially resolved

Same meaning for the three. Merge please. Thanks.
  • Not quite the same meaning for al entries, I think. At least the Scandinavian ones mean something different.--Joostik (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Q3055231 is different. But what is difference between w:en:Ballast and w:en:Sailing ballast? They seem to have same information. Linnea (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
    They could probably be merged, but for now, one is specifically about ballast in a sailing boat, and the other ballast in any kind of vessel. --Izno (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Institutions, etc. of the European UnionEdit

Items involved: Q8549832Talk, Q9232957Talk, Q9642149Talk Status:     partially resolved

they seems fairly the same, but IT and SV links are conflicting. --Ricordisamoa 07:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
The third item is deleted, @Gabbg82, Bultro: to make some help on itwiki. --117.13.95.87 06:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

BrusselsEdit

Items involved: Q239Talk, Q240Talk, Q9005Talk Status:     in doubt

municipality/capital region/city? Seems to be quite a mess with the interwikis. --Wikijens (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Looks ok to me - three wikidata pages each with a clearly defined scope. Labels in other languages seem to reflect the same scope. Wikipedia page links seem to follow the scope as well. Filceolaire (talk) 23:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

The scope of Q9005 is quite odd, actually. It's more or less Q9005 = Q239 + Q240 where Q240 also includes the subject of Q239 by definition. Then people move interwikis around without actually understanding what the articles in different languages actually say. In my opinion, Q9005 is completely redundant to Q240. — Yerpo Eh? 06:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I totally agree with you that most people move interwiki without understanding. This is quite frustrating and one of the reasons I participate less an less in Wikidata. About Q9005: It's not completely redundant to Q240. There a several Wikipedias that distinguish clearly between Brussel as a city (Q239) and the region of Brussels-Capital (Q240), and some Wikipedias that don't. In Q9005, both things are described. Geographically, Q9005 and Q240 may be identical, but on the statistic level for example, there are very different data. In a long term, Q9005 should become obsolete, but only if all Wikipedias start to distinguish between Brussels as a city and as a region correctly. --Monsieurbecker (talk) 04:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

There's only one Occitan article in Q9005 which was created by a bot (why?). It refers to Brussel/Bruxelles as a city of 1 mln inhabitants, which is factually incorrect. That article should be deleted, and as a result Q9005 could cease to exist as well. I've asked the WP.OC admin Boular to look into it. --Midas02 (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

It's a mess and whoever did it left several article disconnected, for example hu:Brüsszel Fővárosi Régió, hr:Regija glavnoga grada Bruxellesa, ro:Regiunea Capitalei Bruxelles (diff). Littledogboy (talk) 22:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Q14467584... Littledogboy (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Probably a systematic mistake – frwiki mentions three concepts, not 2:

  1. agglomération de Bruxelles
  2. Région de Bruxelles-Capitale
  3. Ville/commune de Bruxelles

Littledogboy (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I've done some clean-up between Q239/Q240 and tried to put the articles in the correct categories. The ones that don't belong to either, the left-overs, have been added to Q9005. However. I checked all languages, and the vast majority of the articles are extremely faulty, probably because they were translated from other articles which were faulty to start with, so chosing between Q239 and Q240 is sometimes arbitrary. Much more can't be done without rewriting each and every article. They are combining data of the municipality with those of the region, leading to hybrid articles that are neither one nor the other. They often describe Brussels as a city of 1 mln inhabitants, which would correspond to the greater Brussels region. But with the institutionary reforms of 1989, the greater Brussels area was turned into an official region - not a city -, la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, so all articles in Q9005 should ultimately be merged with the ones in Q240. The concept of Q9005 was discussed and rejected about 3 years ago in WP.NL because it doesn't offer anything else than wat Q240 should already be describing. For correct data about Q239 and Q240, please check WP.NL and not WP.FR as the latter contains numerous mistakes as well. --Midas02 (talk) 01:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

John the Apostle and John the EvangelistEdit

Items involved: Q44015Talk, Q328804Talk Status:     not resolved

very difficult to know if it's duplicate, problem of concept, problem of identification… the content of various articles in many languages is similar… often 2 articles in each language, but not really clear… --Hsarrazin (talk) 19:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Definitely not a duplicate, although some languages do treat him as one. Moved one item, but most are clear enough. --Joostik (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Iraq War / Gulf War disambiguationsEdit

Items involved: Q8139996Talk, Q13408125Talk Status:     in doubt

Some links from first can be moved to second –ebraminiotalk 22:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Moved a lot by name, and ko-link by dates. Infovarius (talk) 06:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013Edit

personal computer hardware/computer hardwareEdit

Items involved: Q3966Talk, Q7144664Talk Status:     not resolved

I guess some of first item links must moved to second or ... –ebraminiotalk 10:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks ok to me Filceolaire (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Something completely wrong with slavonic languages. Infovarius (talk) 08:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

PieEdit

Items involved: Q13360264Talk, Q858627Talk, Q320657Talk, Q13276Talk, Q2006073Talk Status:     not resolved

Per en.wiki interwikis, there is a conflict between these so after resolving the problem please delete en.wiki interwikis –ebraminiotalk 13:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Does not seem at all problematic on the face of it. Littledogboy (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
  • These are the links that are currently in en:pie that need to be added to Q13360264 by someone who speaks these languages and can check if they are correct: --Melody Lavender (talk) 17:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

hr:Pita (hrana) lt:Pyragas ce:Мерза хьокхум pt:Torta ru:Пирог fi:Piirakka vep:Pirg

So many kinds of food :) I'm lost. In addition English language likes to include all country-specific terms... (we always translated ru:Пирог as en:Pie, but here is also en:Pirog...) --Infovarius (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Q249451/Q389528/Q12397773Edit

Items involved: Q249451Talk, Q389528Talk, Q12397773Talk Status:     in doubt

There seems to be some disorganisation around grouping articles about the female name "Irene" and the female name "Irina". It Is Me Here t / c 09:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
seems to be solved --Pasleim (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
But notice that ru:Ирена, currently listed at Q389528, redirects to (and, hence, is) ru:Ирина (Q12397773), making it unclear which Wikidata item "Ирина" should fall under. It Is Me Here t / c 23:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
  • The two items for first names are ok. I moved a sitelink to Q30961222. I haven't looked in the disambiguation one (Q249451).
    --- Jura 14:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Q20867/Q1425058/Q3202271Edit

Items involved: Q20867Talk, Q1425058Talk, Q3202271Talk Status:     not resolved

In one case de:Knüpfel/cz:Palice (nástroj), on the other case de:Fäustel/cz:Palice (nástroj), but both are en:Lump hammer
There is some overlap, but Kamenická palička is specifically about stonemason's tools (both metal and wooden), so probably best as it is now. --Joostik (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
cs:Palice (nástroj)=en:Mallet... Littledogboy (talk) 18:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure about that. Maybe a native speaker should decide. --Joostik (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Well I said that cause I am one. I do not understand the German pages, tho, or what exactly is the difference between es:Mazo and es:Maceta (herramienta). Littledogboy (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
On the German pages there is a clear distinction between a roundheaded wooden Knüpfel and a metal Fäustel. OTOH there is also the square-headed wooden Klopfholz. Unfortunately not all languages are that precise and there is a great overlap between the items. Different languages make different distinctions. As for the Spanish entries: there doesn't seem to be much diference. Perhaps they can be merged? --Joostik (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Inkreis/Inscribed circleEdit

Items involved: Q354337Talk, Q10615255Talk Status:     partially resolved

"Inkreis" (Q354337) should be linked with "Inscribed circle" (which redirects to "Incircle and excircles of a triangle" (Q10615255)).
Resolved for German, other languages are likely to have the same problem though.--Melody Lavender (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Don't understand what you mean(or did). I've added redirect en:Inscribed circle to Q354337. Another variant was en:Incircle but 2 redirects in 1 item are too many :) Infovarius (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I have set the link from en to de.wikipedia manually (de:Inkreis) and I have set the link from the German article on incircle (Inkreis) directly to the English article on "Incircle and excircles of a triangle" (which I just removed again because it has become redundant with the redirect-solution).
The problem is that some Wikipedias treat incircles and excircles and circumscribed circles in different articles, some put them into a single article.--Melody Lavender (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Q3590573/Q11416Edit

Items involved: Q3590573Talk, Q11416Talk Status:     not resolved

in most languages, the articles on games of chance and gambling are the same (the rare exceptions are English, Catalan, Hebrew and Indonesian). In most cases, the literal translation of that article is "game(s) of chance" (jeu de hasard, Glückspiel, Juegos de azar, Hasartmäng, Igra na srečo and so on). Having an item for games of chance is very useful to classify other items but the current situation makes this difficult. One possibility is to merge the en.wiki article to either en:Gambling or en:Game classification but I'm sure someone has a better idea.
In English, the word "gambling" carries the idea of betting money, while "game of chance" is simply a game based on chance (no money is necessarily involved). But the French article says "le même terme jeux de hasard désigne à la fois des jeux impliquant un processus aléatoire [games of chance] et des jeux d'argent pratiqués par les adultes [gambling etc] ...". It is confusing. I don't know about other languages. This, that and the other (talk) 10:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
The distinction makes sense. Children playing roulette with peanuts, pure game of chance, no gambling? Littledogboy (talk) 11:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune international versionsEdit

Items involved: Q303064Talk, Q1799291Talk, Q13516947Talk, Q13516910Talk, Q13516970Talk, Q13516984Talk, Q3567653Talk, Q13517015Talk, Q13517031Talk, Q13517033Talk, Q7408599Talk, Q13517431Talk, Q451990Talk, Q4186829Talk, Q13516876Talk, Q13517481Talk Status:     partially resolved

Well, I'm pleased to announce that I believe I've beaten my own record for largest interwiki conflict  , and I'm now gonna annoy everyone by throwing it up here for review. In summary, various international versions of the show Wheel of Fortune were erroneously linked to international versions of Wheel of Fortune (Q303064).
Think that's all of them. The ones I think I'm mostly likely to have made a mistake on were the Hebrew, Spanish, Polish, and Hungarian ones. I also tried to clean up any conflicting local language links (which will probably lead to my getting blocked on a bunch of random wikis :P ), but I'm not positive I got them all. There may also be some unlinked entries on local 'pedias that can be tied to some of these, or items that can be merged. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 07:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Q15214/Q7235773/Q10053530Edit

Items involved: Q15214Talk, Q7235773Talk, Q10053530Talk Status:     not resolved

Catgeroy:russian leaders vs russian emperors
Yes, but I can't see the problem. Can you specify it? Infovarius (talk) 06:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Merged some and adding one item: rulers in general vs. all sovereigns vs. emperors, if that makes sense. Littledogboy (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

I can't make sense out of new item. What the difference between ruler and sovereign? --Infovarius (talk) 08:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

public interest / public good / common goodEdit

Items involved: Q29627Talk, Q13534337Talk, Q272458Talk Status:     not resolved

I've made some changes but could use a hand there. Littledogboy (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks good to me Filceolaire (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Q5650071/Q5616658/Q5857050 (Template:Infobox information appliance)Edit

Items involved: Q5650071Talk, Q5616658Talk Status:     not resolved

 – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ruud Koot (talk • contribs).
What makes you think those two are the same? Littledogboy (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
How about zh articles? Infovarius (talk) 08:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
They seem to be about different things to me - one about games consoles, the other about computers. Filceolaire (talk) 13:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

July 2013Edit

Q2845593/Q3775308/Q182612/Q208443Edit

Items involved: Q2845593Talk, Q3775308Talk, Q182612Talk, Q208443Talk Status:     not resolved

Does not seem quite right. Littledogboy (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
@Horcrux, Bottuzzu:. --117.13.95.87 06:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q3128342/Q358898Edit

Items involved: Q3128342Talk, Q358898Talk Status:     not resolved

fr:Hatton was linked with ru:Гаттон with Q3128342. On the other side there was Q358898 with de:Hatton... and ru:Хаттон. I have 2 words in russian Хаттон and Гаттон. I don't know which is the good one. --Berdea (talk) 22:34, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, both are similar. Moreover they both are fits into en:Hutton and en:Hutton (surname) as well... (Please don't delete links. I want to have possibilities to go from any ru-article to either of en/de/fr and so on...) Infovarius (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

DoctorateEdit

Items involved: Q849697Talk, Q1054021Talk Status:     not resolved

It seems that there are linked pages that speak a really different things. English page speaks about getting license to teach(?) and finnish one is about promotion to degree (master, doctor etc.). --Linnea (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Linnea, can you find a page on enwiki, that would correspond to the Finish page in its content? What about en:graduation? Littledogboy (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Circular reasoning/Virtuous circle and vicious circle/Begging the questionEdit

Items involved: Q13407334Talk, Q1165103Talk, Q219429Talk Status:     partially resolved

I feel it as a complicated one
it
Wikidata (Q1165103): en:Virtuous circle and vicious circleit:Diallele
Wikimarkup: en:Virtuous circle and vicious circleit:Circolo_virtuoso_e_circolo_vizioso & it:Dialleleen:Circular reasoning (Q1165103 → (nil) and Q1165103Q13590545)

Further, it:Ragionamento circolare is redirect to it:Diallele, but so many languages interwikilink to it:Ragionamento circolare using markup

ja, zh, ar,
Using wikimarkup: Q1165103Q13407334

ThanksVanischenu「mc|Talk」 10:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

automated anaylsis: User:Akkakk/iw#Q219429,Q13407334,Q1165103 --Akkakk 12:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Interwikis where there is no one-to-one matchEdit

Items involved: Q1147037Talk, Q7209Talk, Q2003257Talk, Q473725Talk Status:     not resolved

I noticed that the Japanese Wikipedia has a separate page specific to the Eastern or Later Han Dynasty, located at w:ja:後漢. I wanted to add an interwiki link to the relevant EN WP content, located at w:Han Dynasty#Eastern Han. Note that the English Wikipedia does not have a separate page specific to the Eastern Han -- this content is instead contained as part of the w:Han Dynasty page. There is an w:Eastern Han page, but that's just a redirect to w:Han Dynasty#Eastern Han.

However, attempting to add the relevant link on the Q1147037 page here results in the following error, when attempting to use either Eastern Han or Han Dynasty#Eastern Han:

Site link Han Dynasty already used by item Q7209.

Before the rollout of this Wikidata approach to interwiki links, it was possible to create a link from one independent article to a subsection of an article on another wiki. In cases where one language wiki has an independent page and the other language wiki does not, this approach works to direct readers to the relevant content.

Is this approach impossible now? If so, where do we discuss changing this behavior? -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 20:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

It is impossible to do it in Wikidata and that is unlikely to change. You can still add the link directly in Wikipedia. --Zolo (talk) 20:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
This seems to be a very grave shortcoming, given the large number of cases where one article in language A matches multiple articles in language B. What are the technical reasons for this limitation? -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 21:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikidata is not only about the interwikis (phase 1) but also about the data (phase 2), which must be associated with one and only one page/topic. --Izno (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Well, that is the point, I think. Look for example at glassblower (Q1413824) and glassblowing (Q12185286) – the topic is the same, we could merge, but we want both terms on wikidata. Redirects would be the solution. Littledogboy (talk) 22:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
  • An additional case in point is Q2003257 Cirth. This appropriately links to the article about the Cirth runes by Tolkien on most of the indicated wikis, except for German -- which has one article about both the Cirth and the Tengwar scripts (de:w:Tengwar und Certar). Notably, the Wikidata page for Tengwar at Q473725 has no German Wikipedia link (and with the current restrictions, cannot have one), and likewise the German wiki article at de:w:Tengwar und Certar only links to the articles about the Cirth script on other wikis, while the articles on other wikis about the Tengwar script incorrectly do not link to the German article, and actually don't link to any German WP article at all. This is less than optimal, and actually a regression compared to the older manual approach -- compare this revision to the English wiki article on the Tengwar script, or this revision to the Japanese wiki article, or this revision to the Korean wiki article, or this revision to the Czech wiki article, etc. etc, all of which previously did correctly link to de:w:Tengwar und Certar, but which no longer have this link after changing over to rely on Wikidata.
  The real world is messy. Insisting on one-to-one matching with no redirects is not going to be very complete, nor very useful, and it will give users the incorrect impression that other-language wikis do not have corresponding content. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 18:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

crime/offence/delictEdit

Items involved: Q83267Talk, Q1456832Talk, Q1184244Talk Status:     not resolved

I believe English "offence" (=crime, criminal offence) translates directly as "delict" in Romance languages, ie Spanish and French...? Littledogboy (talk) 21:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I've edited en:delict and en:crime for clarity, and merged in en:offence. I shall proceed to put the interwikis in order. Littledogboy (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Q1045481Edit

Items involved: Q1045481Talk Status:     not resolved

The English site is about the place where a movie (or similar) is shooting, but the German site is more general and only some parts are about film shooting. For the other interwiki-links, I don't understand if they are also about the film shooting (as the English site) or also location in general (as the german site). --Nightwish62 (talk) 19:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
it and pt are in the vein of he English page, while pl is about any filming location including sets. Littledogboy (talk) 19:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Panagia: Q1485229/Q13374616Edit

Items involved: Q1485229Talk, Q13374616Talk Status:     not resolved

The english page on Panagia / Panhagia does enumerate the different meanings in a nice way; the Panagia entries in other language versions usually concern only one specific meaning (german / italian: type of icon; russian / serbian / finnish: Enkolpion with icon of the Theotokos). Additionally, besides these abstract meanings, the are certain geographical entities named Panagia (see disambiguation pages). Is there a way to reconcile the situation? --Fl.schmitt (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
The Italian article starts with the same definition as the English one... Look at Our Lady of the Sign (Q597232), too, and here, ru:Панагиар. Littledogboy (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
ru:Панагиар is a "Panagiar", a liturgical vessel. IMHO distinction should be made between
  1. Panagia as epithet for Mary,
  2. the icon type called Panagia displaying Mary (synonym: Our Lady of the Sign (Q597232)),
  3. the different liturgical objects (Panagia as Enkolpion, Panagia as en:Prosphora), and
  4. finally geographical entities named Panagia.
The problem is that the different wikipedias don't differentiate between them - usually they mix some of those meanings in single articles. So, the question seems to me if Wikidata should be more precise than the different Wikipedias, making it hard to connect them, or if Wikidata should mirror any of the structures used in the different Wikipedias (if so, which of them?). --Fl.schmitt (talk) 13:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
This is tricky. Generally, where the items are likely to enter into relationships with others, such taxons, ship classes, names of professions... then keep it as logical as possible. If not, I'd advice to keep the imprecise match to serve Wikipedias better. So in this case, perhaps you could ask, are there many articles about different Panagia-type icons, that would be "instance of" Panagia-type icon.
In future it will be possible to add redirects. For now, the old-style interwikis can be added for example to all the Russian pages, linking to the English page. Littledogboy (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Q1668014 (Communications/Internet in India)Edit

Items involved: Q1668014Talk Status:     in doubt

en.wp article is about "Communications in India", which is roughly what seems to be the topic of the non-Latin language links, as far as I can tell from a quick look with Google Translate. de.wp article is about "Internet in India", and since "Communications" doesn't necessarily mean "Internet", I don't think this is a match. Are there better matching articles or should de.wp get its own item for itself? What about the asian languages, are they correctly linked to this item? --YMS (talk) 16:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Not a perfect match, but what is the point in disconnecting? Littledogboy (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Well, if it's not on the same topic, it should not have the same item, for principal reasons and to avoid conflicting statements. However, being an abstract article this probably won't be too much of a problem for now. This s why I was mainly asking if there is a better match. So if there is an article about Internet in India in any other language than in de, those two should be connected rather than what is connected now. If no one is awre of such an article or can find one, I guess this can be closed, though. --YMS (talk) 08:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

heatstroke/sunstrokeEdit

Items involved: Q1191065Talk, Q337554Talk Status:     in doubt

There seems to be a problem concerning heatstroke and sunstroke, I think. At first, I tried to merge Q337554 to Q1191065, but then I was confused by cs-wiki. I'm not sure how to deal with these two items.--Bluemersen (+) 15:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Some databases class them as one, some as two different things. Perhaps adding redirects would be the solution for this? Littledogboy (talk) 11:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Seems to me there are enough languages with two different pages to justify keeping them separate...? Littledogboy (talk) 13:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Sahara/SahelEdit

Items involved: Q66065Talk, Q6583Talk Status:     not resolved

Note that whereas Wikipedia articlaes are clearly different, the Wikivoyage entries are identical (and were all interconnected before getting moved to Wikidata).--Ymblanter (talk) 12:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
There is probably a consensus that this kind of problems may be alleviated by adding links to redirects to Wikidata items. Littledogboy (talk) 10:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

employment / labour relations / wage labour ...Edit

Items involved: Q656365Talk, Q608190Talk, Q949973Talk, Q13420193Talk, Q14359059Talk Status:     not resolved

Help needed, especially German, Russian... Littledogboy (talk) 22:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
@Hannover86, Wowo2008: --117.13.95.87 06:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Myth/MythologieEdit

Items involved: Q1213296Talk, Q1396027Talk Status:     partially resolved

I am working on a translation project and discovered that the frwiki "Mythe" doesn't correlate to the enwiki "myth" because the latter links to frwiki's "mythologie" instead. This appears to be the case for a few wikis that have duplicate entries on myth and mythology. Having discovered wikidata as of today, not sure of the solution...? Dev920 (talk) 15:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Q139... is about a book, the other is about the myths. I think it is solved now, at least all the 139... links are correct. Q.Zanden questions? 12:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2013Edit

Q498002/Q13409250Edit

Items involved: Q498002Talk, Q13409250Talk Status:     not resolved

Q498002 has English label "aerial tramway" but most of non-English links belong rather to Q13409250 "aerial lift". --ŠJů (talk) 07:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
@عبد الله, صالح: --117.13.95.87 06:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q7751474/Q8236018Edit

Items involved: Q7751474Talk, Q8236018Talk Status:     not resolved

On English Wikipedia, we have just merged the former category into the latter due to this discussion. Acording to the discussion, these categories refer to the same team, so they should be merged. However, Russian Wikipedia has separate entries for thse categories. Od Mishehu (talk) 08:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Why not drop a short message to Russian Village pump, explaining reasons for the merger? Littledogboy (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Q9005482/Q9074404Edit

Items involved: Q9005482Talk, Q9074404Talk Status:     not resolved

als, bg, de, en, fi, gl, hu, ia, no from Q9005482 are identic with nl from Q9074404. Eo and uk from Q9074404 are maybe different from be, cs, ru from Q9074404. Relation between "pidgins", "creole", "creoles", "pidgin and creoles" and "contact languages" is not clear, all is mixed.
@Artsiom91, Frantishak:. --117.13.95.87 06:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Remembrance Day (Q27631)/Armistice Day (Q6597183)Edit

Items involved: Q27631Talk, Q6597183Talk Status:     not resolved

Some of the interwikis, I think at least ru: links to a wrong item. In pt: there was not linked to anywhere (I've already connect to the correct one) but there still some interwiki in the article (w:pt:Dia do Armistício) that I don't know where they should go. - Sarilho1 (talk) 13:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Why there should be 2 items about 1 day? Infovarius (talk) 19:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Oreshek fortress (Q14690)/Shlisselburg (Q15339)Edit

Items involved: Q14690Talk, Q15339Talk Status:     not resolved

Schlüsselburg/Nöteborg means a fortress and on the other hand a settlement named after the fortress. There are articles that contain both, some languages have seperate articles.
@Чръный человек, Rmir2:. --117.13.95.87 06:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

prime minister (Q14212)Edit

Items involved: Q14212Talk Status:     not resolved

Most articles linked are about Prime ministers in general, while at least da and de are about the Northern European concept of a Statsminister. The others should be checked. --YMS (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


editing (Q194105)Edit

Items involved: Q194105Talk Status:     not resolved

More topics are mixed. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

DevotionEdit

Items involved: Q489644Talk, Q11167443Talk, Q859781Talk, Q366732Talk Status:     not resolved

This looks complicated... Littledogboy (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
@Dobroš, Martin Davídek:. --117.13.95.87 06:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Market townEdit

Items involved: Q3374262Talk Status:     not resolved

Should it be divided into like en:market town (kind of place in Wester Europe) and like pl:miasteczko (kind of place in Eastern Europe)? Infovarius (talk) 12:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
sv:Köpstad maily handle how it looked like in Denmark. -- Lavallentalk(block) 09:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Prime ministers, etc.Edit

Items involved: Q6571919Talk, Q7068352Talk, Q6253849Talk, Q6497616Talk, Q9953626Talk, Q6970479Talk Status:     partially resolved

Resolved as much as I could, but there's probably some more work to do. Here's a summary of what I've done so far: A lot of these categories have very similar scopes, and in some cases there may be conflict between the similarity of their names and the similarity of their actual contents. I would greatly appreciate any input. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 17:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013Edit

Rulers of SpainEdit

Items involved: Q14755848Talk, Q173053Talk, Q13383262Talk, Q6647207Talk Status:     partially resolved

For some reason en.wp has decided that list of heads of state of Spain (Q14755848) and list of Spanish monarchs (Q173053) should be separate lists, despite the fact that they're almost identical, meaning that we have to decide which other-language articles go where. So far, I've moved sk:Zoznam hláv štátu Španielska from the latter to the former, but others are definitely candidates—it:Sovrani di Spagna, for instance, despite translating to "sovereigns of Spain," includes several non-monarchs. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 18:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
If the (logical) merge on enwiki goes ahead, then problem sorted... Littledogboy (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Białystok Voivodeship (Q5261695)Edit

Items involved: Q5261695Talk Status:     not resolved

I just separated Q14756366 from this one, but Q5261695 still has some articles that don't belong to it. Most articles are about the 1945 to 1975 division, zh: is from 1945 to 1998, uk: from 1946 to 1998, and for it: I'm not sure what range it covers. I am too tired to check myself, and I suppose there could be more items and articles involved. Also check for local interwikis, thanks. --YMS (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Cameralism (Q616481)/Cameralism (Q62689)Edit

Items involved: Q616481Talk, Q62689Talk Status:     not resolved

Need a German speaker to describe the difference, so that we can check the other languages. Thanks Littledogboy (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


Kameralismus is a certain policy by the rulers in Germany based on direct influence of the courts to the development of a territory. So the courts would sustain agricultural development after the devastating war 1618-1648 and plant manufactures themselves. It is the German version of Merkantilism, a kind of economic theory as a base to politcs. Kameralwissenschaft means the sciences and teaching of oeconomics, bookkeeping and gouvernment neccessary to maintain the policy of cameralism - somehow the predecessor of todays economic studies, clearly focused on educating people for ruling and development of the territory. However these people also had to learn the Kameralismus economic theory, as todays economic studies contain the learning of the principles of capitalism and markets.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Bijapur district, KarnatakaEdit

Items involved: Q83108Talk, Q1727570Talk, Q11839449Talk Status:     not resolved

No idea what's going on. Seems to be a clash between district, city and DAB page --Delsion23 (talk) 23:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Rubus subg. Rubus (Q13180)/Rubus fruticosus (Q13541716)Edit

Items involved: Q13180Talk, Q13541716Talk Status:     not resolved

Blackberries are the fruit of the bramble bush. The problem is, in most languages the article for "blackberry" doesn't focus on a specific species of bramble. Instead, they usually cover a whole range of different species lumped together. In some Wikipedias, the ambiguous term Rubus fruticosus is used. Arguably, we should have two items, one for the berry (symbolism, culinary usages, tradition role in medicine, etc.) and one for the plant (botanical information, kinship with other plants, etc.), but I don't know to what extent the present two items follow this division across the different languages. Gabbe (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

creator deity (Q635155)Edit

Items involved: Q635155Talk Status:     not resolved

I think these links are mixed up. When I look into trwiki/azwiki/arwiki/ttwiki the articles are about Al-Khāliq, one of the en:Names of God in Islam. But enwiki/eswiki/ptwiki/cawiki/simple are about "creator deity" in a much larger sense. I couldn't check the other languages but I think the links must be separated in two different items. Need other language speakers to check the appartenance of each link in one of the article subject. --Mskyrider (talk) 07:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Animated charactersEdit

Items involved: Q5835575Talk, Q7905527Talk Status:     not resolved

Conflict between animated characters and ones in anime and manga --Delsion23 (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Parthia (Q1645483)/Parni (Q901636)/Parthian Empire (Q1986139)Edit

Items involved: Q1645483Talk, Q901636Talk, Q1986139Talk Status:     not resolved

As far as I can tell, all articles of Q90... are about the tribe of Parni (or Aparni). Their empire was the Parthian Empire (or Arsacid Empire), which is basically what is Q19... about. However, despite the title, de: article there seems to cover the tribe more than the empire. The same seems to be true for at least eu: and maybe fi:, others not excluded. And most sitelinks of Q16... discuss the region of Parthia, while at least nl: and fy: (possibly also hr: is: and vi:, again others not excluded) are about a tribe again, possibly the Parni tribe. Who has better thematic insight and language skills, so he can clean up a bit? --YMS (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Q1048261/Broaching (Q1335086)Edit

Items involved: Q1048261Talk, Q1335086Talk Status:     not resolved

Some articles are about the process, some about the tool used for it, but at least in Q13... this is not clearly separated, as de: is about the tool, en: about the process. en: doesn't seem to have an article about the tool, the de: article about the process is in Q10... However, it's quite complicated to tell in other languages what they are about, plus they are introducing new terminology, like "machine" or "technology", so maybe those two items are not even enough. --YMS (talk) 07:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

torque (Q48103)/moment (Q13222844)Edit

Items involved: Q48103Talk, Q13222844Talk Status:     not resolved

From German de:Drehmoment to Bulgarian bg:Момент_на_сила (wrong) and back to German it shows to de:Moment (Technische Mechanik) (right), similar conflicts may be at

el:Ροπή, fa:گشتاور (فیزیک), sq:Momenti, tr:Moment (fizik), because i cannot add these languages to Moment --Charly Whisky (talk) 10:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

  • I fixed trwiki links. --Mskyrider (talk) 06:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Benedicite (Q2929880)/Grace (Q1668249)Edit

Items involved: Q2929880Talk, Q1668249Talk Status:     not resolved

This is my first time here, so I do not know if I am posting at the right place.

In French, the articles Grâces (prière) and Bénédicité refer to approximately the same subject, which is Grace=Tischgebet, etc in Q1668249. Both these french articles could link to Q1668249. However the english article Benedicite refers to another prayer completely. What should be done?  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by PierreLac (talk • contribs).

Bonjour Pierre. Well, first item Q2929880 should be split because the two links there, although they share the same name, are not about the same topic. So I'd remove the French link. Then looking at Tischgebet, it seems Grâces would be the proper link as it mentions avant le repas ... ou après, like the other languages. Bénédicité mentions a prayer only held before eating. Grâces has a lien interne to Bénédicité anyway.
A further option to consider, would be to merge Grâces and Bénédicité into the same article, and make one article redirect to the other. I don't know to which extent these topics are considered to be mutually exclusive, or considered to be more or less synonyms of each other. If no other language makes the distinction, it might be the better solution to merge them.
One last note, I noticed there are no Latin links for these topics, which I find strange for prayers that come from Latin. Maybe you could check the Latin Wikipedia if there are no articles out there that could be added to these topics. Cdt, --Midas02 (talk) 16:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Finance lease (Q192899)/Q3829288Edit

Items involved: Q192899Talk, Q3829288Talk Status:     not resolved

it:Leasing finanziario contains a merge request now for more than a year, but nobody seems to be willing to fulfill it (and the other article, it:Leasing (diritto italiano), doesn't containg the according template). However, from what I can tell, those are no duplicate articles anyway, but a generic one and one specific to the Italian law. If I'm right with this assumption, I don't see a reason why the specific Italian article should be linked to Q19... and the generic one being unconnected to other Wikipedias as the only sitelink of item Q38... Could someone check this who knows either Italian or all this finance stuff better than me? Thanks. --YMS (talk) 11:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Lilliput and Blefuscs (Q265955)Edit

Items involved: Q265955Talk Status:     not resolved

Some language versions are about two fictional islands Lilliput and Blefuscu (english, russian, croatian) some are about one Lilliput (all the rest)--Shisma (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013Edit

Skåne/Scania County/ProvinceEdit

Items involved: Q103659Talk, Q180756Talk Status:     not resolved

Skåne County and Skåne Province is almost identical in terms of geographic extension, but it's not the same subject. I have moved some languages among the Wikivoyage-projects, but there are two languages (vi/ru) where I need help. There can also be some confusion in some other languages on Wikipedia. Is somebody here native volapük for example? -- Lavallen (talk) 07:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Russian solved. Actually, for Wikivoyage I expect all languages to describe the same destination. I would move the other two as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Skåne County (Q103659) is sligtly larger than Scania (Q180756), so any article claiming area is larger than 11 000 km² is propably refering to Skåne County (Q103659). Judging by that, viwp and ruwp are correctly linked. /Esquilo (talk) 13:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

tobacco addiction99 (Q152100)/tobacco smoking (Q7212330)Edit

Items involved: Q152100Talk, Q7212330Talk Status:     in doubt

I can't see any problems with these items. There's also no description why it should be an Interwiki conflict. Please help! --A.Bernhard (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
I see no problem either in the sv-articles. The first about it as a disease, the second about the habit, and things around it. -- Lavallen (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
(sorry for not writing description and for my english) There are interwikis of a topic in the other element. Julián L. Páez (talk) 19:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

PangolinEdit

Items involved: Q25397Talk, Q2191516Talk, Q9027425Talk, Q2659251Talk Status:     not resolved

Similar to #Ursidae but more complex. The first item seems to have a complete mixture of different taxons: it means the order (ru, uk), the family (nl, de), the genus (eu, it) or alltogether (en). And they are not monotypic! It is a consequence of using common names. I suppose that similar situation in every item where common names for animals/plants/fungae being used... Infovarius (talk) 19:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

The same for categories:

Items involved: Q5822731Talk, Q9754908Talk, Q9760716Talk, Q7468493Talk Status:     not resolved

Q5822731 = mixture of Q9754908, Q9760716 and Q7468493 due to using of common names for taxons... Infovarius (talk) 19:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


Work/labour/jobEdit

Items involved: Q192581Talk, Q268378Talk, Q28640Talk Status:     not resolved

--Infovarius (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
What is the problem? --Redaktor (talk) 14:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

goblet drum (Q13219842)/darbuka (Q319154)Edit

Items involved: Q13219842Talk, Q319154Talk Status:     partially resolved

I could not interlink articles about the same item, because of two different Wikidata numbers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goblet_drum https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darbuka JiriMatejicek (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

It's because two wikipedias consider those two as two separate topics, take a good look. Littledogboy (talk) 18:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Q12031867/shot peening (Q1791166)Edit

Items involved: Q12031867Talk, Q1791166Talk Status:     not resolved

Same issue as above.

https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuli%C4%8Dkov%C3%A1n%C3%AD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_peening en: Shot peening is connected to cs: Balotinovani, which I consider a synonym to cs: Kulickovani. If anything, it is a more specific case of Kulickovani. JiriMatejicek (talk) 14:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

If they really are synonyms, then the solution is: Merge the articles into one on Czech Wikipedia. Remember, this is not about words, but about concepts. Littledogboy (talk) 18:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

casino game (Q3742351)Edit

Items involved: Q3742351Talk Status:     not resolved

This is not exactly a conflict, but i'd like to have a clarification, whether interwiki that cross a level vertically are OK:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankvorteil and https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Edge are equivalent. Through wikidata number, they are connected to en: Casino game, which is a more general item (i.e. one level higher), while only its section (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_advantage#House_advantage) is equivalent to the two items above.

JiriMatejicek (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

кондитерские изделияEdit

Items involved: Q8963780Talk, Q6177517Talk Status:     not resolved

Don't know where ru and uk should go. Infovarius (talk) 09:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC) --Infovarius (talk) 09:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Christo and Jeanne-Claude (Q158477)/Christo (Q14633979) (Korean article about Christo with or without Jeanne-Claude)Edit

Items involved: Q158477Talk, Q14633979Talk Status:     not resolved

There's an item for the duo of Christo and Jeanne-Claude (Q158477), and two separte ones for the individual persons Christo Vladimirov Javacheff (Q14633979) and Jeanne-Claude Denat de Guillebon (Q3351266). Today, an IP added ko:크리스토 자바체프 to the duo item. This is understandable, as this is the more popular one, having much more sitelinks than Christo's, including an English one. However, as far as I can tell from Google Translate, the Korean article is about Christo only and therefore belongs to the Christo item. I did what I thought was a fix, but have been reverted quite immediately. I don't want to start an edit war, and I'm not able to read Korean texts at all, so I can't be 100% sure what the article really is about. So I'd like to get some help here. Thank you. --YMS (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

punctuation (Q82622)/punctuation mark (Q10617810)Edit

Items involved: Q82622Talk, Q10617810Talk Status:     not resolved

Articles on both wikidata pages (53 + 22 languages) seem to cover the same topic. But for 8 languages, an article exist on both wikidata pages even though sometimes it only consits of few sentences. These languages are: Azərbaycanca; Български (Bulgarian); Deutsch; Eesti; 日本語 (Japanese); Nederlands; Русский (Russian); Українська (Ukrainian)

Matus.ludma (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

The main discussion is here: Wikidata:Project_chat#Mess_in_wikidata_pages_about_punctuation. Infovarius (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Psyche (Q843382)/Cupid and Psyche (Q135662)Edit

Items involved: Q843382Talk, Q135662Talk Status:     not resolved

We notice two clusters of articles about the mythical Psyche character:

Most language versions have only one of these articles, the other being a redirect or non-existent. The existing article typically describes both the story and the character. However some languages, notably Italian and Chinese, have distinct articles with non-trivial content.

I think that merging these items on wikidata would make more sense than creating separate pages in most languages. Before proceeding, the editors in language versions that have two articles should be notified and advised to merge the articles in their language. Here is the list of articles to merge (5 languages) as reported by the wikidata merge wizard:

Any volunteers to suggest page merges in the relevant language wikis? I could add "requested merge" templates but would need the help of native speakers to explain why... — JFG talk 02:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Anatidae (Q6864111)/Q8878569Edit

Items involved: Q6864111Talk, Q8878569Talk Status:     not resolved

Both seem to be categories for Anatidae. --F705i (talk) 00:55, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
There are two dewiki pages (also svwiki) connected to these two wikidata entities: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Entenv%C3%B6gel , https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Anatidae The two categories contain the same articles, but that is because every article is categorized by the scientific name (Anatidae) and the popular name (Entenvögel). That seems to be done on purpose: "Der Artikelbestand Lebewesen wird separat sowohl nach wissenschaftlichen als auch nach deutschen Namen kategorisiert." cf. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Leitlinien_Biologie#Kategorisierung_von_Artikeln_im_Bereich_Lebewesen . Thus, there might be more such pairs of category pages. How to proceed? --Zuphilip (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your survey. I understand the duplication is intentional. I'd like to decide not to proceed further, as I'd like to be respectful of German Wikipedia community's decision. --106.188.29.36 13:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
usually I connect the german scientific categories to other languages and let the common name category be in their own item --Robot Monk (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks me for the survey: Wikidata talk:Taxonomy task force#Parallel trees. As for me I usually (already many times) connect german common name categories to other languages and let the scientific categories (along with sv, nl and ceb sometimes) to be on their own. Infovarius (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

computer science (Q21198)/informatics (Q4027615)Edit

Items involved: Q21198Talk, Q4027615Talk Status:     not resolved

These two are completely mixed up across languages... Pikolas (talk) 22:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
This pair was already here in July, see archive. What has changed since then? --Zuphilip (talk) 08:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
It seems some, but others are still standing, apparently. Pikolas (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Why did you move the sitelink to the English wikipedia (and many others) last nigth? --Zuphilip (talk) 09:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The problem was raised by duplicate articles in some wikis. en:Computer science and de:Informatik is the same entity, and all of "instances" of that discipline should be strongly connected to computer science (Q21198). I moved en:Computer science back as it is a principal article, and suggest to do the same when possible with others, Bezik (talk) 16:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
User:Pikolas completely messed up. I've managed to restore computer science (Q21198), but when I try to restore Q4027615, I only receive a very non-descript "Error" message. Could someone put those interwiki links back? —Ruud 18:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
How exactly did I mess it up? Pikolas (talk) 18:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
You made many changes to those two items. All of those changes seem to be wrong. —Ruud 18:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

I add some sitelinks manually back to informatics (Q4027615), moved the eswiki-, cawiki-links from information science (Q16387) back, and could finally restore to the old version. --Zuphilip (talk) 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I am from Vietnamese Wikipedia. informatics (Q4027615) is not correct. It is not "Khoa học máy tính" in Vietnamese. It is called "Thông tin (lĩnh vực giáo dục)" but this page is still not created. Other ones are ok. I changed the title of informatics (Q4027615). Fixed. Alphama (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

The labels of informatics (Q4027615) are still the same as those of computer science (Q21198). The labels of informatics (Q4027615) should probably be removed. —Ruud 18:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Pålegg/spread (Q1472481)/cold cut (Q10426)Edit

Items involved: Q1472481Talk, Q10426Talk Status:     not resolved

"Pålegg" is a Scandinavian/Norwegian word for just about anything you put on a slice of bread. "Spread" is soft pålegg. "Cold cut" is meat pålegg. So we have three terms, but only two items? Or maybe a third item already exists? How is pålegg classified in other languages? - Soulkeeper (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
In Swedish (closly related to Norwegian), Pålägg is a disambig-item. Smörgåspålägg is (almost) anything you can put on a Sandwich, while Kallskuret is only meat (ham and sausages), prepared to be used on a sandwich or as a part of a smörgåsbord. -- Lavallen (talk) 17:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I see you add a strike to the Scandinavian part, but I would consider it correct. "Pålägg" is the main Swedish term for anything you put on a slice of bread, but since it also could be an economic term, is sv:Pålägg a disambig-page on svwiki. And a Swede would pronounce pålägg and pålegg in the same way. And I would expect anybody from Stockholm, to spell it (incorrectly) with e, since many of them cannot hear the difference between these letters. -- Lavallen (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013Edit

Elephant shrew categoriesEdit

Items involved: Q9751349Talk, Q8411845Talk Status:     not resolved

Clash between categories for two different taxon ranks of the elephant shrew. --Delsion23 (talk) 23:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Agricultural science and AgronomyEdit

Items involved: Q3606845Talk, Q173113Talk Status:     partially resolved

In Italian agronomia is a branch of scienze agrarie, called also agraria (See [1] e [2]). In English agronomy is a branch of Agricultural science as well (see: [3] and [4], [5]. I don't expect distinction to be perfect (and I am not giving any one because it would take too much time and space, I let you do your own research on the sources), but it is clear that in some language the first "term" is less generic than the second.

Unfortunately, in other languages the same root close to "agronomy" is probably used for the generic term. For example in French "sciences agraires" is a rare expression and many dictionares translate the italian "agraria"(="scienze agrarie") with "agronomie". I have the feeling that Pflanzenbauwissenschaften and Agrarwissenschaften should be inverted between the two items or at least the last one should be moved to Q3606845.

In conclusion, there is quite a mess. Just take a look in the interwikis in en:agricultural science. I tried to remove the "free" interwikis but I was reverted by a user who didn't reply to my message.

So, can we just try to revise with reliable sources if the interwikis are ok?--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I think I am the one who reversed your edit. Having seen your explanation and agreeing with it yes. By all means continue with the clean up. I apologize for the inconvenience and also do not wish to enter an editing conflict. My reversal of your edit was made in ignorance of your purpose, because I didn't see your explanation. Now that I have, I actually agree with you.Redddbaron (talk) 02:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
In German, agronomy (Agronomie) is an old fashioned term for agricultural science. At least agricultural science is the more generic term. Q3606845 seems to link the wrong German term, it should be Agrarwissenschaften as in Q173113. See also http://aims.fao.org/en/standards/agrovoc/functionalities/hierarchy?mytermcode=49876&mylang_interface=en&myLanguage=EN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.87.228.67 (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Classification (Q1744625)/classification scheme (Q5962346)Edit

Items involved: Q1744625Talk, Q5962346Talk Status:     in doubt

Both items are intended to be the disambiguation on classification but some articles don't seem to be disambiguations. - Matthew Beta (talk) 11:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
some of pages from Q1744625 may not be real disambiguations, but this is vague and we cannot do anything here. The disambiguation templates should be removed afore on lokal wikipedias. --Robot Monk (talk) 09:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Q298126/Cadenza (Q1069389)/cadence (Q14088448)Edit

Items involved: Q298126Talk, Q1069389Talk, Q14088448Talk Status:     not resolved

In music there are two terms related to Q298126 (in some languages they are spelled differently): a sequence of chords and the end of a musical composition. Q1069389 should only include the end and Q14088448 should only include the sequence. Q298126 and Cadence (Q2665078) are disambiguations. sh:Solistička kadenca and sr:Солистичка каденца (Q1069389) are "sub-disambiguations" (even not really) dealing only with these two terms. They should be either connected in a separate item, or moved to the right item. Then sr:Каденца (Q298126) should be moved to Q1069389. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

administrative territorial entity of Canada (Q3750285)/province or territory of Canada (Q2879)Edit

Items involved: Q3750285Talk, Q2879Talk Status:     in doubt

x
Seems to me Infovarius put this right a month ago...? Littledogboy (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
...the question is, wasn't it a bit Russian-centered decision? Littledogboy (talk) 23:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

administrative territorial entity of the Federated States of Micronesia (Q902647)/city of the Federated States of Micronesia (Q3976634)Edit

Items involved: Q902647Talk, Q3976634Talk Status:     not resolved

administrative territorial entity of Honduras (Q15097620)/department of Honduras (Q728145)Edit

Items involved: Q15097620Talk, Q728145Talk Status:     not resolved

(entry not signed)


They are NOT the same, but department of Honduras (Q728145) subclass of (P279) administrative territorial entity of Honduras (Q15097620). --Zuphilip (talk) 11:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

administrative territorial entity of Israel (Q1550119)/district of Israel (Q193560)Edit

Items involved: Q1550119Talk, Q193560Talk Status:     not resolved

Not a conflict. Districts of Israel are the top level administrative subdivisions of Israel, but there are also lower subdivisions. DGtal (talk) 13:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Oxycheilinus arenatus (Q2151653)/Oxycheilinus mentalis (Q1043479)Edit

Items involved: Q2151653Talk, Q1043479Talk Status:     not resolved

There're same taxon with different synonym.--GZWDer (talk) 05:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Iniistius baldwini (Q2090750)/Iniistius evides (Q5614719)Edit

Items involved: Q2090750Talk, Q5614719Talk Status:     not resolved

same as above.--GZWDer (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

monasticism (Q148836)/Q12974038Edit

Items involved: Q148836Talk, Q12974038Talk Status:     in doubt

(Q12974038)mege to Monasticism (Q148836)--Srithern (talk) 11:34, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
sure? Q12974038 looks like a special type of monasteries for me (Adheenam). --Robot Monk (talk) 10:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources (Q9331692)Edit

Items involved: Q9331692Talk Status:     not resolved

References × cite sources × external links help. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013Edit

MitteleuropaEdit

Items involved: Q27509Talk, Q3498665Talk Status:     not resolved

The German-language wiki has a single article "Mitteleuropa / Zentraleuropa". The English-language wiki has two separate articles, Central Europe Q27509 and Mitteleuropa Q3498665. I can't link the English-language Mitteleuropa Q3498665 to the German-language Mitteleuropa because Q27509 already points there.
  • I have added a local link [[de:Mitteleuropa]] to en:Mitteleuropa --Hokanomono (talk) 07:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
    Do we need manual interwiki links in each language? Is there a better way to do that?--Hokanomono (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Haichemys ulensis (Q12071064)/Haichemydidae (Q1835793)Edit

Items involved: Q12071064Talk, Q1835793Talk Status:     not resolved

Both articles are about the same thing, as there's only one species in the family.

Aveiro (Q485581)/Aveiro (city) (Q3344926)Edit

Items involved: Q485581Talk, Q3344926Talk Status:     not resolved

There seems to be a conflict at Q485581 where there is a mixture of the population centre Aveiro versus the Aveiro municipality. Needs some patience and better language skills than mine.

Q14919740/knowledge base (Q593744)Edit

Items involved: Q14919740Talk, Q593744Talk Status:     not resolved

Q14919740 (in Persian: پایگاه دانش) is the same subject for "Knowledge base" in English. The link between these articles in two Persian wikis (Tajik and Farsi) and other wikis (including English wiki) has been broken. They need to be merged, or one of them should be deleted.

Mmehdi.g (talk) 19:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

There exists two different pages in tgwiki tg:Мудирияти дониш and tg:Пойгоҳи дониш connected to these two wikidata objects. What is the meaning of these two articles? --Zuphilip (talk) 10:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Pinging tgwiki sysops @Darafsh, Ibrahim, VASHGIRD, Илья Драконов, Шухрат Саъдиев: How can't we merge both tgwiki articles? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

ScienceEdit

Items involved: Q8027727Talk, Q336Talk, Q475023Talk Status:     partially resolved

Moved to Talk:Q336. --Hokanomono (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Pigs (Q8807789)Edit

Items involved: Q8807789Talk Status:     not resolved

There is a big mess in categories dealing with pigs and related taxa. There should be different intems for categories for suborder Suida, for family Suidae, for genus Sus, for species Sus scrofa, for domestic pigs and for races of pigs. Now all them are messed in a single item, with lots of categories linked by local interwikis. The fact that different wikipedias chosed different meanings for the translation of "category:pigs" (some ones as the genus, some ones just for domestic pigs, and so) doesn't help.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Disambiguation and redirection templates (Q6998835)/Category:Disambiguation message boxes (Q7466803)/Q15304506Edit

Items involved: Q6998835Talk, Q7466803Talk, Q15304506Talk Status:     partially resolved

Disambiguation templates × disambiguation and redirect templates. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

ticket (Q454839)/ticket (Q551800)/ride ticket (Q182587)/airline ticket (Q1140537)/electronic ticket (Q1273299)Edit

Items involved: Q454839Talk, Q551800Talk, Q182587Talk, Q1140537Talk, Q1273299Talk Status:     not resolved

There occure some inconsistencies in interwikis.
  • ticket (Q454839) links only to dissambiguation pages, a real item covering the full scope of the term "Ticket" is missing
  • ticket (Q551800) - the linked English Wikipedia article - Ticket (admission) - seems to cover entrance tickets together with transport tickets (tickets to ride), however some linked articles covers only entrance tickets (as an opposite of transport tickets). Some languages have a specific term for entrance ticket (de:Eintrittskarte, cs:Vstupenka etc.) which doesn't include transport tickets (ride tickets).
  • ride ticket (Q182587) - the linked English article is "train ticket", some linked articles are about "transport ticket" generally (including bus tickets, tram tickets, ship tickets, amussement ride tickets etc.). Some languages have a specific word for land-transport ticket /ride ticket (de:Fahrkarte, cs:Jízdenka etc.) (train ticket (Q15306266) set aside now --ŠJů (talk) 17:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC))
  • airline ticket (Q1140537) seems to have no problem (however the problem is whether is should be attributed as a type of ride ticket (Q182587) or shouldn't.
  • electronic ticket (Q1273299) in some languages covers airline tickets only, in some languages covers electronic bus, train, ship or even entrance tickets too. (Electronic train ticket (Q15306376) set aside now, see also Electronic train ticket (Q4531048) --ŠJů (talk) 17:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC))
--ŠJů (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

mulled wine (Q6584)/Glogg (Q7723658)Edit

Items involved: Q6584Talk, Q7723658Talk Status:     not resolved

English article "Mulled wine" seems as the same thing as Norwegian "Gløgg". But it is not possible to add the Norwegian language link because of the conflict.
I guess the solution is to have a separate item for the articles who handle only the Nordic version of the drink. The Swedish version sv:Glögg is almost only about the Nordic version (Q7723658), therefor now moved. But I think "Glühwein" is considered to be in the same group of drinks. -- Lavallen (talk) 15:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
If you think that the article no:Gløgg is about mulled wine in general (not only the nordic variant), then the link should be moved to mulled wine (Q6584). To me the article looks very much like a mulled wine (Q6584).--Hokanomono (talk) 23:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

quartierEdit

Items involved: Q253019Talk, Q123705Talk, Q1348006Talk Status:     not resolved

similar notions --Infovarius (talk) 13:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
There are two different wikipages in English, German, French (and maybe more). Thus, there will also be two objects in wikidata. Are there any language links which looks wrongly attached? Or what do you suggest? --Zuphilip (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
English label in Q253019 looks similar to many of labels in Q123705 which prevents me from correct russian labelling. I don't know which is ru:Квартал. --Infovarius (talk) 14:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
@Infovarius: There is an object for the disambiguation pages Q1437134, one for the subdivisions within cities Q123705, and one for the subdivisiosn of other places (in German: 'Orte, Gemeinden') Q253019. The question what is a 'city' and what not, is not in every country handled equally. However, the English page en:Quarter (urban subdivision) looks for me like the it speacks about a subdivision of cities AND other places, i.e. this would be the union of both indivdual objects. Are there other languages which looks similar to that? Then, one could create a new object linking to the English page. But the Russian page should stay linked to the disambiguation object Q1437134, and ru:Городской_квартал does not yet exists. --Zuphilip (talk) 11:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Added one more. So now ru:Городской_квартал exists and connected to Q1348006. But what is the difference from Q123705? --Infovarius (talk) 08:08, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Homo sapiens (sapiens)Edit

Items involved: Q5891007Talk, Q5Talk, Q3238275Talk Status:     not resolved

Human is Homo sapiens sapiens but now it is classified as Homo sapiens --Infovarius (talk) 14:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
  • There is an ongoing scientific debate whether the Homo neanderthalensis was a subspecies of homo sapiens, i.e. homo sapiens neanderthalensis. Appearently the currently favored view is that of two different species of homo. Anyways, the species of all living human individuals is homo sapiens, no matter what subspecies we might belong to. (anatomically modern human (Q5891007) only links to a disambiguation page, therefore anatomically modern human (Q5891007) should be turned into a disambiguation page: remove taxonomy properties, add disambiguation page property. It may be easier to create a new item.) Is there still a conflict? --Hokanomono (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Added another one Sapiens sapiens. Infovarius (talk) 11:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Split podcasting (Q20899)Edit

Items involved: Q20899Talk Status:     not resolved

since instance of podcast and instance of podcasting are two seperate things there should be two entites. wikipedia has articles for both here--Shisma (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Indische Narde/SpikenardEdit

Items involved: Q15283858Talk Status:     not resolved

These items seem to be linked already by their taxonomic names ("Nardostachys grandiflora" and "Nardostachys jatamansi") and thus I get an error when trying to link enWiki "Spikenard" to deWiki "Indische Narde". If I look up "Nardostachys jatamansi" or "Nardostachys grandiflora" in the german or english wikipedia's search box, I am redirected to either "Indische Narde" or "Spikenard", but the interwiki links to english/german are missing. It would be useful if they'd be available there too. --Maikek (talk) 12:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

residenceEdit

Items involved: Q481289Talk, Q1180262Talk Status:     not resolved

--4th-otaku (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

insular area (Q462778)/Q2107324/unincorporated territory (Q783733)Edit

Items involved: Q462778Talk, Q2107324Talk, Q783733Talk Status:     in doubt

These two objects seems to be very close but not the same. There are different wikipedia pages in ca, en, es, pl, pt, vi. Certainly, we cannot merge them. But maybe someone can help to improve them, such that it is possible to better see the differences. For example the German label is exactly the same and there is no description on either of the pages. --Zuphilip (talk) 14:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Charge/Military attackEdit

Items involved: Q1174599Talk, Q543461Talk Status:     not resolved

these two appear to be about very similar concepts. There are two articles in some languages. --Delsion23 (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

2014Edit

January 2014Edit

urban area (Q702492)/urban area in Nordic countries (Q6566301)Edit

Items involved: Q702492Talk, Q6566301Talk Status:     not resolved

Urban area = sv: Tätort = no: Tettsted

This is a conflict, the swedish word coult not be saved because there is a page called "Urban areas in Sweden" that corspond to the swedish word. A good solution is to merge the latest mentioned page in the page "Urban area". Krg (talk) 23:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

@Lavallen: Thoughts? --Izno (talk) 13:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
The English article "Urban area" "Q702492" is "International". There is also a "Nordic" standard (Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark) from 1960 who have another formal standard. (The difference is maybe that a Nordic urban area often is smaller and maybe have larger distances between the houses, compared with an international.) But that standard also allow some local differences between the nations. (In Sweden we are counting the summer and holiday homes separatly, and do not allow to many of them, why a Norwegian urban area does not always fit into the Swedish standard.) SO, I guess we need separate items for "International", "Nordic", "Swedish" and "Norwegian" urban areas. I know that also the Norwegian definition is a little separate from the "Nordic standard" from 1960, so I guess that also need an Item of it own. I do not know if we have any items about Finnish or Danish urban areas and if they have any differences from the Nordic standard. So, I guess we can rename Q6566301 to "Urban area in the Nordic nations" or something like that. Some of the sitelinks maybe have to be moved to "Q12813115". The Danish (a redirect) and the Italian looks like they definitly have to be moved to that item. In Sweden we also have some other definitions named "Fritidshusområde", "Småort" and "Arbetsplatsområde" who are related to Tätort, but they not the same thing. -- Lavallen (talk) 15:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
I haven't yet got a reply so I write here, even though I don't think this is right place. Shouldn't "Urban areas of Sweden" be changed to "Urban areas in Sweden" as the Wikipedia article is called? --IRISZOOM (talk) 01:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Cantonese (Q9186)/Yue Chinese (Q7033959)Edit

Items involved: Q9186Talk, Q7033959Talk Status:     not resolved

There are two languages/dialects known as Cantonese: Cantonese (Q9186) (Guangzhou) and Yue Chinese (Q7033959) (Yue). But some links in Cantonese (Q9186) about Yue. Need somebody who knows Chinese. --putnik 04:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
cf Wikidata:Interwiki_conflicts/Unresolved/2013#Q9186.2FQ7033959_.28Yue_Chinese.2FCantonese.29 --Zuphilip (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
"Yue" is used by Mandarin speaking people and ISO only, Cantonese and Westerners call this language Cantonese. Of course "Cantonese" is more useful for the English users. (And, Cantonese may also referred to the ethnic group speaks Cantonese.) --Fongyun (talk) 04:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
If we go by the linguistic definition, Yue Chinese is the name for the branch of languages and includes Cantonese, which is treated as the prestige dialect of the group. So Cantonese would be a subcategory of Yue Chinese. - M0rphzone (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

The Tatler (Q1613096)/Tatler (Q15078212)Edit

Items involved: Q1613096Talk, Q15078212Talk Status:     in doubt

The German wikipedia article under Q1613096 refers to both entities. --GVogeler (talk) 07:45, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
I tried to improve it and collect the items with a focus on the 1709 magazine in The Tatler (Q1613096). The English article en:Tatler speaks only about the new magazine (from 1901). The Spanish Wikpedia seems to treat both in equal parts. Can someone check the Russian Wikipedia? Should it better be seperated because there is also a Russian version of the magazine? --Zuphilip (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
ru-wiki article is only about new one (after 1901). -- Vlsergey (talk) 03:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I think it's fixed now. The Tatler (Q1613096) has a bunch of articles, each of which discuss various magazines named the Tatler which have appeared at various times since 1709. These should really each get their own items so each can have their own start date and end date.
I moved finnish and russian sitelinks to Tatler (Q15078212) as Google translate says they only discuss the current version of the magazine published by Conde Nast. Filceolaire (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

East Asian Yogācāra (Q349849)Edit

Items involved: Q349849Talk Status:     not resolved

Sorry, I assume this is not an interwiki conflict but Ididn't find an appropiate task force to signalize the problem. The articles from East Asian Yogācāra (Q349849) should be separated in two wikidata items: one should contain the articles about the general notion (en:East Asian Yogācāra, it:Buddhismo Fǎxiāng, no:Faxiang zong) and the other one the Japonese version of it (de:Hossō-shū, fr:Hossō-shū, hu:Hosszó and probably the ru and uk articles as well). I have no idea about the remaining three (ja, ko and zhwiki); and no experience with splitting wikidata items. --Hkoala (talk) 16:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
I just have created Q15606337, which seems to be member of the first group... --Zuphilip (talk) 17:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
There are now three objects
The English link is the only one who describes both of them in one page, but it has some focus on China. Thus, it connected to the one about China. Can someone look at ja, ko and zhwiki and link them accordingly? --Zuphilip (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

bay (Q1124247)/intercolumniation (Q1364172)/vault (Q189771)Edit

Items involved: Q1124247Talk, Q1364172Talk, Q189771Talk Status:     not resolved

The Wikipedia articles this interwiki data item links to seem to describe similar but not really identical concepts.

There is probably more

I'm no architect or art historian and don't speak enough of most of the involved languages to really sort this out, so would appreciate any help on this.

Thanks, --S.K. (talk) 23:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

PS: I'm not sure if here is the right place, so pointing me towards such a place is appreciated if it is not.

I moved es and ca-wiki link to intercolumniation (Q1364172). - In the talk page of enwiki also fr:Baie (architecture) was mentioned which is now bay (Q2879412). - I guess that cs:Klenební pole is a subclass of Q189771, because there is already a cswiki attached to it. I guess this needs more clean-up... --Zuphilip (talk) 11:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This might be helpful for German: http://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Joch --Zuphilip (talk) 11:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
German has two concepts of measurements: Joch means the distance beween the axes of two columns, Interkolumnium means the distance between two columns measured on the surface. Columns with the same joch can have different interklumnium, depending on the diameter of the column. Joch = Intercolumnium + diameter / Joch - diameter = Intercolumnium.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Lutte Ouvrière (Q870667)Edit

Items involved: Q870667Talk Status:     in doubt

Wikipedia articles referring to a party and its newspaper (which shares the same name as the party) are in the same item. --Wylve (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
I haven't found any wikipedia page about the journal, only the French article speaks about both: fr:Lutte_ouvrière. I changed the properties of the object to the political parti, such that at least the linked person will fit into the constraints of member of political party (P102). --Zuphilip (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Project 1143.7 (Q263381)Edit

Items involved: Q263381Talk Status:     not resolved

I'm not sure which are talking about the class and which the ship itself. The en.wp article is obviously more about the ship. --Izno (talk) 03:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be all fine. This ship is unique for his class, so I think articles for class and ship itself can be mixed. --Winterheart (talk) 03:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Freikörperkultur (Q9300865)/naturism (Q152311)Edit

Items involved: Q9300865Talk, Q152311Talk Status:     not resolved

I believe the Freikörperkultur article should link to the German Freikörperkultur article. I guess I'm getting an error because of linking of Naturism to the German Freikörperkultur site. Kdammers (talk) 05:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Kdammers: To which objects are you refering to? --Zuphilip (talk) 13:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Probably Q9300865 (English: Freikörperkultur) and Q152311 (English: naturism; German: Freikörperkultur). Mr. Granger (talk) 21:20, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

State of Palestine (Q219060)/Palestine (Q23792)/Palestinian territories (Q407199)Edit

Items involved: Q219060Talk, Q23792Talk, Q407199Talk Status:     not resolved

probably relink in Wikivoyage.--GZWDer (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Cannibalization (marketing) (Q1154300)/Cannibal (Q59857)Edit

Items involved: Q1154300Talk, Q59857Talk Status:     not resolved

There are three articles about Cannibalization in English. One is about C in marketing, the next is about C in fiction and the last one about C of machine parts. There also is a disambiguation page, which (unfortunately) is also disambiguating man-eating cannibals etc.

The articles in all the other languages linked at Q1154300 are either about marketing (:ar and :ko), about machine parts (:pl) or both (:nl, :it, :de). None (except the English one) is about fiction.

Therefore I would like to change Q1154300 to link to en:Cannibalization (with or without an additional #Cannibalization), and rename it afterwards, but wikidata will not let me, as the disambiguation seems to be occupied by Cannibal (Q59857).

In my opinion, having this bunch of articles in English is correct, as most articles are quite detailed. Also, not having a bunch of articles in the other languages seems right, as right now, they are not so detailed (also, I guess not all usages of Cannibalization are valid in all of the other languages, eg in German you would rather say "Plagiarism" than "Cannibalization of fiction"). So I give up. --Vwm (talk) 18:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Prirazlomnaya (Q14936000)/Prirazlomnoye field (Q59557)Edit

Items involved: Q14936000Talk, Q59557Talk Status:     not resolved

Hallo dear problemsolvers! maybe the two items could simply be merged, but exactly there is the oil- and gasfield en:Prirazlomnoye field and the building de:Priraslomnaja-platform. Two different details in our natural and man-made environment. So both items should be described a little bit better, links between both items maybe better than a merge, wrong sorted articles should be moved to Priraslomnaja Q14936000 (to move the platform for recycling or for usage in greenpeace-gazprom-whalewatching to reach a longterm economical and ecological bonus is here not possible, unfortunately, global thinking may find real renewable solutions). Is it possible to connect articles by REDIRECTS in Wikidata, so in en-WP the existing REDIRECT en:Prirazlomnaya platform to en:Prirazlomnoye field#Development should be used; and vice versa the (not written) REDIRECT de:Priraslomnoje oilfield (to de:Priraslomnaja platform and similar articles in the other WP-projects. If direct Wikidata-REDIRECTS are not possible, are old interwikilinks to Redirects a possible solution to link articles? --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

backlight (Q574291)/Q12810597Edit

Items involved: Q574291Talk, Q12810597Talk, Q1797988Talk Status:     not resolved

--Q574291 is about the definition of the term "backlight" but holds interwiki's to "TV that uses this technique" (Retroiluminación LED, Lysdiode-bagbelyst LCD-skærm), standard LED-TV and backlight itself (Rétroéclairage, Hintergrundbeleuchtung). This item should only be connected to the concept of backlight itself. Q12810597 and Q1797988 should be merged to form one item to articles about LED-TV's and another item should be created to connect to "Backlit LED-TV's". Something like that anyway :/ EvilFreD (talk) 06:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

printed circuit board (Q173350)/Perfboard (Q3375299)Edit

Items involved: Q173350Talk, Q3375299Talk Status:     not resolved

(Sorry - I'm new in the interwiki subject :)

Problem:
In enwiki 'PCB' and 'Perfboard' are separate subjects. (The same sems to be valid for French.)
In dewiki there is only 1 subject covering both:
"Leiterplatte" equals "PCB",
"Leiterplatte#Experimentierplatinen" includes the perfect equivalent of Perfboard: "Lochrasterplatine" (which currently seems not to allow for a direct reference).
As it is, it would be helpful to have "Perfboard" linked to "Leiterplatte#Experimentierplatinen"

- which is currently not possible.

Torsion pendulum (Q1071566)/Torsion scale (Q379114)Edit

Items involved: Q1071566Talk, Q379114Talk Status:     not resolved

--Nouill (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

cookie (Q13266)/biscuit (Q13270)Edit

Items involved: Q13266Talk, Q13270Talk Status:     not resolved

Differing terminologies have left some issues with interlanguage links. For example, the es.wikipedia page for Q13266 is wikipedia:es:Galleta con chispas de chocolate (specifically discussing those pastries with chocolate chips) because the page for Q13270 is already wikipedia:es:Galleta (these pastries in general). See wikipedia:en:Talk:Cookie#German Wikipedia link for more information. --Anon126 (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014Edit

several item about police, etc.Edit

Items involved: Q6494145Talk, Q7481111Talk, Q6163581Talk, Q8979144Talk, Q8465734Talk, Q454812Talk, Q495304Talk, Q35535Talk, Q44554Talk, Q43504Talk, :en:Medical jurisprudence[[Talk::en:Medical jurisprudence|Talk]] Status:     not resolved

Probably a big mix up, see Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#Sorting request: Police. I tried to relink some article [6], but I found it's a big work to do.--GZWDer (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

web marketing (Q3008173)/digital marketing (Q1323528)Edit

Items involved: Q3008173Talk, Q1323528Talk Status:     not resolved

The italian pege about it:Web marketing looks more like a specific case of en:Digital marketing, whilst fr:Cybermarketing seems more a specific aspect of en:Web traffic, which in French doesn't exist. Please notice that Web marketing on en.wiki is a redirect to en:Online advertising since 2007, but IMHO marketing is a wider concept than advertisiment.

All the articles show very poor references, so it is quite difficult to have an idea. Even if there are subtle differences, I think in some languages a rearrangement of some concepts in different (maybe new) articles will help in sorting them out in a much clearer way.

--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Twinkle Twinkle Little Star (Q1058356)Edit

Items involved: Q1058356Talk Status:     not resolved

Different songs (based on the same tune) under the same item, Twinkle Twinkle Little Star (Q1058356) should probably be split.

brwiki (at least) have an article about three differents songs : Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, A ! vous dirai-je, Baa (the last has it's own item : Baa, Baa, Black Sheep (Q552300)).

VIGNERON (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

PteridophytaEdit

Items involved: Q2912898Talk, Q178249Talk, Q80005Talk Status:     not resolved

Where is Pteridophyta? --Infovarius (talk) 05:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Welfare / Social help / Wellness (medicine) / Welfare State / Social State / Social Insurance / etc ..Edit

Items involved: Q180043Talk, QQQTalk, Q1077209Talk, Q192451Talk, Q619610Talk, Q7653906Talk Status:     not resolved

Just have a look .. I can't describe it. Look especially at those old inter-wiki links left over on almost ALL language articles.
and here are some interwiki "orphans" zh:社會救助, nl:Bijstand, de:Wohlfahrt; also the japanese(ja) is still there in Q11154430. I removed it just now. And the tr:Refah is NOT very satisfactory; de:Wohlfahrtspflege (Begriffsklärung) as well ... and es:Bienestar means Benefit, right?
so please help me check if this is well done. Thank you! -- SzMithrandir (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
well ... anyone knows what's going on here, Q358063?

Category:Emergency medical services (Q8412342)/emergency medical services (Q860447) /Prehospital care (Q15692326)Edit

Items involved: Q8412342Talk, Q860447Talk, Q15692326Talk Status:     not resolved

The three seem to be mixed up. It seems that across all the wikis, the three subjects are mixed up and that the three entries on wikidata are equally confused. I stopped editing it when I realized I couldn't sort it out.--Evrik (talk) 05:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Commissariat (Q1780239)/Q13434340Edit

Items involved: Q1780239Talk, Q13434340Talk Status:     not resolved

I think de:Intendantur and no:Intendantur should be moved to Q1780239. Not sure what to do with de:Kommissariat. --Wikijens (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Orchestra/bands and their categoriesEdit

Items involved: Q239582Talk, Q762048Talk, Q9102906Talk, Q8408393Talk, Q7722029Talk Status:     not resolved

Linking in articles and categories doesn't coincident, so it is hard to develop one-to-one properties topic's main category (P910) and category's main topic (P301). Especially look at es-links. musical ensemble (Q2088357) and band (Q215380) also mixed here. Infovarius (talk) 13:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014Edit

Category:British writers (Q5636453)/Category:United Kingdom authors (Q15895322)Edit

Items involved: Q5636453Talk, Q15895322Talk Status:     partially resolved

Wikipedia vs. Wikisource but also to check 'pedia links. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
  Comment Seems legit but not sure… At least for fr.wp and fr.ws there is a small distinction beetwen « écrivain » (writer (Q36180)) and « auteur » (author (Q482980)). All writers are author but some authors aren't writers (painters, musicians, etc.). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Both items now have enws link. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

internment (Q1668049)/concentration camp (Q152081)Edit

Items involved: Q1668049Talk, Q152081Talk Status:     not resolved

"Concentration camp" is used in Simple English wikipedia, but "Internment" in English wikipedia. The number of wikipedia connected to "Concentration camp" is more than "Internment". Should they be unified to facilitate readers to go through different language versions? --Fongyun (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
I think both are not the same thing, then should not be merged. Also, for example, čeština have two articles: cs:Internace (Internment) and cs:Koncentrační tábor (Concentration camp). Dansk and Deutsch are in the same circumstance. Maybe it is a mistake of English Wikipedia, or explains both themes in the same article. Internment maybe it is wider than concentration camp. --Zerabat (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

khutor (Q2023000)/farm (Q131596)/crofting (Q15094780)/alqueria (Q15501937) and maybe othersEdit

Items involved: Q2023000Talk, Q131596Talk, Q15094780Talk, Q15501937Talk Status:     not resolved

You can start a funny contradictory journey through all following interwikis starting from ru:Хутор. A little mindmap can be found at de:file:Хутор.png JøMa (talk) 15:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

ensign (Q14595679)/second lieutenant (Q10918728)Edit

Items involved: Q14595679Talk, Q10918728Talk Status:     not resolved

There seems to be a huge mess between those items. Maybe we should separate some of those links / move them to some other items. Someone who knows many languages and a lot of army? --Stryn (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

trademark (Торговая марка)Edit

Items involved: Q6450098Talk, Q5896763Talk Status:     not resolved

some mixture in categories about notions --Infovarius (talk) 18:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Baroque architecture in the United Kingdom (Q6186383)/Category:English Baroque architecture (Q8415281)/Q9067266/Q9463653Edit

Items involved: Q6186383Talk, Q8415281Talk, Q9067266Talk, Q9463653Talk Status:     partially resolved

Three French pages. What links do belong to which item? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I tried to do something, but fr:Catégorie:Architecture baroque en Angleterre and fr:Catégorie:Architecte baroque anglais are redundant, then I requested to merge in frwiki these categories. Also, I move fr:Catégorie:Architecture baroque au Royaume-Uni and it:Categoria:Architetture barocche del Regno Unito to a different item from Q8415281 because "Category ... United Kingdom" is geographically wider and includes for example (if exist) Cat:Arch. bar. scottish, Cat:Arch. bar. welsh, and so on.
From now, we must to wait until frwiki will decide to merge the redundant categories. --Zerabat (talk) 12:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
@Zerabat: Frwiki has decided not to merge the categories (it was long time ago). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Q3553251/vagrant (Q416718)/vagrancy (Q23906234)Edit

Items involved: Q3553251Talk, Q416718Talk, Q23906234Talk Status:     not resolved

It seems to be the same concept. It needs help for analyze the meaning in each language. --Joxemai (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

brasse (Q280164)/fathom (Q6502423)Edit

Items involved: Q280164Talk, Q6502423Talk Status:     not resolved

--GZWDer (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
This conflict is hard to solve. Some articles talk about fathom (braza inglesa), some other talk about braza (braza española), and a few talk both in the same article. --Zerabat (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Breads (Q5827742)/Category:Baked goods (Q7353893)/Category:Pastries (Q8963780)Edit

Items involved: Q5827742Talk, Q7353893Talk, Q8963780Talk Status:     not resolved

Links of the items are inconsistent. For me it is quite difficult to solve it. Also, there are probably old interwiki links in articles. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

flaying (Q1145315)/skinning (Q1788637)Edit

Items involved: Q1145315Talk, Q1788637Talk Status:     not resolved

The English language articles of "flaying" and "skinning" are translated to the same word in Finnish: "nylkeminen". However, the Wikipedia does not allow linking both English language articles to the corresponding Finnish language article. --Keskival (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

sophism (Q1483917)/Sophism (Q166955)Edit

Items involved: Q1483917Talk, Q166955Talk Status:     not resolved

I think that https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Софизм should be linked not to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophism but to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy . https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Софизм talks about logical fallacies while https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophism is about Sophism as a method of teaching. I suggest that https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Софизм should be linked to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy, and possibly be merged with https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Логичиская_уловка. Bearw08 (talk) 03:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Continued at Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Unresolved/2014#.E8.BE.A9.E5.A3.AB.E5.AD.A6.E6.B4.BE_.EF.BC.88Q166955.EF.BC.89.2F.E8.AF.A1.E8.BE.A9_.EF.BC.88Q1483917.EF.BC.89. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:29, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

computer science (Q21198)/information science (Q16387)Edit

Items involved: Q21198Talk, Q16387Talk Status:     not resolved

Some interwikis which the spelling looks like "information" in Q21198 seem to mean "information science". --What here area team (talk) 17:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

power (Q25107)/political power (Q2101636)Edit

Items involved: Q25107Talk, Q2101636Talk Status:     not resolved

It seems that some wiki distinguish Power (political science) from Power (sociology). As a sociologist, I find this a rather unnecessary division, but for us it means that some interwikis are messed up. On en wiki, there's an article about w:Power (social and political). We need to consider whether we want to have three articles (Power (political science), Power (sociology) and Power (political science and sociology) or just one and clean up the interwikis. I think that power (Q25107) should be the main one, and it should be linked to en w:Power (social and political) which is currently incorrectly linked to more limited political power at Q2101636. While my preferred solution would be to merge all articles on power (s) and power (p), I think we need to 1) retitle power (politics) to Power (political science), 2) create a new entry for power (sociolology) and move the articles between those three families. Most latin ones can be guessed at where they should be (defaulting to Q25107). For non-latin ones... google translate? --Piotrus (talk) 08:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014Edit

Category:Crockery (Q6327007)/Category:Cooking utensils (Q8879693)/Category:Tableware (Q13296117)Edit

Items involved: Q6327007Talk, Q8879693Talk, Q13296117Talk Status:     not resolved

--GZWDer (talk) 13:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

energetics (Q719597)/energy industry (Q2151621)/Category:Energy industry (Q6274177)/Category:Energetics (Q8413433)/energy technology (Q14554973)Edit

Items involved: Q719597Talk, Q2151621Talk, Q6274177Talk, Q8413433Talk, Q14554973Talk Status:     not resolved

Three articles, two (main) categorie (maybe they're also three and I didn't find the third). --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
What is the difference between "Energetics" and "Energetic technology/industry". --Zerabat (talk) 19:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Project bots (Q3681760)/Category:Wikipedia bots (Q8189437)Edit

Items involved: Q3681760Talk, Q8189437Talk Status:     not resolved

Both pages seem to list Category pages relating to Project Bots, but I'm not quite sure what the difference between them is meant to be. Furthermore, there is currently some inconsistency re. where to put q:, s:, voy: links where a project only has one Project Bot-related Category. It Is Me Here t / c 12:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
@It Is Me Here: On en.Wikipedia the difference seems clear. All bots is all bots and appears to be non-diffusing (because it is defined as all of them); bots is diffusing. I would suggest that the majority of category links should be on the "bots" category rather than the "all bots" category. --Izno (talk) 14:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

IUD with copper vs Intrauterine deviceEdit

Items involved: Q16274676Talk, Q899868Talk Status:     not resolved

On enwp there is iw-to wikis with Q899868, while the original enwp is on Q16274676 and another en is on Q899868. --(tJosve05a (c) 14:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

en:IUD with copper > Q16274676
en:IUD with copper > sv:Spiral (preventivmedel)
sv:Spiral (preventivmedel) > Q899868
Q899868 > en:Intrauterine device

(tJosve05a (c) 14:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

mindfulness (Q15009109)/mindfulness (Q341045)Edit

Items involved: Q15009109Talk, Q341045Talk Status:     not resolved

This began when I removed the interwiki links from the Wikipedia article w:Mindfulness (psychology), which here at Wikidata is mindfulness (Q15009109). I came here to ensure the database for that article would include the links I removed. Right away, I ran into conflicts with mindfulness (Q341045), which holds the links for w:Mindfulness, an article without the "(psychology)" disambiguator. It appears that some of the links at mindfulness (Q341045) have the disambiguator, and perhaps those should go at mindfulness (Q15009109)? Others without qualifiers may need help from those who know the language and can add qualifiers for mindfulness (Q15009109)? I don't know; this is the first time I've ran into conflicts, so I'm not quite sure how to proceed. Thank you for any help you can give! – Paine Ellsworth WD:CLIMAX! 16:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Let me also note that the list of interwiki links I removed from the w:Mindfulness (psychology) article have been transferred to this page. – Paine Ellsworth WD:CLIMAX! 04:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

i am confused with this. is the german for the buddhist mindfulness, but this is only a short paragraph. w:Mindfulness (psychology) seems to be de:w:Achtsamkeit. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Nicene creed (Q207937)/Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed (Q13231188)Edit

Items involved: Q207937Talk, Q13231188Talk Status:     partially resolved

These two items should be merged. I didn't manage to use any automatic tool - can you please help? Thanks. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Laibniz (talk • contribs).
@Laibniz: These items are about different topics so they cannot be merged. TarzanASG moved some links and can tell us how it's with the conflict. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
A few more links moved. The only one I cannot verify is the arc.wp article at Q132... Is there someone who has basic knowledge of that language, GoogleTranslate doesn't work. Q.Zanden questions? 16:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Q3777328/Amaro Averna (Q790615)Edit

Items involved: Q3777328Talk, Q790615Talk Status:     not resolved

there are two entities, the company, and the product, on the italian wikipedia. the german only contains the company. the product is redirected to the company. on other languages it is inverse. it is not possible (or not easy?) to add the corresponding german page to both items, as it forces the redirection target instead of the original. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

sentence (Q41796)/phrase (Q187931)Edit

Items involved: Q41796Talk, Q187931Talk Status:     not resolved

Probably also clause (Q117364) --Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 23:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Pepper (Q980700)/Peppar (Q11451900)Edit

Items involved: Q980700Talk, Q11451900Talk Status:     not resolved

transferir o link "Noutras línguas - english" da página "Pepper" para a página "Pimenta", pois a 1ª é para desambiguação e não refere as plantas. Transfer the link "Noutras línguas - english" from page "pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper" to "pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pimenta" because the first is for disambiguation and does not refer to the plants. --Ceciliawolf (talk) 07:31, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thats ok. disambiguation pages should contain links to similar spelling not to translations. --Akkakk 08:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

artificial selection (Q995745)/selective breeding (Q4023882)Edit

Items involved: Q995745Talk, Q4023882Talk, Q788558Talk, Q227675Talk Status:     not resolved

The terms are not clearly separated. Also sometimes items in animal breeding (Q227675) or plant breeding (Q788558) are involved. --S.K. (talk) 06:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

development aid (Q865909)/official development assistance (Q954977)Edit

Items involved: Q865909Talk, Q954977Talk Status:     not resolved

enwiki:Development aid involved! --Peprochazka (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
@Peprochazka: The English page has never existed. Where is the problem, then? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
@Matěj Suchánek: Never exists? Although, I doubt if we should "merge two items", better to clarify both. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
It does, my bad. But still I don't see where the problem is. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:12, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Business travel (Q1995666)/business tourism (Q655855)Edit

Items involved: Q1995666Talk, Q655855Talk Status:     not resolved

French and English mismatch but I'm not sure about other languages --Ske (talk) 12:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

bombardier beetle (Q15221944)/Brachininae (Q1343544)Edit

Items involved: Q15221944Talk, Q1343544Talk Status:     not resolved

Seem to be the same thing, except for the French version (which could be merged into one page) --2A01:2A8:8701:E72C:0:0:0:5B9 21:37, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014Edit

categories about disambiguationEdit

Topic: categories about disambiguation Items involved: Q1982926Talk, Q8182851Talk, Q7663195Talk, Q8235688Talk Status:     not resolved

too complicated structure in en-wiki with too little in some other wikis. Infovarius (talk) 10:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Earth's crust (Q15316)    Edit

Items involved: Q15316Talk Status:     not resolved

Two different subjects in this item I think : Crust and Earth crust ... just created Q16760598     to prepare the split. --TomT0m (talk) 18:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Some pages are about crust, but then talk about earth crust, with no other page to treat this last one (ex: portuguese wiki, english wiki). Some other are about earth crust (the majority). But I don't know if there are articles about crusts only. --Zerabat (talk) 00:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Q16760598 was merged. There's Earth's crust (Q15316)... --Yair rand (talk) 04:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (1900) (Q15678327)/Constitution of Australia (Q1144614)Edit

Items involved: Q15678327Talk, Q1144614Talk Status:     not resolved

I'm pretty sure these should not be merged, but they should definitely refer to each other somehow. Of course there will be more equivalent documents in wikisource:Portal:Constitutional documents (or wikisource:Category:Constitutional documents) and w:List of national constitutions (or w:Category:Constitutions by country). --Mark Hurd (talk) 13:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I've guessed Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (1900) (Q15678327) instance of (P31) Constitution of Australia (Q1144614). --Mark Hurd (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

product (Q2424752)/goods (Q28877)/manufactured product (Q3406743)Edit

Items involved: Q2424752Talk, Q28877Talk, Q3406743Talk Status:     not resolved

Manufactured product, marketing product, marketting around a product ... The definitions of the main items does not fit the articles, I'm not sure about everything, seems like a mess. --TomT0m (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Letter and syllableEdit

Items involved: Q9788Talk Status:     not resolved

--Wikiuser13 (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
@Wikiuser13: Do you mean there is a conflict between Q9788 and Q8188. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Hesperus (Q59697)/Phosphorus (Q1775444)Edit

Items involved: Q59697Talk, Q1775444Talk Status:     not resolved

All the links to Hesperus and Phosphorus (morning star) were mixed up. I canceled many but not all wrong links but I don't succeed to reintroduce the correct links to the proper page. Pinea (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC) --Pinea (talk) 22:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Let me explain further: A lot of pages related to Hesperus were linked to Phosphorus and viceversa. So the problem was that I had to exchange links and I was not allowed by the system. I had to destroy half of the links before modifying the other half. After several attempts I succeded to fix most of them but not all. For instance I don't know how to handle the eswiki Hespero, still connected to Phosphoros. Moreover I destroyed the links of dewiki hesperos, fiwiki hesperos, eowiki hesperos and nowiki fosforos, and I am not able to link them to the correct page anymore(I really tried only for dewiki). I also don't read chinese, japanese, hindi, persian or arabic titles so I don't have the slightest idea whether they are connected to the proper pages. There are several questions. First why some wiki behave differently than others. Even in wikidata table some links were initially impossible to remove (an error flag was popping out), Gd only knows why. Second the difficulties probably were due to the fact that the software cannot handle easily the replacement of a wrong link with another one. Rather than simply telling that I cannot make the link because another page from the same wiki is already linked, it should suggest me what to do, for instance could allow the replacement provided I also suggest a new link for the other page previously linked there.Pinea (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

it looks like these have been sorted out. Can this item be closed now? - PKM (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Islamic texts (Q7023551)/Category:Islamic literature (Q8555531)Edit

Items involved: Q7023551Talk, Q8555531Talk Status:     not resolved

I find that interwikis between Islamic text Category and Islamic Literatur Category are interchanged (mixed up). I propose a merge for this two categories, because the word Text and Literature have similar meaning in most languages. -- Ibensis (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

character structure (Q366773)/moral (Q235282)/moral character (Q12504525)/Q225819Edit

Items involved: Q366773Talk, Q235282Talk, Q12504525Talk, Q22581Talk Status:     not resolved

Dexbot link Wikiquote pages to disambig pages. Links should be moved to other items. --GZWDer (talk) 10:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Muraenidae (Q35076)/ ---Edit

Items involved: Q35076Talk, ----Talk Status:     partially resolved

A user has taken war:Muraenidae (which is now unlinked) out of Q35076 and added a different :war: article. I suspect that the item mixes the family and the subfamily and must be split, but I do not have enough knowledge in biology to understand how it should be done.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Whoever changed the articles just made a mistake. war:Muraenidae put back; where war:Panangitan should go is not clear, as its description is too vague. It should probably be merged with war:Muraenidae or possibly with war:Muraena --Joostik (talk) 20:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Kosovo (Q1246)/Kosovo (Q1231)Edit

Items involved: Q1246Talk, Q1231Talk Status:     not resolved

one item should be about the republic, the other about the geographical region. But at the moment it is messy. --Pasleim (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Artsakh (Q244165)/Nagorno-Karabakh (Q44302)Edit

Items involved: Q244165Talk, Q44302Talk Status:     not resolved

one item should be about the republic, the other about the geographical region. But at the moment it is messy. --Pasleim (talk) 14:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

pornocracy (Q867808) /Saeculum obscurum (Q1359213)Edit

Items involved: Q867808Talk, Q1359213Talk Status:     not resolved

Q867808: be (904-963),br,ca,cs(904 – 963),de,el,es,fi,fr,ja,it, ka,ko,ru,sr,sv,uk= popes 903/4-963/4; nl= french revolution; perhaps fi connection to other contexts
                     Q1359213: cs, de +888-964,en:904-963,hy, id, it:903-1048,lt, sh,sk 882+
I recommend creating different items for nl, no--Oursana (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014Edit

home appliance (Q212920)/electrical apparatus (Q2425052)Edit

Items involved: Q212920Talk, Q2425052Talk Status:     not resolved

--GZWDer (talk) 05:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Street party (Q2916192)/Volksfest (Q13930359)Edit

Items involved: Q2916192Talk, Q13930359Talk Status:     not resolved

In the German Wikipedia the page for "Street party" ("Straßenfest") redirects to "Volksfest" ("Volksfest") because this article describes both. So I can't anymore connect "Street part" to "Straßenfest" ... and don't know how to fix that. Is this a bug because I can't connect to a page thats redirects?

--Tobias B. Besemer (talk) 00:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@Tobias B. Besemer: It is a known bug. Once it will be possible to connect pages with redirects. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Q11259184/Isao (Q1573676)Edit

Items involved: Q11259184Talk, Q1573676Talk Status:     not resolved

These two both appear to be about the Japanese given name "Isao". --24.85.128.55 04:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
They are not the same. The Japanese page does not mention the given name specifically, as opposed to the Western language pages which are structured around it. The Japanese page only mentions a stylized form of the name which is used as a stage name by a performer (Isao Yonezaki) who is actually not mentioned on any of the other pages, so there is zero intersection between the Japanese page and the others. --Haplology (talk) 05:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Semer (Q614023)/Ash Street (Q2450158)Edit

Items involved: Q614023Talk, Q2450158Talk Status:     not resolved

Not sure it's an interwiki conflict, but reporting anyway: the Semer interwikis are OK, the Ash Street ones link to a sub of Semer. Regards, --Sander1453 (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Tahr (Q3130200)/Hemitragus (Q1577386)Edit

Items involved: Q3130200Talk, Q1577386Talk Status:     not resolved

I am not completely sure about this. To me it looks like one is referring to the taxonomic genus and the other one to the common name associated to this genus. Can somebody else take a look at it and confirm/reject this? Thanks --Frog23 (talk) 06:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
The problem is that the genus Hemitragus has recently been split up, but only the French wiki properly reflects this. The English wiki and some others mention this but still treat them as a group, some other wikis don't mention this at all. --Joostik (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014Edit

Ghotuo-Uneme-Yekhee languages (Q12631472)/Q17308521Edit

Items involved: Q12631472Talk, Q17308521Talk Status:     not resolved

Compare afen1234 to [7]/ghuy. "ghuy" seems to include some glottolog has under unclassified, like "Sasaru". Would it be okay to merge these items? I do not know if there is a significant difference between these classifications. πr2 (t • c) 03:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

fast-neutron reactor (Q796821)/breeder reactor (Q552334)/Q17315534Edit

Items involved: Q796821Talk, Q552334Talk, Q17315534Talk Status:     not resolved

Three way conflict; There are three different things, but different languages decided to merge (different) two or all three into one wikipedia article.

I created Q17315534. This should deal with the product of OKBM, as there are wikipedia articles dedicated to it. The russian brandname for this however simply is the generic term "Reactor for fast Neutrons". The russian wikipedia has only one article for both topics. The latter two should however not be confused because there are other manufatures for "Reactor for fast Neutrons".

The german wikipedia has only one article for Q796821 Q552334.

August 2014Edit

railway (Q22667)/rail transport (Q3565868)Edit

Items involved: Q22667Talk, Q3565868Talk Status:     partially resolved

Seems "railway system" and "rail transportation" are more or less the same, and most of the languages have only either one of those.

--202.40.137.199 07:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

There are two similar reports in the following year's report page. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
This report is duplicate of another one. --Dvorapa (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Q166461Edit

Items involved: Q166461Talk Status:     not resolved

LinkRecoveryBot repeatedly recovers a wrong sitelink (eswiki/Villarriba y Villabajo), see History. How can this wrong Bot behaviour be stopped? --Invisigoth67 (talk) 20:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
@Invisigoth67: Simply using the links elsewhere. Or letting someone with more than 10 edits to delete them. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Persons of artsEdit

Items involved: Q6442246Talk, Q6613951Talk, Q7062510Talk Status:     not resolved

Please explain what the difference between these categories? Main articles don't help (there are not enough of them, by the way). --Infovarius (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hala'ib (Q5640964)/Halayeb (Q2577574)Edit

Items involved: Q5640964Talk, Q2577574Talk Status:     partially resolved

--Speculos (talk) 07:46, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
(Q5640964) ar seems to be a duplicate. --Joostik (talk) 19:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

soft start (Q477208)/Motor soft starter (Q2666306)Edit

Items involved: Q477208Talk, Q2666316Talk Status:     not resolved

This turned out indeed a little more complicated, unable to get explained by a terse template.

I actually wanted to add the German (dewiki) article to Q2666306 but couldn't because the dewiki article was used for another article, which was Q477208 (Soft start) *BUT* as Soft start now redirects on its part to Motor soft starter, this is way more tricky than it looks. When I tried to merge by the Merge tool in "Special" section, I got "Conflicting labels for language pt" error. So even this does not work. This will have to be merged by hand as it looks.--2.242.207.151 11:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Two different notions. --Dereckson (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014Edit

Prunus subg. Prunus (Q6401215)/Prunus domestica (Q44120)/Prunus domestica subsp. domestica (Q13223298)/Prunus domestica subsp. insititia (Q149195)Edit

Items involved: Q6401215Talk, Q44120Talk, Q13223298Talk, Q149195Talk Status:     not resolved

plum (Q6401215)

Labels/descriptions

EN plum/drupe fruit of Prunus species

NL Kwets/ --

DE Pflaume/Untergattung der Genus Pflaume

Problem in NL: in the Dutch of Belgium (Flemish), I believe “kwets” is an appropriate label, but “pruim” would also be right. In the Dutch of the Netherlands, the word “kwets” refers specifically to Prunus domestica subsp. domestica, so I believe “pruim” would be a more appropriate label for Q6401215 in Dutch.

Pages linked to Q6401215:

If this item includes all species in the subgenus Prunus of the genus Prunus, then EN Plum and FR Prune appear to be correctly linked to Q6401215.

AF Pruim appears (my understanding of Afrikaans is limited) to refer to Prunus domestica only and to distinguish Prunus armeniaca, so perhaps it should be linked to Q44120 instead.

I cannot comment on the other pages linked to Q6401215.


Prunus domestica (Q44120)

Labels/descriptions

EN Prunus domestica/ --

DE Pflaume/Pflanzenart aus der Gattung Prunus in der Familie der Rosengewächse

NL Kwets/ --

Problem in NL: in the Dutch of Belgium (Flemish), I believe “kwets” is an appropriate label, but “pruim” would also be right. In the Dutch of the Netherlands, the word “kwets” refers specifically to Prunus domestica subsp. domestica, so I believe “pruim” would be a more appropriate label for Q44120 in Dutch.

Pages linked to Q44120:

DE Pflaume, EN Prunus domestica, FR Prunier, and LB Promm appear to be correctly linked to Q44120.

NL Pruim purports to refer to Prunus domestica but also includes substantial discussion and photos of Japanese plums that are not Prunus domestica, so I believe it should be linked to Q6401215 instead (and the taxonomy box amended accordingly).

I cannot comment on the other pages linked to Q44120.


plum (Q13223298)

Labels/descriptions

EN plum/subspecies of plum (Prunus domestica subsp. domestica)

NL Kwets/ --

DE Zwetschge/Unterart der Art Pflaume (Prunus domestica)

These are all appropriate.

Pages linked to Q13223298:

BAR Zwetschgn; DE Zwetschge, EN Zwetschge, and NL Kwets appear to be correctly linked to Q13223298.

FR Prunier de Damas refers principally to Prunus domestica var. insititia (or Prunus insititia) and also lists, e.g., Prunus domestica subsp. syriaca as a variety of Prunier de Damas, so linking FR Prunier de Damas to Q13223298 appears not to be appropriate. I suggest it might be linked to Q149195 instead. However, the French language apparently treats “quetsche” (which is a close cognate of zwetschge, Prunus domestica subsp. domestica, originating from the parts of France that once spoke German) and “prunier de Damas” (damson) as synonymous, so advice from someone with a sound grasp of French and Prunus taxonomy is needed.

I cannot comment on the other pages linked to Q13223298.


Prunus domestica subsp. insititia (Q149195)

Labels/descriptions

EN Prunus domestica subsp. insititia/subspecies of plants, Damson

DE Kriechen-Pflaume/Unterart der Art Pflaume (Prunus domestica)

These are both appropriate.

Pages linked to Q149195:

DE Kriechen-Pflaume, EN Damson, and ES Prunus domestica subsp. insititia appear to be correctly linked to Q149195.

FR Quetsche purports to refer to a variety of Prunus domestica subsp. insititia, but I believe the entire text (except the gallery) may be good as a discussion of Prunus domestica subsp. domestica, so linking FR Quetsche to Q149195 may not be appropriate. I suggest it might be linked to Q13223298 instead. However, the French language apparently treats “quetsche” (which is a close cognate of zwetschge, Prunus domestica subsp. domestica, originating from the parts of France that once spoke German) and “prunier de Damas” (damson) as synonymous, so advice from someone with a sound grasp of French and Prunus taxonomy is needed.

I cannot comment on the other pages linked to Q149195.

--Frans Fowler (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

As far as I can tell (as a hobby planter also) there is a need to stick to the latin names to keep seperate the different concepts as there lures also Prunus (Q190545) as well. So i think one of the three items Prunus subg. Prunus (Q6401215)/Prunus domestica (Q44120)/Prunus (Q190545) is redundant. So lets explain plums and the relatives: 1. Prunus genus: very broad concept of different plants like cherries, apricots, almonds and plums 2. prunus subgenus prunus: Includes plums and prunus spinosa 3. Prunus domestica (plums), most of the different fruits belong to this species. However although some of the fruits look very similar in fact they are not the same, but they all belong to this group 4. prunus domestica subsp. domestica. Zwetschge is a very special subspecies of plum. You can store it for some weeks, you can dry it very well, flesh adheres not to the stone, it is also used for destilling Schnaps. Other plums are watery and will be gone within a few days. Q13223298 seems approprate, however dawiki Blomme (frugt) and stqwiki Oachteboom seek to describe the broader concept of plums. The frenchPrunier de Damas has no taxon, but lists the different forms of subspecies so this belongs to the broader concept of Plums. There seem to be several redundancies in the french wiki and also different names for ther same thing. 5. Prunus domestica subsp. insititia is also a very special subspecies however the names are many and sometimes the same name is used for different plants or fruits. The greek Δαμασκηνιά however seems to describe prunus domestica. French frwiki Quetsche seems to describe prunus domestika subsp. domestica but gives it another taxon. gawiki Daimsín: don´t know, is a substub. iowiki Quecho seems me to be prunus domestica subsp. domestica.

--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Giza Pyramids (Q13217298)/Giza (Q81788)Edit

Items involved: Q13217298Talk, Q81788Talk Status:     not resolved

see wikivoyage link--GZWDer (talk) 05:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

contralto (Q37137)/alto (Q6983813)Edit

Items involved: Q37137Talk, Q6983813Talk Status:     not resolved

This two items are about deep womans voices so it seems to be possible to merge the two items. However the term kontraalto(contralto) and alto describe different concepts in some langunages, in some it is the same. In some languages the contralto means a very low womans voice like Zarah Leander, similar to tenor. In other langugaes as italian contralto and alto is the same but only contralto is used. So it is necessary to use one item for the general concept of deep womans voices and one only for the concept of womans voices in tenor range. I find no way to tell which link in which item describes the general and which one the "deeper" concept. --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

lacquer (Q11236878)/varnish (Q81683)/lacquerware (Q368972)Edit

Items involved: Q11236878Talk, Q81683Talk, Q368972Talk Status:     not resolved

Overlap lacquer and varnish in several languages, lacquer=lacquerware in some. --Joostik (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

psychoactive drug (Q3706669)/recreational drug use (Q7708739)Edit

Items involved: Q3706669Talk, Q7708739Talk Status:     not resolved

The fi:wikipedia article Q3706669/Päihde deals with intoxicating substances used for recreational purposes but the links to other languages redirect to articles dealing with psychoactive drugs used for variety of purposes. Correct english link would be to article Recreational drug use. In the en:wikipedia article Psychoactive drugs there is a link to fi:wikipedia article Psykoaktiivinen aine and that is correct. When I try to change the english link in Q3706669 to Recreational drug use, an error message pops up saying that it cannot be done because Recreational drug use is already in Q7708739 but when I go there, there is is no fi:wikipedia relations and when I try to add the fi:wikipedia article Päihde an error message comes up saying Päihde is already used in Q3706669.--Custoo (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
So, could the solution be to delete item Q3706669 and then add Päihde as the Finnish counterpart to item Q7708739? --Custoo (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

God (Q190)/deity (Q178885)Edit

Items involved: Q190Talk, Q178885Talk Status:     not resolved

In January 2014 the topic of Q190 was changed from "god" (an ambiguous word) to "God in monotheism". This corresponds to all the European-language articles as well as both of the Sinosphere WP articles. However, the Japanese article is about both monotheism and polytheism. I requested that they split the article and was met with a flat rejection due to the two concepts being ambiguous in Japanese culture. Furthermore, there is already a Japanese article corresponding to deity (Q178885), but as far as I can tell it is actually about the word "divinity". Shii (talk) 18:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014Edit

waterline (Q492878)/Plimsoll line (Q942969)Edit

Items involved: Q492878Talk, Q942969Talk Status:     not resolved

There are some conflicts, per request on my talk page. --Stryn (talk) 14:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Q13222435/charity (Q1077064)/charity (Q456673)Edit

Items involved: Q13222435Talk, Q1549811Talk, Q1077064Talk, Q456673Talk Status:     not resolved

see also sk:Štedrosť; no Næstekærlighed should go to Q1077064, but there is another no link, perhaps create extra item for Nächstenliebe--Oursana (talk) 09:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: Q13222435 is merged with Q456673. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Q11240684/river island (Q162602)Edit

Items involved: Q11240684Talk, Q162602Talk Status:     not resolved

There are two Korean links for the one Japanese page (sorry I don't know Korean). Q162602 has a lot of links (including Korean) and it should link with the Japanese page 中洲 but that link exists in Q11240684 which only has the Japanese link and a Korean link. Are the two Korean pages the same or should they be different? Unimaginable666 (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

rocket launch site (Q1933026)/spaceport (Q194188)Edit

Items involved: Q1933026Talk, Q194188Talk Status:     not resolved

--GZWDer (talk) 12:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
@Asdert, Innobello, PM3, RoBri, CorrectHorseBatteryStaple: ideas? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

November 2014Edit

Layperson (Q10317028)/Laity (Q15407657)Edit

Items involved: Q15407657Talk, Q10317028Talk Status:     not resolved

Similar concepts at play here - "lay (person, preacher, etc.)" vs. "laity" vs. "secularism". I think they need to be merged, or cleanly split along the lines of lay individual/concept of laity. This, that and the other (talk) 10:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

shortwave (Q672859)/shortwave radio (Q368646)Edit

Items involved: Q672859Talk, Q368646Talk Status:     not resolved

Q672859 and Q368646 refer to the same subject in enwiki, cawiki, glwiki, itwiki, simplewiki, ptwiki and maybe some other wikis. I thought about merging them but realized that they refer to different pages in fawiki, jawiki, kowiki, ruwiki and zhwiki. Since I cannot read these five languages, I don't know what to do. So, I'm wondering if someone can fix this issue. Py4nf (talk) 23:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

assault (Q81672)/Q5710433Edit

Items involved: Q81672Talk, Q5710433Talk Status:     not resolved

Q81672 mixes assassination (en.wp link, statement) and terror attacks (most other sitelinks). Most links should probably be moved to Q5710433 but translations and incoming links should be checked. --Zolo (talk) 08:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Apostolic Palace (Q145093)/Palazzí Pontificí (Q7127020)Edit

Items involved: Q145093Talk, Q7127020Talk Status:     not resolved

SV wiki has two separate articles. In EN wiki, one is a redirect to the other. All other wikis seem to be linked to Q145093. There are also separate categories and institution pages in Commons that need to be straightened out. Most of the files in these categories actually belong in one of the many subcategories. --PKM (talk) 04:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Glögg / mulled wineEdit

Items involved: Q7723658Talk, Q6584Talk Status:     not resolved

--(tJosve05a (c) 13:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

hunger (Q165947)/hunger (Q3535686)Edit

Items involved: Q165947Talk, Q3535686Talk Status:     not resolved

This is a huge mess. There's the political topic of hunger (to which probably Q2558248, currently with only one item, would also belong), and the physiological state of hunger. Unfortunately, the interwikis are mixed up between the two topics and I have no idea which belongs to which. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 00:36, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014Edit

punctuation (Q82622)/punctuation mark (Q10617810)Edit

Items involved: Q82622Talk, Q10617810Talk Status:     not resolved

In some cases articles from the two items are about the same thing (as far as I know, in catalan, español, euskara and français). In Deutsch and Nederlands there are distinct articles in both items. --Joxemai (talk) 07:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
@Joxemai: This discussion may be useful: Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2013/10#Mess in wikidata pages about punctuation. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

list of the longest ski jumps (Q2292241)/list of the longest ski jumps (Q3501105)Edit

Items involved: Q2292241Talk, Q3501105Talk Status:     not resolved

Some articles are lists of longest ski jumps throughout the history (for example German or Polish ones), some are lists of longest ski jumps at the moment (the Finnish one) and some cover both topics. Norwegian bokmal wiki is the only one with two articles. Additionally, Swedish article seems to be completely unrelated. Barcival (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

thermal power station (Q200297)/fossil-fuel power station (Q1434958)/coal-fired power station (Q6558431)Edit

Items involved: Q200297Talk, Q1434958Talk, Q6558431Talk Status:     not resolved

A lot of interwikis (including most, if not all, from the former Soviet Union) in the former item are about fossil fuels, not steam generation. Ain92 (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I added third item, which also seems to be connected. Barcival (talk) 11:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

2015Edit

January 2015Edit

Asia Minor (Q12824780)/Anatolia (Q51614)Edit

Items involved: Q12824780Talk, Q51614Talk Status:     not resolved

It should be the same thing. I didn't get any respond here, also user Treisijs didn't get respond here. --Edgars2007 (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Actually there are two classes of articles: Asia Minor (Q12824780) is for peninsula (geographic entity) and Anatolia (Q51614) is for historic region (historic and cultural entity) — NickK (talk) 22:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
I ammended the description to match this but I'm not sure the sitelink split matches the division described by NickK Lots of the descriptions for Anatolia (Q51614) in other languages describe it as a peninsula. Needs work. Filceolaire (talk) 21:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

February 2015Edit

text corpus (Q461183)/lexicographic thesaurus (Q179797)Edit

Items involved: Q461183Talk, Q179797Talk Status:     not resolved

w:ar:مجموع نصوص and w:ar:مكنز لغوي and w:ar:مكنز? Do we need a new item for w:ar:مكنز لغوي (is not a disambiguation page, but is link to in Corpus (Q226250)? Should two of the ar:articles be merged? Is there another item for one of them? --Diwas (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

sausages etc.Edit

Items involved: Q131419Talk, Q327316Talk, Q829720Talk, Q11990064Talk, Q9110341Talk, Q7215708Talk Status:     not resolved

sausage (Q131419)/Vienna sausage (Q327316)/kielbasa (Q829720)/Q11990064/Category:Cold cut (Q9110341)/Category:Sausages (Q7215708) --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:35, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

railway (Q22667)/rail transport (Q3565868)Edit

Items involved: Q22667Talk, Q3565868Talk Status:     partially resolved

Please unify this items --DonDrakon (talk) 08:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi DonDrakon
There is some conflicts so we can't merge this two. There is two different articles on:

It seems to be two different concepts to me. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

This report is duplicate of another one below. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:58, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

railway (Q22667)/rail transport (Q3565868)/rail guided transport (Q350783)Edit

Items involved: Q22667Talk, Q3565868Talk, Q350783Talk Status:     not resolved

This three elements involve two different concepts. As far as I can see, the two clearly distinct concepts are:
  • Railway / railroad (based on Q22667), i.e. vehicles and infrastructure of train transportation
  • Rail transport (based on Q3565868), i.e. any kind of transport using rails, not only trains, but also urban rail such as underground/subway/metro, trams, funiculars etc.

The third concept (based on Q350783) is unclear and can be hardly distinguished from the previous ones.

For seven languages currently present in rail guided transport (Q350783) I would suggest doing the following:

I would welcome other ideas (especially if anyone sees how rail guided transport (Q350783) is different from the others). If there are no objections, I will do this merge within a few days — NickK (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Update: I see a potential problem with French (and probably Occitan) as it does not seem to have an exact equivalent of rail transport: there is a notion of railway/railroad (fr:Chemin de fer) and a notion "rail transport and cable cars" (fr:Transport guidé), with nothing in between for purely rail transport. Is there an equivalent of fr:Transport guidé in any language or should we leave it alone? @VIGNERON:, you are quite active here so your feedback is welcome — NickK (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi NickK,
First, there is already a request up here about railway (Q22667)/rail transport (Q3565868).
Then there is two families of concept : « transport » (the system globally) and « infrastructure » (an element of the system). On the french wikipédia, two articles about railway : fr:Chemin de fer and fr:Voie ferrée (both expression that can translated as « railway » in english ; but the first is more general like « transport by rail » and the second is more « railroad »…). It's very bit subtle but I think the first article could go to the « transport » family and the second on to the « infrastructure » family.
fr:Transport guidé is completely different, it's in the « transport » family but it's more general, it's a superclass of « railway transport ». I can't find any articles about that concept except on the french and occitan wikipedias.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi VIGNERON, and yes, I have seen this discussion. However, I wanted to add a different angle to it by adding one more related element and merging 3 elements into 2. As far as I can see, we already have a large family of notions:
The issue is that while track (Q160342) is a very clear notion (clearly indentifiable, most of languages have a word for this), it is almost impossible to draw a line between the remaining four. en:Rail transport and uk:Рейковий транспорт have exactly the same meaning (i.e. rail (Q633423) + transport (Q7590)) but do not belong to the same element. Many languages have a distinction between a railway and a rail transport (e.g. cs:Železnice is railway and cs:Kolejová doprava is rail transport, i.e. railway + metro + tram + funicular etc.) but not between a railway system and a railway transport. In pt there are pt:Ferrovia and pt:Transporte ferroviário but they are candidates for merging.
I see the problem in the following view. There are 3-4 notions:
1. Infrastructure of railways and stations (probably at railway (Q22667)) and websites and companies... - branch of economics
2. Only railways and probably their net (probably at track (Q160342)). Not clearly distinguishable from previous, for me.
3. Rail transport (for sure at rail guided transport (Q350783))
3. Train transport = rail transport - metro - trams and so on (probably at rail transport (Q3565868))
So, the existance of 4 items is understandable. --Infovarius (talk) 13:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Thus the question is now different: do we need to split it even further or is it possible to put something together? — NickK (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
A similar problem: what's meant by Q12897871, i.e. the Haitian Creole ht:Tren. @Ajv75, Bequw, Bfpage, Dionysia, Fetmar: --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Well it looks like train (Q870) to me so   Merged. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

March 2015Edit

Macedonia related diambiguationsEdit

Items involved: Q568972Talk, Q3275109Talk, Q10322747Talk, Q15977979Talk, Q39702Talk, Q1163835Talk, Q1161192Talk, Q15978057Talk, Q11774177Talk Status:     not resolved

--Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Macedonicus (Q11774177) has nothing to do with the others as it is about a person named Macedonicus. For the remaining ones... it is complicated. I made some cleanup and got the following:
  • Macedonian (Q568972) for everything related to Macedonian people (or Macedonians)
  • Q3275109 for everything related to Macedonian language (or Macedonian)
  • Macedonia (Q39702), Q15977979, Makedonia (Q1163835), Macedónia (Q1161192) = Macedonia in different spellings. Many languages use different spellings for Macedonia as an independent republic, a Greek and a Bulgarian ethnic territory (the record holder is Hungarian where a Roman province, Greek Macedonia and Republic of Macedonia all have different names); in addition, there are other things (like cities in the USA and Romania or a French salad) named after Macedonia. I don't imagine how we can merge all of these together — NickK (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Foundation degree (Q5474382)/associate degree (Q14625016)/educational technologist (Q1940036)Edit

Items involved: Q5474382Talk, Q14625016Talk, Q1940036Talk Status:     not resolved

--−ebraminiotalk 22:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

dubbing (Q187657)/voice actor (Q2405480)/dub actor (Q11481802)Edit

Items involved: Q187657Talk, Q2405480Talk, Q11481802Talk Status:     not resolved

--Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
In the languages I see, dubbing (Q187657) is a stage in film making, whereas voice actor (Q2405480) and dub actor (Q11481802) are occupations which a person can have, so they should not be merged. It is possible that voice actor (Q2405480) and dub actor (Q11481802) should be merged. I see discussion on the Catalan Wikipedia about merging. On the gl Wikipedia they are distinguished [8] [9], but why? I suppose a "Actor de voz" could be an actor working in the radio. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 16:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:User yue (Q6332367)/Category:User zh-yue (Q7583331)Edit

Items involved: Q6332367Talk, Q7583331Talk Status:     not resolved

Per phab:T30441, mark as   stalled for me. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps all should be merged on-wiki. --Infovarius (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
This is currently too hard, because all of these codes are supported by Babel Extension (per testwiki:User:Liuxinyu970226/Babels vs. Babels). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
It looks like phab:T101086 is the ticket for standardising the codes used by the Babel extension (although that won't fix the cases where the categories are coming from a local template rather than the Babel extension). - Nikki (talk) 06:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
OK, thx. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
9 months and no new responses... Should I list all things like this case here (with a new 2nd heading)? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
PS: Is phab:T5311 related to this issue? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
I tried to move most sitelinks to corresponding items. Can someone control my edits? Q.Zanden questions? 17:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Four years past and nothing else merged??? --117.13.95.87 06:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

worm drive (Q12529)Edit

Items involved: Q12529Talk Status:     not resolved

This page have interwikis about the worm drive concept and some about only the worm screw (ex in French worm screw means vis sans fin and a worm drive is roue et vis sans fin) --Otourly (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:L (Q6171224)/Q19677287/Q19677288Edit

Items involved: Q6171224Talk, Q19677287Talk, Q19677288Talk Status:     partially resolved

Too dozens of birthday templates avaliable. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Q19...88 was a redirect to Q617... and I merged them. Q19...87 is almost the same, but the output gives the dates between '(' and ')'. That is the only difference, and therefore not the same. Q.Zanden questions? 13:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

social welfare (Q11248882)/social work (Q205398)Edit

Items involved: Q11248882Talk, Q205398Talk Status:     not resolved

I can't see how social work science differs from social work, but there are five languages with articles on both entities. --Runner1928 (talk) 16:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
One is about the actual work, the other about the science as teached in (academic) institutions. No conflict here. Don't you think that if five languages have two separate articles, there should be something to it? --Joostik (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Perhaps. Both English articles, at least, claim that they're the academic discipline. And so do both Wikidata entities. If we're to say they're separate entities, then we should make sure that claims/properties don't overlap in a conflicting way. Runner1928 (talk) 15:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015Edit

Durio (Q2309085)/durian (Q134185)Edit

Items involved: Q2309085Talk, Q134185Talk Status:     partially resolved

See the talk page of Q134185. Mainly, en.wiki should not be at Q134185 since the article is not about genus, but tree. --AntanO (talk) 05:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Moved a large number of pages, should be okay now. Anyone check? --Joostik (

talk) 14:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your edits are reverted. :( --AntanO (talk) 18:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
That's rather rude, as this was done without any notification and no clear reason. Simple vandalism. --Joostik (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Both data has mix of plant and genus. One should be plant and other should be genus. --AntanO (talk) 04:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Brya seems to disagree and wants to keep things as they are. It's hard working with people like that. --Joostik (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Per history, Shizhao has moved the acewiki+enwiki+lbewiki to Q2309085 again, and Removed the mswiki & viwiki link indefinitely (why?). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Temporary restored the mswiki one, for viwiki, @Mxn: vi:Sầu_riêng should be Q1135236 or Q134185?--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Mxn for reshuffling the Vietnamese links and labels Special:Diff/231646232, Special:Diff/231646183, Special:Diff/231646198... --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

TRS-80 Model I (Q12747078)/TRS-80 (Q610305)Edit

Items involved: Q12747078Talk, Q610305Talk Status:     partially resolved

There's a conflict on srwiki, but I can't really say much about it because I can't read sr. --SamB (talk) 21:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Aparently srwiki has a redundant article which should be merged there. Nothing to be done here. --Joostik (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:IPA (Q5751017)/Q14461351/Template:IPA-all (Q6508089)Edit

Items involved: Q5751017Talk, Q14461351Talk, Q6508089Talk Status:     not resolved

These IPA related templates are all passing fish eyes for pearls.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

urban and regional transportation (Q294362)/transit district (Q7834360)Edit

Items involved: Q294362Talk, Q7834360Talk Status:     not resolved

Q294362 and Q7834360 are the same topic, in different languages. Tried to fix myself, but: "The link enwiki:Transit district is already used by item Q7834360. You may remove it from Q7834360 if it does not belong there or merge the items if they are about the exact same topic." --24.207.252.241 20:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

unmerge requestEdit

Items involved: Q816829Talk, Q11514315Talk Status:     not resolved

Hi, this merge is to cancel, and the second item is to undelete. There is two topics : the split of the history into historical areas on one hand, and historical periods on the other hand ... This is actually a mess We need to find the right order to cancel things, otherwise interwikis are not moved correctly ... If put there here to raise the problem of unmerging :)


Pinging involved users: @Zolo, Danrok, Omar Ghrida, Sangjinhwa, Wcam, Geraki: @Neo-Jay, Aucassin:

-- TomT0m (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@TomT0m: if you are so sure about your case, why don't you do it yourself? Q.Zanden questions? 16:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2015Edit

cat's cradle (Q15304688)/String figure (Q584764)Edit

Items involved: Q15304688Talk, Q584764Talk Status:     not resolved

He:סבתא סורגת and He:משחק לולאות are backwards, the former should be associated with cat's cradle and the latter string figures. --Hyacinth (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

durian (Q134185)/Durio zibethinus (Q1135236)Edit

Items involved: Q134185Talk, Q1135236Talk Status:     not resolved

Unable to add language-specific sitelinks Q134185 (durian) due to links already placed in Q1135236 (Durio zibethinus). Q134185 is the more general of the 2 entries and many languages do not have a separate and specific entry for Q1135236. Currently sitelinks of different languages are split between the 2 entries without any rule. As a result matching sitelinks cannot be added to the more general page Q134185 (e.g. for zh and zh_yue) --58.111.145.131 20:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
As already set out, there are three items, with three distinct topics. The problem is that some Wikipedia's have very mixed pages (especially enwiki) which are difficult to place unambiguously. But that cannot be resolved here. - Brya (talk) 04:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:User zh-classical (Q7229580)/Q17405955/Category:User lzh (Q9117977)/Q21995208Edit

Items involved: Q7229580Talk, Q17405955Talk, Q9117977Talk, Q21995208Talk Status:     partially resolved

All three represent the same thing, just using different language codes to mean classical Chinese. --Nikki (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Right. But merging should happen at Q7229580, because its the lower Q-value. You seem to start merging at the higher number item. Steak (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
So Q17405955 merged to Q7229580, however there's another dupe item Q21995208 existing. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:User zh-classical-1 (Q9442055)/Category:User zh-wen-1 (Q9118309)/Category:User lzh-1 (Q9431297)Edit

Items involved: Q9442055Talk, Q9118309Talk, Q9431297Talk Status:     not resolved

All three represent the same thing, just using different language codes to mean classical Chinese. --Nikki (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:User zh-classical-2 (Q7583335)/Q19615354/Category:User lzh-2 (Q8161806)Edit

Items involved: Q7583335Talk, Q19615354Talk, Q8161806Talk Status:     partially resolved

All three represent the same thing, just using different language codes to mean classical Chinese. --Nikki (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: Q19615354 is merged with Q8161806. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Q17405957/Category:User zh-classical-3 (Q9442067)/Category:User lzh-3 (Q8891243)Edit

Items involved: Q17405957Talk, Q9442067Talk, Q8891243Talk Status:     partially resolved

All three represent the same thing, just using different language codes to mean classical Chinese. --Nikki (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
NOTE: Q17405957 merged with Q9442067. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:User zh-classical-4 (Q9431315)/Q9443316/Category:User lzh-4 (Q8891246)Edit

Items involved: Q9431315Talk, Q9443316Talk, Q8891246Talk Status:     not resolved

All three represent the same thing, just using different language codes to mean classical Chinese. --Nikki (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:User zh-classical-N (Q9431325)/Q9443319/Category:User lzh-N (Q9707662)Edit

Items involved: Q9431325Talk, Q9443319Talk, Q9707662Talk Status:     partially resolved

All three represent the same thing, just using different language codes to mean classical Chinese. --Nikki (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Q9443319 merged with Q9707662. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

9K115-2 Metis-M (Q298607)/9K115 Metis (Q2479603)Edit

Items involved: Q298607Talk, Q2479603Talk Status:     not resolved

Per comment on my talk page--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Colloquium (Q1115343)Edit

Items involved: Q1115343Talk Status:     not resolved

Some are DP's, some treat specific meanings --Joostik (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Open-source video games (Q13279461)/Category:Open-source games (Q6850493)Edit

Items involved: Q13279461Talk, Q6850493Talk Status:     not resolved

It seems to be the same topic, unlike what is said in the second title, which is the same as this page : Q6850493. I already ask for help to the chat but the discussion is already archived : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2015/05#Wikimedia_category_.26_Wikimedia_category_page --Jona (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Suum cuique (Q629199)/Jedem das Seine (Q17101881)Edit

Items involved: Q629199Talk, Q17101881Talk Status:     not resolved

Q629199 is about the Latin phrase "Suum cuique," meaning "to each his own/may all have their due." Q17101881 is about the German translation of the phrase, "Jedem das Seine", notorious for its use as a WW2 death camp motto. enwiki has articles on each, but all(?) other wikis combine both in one. Several also translate "Suum cuique/Jedem das Seine" into the wiki language (bg,fa,hy,ja,ko,ru). "Jedem das Seine" is a far more common title than "Suum cuique", but I think Q629199 should be the default item anyway. N.B. itwiki uses "Cuique suum", semantically identical to "Suum cuique". --Alarob (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015Edit

state or territory of Australia (Q178712)/administrative territorial entity of Australia (Q4494320)Edit

Items involved: Q178712Talk, Q4494320Talk Status:     not resolved

Discussion at en:talk:States and territories of Australia shows that these two groups appear to be about the same topic. As I speak only English and am not familiar with wikidata, I am not comfortable making such a large change without oversight from someone else. Only the Slovak language (sk) appears in the interwiki links of both groups, and the article for one is a redirect to the article for the other there. --ScottDavis (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
@ScottDavis: Hi :) I don't think they are actually the same thing - one is about the states and territories, which are the highest level of subdivision, the other is about subdivisions in general (which includes, but is not limited to, the states and territories), although you do seem to be right that most of them appear to only be talking about the states and territories. The Dutch one isn't though, that's mostly talking about local government area of Australia (Q1867183). ‎I've removed the Slovak sitelink which was redirecting and I've asked on the country subdivision task force page about whether the other links should be moved. - Nikki (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Further discussion is at Wikidata talk:Country subdivision task force. --Infovarius (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

detective (Q842782)/private investigator (Q1058617)Edit

Items involved: Q842782Talk, Q1058617Talk Status:     not resolved

I wanted to add a link between https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9tective and https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2_(%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F) , and I got a message: "The link ruwiki:Детектив (профессия) is already used by item detective (Q842782). You may remove it from detective (Q842782) if it does not belong there or merge the items if they are about the exact same topic." It looks too difficult for me, but maybe a good detective can solve the mystery. On the Project chat, I was advised to post here, so that's what I do. --Rene1596 (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
@Rene1956:, ru:Детектив (профессия) can work in police, and what about fr:Détective? It seems that it is about private profession, so it's different. --Infovarius (talk) 06:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
@Infovarius: Thank you for your answer. First, you are right, this is not 100% the same profession. However, it is about 90% the same thing and that's why I would like a link between fr:Détective and ru:Детектив (профессия). Second, there is another problem: I go to en:Detective. I see a link, both to fr:Détective and to ru:Детектив (профессия). Then, I go to fr:Détective and I don't see the link to ru:Детектив (профессия). --Rene1596 (talk) 08:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015Edit

naval ship (Q177597)/warship (Q3114762)Edit

Items involved: Q177597Talk, Q3114762Talk Status:     not resolved

The first item should be about naval ships. I.e. ships that are operated by a navy, independent of if they are intended to be used for combat (i.e. also the transport ships etc).

The second item should be about ships specifically built for combat. While these often belong to a navy (and are thus a subclass of naval ships) I'm not sure that is technically a requirement.

The Wikipedia links (and therefore labels, aliases and possibly even some of the properties) are a mess. Initially almost all of the articles were connected to the second item independently of which of the two concepts they talked about and some likely combine the concepts in the same article.

Any help with clearing this up and making the two entities more stable would be welcome --André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

boating (Q2141830)/competitive boating (Q1295912)/pleasure craft (Q17096141)Edit

Items involved: Q2141830Talk, Q1295912Talk, Q17096141Talk Status:     not resolved

I believe the first two are probably the same concept (the activity) whereas the third is for the boats used in this activity. On the other hand most Wikipedias seem to have originally been linked to the first of these independently of if they were about the boat type or the activity. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 14:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

scapegoating (Q2912143)/scapegoat (Q245122)Edit

Items involved: Q2912143Talk, Q245122Talk Status:     not resolved

We seem to need items about
  1. the scapegoat described in a passage of the Bible. fr:Bouc à Azazel, apparently he:שעיר לעזאזל (מצווה)
  2. the more general use of scapegoats in old Middle East (en:Scapegoat)
  3. the figurative concept of scapegoating (en:Scapegoating, apparently en:שעיר לעזאזל (חברה))

Most items in scapegoat (Q245122) seem to mix meaning 1 or 2 and meaning 3. I think that when an item mixes two meanings, it should use the more general item.

If anyone solves this one, can I be pinged :). ? -Zolo (talk) 07:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015Edit

Q1372064/Christian hymn (Q856713)Edit

Items involved: Q1372064Talk, Q856713Talk Status:     not resolved

Problem with what a psalm/salme is. In English a Psalm is not what in Danish (and other Nordic languages) is typically referred to as a "salme". We could make Q856713 to mean psalm as they appear in the Bible and related books, while Q1372064 to mean songs as used in (Christian?) liturgy (Christian Hymns). Then loads of songs marked up with P31 as a Q856713 should be moved to Q1372064 and some language links should be moved. --Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 20:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Alocandrena porteri (Q4734108)/Alocandrena (Q18099180)Edit

Items involved: Q4734108Talk, Q18099180Talk Status:     not resolved

The enwp article is about both Q4734108 (species) and Q18099180 (genus). --(tJosve05a (c) 02:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015Edit

Q1662668/Infrared divergence (Q3032223)Edit

Items involved: Q1662668Talk, Q3032223Talk Status:     not resolved

Both are quite obviously about the same topic, with a bit different naming convention (both naming exist in german and in english), but hampers interwiki linking; please merge (sorry, but I still have to learn a bit how to do this). --Molzer (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Prussian blue (Q421894)/ferric hexacyanoferrate (Q15628135)Edit

Items involved: Q421894Talk, Q15628135Talk Status:     not resolved

There are two articles in ru.wikipedia. I don't speak Russian but one seems to be about the chemical component and the other about the color.

We can probably keep the two items but we should correct one to make it an instance of Q1075 instead of Q11173.

Ske (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Frame of a vector space (Q194737)/frame (Q5477875)Edit

Items involved: Q1Talk, Q5477875Talk Status:     not resolved

Both items refer to the same thing, and corresponding English articles are connected by redirection. However, the language links are not intact.

Christmas lights vs Paper lantern vs Luminaria vs Lluminària (artifici)Edit

Items involved: Q1653073Talk, Q9545439Talk, Q17051001Talk, Q11933568Talk Status:     not resolved

Three similar items that appear to be mixed up across the wikis--Evrik (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Government of National Salvation (Q5589262)/axis occupation of Serbia (Q10726489)Edit

Items involved: Q5589262Talk, Q10726489Talk Status:     not resolved

"Government of National Salvation" is corresponding to "Serbia (1941-1944)".--Lord Mota (talk) 13:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Q22335/Q3709251/?other (Vajont dam disaster)Edit

Items involved: Q22335Talk, Q3709251Talk Status:     not resolved

Italian and some other Wikipedia articles more granular than English Wikipedia, causing two problems needing fixing:
  1. Cannot create an interlanguage link for it:Disastro del Vajont to en:Vajont Dam. Temporarily fixed by adding a link to a redirect at en:Vajont dam disaster which partly works but not entirely.
  2. The draft article at en:Draft:Vajont dam (translation for checking and merging, taken from IT wiki) appears to be interlinked to Italian but should not be - it's a working draft only not an article. Not sure how it got linked, how to fix it, or what else is incorrect. FT2 (talk) 10:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

methenamine (Q71969)/Q3855569Edit

Items involved: Q71969Talk, Q3855569Talk Status:     not resolved

--Almondega (talk) 11:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

computer data storage (Q66221)/computer memory (Q5830907)Edit

Items involved: Q66221Talk, Q5830907Talk Status:     not resolved

many of the articles linked to computer data storage seem to be about computer memory, but I didn't have the time to really clean them all up. --Denny (talk) 23:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015Edit

Phymatosorus scolopendria (Q3027867)/Microsorum scolopendria (Q15248487)Edit

Items involved: Q3027867Talk, Q15248487Talk Status:     not resolved

According to w:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#Microsorum scolopendria and Phymatosorus scolopendria I'd like to merge Microsorum scolopendria into Phymatosorus scolopendria. If I understand Help:Merge right, there is an interwiki conflict, because both items refer to the vi and zh language versions of Wikipedia. --ThT (talk) 10:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Can I resolve the interwiki conflict myself by removing the interwiki links from one of the items? --ThT (talk) 15:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

99of9
Achim Raschka (talk)
Andrawaag (talk)
Brya (talk)
CanadianCodhead (talk)
Christian Ferrer (talk)
Circeus
Dan Koehl (talk)
Daniel Mietchen (talk)
Enwebb
Faendalimas
FelixReimann (talk)
Infomuse (talk)
Infovarius (talk)
Jean-Marc Vanel
Joel Sachs
Josve05a (talk)
Klortho (talk)
Lymantria (talk)
MPF
Manojk
MargaretRDonald
Mellis (talk)
Michael Goodyear
Mr. Fulano (talk)
Nis Jørgensen
PEAK99
Peter Coxhead
PhiLiP
Andy Mabbett (talk)
Plantdrew
Prot D
pvmoutside
RaboKarbakian
Rod Page
Strobilomyces (talk)
Tinm
Tom.Reding
TomT0m
Tommy Kronkvist (talk)
Tris T7 TT me
Tubezlob
William Avery   Notified participants of WikiProject Taxonomy. --117.13.95.87 06:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

You should neither remove valid sitelinks, nor merge items of taxa with different scientific names, although called "synonyms". Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
As Lymantria says, these are two different names, that is, two different formal entities. Each should have its own item. Probably something should be done at the vi and zh language versions of Wikipedia, but there first, not here. - Brya (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Q16056056/Q3427345Edit

Items involved: Q16056056Talk, Q3427345Talk Status:     not resolved

These items are fundamentally on the same topic of reproductive toxicity / Reprotoxicity and should be merged into on item. --2A02:238:F014:59:81F2:26F9:87EB:464B 15:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

methenamine (Q71969)/Q3855569Edit

Items involved: Q71969Talk, Q3855569Talk Status:     not resolved

--Almondega (talk) 19:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
@Almondega: You already reported above, isn't it? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:40, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: Yes, sorry. --Almondega (talk) 13:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

baldness (Q181391)/alopecia (Q2697787)Edit

Items involved: Q181391Talk, Q2697787Talk Status:     not resolved

maybe Q181391 is more about Androgenic alopecia (ICD10 L64) ? --Ske (talk) 16:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

list of international vehicle registration codes (Q742993)/international vehicle registration code (Q154015)Edit

Items involved: Q742993Talk, Q154015Talk Status:     not resolved

It appears that both items describe the same concept. Some wikipedias (e.g. German and Swedish) have pages for both items, whereas most just have a page linked to one item or the other. It is possible that Q742993 focuses mostly on the *concept* of the international code, whereas Q154015 is a list of codes, but it's not the same in all languages. It is likely that some wiki pages should be moved from one item to the other, but I don't know most of those languages. --Lou Crazy (talk) 17:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

poisoning (Q114953)/Q18642366/intoxication (Q18621601)Edit

Items involved: Q114953Talk, Q18642366Talk, Q18621601Talk Status:     not resolved

--Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015Edit

Capsicum pepper categoriesEdit

Items involved: Q9549955Talk, Q7580291Talk, Q8343388Talk Status:     not resolved

Capsicum/pepper/chili - all are mixed. Recent edits have made worse imho. --Infovarius (talk) 13:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:User be-tarask (Q8890593)/Category:User be-x-old (Q19791804)Edit

Items involved: Q8890593Talk, Q19791804Talk Status:     not resolved

Can't this be the first trial to merge duplicated babel categories? What problem blocks this? eh. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Metro International (Q293008)/Metro (Q1978245)Edit

Items involved: Q293008Talk, Q1978245Talk Status:     not resolved

Many newspapers are titled as "Metro" around the world, I'm wondering what matches what?--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Russo-Turkish War (Q6895581)/History of the Russo-Turkish wars (Q743046)Edit

Items involved: Q6895581Talk, Q743046Talk Status:     not resolved

Português: A maioria dos artigos da Wikipédia no segundo item são páginas de desambiguação, as exceções são o da ar.wiki, ru.wiki, sr.wiki. O artigo da en.wiki é um redirecionamento.
--Luan (talk) 16:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015Edit

atmosphere (Q8104)/atmosphere of Earth (Q3230)Edit

Items involved: Q8104Talk, Q3230Talk Status:     partially resolved

I looked around some articles about atmosphere (Q8104) in another languages and I observed they was only about atmosphere of Earth (Q3230). Need to check all of these interwikis, and, if they are about atmosphere of Earth (Q3230), need move to that entry. --Treisijs (talk) 22:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Moved a considerable number, but there were some I could not determin. --Joostik (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

hermaphrodite (Q303479)/hermaphroditism (Q16674976)Edit

Items involved: Q303479Talk, Q16674976Talk Status:     not resolved

I don't quite understand why hermaphrodite and hermaphroditism are separate. After removing two links to stubby and not very informative seeming pages from hermaphrodite (eo and uk), there is no overlap left: none of the other language versions seems to have separate pages for these concepts. So I added the statement that hermaphroditism is "said to be the same as" hermaphrodite. I was about to boldly simply merge the two pages, as they seem redundant, when I reconsidered (I saw that hermaphrodite lists hermaphroditism as "has quality") and decided to ask here for advice how to proceed. I do not wish to screw up the concept of the database, just in case the separation of these two pages was intentional after all. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 03:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
I suppose it is a classical "hatmaker-hatmaking" problem. --Infovarius (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Agreed that this is a "hatmaker-hatmaking" situation. Two years on, having two separate items is standard Wikidata procedure. Having all the interwikis on a single item seems most useful to readers. I suggest closing the issue. - PKM (talk) 21:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

ПрофессииEdit

Items involved: Q9672372Talk, Q4048530Talk Status:     not resolved

It seems that some links are in wrong places. --Infovarius (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Pac-Man (Q10343374)/list of Pac-Man video games (Q6593280)Edit

Items involved: Q10343374Talk, Q6593280Talk Status:     not resolved

First item is an article, which may include as as section a list as second item. Conflict initially raised on French WP [10]. Racconish (talk) 22:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Carpathian RutheniaEdit

Items involved: Q170213Talk, Q1148511Talk, Q13414608Talk, Q8980129Talk, Q8958550Talk Status:     not resolved

I'm lost. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

face perception (Q529895)/facial recognition system (Q1192553) /Q16669473Edit

Items involved: Q529895Talk, Q1192553Talk, Q16669473Talk Status:     not resolved

confusions between the cognitive process and computer-based facial perception -Ske (talk) 18:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

2016Edit

Januari 2016Edit

non-fiction (Q213051)/non-fiction literature (Q27801)Edit

Items involved: Q213051Talk, Q27801Talk Status:     partially resolved

These two elements mean the same thing, but I can't merge them, because there are two different articles in Tagalog Wikipedia. --Facenapalm (talk) 12:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Tagalog item moved to Q20669574, but not merged. Aparently one is about non-fiction in general (including films ans such), the other more specific about literature. --Joostik (talk) 07:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

copy/copyingEdit

Items involved: Q1156791Talk, Q23013246Talk Status:     not resolved

--Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
What exactly is the conflict? --Joostik (talk) 07:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Copy (kopie, kópia) vs. copying (kopiowanie). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

list of adiabatic concepts (Q2990712) and adiabatic process (Q182453)Edit

Items involved: Q2990712Talk, Q182453Talk Status: